A superb letter to the Columbia University President

The President of Columbia University ought to be thoroughly ashamed of himself and resign. Not for his personal political beliefs, to which hi is entitled, but for the ignorance that he demonstrated towards the elected leader of Iran. As the head of a University, he (more than anyone) should demonstrate that he is educated and informed and behave as an academic. Not a closed minded bigoted thug, completely mind controlled by a biased and corrupt media. I read the transcript and was disgusted that a country built on freedom, liberty, justice for alll could have as a Universoty President a man so closed minded, ignorant and above all WRONG, on so many substantive issues.

Mr. Lee Bollinger should apologise for his ignorance and resign.

Seven chancellors and presidents of Iranian universities and research centers, in a letter addressed to their counterpart in the US Colombia University, denounced Lee Bollinger's insulting words against the Iranian nation and president and invited him to provide responses for 10 questions of the Iranian academicians and intellectuals.

The following is the full text of the letter.

Mr. Lee Bollinger
Columbia University President

We, the professors and heads of universities and research institutions in Tehran , hereby announce our displeasure and protest at your impolite remarks prior to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent speech at Columbia University.

We would like to inform you that President Ahmadinejad was elected directly by the Iranian people through an enthusiastic two-round poll in which almost all of the country's political parties and groups participated. To assess the quality and nature of these elections you may refer to US news reports on the poll dated June 2005.

Your insult, in a scholarly atmosphere, to the president of a country with a population of 72 million and a recorded history of 7,000 years of civilization and culture is deeply shameful.

Your comments, filled with hate and disgust, may well have been influenced by extreme pressure from the media, but it is regrettable that media policy-makers can determine the stance a university president adopts in his speech.

Your remarks about our country included unsubstantiated accusations that were the product of guesswork as well as media propaganda. Some of your claims result from misunderstandings that can be clarified through dialogue and further research.

During his speech, Mr. Ahmadinejad answered a number of your questions and those of students. We are prepared to answer any remaining questions in a scientific, open and direct debate.

You asked the president approximately ten questions. Allow us to ask you ten of our own questions in the hope that your response will help clear the atmosphere of misunderstanding and distrust between our two countries and reveal the truth.

1- Why did the US media put you under so much pressure to prevent Mr. Ahmadinejad from delivering his speech at Columbia University? And why have American TV networks been broadcasting hours of news reports insulting our president while refusing to allow him the opportunity to respond? Is this not against the principle of freedom of speech?

2- Why, in 1953, did the US administration overthrow the Iran's national government under Dr Mohammad Mosaddegh and go on to support the Shah's dictatorship?

3- Why did the US support the blood-thirsty dictator Saddam Hussein during the 1980-88 Iraqi-imposed war on Iran, considering his reckless use of chemical weapons against Iranian soldiers defending their land and even against his own people?

4- Why is the US putting pressure on the government elected by the majority of Palestinians in Gaza instead of officially recognizing it? And why does it oppose Iran 's proposal to resolve the 60-year-old Palestinian issue through a general referendum?

5- Why has the US military failed to find Al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden even with all its advanced equipment? How do you justify the old friendship between the Bush and Bin Laden families and their cooperation on oil deals? How can you justify the Bush administration's efforts to disrupt investigations concerning the September 11 attacks?

6- Why does the US administration support the Mujahedin Khalq Organization (MKO) despite the fact that the group has officially and openly accepted the responsibility for numerous deadly bombings and massacres in Iran and Iraq? Why does the US refuse to allow Iran 's current government to act against the MKO's main base in Iraq?

7- Was the US invasion of Iraq based on international consensus and did international institutions support it? What was the real purpose behind the invasion which has claimed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives? Where are the weapons of mass destruction that the US claimed were being stockpiled in Iraq?

8- Why do America's closest allies in the Middle East come from extremely undemocratic governments with absolutist monarchical regimes?

9- Why did the US oppose the plan for a Middle East free of unconventional weapons in the recent session of the International Atomic Energy Agency Board of Governors despite the fact the move won the support of all members other than Israel?

10- Why is the US displeased with Iran's agreement with the IAEA and why does it openly oppose any progress in talks between Iran and the agency to resolve the nuclear issue under international law?

Finally, we would like to express our readiness to invite you and other scientific delegations to our country. A trip to Iran would allow you and your colleagues to speak directly with Iranians from all walks of life including intellectuals and university scholars. You could then assess the realities of Iranian society without media censorship before making judgments about the Iranian nation and government.

You can be assured that Iranians are very polite and hospitable toward their guests.


=========================================

Mr Bollinger could learn a lot from that invite.

Aaron Russo RIP

911 = Inside job. The NWO elite planned it. A direct confession to a witness, Aaron Russo, by the elitist Nick Rockefeller, who invited Aaron into the CFR.

Another Rockefeller sent Stew Web the following email:

From "Rockefeller Global Communications"

admin@rockefeller.com.au

TO: stewwebb@sierranv.net

Title: The Countdown to Armageddon

To the great sea of mankind,

The time of the end is upon us. Like it or hate it, it's the destiny

we must all face. On September 11, 2001 the world was witness

to the beginning of the end. What you saw and experienced will

be nothing compared to the calamity that is to soon transpire. It

is sad that so many lives will be taken - but these things will continue

to happen as this old system begins to collapse.

No human government in existence now or since the ancient times

have been able to sustain a perfect order. Every government has

failed and will fail. They can not protect you. They can not give you

a place where people are truly free, where your neighbours are your family

and foreigners are your friends. No human government today

can or will ever be able to achieve this. That is why the Agenda

has been set. It has been referred to over time as the Armageddon

Agenda. But be not fearful. It will not be a nuclear holocaust or some

stray asteroid from the heavens that will level our civilization. In

fact it's not the planet that will suffer and be swept away. It will be the

human inhabitants of this great planet who have no respect or genuine

regard for their fellow human beings. Each one of you over the next

year must do some very deep and sincere thinking. Will I overcome

my hatred for my fellowman or will I put aside my differences and unite

and care for my neighbour? Will I treat them with kindness? Or will I continue

to take advantage of them? When was the last time you took a person in off

the street and gave them some food or helped them find shelter for the night? Or

sat beside someone on a bus, in a mall, on a train and said Hello. When did you

last comfort a stranger who had lost someone they loved. When was the last time

you befriended someone not because of their posessions or their wealth - but

because you cared about them?

None of the above is easy. It is hard. None of us are perfect. None of us have had a

good life. Some think that because we have suffered to some degree that we deserve

what ever we can get - even if it means hurting another person in the process. But those

who try and rise up against our negative ways will survive and will be rewarded with

a life on earth that right now is only a dream. Only the meek will possess the earth.

This is a certainty.

The New System is coming. The only question is: Will you choose to be there? Or will

you continue to go down the road to self destruction. It's up to you. The following

Agenda is what will happen and what you will need to endure through to

survive and get there. So think deeply. It's your future. And may you do well.

Your Brother

Rockefeller

======== AGENDA TO THE NEW WORLD =========

The steps will be:

1) A complete irresolvable collapse of Middle Eastern peace.

2) Vatican city will fall to religious terrorists.

2) World-Wide Crack Down on all religion. All Religions will be
banned.

3) United Nations will establish an interm one world government
state, followed by a declaration of worldwide peace and security.

4) Sudden and systematic collapse of Great Britain, Chinese
and the United States Governments. The rest of the world will fall
into anarchy. Billions will perish. Only those of good-will, and
followers of the truth will survive.

5) New system government of 144,000 members and 6 million
plus subjects will take control.

6) Massive cleanup operation will commence as New World is
created. Eco-systems will be restored. Infrastructures re-built. Sickness
and disease will be eliminated. Aging will be reversed and the aging
process itself will cease. A New restored human family will gradually
bring the earth into paradisaical conditions under theocratic rule.

======== END OF AGENDA =========

Where does money come from?

Do whatever the fuck you want? LMAO!

What a shame for this pussy whipped bitch!

Rice swipes at IAEA, urges bold action on Iran

The United States has been critical of a deal International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Mohamed ElBaradei has made with Iran to answer long-standing questions about its nuclear activities.

Rice, who has previously accused ElBaradei of "muddying the message" to Iran, voiced strong irritation with the IAEA chief.

Who was correct over the details of Iraq's nuclear program? Ms Rice or the IAEA?

Who are you going to believe now?

Somebody ought to ask this guy about this in the next debate!

In addition to the reasons cited in this video, another reason for the emergency command center to be located in WTC7 was the fact that the unique design and construction of the building meant that an entire floor could be removed and remodeled if needed without effecting the structural integrity of the building. In other words it was several buildings within one. In other words it was very VERY strong. A localised collapse would NOT have brought down the whole building.

Rudy has some explainin' to do.

Welcome to the land of the free!

OK this guy is a little bit agitated at the start, but given how the USA has fucked over the people, I think he has every reason to be angry and considering this, I think he was being very restrained.

Oedipal complex on steroids!

This is a really disturbing video in some ways, but the martial arts baby is hilarious.

Oh, and from personal experience, those shavers are pretty good too.

ARRGGHH!! The ICE, It's MELTING!!!

Warming 'opens Northwest Passage'

The most direct shipping route from Europe to Asia is fully clear of ice for the first time since records began, the European Space Agency (Esa) says.

Historically, the Northwest Passage linking the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans has been ice-bound through the year.

But the agency says ice cover has been steadily shrinking, and this summer's reduction has made the route navigable.

The findings, based on satellite images, raised concerns about the speed of global warming.

'Extreme'

The Northwest Passage is one of the most fabled sea routes in the world - a short cut from Europe to Asia through the Canadian Arctic.

Recent years have seen a marked shrinkage in its ice cover, but this year it was extreme, Esa says.

It says this made the passage "fully navigable" for the first time since monitoring began in 1978.

1978!!! You mean we started monitoring the ice at the END of a cooling period? I'll bet, although they were not monitoring this then, that in the 1930's that this passage WAS navigable then too... In fact it may have been navigable almost permanently back in the medieval warm period. In fact when Greenland was Green I am sure that this route would have been open. But according to the mainstream education, America had not been discovered and the earth was thought to be flat back then so nobody would have dared venture out there in there little boats.

Using phraseology like, "this has been the worst melt since records began," is very misleading and very emotive and paints a wholly inaccurate picture of arctic ice.

What is also NEVER mentioned these days is the antarctic ice, which is getting thicker and wider, the majority of glacier's on the planet are increasing in size and the Polar Bears have survived long periods when the earth has been much warmer than today.

The people who wish to control what we think and do are trying everything to convince us that AGW is real and forget all that nonsense about the way the climate behaved in the past. They must have theri quasi-religious cult brainwash as many of us as possible.

I am not against reducing polution, but the idea of getting every TV in the UK to have it's stand-by function disabled and putting a £3000.oo tax on 4x4's SUV's is not going to make the Northern ice re-freeze.

I have no problem with taking action to solve a problem, IF we know there is a good chance of success. With something as (supposedly) catastrphic as global warming, I have no problem making major sacrifices even if there is the slightest chance of success. However, when the knee-jerkers are running bout saying we must use solutions that create a bigger carbon footprint (EG energy efficient bulbs, whose manufacturing process consumes more energy per-bulb, than the bulb saves over it's lifetime, or windmills placed in places with low levels of wind, so that the carbon footprint of manufacturing it is greater than the energy it will produce over its lifetime) and when the solutions are guaranteed to fail, because even if the UK does reduce its carbon output to zero, it will NOT stop global warming. for 2 reasons.
1. the Chinese and Indians will still increase their output by more than what we, in the UK, produce thus completely negating all our efforts and
2. Global Climate change is not solely driven by CO2.
Then I greatly resent having to make sacrifices that will achieve absolutely nothing!

Vote Ron paul 08

Watch this.

The past as prologue?

Watch This:

http://blip.tv/file/306082/

It is an Architect giving a presentation on the collapses of the WTC. It's very good.

This a representative of AE911truth, architects and engineers for 911 truth. The media claim that 911 researchers and 911 truthers are a bunch of whacko fringe conspiracy nuts. They claim that "real" scientists and experts do not agree with the inside job theory. They claim that there isn't any evidence at all that the WTC buildings were demolished by explosive charges and real experts do not support the conspiracy, that there aren't any real experts that support this theory.

ae911truth ARE the real experts, architects, structural engineers, controlled demolition experts et all.

These are guys who really DO know there stuff and guess what? The mainstream media will not DARE meet with them. They (the media) know that they cannot debunk, nor write off, what these guys are showing us. So rather than have the guts to report truth, they hide behind their defense portfolios and keep schtum!

Using 911 as a pretext worked for ousting the Taliban in Afghanistan, for they where shielding Al Queda and Iraq where the lies went as follows: Saddam Hussien has extensive stockpiles of WMD and is not far from developing a nuclear weapon. He could then pass this on to terrorists like Al Queda. 911 turned a passive and defeated non-threat known as Iraq into the direst threat since Hitler.

However in the case of Iran, Al queda and Iran are totally opposed to each other. Their proxies are currently fighting against each other inside Iraq. It would be difficult to sell a new front against Iran based on a:" diminished, yet more dangerous Al Queda allied with Iran." There are simply too many contradictions in that sentence to warrant faith or belief in the concept.

People are waking from the hypnotic trance that they were suddenly and violently induced into on that still Tuesday September Morning, six years ago. They are waking up and beginning to have rational thought. Cognitive processes are telling them that the benevolent great state that they have been clinging to for security is actually the great beast that threatens all.

So, are they about to launch a new 911? How will they put more people back to sleep? As with any subliminal, once you know it exists and you know what to look for, it is no longer subliminal. You cannot willfully induce a subject to a hypnotic trance, if they do not wish to be hypnotised AND they recognise what technique is being used to induce them. They can willfully resist and the induction will fail.

be alert for new attacks. The signs are now there and unmistakable.

As in the following letter from http://infowars.net/articles/august2007/270807Warning.htm :

To the American people, and to peace loving individuals everywhere:

Massive evidence has come to our attention which shows that the backers, controllers, and allies of Vice President Dick Cheney are determined to orchestrate and manufacture a new 9/11 terror incident, and/or a new Gulf of Tonkin war provocation over the coming weeks and months. Such events would be used by the Bush administration as a pretext for launching an aggressive war against Iran, quite possibly with nuclear weapons, and for imposing a regime of martial law here in the United States. We call on the House of Representatives to proceed immediately to the impeachment of Cheney, as an urgent measure for avoiding a wider and more catastrophic war. Once impeachment has begun, it will be easier for loyal and patriotic military officers to refuse illegal orders coming from the Cheney faction. We solemnly warn the people of the world that any terrorist attack with weapons of mass destruction taking place inside the United States or elsewhere in the immediate future must be considered the prima facie responsibility of the Cheney faction. We urge responsible political leaders everywhere to begin at once to inoculate the public opinion of their countries against such a threatened false flag terror operation.

(Signed) A Group of US Opposition Political Leaders Gathered in Protest at the Bush Compound in Kennebunkport, Maine, August 24-25, 2007

CYNTHIA MCKINNEY, FORMER US CONGRESSWOMAN, GEORGIA

CINDY SHEEHAN, CANDIDATE FOR US CONGRESS, CALIFORNIA

CRAIG HILL, CANDIDATE FOR US CONGRESS, VERMONT GREEN PARTY

BRUCE MARSHALL, CONVENOR, PHILADELPHIA PLATFORM

JAMILLA EL-SHAFEI, KENNEBUNK PEACE DEPARTMENT

WEBSTER G. TARPLEY, AUTHOR

ANN WRIGHT, COLONEL US ARMY RESERVE, FORMER US DIPLOMAT

DR. DAHLIA WASFI, WWW.LIBERATETHIS.COM

GEORGE PAZ MARTIN

JOHN KAMINSKI , PRESIDENT MAINE LAWYERS FOR DEMOCRACY

------------------------------------

The letter was signed by the group at an anti war protest this weekend which saw four thousand march near the Bush family residence on Walker's Point in Kennebunkport.

The warning comes on the heels of a spate of recent news stories and reports indicating that "chatter" about a terror event is at an all time high.

Further evidence that some form of event is imminent has emerged with strange stock market activity occurring just as did in the weeks and days preceding 9/11.

A mystery trader risks losing around $1 billion dollars after placing 245,000 put options on the Dow Jones Eurostoxx 50 index, leading many analysts to speculate that a stock market crash preceded by a new 9/11 style catastrophe could take place within the next month.

The Kennebunkport group have demanded the immediate impeachment of Dick Cheney in order to prevent any such activities coming to fruition.

Be Alert. If anything happens in the next month or two, do not be shocked into a hypnotic trance to believe all the suggestible nonsense that will be embedded into your psyche and your sub-conscious mind. Be aware that any large attack WILL be followed by lies and manipulations to create a context for martial law and new wars.

Be alert and be prepared to record everything that happens during and immediately following the attacks. Gather the evidence to show who is responsible, who had the means, motive and opportunty and who benefits.

They have lied before, in fact that is ALL they do. How do we defeat these evil men?

Fight Lies with Truth,
Fight Ignorance with Knowledge,
Fight Fire with Water,
Fight Hatred with Love,
Fight Intolerance with Compassion,
Fight Violence with Peace.

Vote Ron Paul '08 Constructing a miracle, one voter at a time!

Aaron Russo RIP 1943 - 2007

Interesting, If you only have 10 minutes to spare, Watch this:

Interesting, if you have an hour to spare watch this.

Constructing a miracle one step at a time

How uniquely American!

What am I referring to? No not that self satisfied jibe by GW Bush to the poor mother forced to work 3 jobs to make ends meet. This was actually an admission of economic failure. OK, I know that the top executives in America hold down as many as 20 or 30 jobs, well directorships, but I don't count them unless they actually have to spend more than three days a week at each!

No, the uniquely American value to which I refer is the idea that it is impossible to elect Ron Paul to the presidency, SO that gives everyone involved in his campaign (official and otherwise) MORE determination to see it succeed!

In most other countries, the realization that something is impossible causes people to quit, to give up, to surrender to the inevitable failure. NOT SO AMERICA, whereby people knuckle down, step up and rise to the challenge and, by the sheer force of their WILL, MAKE THE IMPOSSIBLE THE POSSIBLE AND THE ACHIEVED!!!

We would never have gotten to the moon without the American desire to make the impossible possible.

Saying that it is impossible only makes the will stronger, the desire more acute and the determination utterly resolute.

Yes it WILL take a miracle to elect Ron Paul, but miracles are what American People are good at! What the great republic of the United States was BUILT UPON. It took a miracle to end British Tyranny over 200 years ago and Ron Paul and the Ron Paul Supporters are cut from the same cloth as those founding fathers.

Yes it will take a miracle to elect Ron Paul. BUT WE ARE CONSTRUCTING A MIRACLE, ONE VOTE AT A TIME.

JOIN THE REVOLUTION, MAKE A DIFFERENCE, SAVE THE NATION, HELP CONSTRUCT THE MOST AMERICAN MIRACLE IN OUR LIFETIMES.

VOTE FOR RON PAUL EVERY CHANCE YOU GET!


RON PAUL, CONSTRUCTING A MIRACLE, ONE VOTE AT A TIME

Congratulations Ron paul Supporters

The Mitt Romney Goon who stood on the Ron Paul banner at the end of this vid is deliberately trying to provoke the Ron Paul supporters, this would have been spun to show Ron Paul supporters as violent nutters.

Well done for showing this goon to be what he really is, fofr showing the MittRomney machine for being what it is. Mitt Romney does NOT support free speech, Mitt Romney does not support free competition.

Constructing a miracle, one vote at a time

Ron Paul 08

The problem with Climate modelling.

As I have stated on a number of occasions, in various locations online, I may not be a scientist, but I know that computerised climate models cannot be relied upon. How can I be so sure? I may not be a climate scientist, but my other job is as a systems engineer and computer programmer. From this environment I can confidently and authorititavely state that the computer models rely on two unreliable elements to make their predictions. 1. the data entered into the model and 2. the coding of the model itself.

As the article linked to the title of this comment states, the data entered into the famous global warming models is incorrect. This is due to a Y2K bug of all things.

When the raw data that the models use is wrong, the prediction is bound to be wrong.

Man made climate change is a scam.

OK so keep voting for the problem then???

I have seen the media and others say that they cannot support Ron Paul because he does not have enough real support or that simply, he has "no chance" of winning.

This is basically saying that they know what the problem is, they know what the solution is, BUT despite liking the solution, they will keep on voting FOR the problem, because it is wasting a vote to vote for the solution.

I do not understand that kind of logic. If my car's tire gets a puncture, I go to the garage and get a new tire. I do not go to the garage and say, I would like a new tire, but realistically another punctured tire is cheaper, so I will have one of those instead.

Or, my computer gets a virus, so I use a virus checker to find and eradicate or inoculate the computer from the virus. I don't add another virus to the computer because, let's face it, computer's get viruses. No, I fix the problem with a solution.

If you do not like the problem, vote for the solution.

Be logical, see sense, reclaim your country, vote for the solution to America's problems.

Vote for Ron Paul.

This is truth. Watch it ALL!

The ONLY hope for an end to this is Ron Paul

Vote for Ron Paul in the Primaries.

Iraq war veteran and experienced demolitions expert blows the cover on 9/11 inside job.

I am posting the following because this person, I believe, has a level of credibility that makes what he says carry serious weight.

Iraq war veteran and experienced demolitions expert blows the cover on 9/11 inside job.
Written by Gibbwake

Meet Torin Wolf. He has a broad and varied background as a US Army Combat Nurse during Operation Iraqi Freedom,....


...building construction contractor, certified structural welder, certified asbestos and hazardous materials worker, experienced demolitions expert, teacher, radio show host, and well studied 9/11 truth activist. Torin knows how to put a building up, and bring the same building down in its own footprint. Torin's free presentation, "Taking the Red Pill" was hosted by Brave New Books on 1904 Guadalupe in Austin last Saturday, June 23rd at 7 pm.

Read the rest here ...

Additionally Architects and Engineers for 911 truth is an EXCELLENT website with credible expert testimony.

Are YOU this stupid?

This reminds me of the political committee that tried to also ban Dihydrogen-Monoxide to prevent this lethal chemical from falling into the hands of terrorists. After all, in the wrong hands this stuff could (in its gassius form) strip the skin from your body in seconds. It can stop you from breathing, and in large quantities it is poisonous. I mean, thousands of people every year are killed by this chemical.

Additionally, Aliso Viejo city officials famously came close to banning styrofoam cups in 2004 after hearing that "dihydrogen monoxide" was used in their production.

Team calls climate change target too weak

"LONDON (Reuters) - Draft plans to curb the nation's carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 60 percent by 2050 were too weak, an environment committee of parliamentarians said on Monday."

Tim Yeo MP is another victim of the dreaded King Canute Delusion Syndrome. He believes that we can actually reduce the average temperature of the entire planet. How? by reducing how much energy we use by over 60%. That would have us serfs returned to the stone age. We would not be allowed to use cars, washing machines, kettles, fridge freezers, TV's or have any heating on.

We would have to cover our houses in solar panels and windmills. Whilst I am not against this idea, I think if the Government were actually serious about this, and not simply using the debunked specter of man-made global warming as a cash cow and excuse to limit our freedoms and tax us to the hilt, then they would provide solar panels and windmills for free.

Ben Fulford? Come on!

There has suddenly been a rush of interest in a new character appearing on the alternative, (or accurate/true/hidden/secret/repressed) news scene.

Ben Fulford has come forward on Rense.com and is offering a ray of hope for the global inhabitants of this human plantation.

Is he for real? Well, I think that the Jury is out, and the worrying thing for me is that what he is offering us good and decent folks in the truth movement is a huge portion of the kind of news that we would LOVE to believe. How many false dawns have we seen before? how many so-called saviors have we put our faith in, only to be sorely disappointed?

If (and that is a HUGE IF) what he is saying is indeed true, (and a lot of it is, but the central message? Hmmmmm?) then we wish that they got on with it and save humanity from the impending nuclear Armageddon that Tim Rifat has been long predicting.

The plan is a simple enough one and to be fair, is the only obvious one to save humanity from global debt slavery.

The "illuminati" (for want of a less conspiratorially tin hat silly name) have been moving steadily in the direction of having the whole world trade using bits of data created out of thin air, but the value of these bits of data is wholly controlled by this global banking elite.

Think about it, if you had the power to legally create electronic money which amounts to nothing more than a decimal numerical figure entry entry in a database table, and then lend those bits at an actual intrinsic value to your debtors, and charge interest upon those credits, and then get the whole world to use your credits for their trade and for taxes and call it money? It would cost you nothing to be the actual owner of all the money in the world. You control its value and you own and run the computer servers that run the databases that store all the bank accounts of all the people in the world. You would control how much money can be created, circulated and spent. You would control the global economy.

Well this power is real and these banking families that make up what is called "the Illuminati" do currently control most of the money in circulation in the west. With this control comes massive power and they are abusing this power by creating wars and funding both sides. They are playing a game of monopoly with a global sized board and money that they themselves created. They use this power to own think tanks and selection boards and buy and promote politicians and media outlets. They use this power to control the bureaucratic arms of the state, to control the laws and the judicial apparatus, to create pockets of secrecy in which they can hide and feed their lustful pursuits. The family courts in the UK are utilised to provide save haven for them to legally snatch children from their loving parents and have them adopted by families that belong to paedophallic and satanic gangs. They use this power to manipulate people's greed and people are indebted into wage slavery in order to still have somewhere to live and call their own.

How can a few families have this much control? By secrecy that's how.

The only way to end this is to take out the ruling Illuminati families. There are very few of them and there are millions of us. The name General Custer springs to mind.

OK so this plan is very very simple.

Is it too good to be true? We have had so many false dawns before, but now we are at a crossroads.

Humanity is evolving, the earths frequency is rising and people's spirits are becoming ever higher. Information is filtering into the common and universal consciousness. The Illuminati's days are numbered.

Fulford writes about the new Cambrian explosion. Who knows? He could be right and I, for one, certainly hope that he is.

Here's to a new and powerful evolution of mind and spirit.

Go for it Cheney!

According to an editorial in the New York Sun, VP Dick Cheney is considering a run for President. Many in the blogosphere on the old right and on the left are horrified at the prospect. Whilst I can understand the horror that a Cheney Presidency would produce, I am positive that Cheney could never ever win a Presidential election.

This is why I urge Cheney to stand for the Presidency. A Cheney Presidential election bid would show clearly how all the other candidates (less Ron Paul) are really evil neocon clones, even Hillary and Obama. The candidate's views on the prospect of an attack on Iran will show this. An election season with all the canidates trying desparately to out-Cheney; Cheney? Bring it on!

The best possible outcome from this would be victory for the Ron Paul camp.

Go for it Cheney.

[StumbleUpon] |
[Reddit] |
[Digg] |
[Delicious] |
[Newsvine] |
[Facebook] |

Feingold: Censure Bush, Cheney for 'their repeated assaults on the rule of law'

Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is calling on Congress to censure President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and other administration officials for "misconduct relating to the war in Iraq and for their repeated assaults on the rule of law." "Censure is about holding the administration accountable,” Feingold said in a press release sent to RAW STORY. "

Well excuse me Senator Feingold, but you are offering way too little way way too late. To use Bush's language, you are either with us, or you are with the neo-con warmongers pushing for more wars and torture.

A censor of the President will do ziltch to put right what the neo-con fundementalist fanatics have destroyed. Step up Feingold, and get behind a full support for the impeachment of Bush and Cheney et al. or YOU TOO will be a target. you WILL be considered a FULL SUPPORTER of the Bush regime. People are angry. People are very VERY angry Senator Feingold, and YOU are going to get the brunt of that wrath.

As far as house politics is concerned, you are either with us, or you are with the neo-cons.

Senator Feingold, you are going to face the anger of the American people. Which side are you on? The American's or the Neo-Cons?

[StumbleUpon] | [Reddit] | [Digg] | [Delicious] | [Newsvine] | [Facebook]

The Reason WHY?

Fabian was excited as he once more rehearsed his speech for the crowd certain to turn up tomorrow. He had always wanted prestige and power and now his dreams were going to come true. He was a craftsman working with silver and gold, making jewelry and ornaments, but he became dissatisfied with working for a living. He needed excitement, a challenge, and now his plan was ready to begin.

More ...

Do you want $100,000?

Jock Doubleday, director of the California non-profit corporation Natural Woman, Natural Man, Inc., has offered $75,000 to the first medical doctor or pharmaceutical company CEO who publicly drinks a mixture of standard vaccine additives. ...more...

A look in the mirror

The past week has borne witness to that vanishingly rare event: a bout of media self-examination. We’ve seen major news outlets like the BBC and Channel Four step back and reflect on the quality and accuracy of their output, even going so far as to publicly apologise for mistakes that were made. Well, sort of....... more ...

Actually, I don't think that the mainstream media have gone anywhere near far enough. The article above is very very good, However, until the mainstream media admits to being the willing accomplices and accessories to war-crimes, these media platitudes are utterly meaningless.

Any person or group that brings forward information that runs counter to the continuous Rothschild push for a unipolar world order is dismissed as cranky, delusional, conspiracy theorist and ridiculed, or presented as something dangerous. Globalisation = good. Global Warming = man made. Closer political integration = good. Withdrawing from the EU = Bad. Democracy = good. (except in Palestine or the EU or anywhere where national determination is advanced) I invite th reader to watch, Putin has amazing favourability figures at the moment in Russia, but he is a nationalist. He stands in the way of the Rothschild's New World Order. Watch the mainstream media demonise him, for placing his countries interests ahead of the Rothschild's ambition for their new world order.

The media is a paid propaganda mouthpiece, NOT a place of truth.

The parts of the 911 documentary that the BBC 'forgot' to mention

Excellent Must See!!!

The Journey Of A Democrat

The Journey Of A Democrat To Ron Paul And The Constitution
By Martha Newhouse
© 2007 Martha Newhouse

As a life-long Democrat, I should be excited as the 2008 race for President of the United States begins. I should be excited to talk with friends and family about how the Democrats are poised to take the White House back. I should be gleeful at how helpful it has been that George Bush has made such a mess of things that any Republican candidate is going to be painted with the same Iraq war brush. At this point my only problem should be, who will I put my energy behind, Clinton, Obama, Edwards, or Kucinich?
But that is not happening. I am already working to elect Republican Ron Paul for president in 2008. How on earth did an active Democrat make a whip-lash, 180-degree turn to support a congressman from Texas, who says he's a "Constitutionalist?" ...more

So voting in a poll is wrong?

I have been reading online that some pollsters are fed up with Ron Paul's supporters and are thinking of removing him from some straw polls because of them. What are these supporters doing that is wrong? Well, I'll tell ya and as an intelligent and thoughtful reader of this blog, you will never fucking believe this, but here goes:

Apparently they are skewing the natural and correct results in polls by actually having the cheek to vote for Ron Paul. YEAH I know, Crazy isn't it? How dare the supporters of a candidate support him by voting for him in polls! Dammit, all the supporters of the other media picked candidates will be pissed to learn that they lost only because of the supporters of another candidate voted for the candidate THEY support. How dare they?

Can you imagine these pollsters saying that about any other candidate? "

We are sorry, but we had to exclude Hillary Clinton from the Straw poll because the results are being skewed because of her supporters. You see that 'targeted' voting by Clinton supporters on this and other open polls may even be hurting their candidate because the public is turned off by her supporter's behavior."

This is blatant, in-your-face Bullshit. How obvious does it have to be that the media are paid shills for the corporate elite's pre-selected candidates.

People, you are going to have to do more, work harder, be even more unreasonable in your assertions and get even more creative. This is going to be like being a Brit in a boxing match in Mexico, You'll need more than a knock-out to draw. Ron Paul supporters are going to have to make sure that at LEAST 65% of ALL Americans support Ron Paul for him to have any chance of victory in this massively biased process.

How to create an angry american!

"You have somebody like George Tenet acknowledging in his book that he knew that the administration was deceiving the American people into a situation that is murdering young men and women from this country and others, then George Tenet and Dick Cheney and Condoleezza Rice and George Bush should be in fucking jail."

-- Sean Penn

IMPEACH! TRY! CONVICT! IMPRISON! EXECUTE FOR TREASON!

They swore to uphold and defend the constitution of the United States from ALL enemies, Foreign OR DOMESTIC!

The Great Global Warming Swindle

This video has some debunked science in it, and some good science in it. Just as Al Gore's inconvenient truth has some good science and some debunked science. The "hockey stick" theory has been debunked, yet is still quoted by some.

The reason I post this is because the science of climate change is NOT settled.

Anyone that claims it is, is wrong and the rest of their argument is suspect at best.



Enjoy!

Is this a devout follower of Islam?

Is this the image of a devout follower of a very strict form of Islam?

If it is, then, in 20 words or less, Why is Saddam wearing what looks like a gold ring?

Answers on a postcard to :

Osama Bin Laden cock up competition.
CIA Headquarters,
Langley
Virginia
USA.

Global warming knee-jerking ...

What’s the connection between ethanol, the biofuel produced from corn, and a cherry vanilla ice-cream?

Answer: the first is responsible for pushing up the price of the other.

A fine summation from www.whatreallyhappened.com:

"Fossil fuel are burned to convert corn to ethanol. The net carbon and heat load added to the atmosphere is GREATER using ethanol when the fossil fuel burned to convert the plant matter to ethanol is added in. Plus, now there is a shortage of corn for food products."

So the world is apparently getting hotter, and we can't have ice cream because the corn oil is being used for something else?

It's a good job that man-made global warming is a myth. Man has almost 0% effect on the climate. But that big shiny ball of light in the sky, that gives us all our energy, definitely does have an effect.

What is climate? basically it is the tiny interactive layer, where the sun's energy is absorbed by vast oceans and the surface of the planet. To deny that this thin layer is NOT somehow effected by variations in the sun's output and cyclical trends in the oceans is just folly.

To suggest that an insignificant amount of the global CO2, an increase far lower than has been recorded in our history, has a greater effect on climate than that of the sun? That is pure flat earth thinking in my book.

Go ahead and download google earth. Look at how vast the earth is, the vast majority of the surface is ocean, and the rest is empty. Go ahead, zoom in anywhere at random. You'll most likely hit a big patch of empty nature.

I know that the world seems crowded and dominated by man's huge and clunking footprint when you live and work and exist almost exclusively in cities. But it is mostly empty and we are NOT making the huge changes that ARE happening. They are NORMAL.

There is a massive amount of King Canutian delusional syndrome about at the moment. The sooner people realise it is all a scam, perpetrated by the Rothschild faction of the unipolar world order, the better.

I am sick of this shit, I wish he would just be a man and stop!

It seems that the neo-con-lib Israeli firster (American traitor) Senetor Leiberman is rabidly demanding the death and sacrifice of far more people by having a daily demand for more war.

Iran, Syria and Pakistan are all in his sights, so here's my advice to mr "Lets kill more american troops for a foreign nation" and I shall put it in capitals to be real clear...

MR LEIBERMAN. IF YOU REALLY WANT A WAR WITH IRAN; GET A FUCKING GUN, GO TO TEHRAN, STAND IN THEIR MAIN SQUARE AND START SHOOTING AND DO NOT STOP UNTIL THEY STOP YOU!

Please STOP demanding more wars and deaths, STOP threatening other countries, STOP acting like a beligerant and evil emperor UNLESS you are prepared to have the balls to fight in these wars yourself, in person and on the FRONT LINES YOU EVIL CHICKEN SHIT COWARD!

If you ever got within a thousand miles of real military action you would piss your pants in fear and cry for mommy you sick in the head warmongering dumbfuck!

Your type of amoral, sociapathic cowardice makes me sick to my stomach and the sooner you are unelected and slip into total obscurity to die a lonely and miserable anonymous death, the better we shall all be.

You are a coward and a liar and a hypocrite.

I hope you are reincarnated as an Islamist's sweaty jockstrap.

Just STOP!

Oh, and before I am called some called of anti-semite racist, this rant has nothing to do with his being a Jew. NOTHING AT ALL. BUT, it has everything to do with his being a complete fucking jerkoff wanky media whore asshole warmongering cowardly bastard!

Impeach Bush and Cheney.

FLASHBACK: President Is Denied Executive Privilege

By Peter Baker and Susan Schmidt
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, May 6, 1998; Page A01

A federal judge has ruled that President Clinton cannot use the power of his office to block prosecutors from questioning his senior aides, rejecting Clinton's assertion of executive privilege in the Monica S. Lewinsky investigation, lawyers familiar with the decision said yesterday.

In a ruling issued under court seal Monday, Chief U.S. District Judge Norma Holloway Johnson concluded that independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr's need to collect evidence in his obstruction of justice probe outweighs Clinton's interest in preserving the confidentiality of White House discussions, the lawyers said.

The decision made Clinton the first president to take a claim of executive privilege to court and lose since the dramatic Watergate showdown in 1974, when the Supreme Court unanimously ordered Richard M. Nixon to turn over the secret Oval Office tapes that ultimately led to his resignation. Clinton's case also seems headed for the high court as sources indicated that the White House likely will appeal.

Johnson's ruling could amount to a significant political as well as legal setback for Clinton, lending ammunition to Republican critics, such as House Speaker Newt Gingrich (Ga.), who have charged that Clinton is trying, in Nixonian fashion, to impede Starr's investigation with invalid privilege claims.

Clinton invoked both executive privilege and attorney-client privilege to prevent Starr from ...

© Copyright 1998 The Washington Post Company

The time is ripe.

I find myself wondering what the global elite are thinking just now. They have been planning a unipolar world order, with a single global government, single global cashless currency and a micro chipped population. All these things still seem galling and most people (I would hope) would reject this idea as simply preposterous.

However, go back 7 years. The summer of the year 2000. In this more innocent time, before 911, before the War on Terror, When Bush was still considered a compassionate conservative by all but the 31 people executed in the Texas legal system under his watch. In those 'heady*' days when Americans believed themselves to be free, it would have been unthinkable to present the Average American with what we see today.

If you had told the average American that their republican party would be appointed to power by the supreme court, they would have laughed.

If you had told the average American that they would be attacked by airliners that would evade the NORAD and Air force defences of the United States for over 80 minutes to crash (apparently) into the Pentagon. They would deride you as insane. NORAD and the whole of the USA Air defence system defeated by people who could not even fly a Cessna? They would have doubts.

If you had told the average American that on the back if this that the fiscally conservative republicans would create the Department of Homeland Security, a department so huge and vast that the taxpayer will be burdened as never before. They might wonder what had happened to conservatism.

If you had told the average American that the USA would invade Afghanistan to take out Osama Bin Laden, and that this would fail miserably, they would scoff.

If you had told the average American that the Congress would pass the USA PATRIOT Act and that this act would remove their constitutional rights, they they could be detained without trial, that they could have their homes invaded by federal agents, their belongings ransacked and taken and all this could happen without them having to get a court order. Then they would not believe you. Not in the land of the free.

If you had told the average American that their court appointed leader would lie to the American people to succour them into invading a country that had never ever attacked them, to lie about WMD's and to tear up that country leaving it a ruinous wrecked failed nation, more corrupt and dangerous than Saddam's Iraq, a real breeding ground for international terrorism. That their government would have the CIA fly around the world kidnapping people flying them to detention facilities in other countries and torturing them, They would stick their fingers in their ears and shout la la la la la I CAN'T HEAR YOU!

If you had told the average American that their leadership would deliberately and with malice aforethought blow the cover of a covert CIA agent Valerie Plame, an agent who was protecting the world from the proliferation of WMD, in order to deflect criticism of their own deliberate lies. They would be walking away quickly from the strange delusional idiot who claims to be able to see into the future.

If you had told the average American that in the investigation that followed the leaking of Plame's identity, that a member of the Bush administration would deliberately obstruct that investigation and commit perjury to protect the administration, they might not be entirely surprised. But

If you had told the average American that the President would step in and commute the sentence of that criminal who was covering up and obstructing the prosecution in attempting to discover who risked the national security of the United States, during war time? A high crime and misdemeanor and that the opposing party would actively rule out impeachment? They would not believe you.

If you had told the average American that they would no longer be living in the land of the free, that they would be in a country universally detested and reviled in the world, that they would have lost their freedom and that the people of the USA would have rolled over and allowed this to happen with barely a squeak of protest? They would be sure that you are a crazy lunatic.

The global elite must be rubbing their hands with glee. Their selected leaders can do whatever they please and the people will meekly comply. They have the leaders in their pockets, the media in their pockets and now the people so utterly dumbed down and compliant that they may as well go for broke and imprison us all whilst enough of us are still far too deeply asleep to do anything about it.


*I could not resist the cliche, sorry.

Spot the difference!

The image below is of an IDF soldier inspecting the wreckage of a car bomb...




The image below is of the Glasgow Airport car fire.



Spot the difference?

Now can the mainstream media PLEASE STOP BULLSHITING ABOUT CAR BOMBS!!!!

There was no BOMB! there was some harmless gas cannisters that were never ever going to explode.

The image above is as bad is it was going to get. We were NOT lucky that it was not worse, we have NOT narrowly avoided a mass slaughter. THAT WAS IT! We are not facing a massive terrorist threat, we are facing a bunch of clueless muppets!

I will NOT give up my liberties and hard fought freedoms for these FUCKWITS!

An extraordinary challenge.

America! You have an extraordinary challenge to get an extraordinary human being into the Whitehouse in 2008! Are you up to the challenge? or are you going to give in and allow yourselves to be dictated to by the corrupt an undeserving for four more years and four more after that and so on...




Now is the time to take a stand and throw your full support in time, effort and money, behind Ron Paul.

Go forth and recruit, convert and pursuade everyone you know to vote for Ron Paul in the Primaries and RISE TO THE CHALLENGE SET BY THE FOUNDING FATHERS.

This July 4th, remember that the international banking interests in the City of London are pulling your strings. Declare independence from them once more.

Join and extend the Ron Paul Revolution.

More responsible reporting.

Wow! on CNN too! I bet he's never asked back on again.

This was no Government Conspiracy.

Before the tin foil hat wearing conspiracy nuts start claiming that the Government were behind these (so called) "attacks" lets look at the facts. We know that the Government was not behind these because:

a) These attacks were very small and amounted to one car fire and minor damage to the front facia of an airport and some damaged dustbins.

b) The "terrorists" were caught.

c) the CCTV cameras were actually working and other "terrorists" were recorded succesfully by CCTV.

d) Israelis where not warned of the attacks before hand

e) Security firms linked to intelligence services were not running top secret security drills in the same place at the same time.

f) Several identical copies of the "ID's" of the "terrorists" were not discovered intact at numerous locations.

g) There was no military explosive that magically became "home made". In fact there where no explosives used of any kind.

So this is the REAL terrorists (as opposed to the secrurity service enabled elitist neo-con created terrorists) and what can they do to instill such mind numbing, liberty scrapping, freedom destroying fear?

set light to a car!

wooo. I am, like, soooooooo scared!

"but it could have been so much worse" people foolishly cry.

Actually, NO it could not.

a) There was no bomb!

b) A car was never ever going to get inside the airport.

This pathetic car fire was the best that the terrorists could have hoped to achieve with what they had. There was NO bomb. If the media turn round in days to come and say that there was, they are lying, 1984 memory hole style.

And even IF it there had been, so the hell what? IF my aunt had a dick she would be my uncle!

Big fucking deal! IF this and IF that..... what bollocks. How about this one to make you squirt the brown and runny down your trouser legs:

"If they had a nuke in the car and the controls to all the world's military satelites they could have taken over the world and killed literally billions of people!!!"

Get real for fucks sake. It was a car fire. That's all, and that was all it was ever going to be at worst.

The mainstream media is losing what shreds of credibility it once had by the minute and they should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.

Sensible, realistic, responsible journalism at last! Listen Up BBC, SKY Et al.

This is decent responsible journalism. The BBC and SKY and all the other "news" outlets, that are currently salivating in a ridiculous, rabid fearmongering orgy, could learn a lot from this REAL journalism.

Olbermann is a credible journalist who reports on reality, not the vacuous vapid overhyped yellow journalism of the BBC et al.

Now who are the terrorists?

The police have blown up more cars than the alledged terrorists. Talk about un-necessary overkill.

It turns out this car did NOT have explosives in it. This whole thing has descended into the level of farce.

Who is the real terrorist?

After the "terrorist attack" at Glasgow airport and the subsequent media orgasm of propaganda, I have to ask, Who are the real terrorists?

If we are to judge on the ACTUAL AND REAL IMPACT of what happened, then let's consider how much fear has been spread by what happened.

So, what happened?

In Glasgow, a car was burned, the culprits found and aprehended immediately. Nobody else was even injured.

In London 2 cars were so baldy set up as car fires, (NOT BOMBS) that they did not even ignite. Slight damage was caused to dustbins. That's it!

Let's compare this to what happens nationally every year. From a minor local report in South Wales, UK, a computer system has been installed to reduce the amount of dumped cars.

"But despite this, hundreds are still dumped every year with up to 460 of them set on fire in arson attacks in 2005."

Sorry, let's look at that again? 460???? and this is only mentioned as a side issue in the local news?

Why should I be scared of those clowns in Glasgow? people who have attributed 1/460th to the abandoned and burned out cars statistics.

Well, Who has actually been spreading fear? Worse still, utterly groundless, baseless fear? Encouraging the nation to be afraid, be very afraid.

THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND THE GOVERNMENT!

Look at the evidence. We have 1 car fire, something that happens about 460 times every year in council estates up and down the country, often without any media coverage whatsoever. Occasionally warranting a side issue in another report in local news. How does the media respond to this actual event?

Forget what REALLY happened and go to 24 hour coverage of, IT WAS A Car BOMB! it could be Al Queda! remember 911! Terrorists! trying to kill vast numbers! evil maniacs! just like 911 this was low tech terrorism that could cause mass murder on a large scale. We are under enormous risk from global terrorism. Highest level of alert, etc etc etc.

All genuine quotes from the mainstream media and all fearmongering BOLLOCKS!

So, Who is terrorising the country?

It's not Al queda. Perhaps we should lock up the media and the Government.

The media is a fucking joke!

UPDATE:

The media frenzy surrounding this pathetic attack is just ridiculous. 24 hour non-stop political wet dream of fearmongering and disinformation.

A burned out car does not in anyway justify the massively over the top orgy of terrorism tv. Please could they just report, for once, on what has actually happened? You know, just for once, please? And not on mindless, brain-dead, speculation on top of propaganda on top of blatant lies.

The mainstream media is screwing its own reputation more and more by the minute.

the fact is we have a burned out car and two arrests of "Asian" looking people.

SO FUCKING WHAT?

If these pathetic and useless so called terr0rists actually pull off a real attack, then report it. until then, GET A FUCKING CLUE!!!

The media is a fucking joke!

Is that it? I am not giving up my liberties for these pillocks.

So, all the liberty removing laws. The constant hysteria in the media for years, the total consumation of fear that drives political media in this nation, warning of deadly attacks, attacks so severe that laws MUST be implemented that remove our freedom and liberty for our own good. A threat far far worse than anything Hitler, or the IRA could subject us to, A threat unlike anything we have ever seen before.

Well they are half right. This is a threat unlike anything we have faced before as this is a threat that is far, far more pathetic than anything we have ever faced before.

The attack at Glasgow airport is the first that has happened that has no Government link or clear attribution to the security services.

If this is all these so called terrorists can achieve over here then they can fuck off. There are home grown hooligan kids on council estates far far worse and more dangerous than these fuckwits.

I am not giving up my liberties for these pillocks.

I have just heard the police mention 911 and all the other so called "low tech" terrorist attacks to imprint fear. These attacks are so pathetically, rediculously inept that they could not scare a small child, so the specter of 911 must be mentioned to link the two. When the attacks are so lame, that they have to mention other intelligence sponsored attacks in order to subliminally increase the impact of these useless and woefully inept attacks, you know they are in trouble.

"Oh look, we are being attacked! You are in DANGER!" But this is pathetic, I will not fear this! "Oh but 911 was committed with box cutters and this could have been just as bad"

WHAT UTTER BOLLOCKS!

So anyone buying gas cannisters for their home barbequeues or their patio heaters will now be a target for the police.

This is all a sick joke.

WTF?

In Foreign Affairs, the publication issued by the CFR, Mitt Romney pens the following:

"Today's challenges are daunting. They include the conflict in Iraq, the resurgence of the Taliban, and global terrorist networks made even more menacing by the threat of nuclear proliferation. While Iran's leaders relentlessly pursue nuclear weapons capabilities and spout genocidal threats against Israel" {my emphasis}

WTF? This utterly abysmal paragraph, devoid of fact and yet utterly dripping with propagandistic venom is but one of the many reasons why I support Ron Paul.

There is not one jot of evidence that Iran has a nuclear weapons program, let alone a relentless one and Iran has never uttered any genocidal threats against Israel, they have only called for regime change (something America and Israel do regularly BTW) and the current administration know this, yet, as with Iraq's non existant WMD's, these brain dead religious extremist tools of a zionist entity continue to spout blatant and known lies for all they are worth.

Ahmadinejad has no military power, he is not head of the Iranian armed forces and has never called for war with Isreal, for more of what Ahmedinejad actually has said, look here.

So you know that with Mitt Romney there will be many more needless wars of choice based on lies, more of the American taxpayers (yours) money and the blood of American youth being overtly sacrifed on the alter of political cowardice and supine submission to a foreign entity.

If you want to cast a pro American vote, then Mitt Romney is not a viable candidate. I would suggest Ron Paul.

There is no path to peace, peace IS the path. Vote for Ron Paul in the primaries.

It is unrealistic to elect Ron Paul.

This is one response to the video linked to the title of this post, that it is unrealistic to support Ron Paul and hope he wins the Presidency.

That said, I believe that we can achieve the election of Ron Paul. We need belief and energy. Belief is the engine that helps tranform energy into matter. We can create this future of our dreams. We need belief and action.

Educate everyone. Spread the Ron Paul message. Get everyone to contribute and volunteer as much as they are able and even more.

A truly worthwhile revolution requires revolutionary and unrealistic levels of energy. Demand that people are unreasonable in their efforts.

Meanwhile we should all be unreasonable.

Is it reasonable to accept global perpetual war?

Is it reasonable to force fake democracies onto other nations at gunpoint?

Is it reasonable to accept the federal reserve creating money out of thin air and then charging interest upon it? (The interest that is charged is never loaned into circulation, so can NEVER be repaid. So the national debt gets bigger and bigger by design, that is why taxes always go up!)

Is it reasonable to pay unconstitutional taxes on your labour that is exchanged for cash? (income tax)

Is it reasonable to accept being subservient to the Government by the issuance of ID cards in a FREE COUNTRY?

Is it reasonable to give up your freedom and liberty to gain the false pretence of security?

Is it reasonable to live under a self declared dictatorship and the tyranny that is generated therfrom?

It is time to be unreasonable and unrealistic and to take unreasonable action to achieve the unrealistic aims of PEACEFULLY retaking the Constitutional republic of the United States and reinstating it as a beacon of freedom and liberty for the world to see and emulate.

It will take an unreasonable amount of effort to achieve the unrealistic goal of a Ron Paul Presidency, but is it worth it? I say it is. We shall unreasonably promote Ron Paul's message endlessly, to be heard everywere, and I say we do it and keep doing it and never tire of doing it until we succeed.

The whole world cannot afford for us to fail and that is the most unreasonable thing of all.

Ken Hall.

Another letter to the BBC.

Here is another letter I have submitted to the BBC that I expect will not be published. I am disgusted at the blatant way in which the BBC and other media have been trying to show Brown in a new light. As if they are trying to trick us into forgetting the last 10 years.

Actually the Daily Mail are even worse. They berate Blair and almost everything he has presided over, including the stealth taxes and all the policies pushed forward and funded by Brown, they are delighted to see the Back of Blair, yet they too are trying to push this new broom bullshit.

The whole, Brown has changed and is going to be a good Prime Minister who will listen and stop the spin and yadda yadda yadda Bullshit is completely, laughably and totally unbelieveable.

If ever there was a more blatant display of the media exposing themselves as the whores of the hidden rulers behind the new world order, then I have yet to see it.

here's my letter:

I understand that Blair has ruined the elitist agenda that the people who selected him put him in power to implement. He has lost the support of the nation, so that agenda is in peril, so Brown has to put up a different 'front' to get that agenda back on track. I also understand that as the mouthpiece for the 'establishment' the BBC has to help promote that agenda by helping promote a more acceptable image of Brown, but it really will not wash.

So long as a political leader pushes an agenda of an expanding EU, more globalisation, and every stepping stone to a "new world order" or "unipolar world order", then they get a favourable press. When they turn against that agenda, (like Thatcher did late in her premiership), or if they become a liability through their own ineptitude (like Blair) then they lose the support of the media and are replaced.

Name one British political leader, in the last 40 years, who was more Eurosceptic OR had a greater desire to move away from a unipolar world order, than the discredited leader they replaced? Why is the more expansionist leader popular? They are given the more favourable press, every time.

This is the same duplicitous Brown we have come to know and dislike for 10 years. The only change, perhaps, is that he has become more blatant in his lies as he knows he will not be called out on any of them by a supine media that's pushing the same NWO agenda.

That is why the media is despearately trying to push a false idea that he genuinely has changed, no really, this time he really really has, honest. Would we lie to you? OK forget the WMD in Iraq thing, this time we mean it.

The media's desparation is palpable.

Like a freshly beaten wife on the morning after listening to an abusive alcoholic husband declaring this time he really has changed, I do not believe a word of it.

And shame on the BBC for pushing this rubbish.

Instead of pandering to his blatant lies about being closer to the people, giving Parliament a greater say, listening more and being more open etc etc, perhaps you might try, for once, to hold him to account for his words and his actions being 180 degrees different. The restrictions on the freedom of information act, the referendum on the just signed EU treaty would be 2 very good places to be holding his feet to the fire over for a start.

I won't hold my breath however.

Cameron supports war crimes.

The tories have permanently lost my support. Cameron voted for war in Iraq. Cameron has stated that he still believes that it was the right thing to do. That means he beleives that a pre-emptive invasion against a nation that is no threat is just peach to him. Now I know why.

According to the report linked to this, he is a declared zionist.

Put the UK first or lose my support forever.

Vote UKIP!

WOOHOO!!! Outstanding drive from Hamilton

Anthony Hamilton has just won the incident packed Canadian Grand Prix. He was the class of the field and, in only 6 races, has raised the bar for the other formula one drivers. As a rookie, he has finished on the podium on every race in his career. He is showing himself to be an outstanding driver, possibly even better than Michael Schumacher himself.

Well Done Anthony Hamilton.

My take on the BB8 racism row (UK)

I am at a loss to understand why Big Brother allowed a contestant to shamelessly utter a disgusting racist word without any sanction whatsoever.

I refer to Charley calling herself a "nigger".

Emily was (rightly and appropriately) cast out of the house for her use of that word. Charley also used that word (more often than Emily did) and was not reprimanded at all. It seems that the ONLY reason for this is that Charley has a different colour of skin from Emily. In this case the rules are being interpreted and applied in a racially discriminatory fashion. This is appalling behaviour and is totally unacceptable to me.

This word, according to Channel four's own definition, was so foul that no housemate should utter it under any circumstances or in any context whatsoever.

According to channel four's big brother website:

"In the wake of Celebrity Big Brother we must consider the potential offence to viewers regardless of Emily's intentions and her housemates' response. The word nigger is clearly racially offensive and there was no justification for its use."

And

"Unacceptable behaviour includes: behaving in a way that could cause serious offence to either their fellow housemates or members of the viewing public including serious offence based on the grounds of race. Housemates who act in a way that is seriously unacceptable will be evicted."

Charley breached this very serious rule.

Here is an excerpt from the transcript:

"Emily: (referring to Charley dancing/ pushing her hips forward) You pushing it out you nigger.
Nicky: (shocked laughter) Em, I can't believe you said that.
Charley: You are in trouble.
Emily: Don't make a big thing out of it then. I was joking.
Charley: I know you were... but that's some serious shit, sorry.
Emily: Why?
Charley: Oh my god. I'm not even saying it.
Nicky: Just don't talk about it anymore.
Emily: I was joking.
Charley: Do you know how many viewers would watch that?
Nicky: Okay, don't make a big deal out of it.
Charley: Fancy you saying that. I can't believe you said that.
Emily: Somebody has already used that word in this house.
Charley: No way. (Pause) Yeah, me. I'm a niggerr.
Charley: I am one. Fancy you saying it. I know maybe you see it in a rap song. Maybe you and your friends sit there saying it."

I cannot understand why Charley is still in the Big Brother house and has NOT faced ANY sanction whatsoever.

Rules are rules. Either it is acceptable to use this word in a non-malicious fashion, (as BOTH girls did, and as accepted by channel four and the producers of this program), or it is not acceptable.

The serious sanction, and subsequent adverse media attention, that Emily suffered was not equally given to Charley. They both committed exactly the same offensive behaviour. The ONLY difference is the colour of their skin. If one human punishes, or prohibits the actions of another human based SOLELY on the colour of their skin, then that IS racially motivited discrimination.

I am also appalled that the media is editing and cutting their coverage of this programme to deliberately exclude Charley's use of this word.

Everyone I know who has fought racism, as I have, for many many years and who saw the episode last night are equally appalled.

It is this kind of blatant racial discrimination that feeds the evil popularity of the BNP. This could set back race relations for decades.

The Big Brother executives and the Channel four executives (and much of the mainstream media on screen and in print) are using edited and dishonest footage in such a way as to play the race card for all they are worth and are doing so in a blatantly racially discriminatory manner.

I am appalled.

Blogging is not enough!

Do more to support Ron Paul, blogging is not enough. Here is what you can do to support the great man ...

Love

Love is the only way. We cannot continue to grow and thrive on a diet of war and fear. We must love our enemy as much as our friend. We are all one consciousness, one mind, one heart, one energy, one love.

If there is one thing I have learned this week it is this: Love is eternal and will never end. Pain is momentary and will pass. To all those I love, I will always love. To those I have caused pain, anguish, stress, anxiety or doubt. I am truly sorry.

To those with hope left in their hearts, but doubt in their minds, I simply offer this truth. You are the manifest creation of love moulded from your imagination, wants, needs, expectations, hopes and deepest fears. Whatever you truly desire, you can create.

Never EVER give up hope.
Never EVER give in to fear.
Always KNOW truth.

Love is all you need.

When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace.

Ron Paul LOSES in own poll Shock!

This just in!

Scroll down for the active poll!

In the poll below (according to FOX's way of thinking) in a poll where ONLY Ron Paul is standing, Ron Paul has lost his own Poll! We cannot say who he lost to, as we don't want to distract the feeble minded from realising that he also won. BUT you can clearly see that the losing name is RON PAUL!!! Gee what a loser!!!!

Now, for those readers with active brain cells, Please support Ron Paul. This obviously excludes Fox reporters, as they even admitted not even being able to use a cellphone to send text messages!!! It's true. I could not believe what I was hearing. They tried to suggest Ron Paul did so well in their text poll because older people over 30 do not know how to use a phone to text in. Then they said that they could not use them themselves! They admitted being too stupid to know how to text. Well there you have it, fox reporters admiting to a major IQ deficit.

Fox News! We report, You decide, because we are too bloody thick to understand the question!

Who Won the televised debate?

So many other online polls have removed Ron Paul from their selections, so I am redressing the balance. If you cannot select Ron Paul in their polls , then vote here instead.

Service and how to make a REAL difference.

You may find it profitable to watch this movie, but I found it inspirational. What can you do today to give from your heart?

Holy Crap! Was he right? You decide.

Outa my mind?

if this don't move you, then you are already dead.

News Just IN, KSM booked for CONFEST 2007!

Waleed Mohammed bin Attash, long suspected of plotting the bombing of the USS Cole, confessed at a hearing in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to planning the attack, according to a Pentagon transcript released Monday.

This has enraged the world champion confessor, alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, or KSM as he has become known. The mainstream media darling was planning to open the confession gig 'confest 2007' with confessing to being the 'mastermind' behind the audacious attack, and to providing the equipment, personnel and even to piloting the craft and being killed in the attack!

The Pentagon sponsored event is expected to attract the cream of international terrorism patsies to confess to both solved and unsolved crimes before an audience of heckling conservative rednecks. As a special treat, Pentagon spokesperson said that there would be some extra surprises at this years event and hinted at spectacular expose's of who created the 'face' on Mars and how crop circles are really formed.

This Year's CONFEST is set to be the biggest and best for years, with the staff at the Pentagon having worked overtime diligently preparing the confessions for this years show.

"We have really pushed the boat out this year and utilised every tool at our disposal to come up with the most amazing collection of confessions possible." said a Guantanamo spokesperson, on the condition of annonimity. "This year is set to be the best year for confessions we have ever had."

However, speculation was quashed about an amazingly spectacular confession by the Israelis at this years show. "The attack on the USS Liberty will not be in this years show, and anyone that is claiming it is, is a dirty anti-semite and a friend of the terrorists." Said the spokesperson.

Well we should not expect miracles now, should we?