Monday, June 23, 2008
George Carlin R.I.P.
George Carlin, a great comedic hero famed for his routines about global mis-governance, religion and the power elite, died of heart failure at a Los Angeles-area hospital on Sunday, a spokesman said. He was 71.
Thursday, June 19, 2008
Thursday, June 12, 2008
ABOUT TIME!!!!
First step the by election.... next step, the general election and then, perhaps, we can have our country back from the labour dictatorship and have our freedoms and our privacy respected again.
Labour: **** OFF!
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Friday, May 16, 2008
If Only ...
We had some news interviewers in the UK who would have the balls to take our politicians and so-called experts to task like this. I would have loved for someone to interview Blair like this and call him on his blatant BS before he invaded Iraq. The news media has been supremely craven and supine in their support for our corrupt political leaders for far too long.
Thursday, May 15, 2008
Friday, May 09, 2008
Global Warming and Cooling - The Reality
Stephen Wilde has been a Fellow of the Royal Meteorological Society since 1968. The first two article's from Mr Wilde were received with a great deal of interest throughout the Co2 Sceptic community.
In Stephen Wilde's third and exclusive article for CO2Sceptics.Com, he explores the mechanics and mechanism involved that are attributed to the Earth's Warming and Cooling, needless to say the presence of CO2 is not part of the process.
Global Warming and Cooling - The Reality.
It’s all very well doing what alarmists do which is to say that Co2 is rising and temperatures are rising so in the absence of any other known cause it must be man made CO2 that is warming the planet. That approach ignores both the differing scale of the possible influencing factors and the clear historical relationship between cooler climates and periods of a less active sun. The presence of the sun must be a much bigger influence on global temperatures than the greenhouse characteristics of CO2 on it’s own.
At most the greenhouse effect can only be marginal though some have tried to talk it up by asserting that the planet would be very much colder without a greenhouse effect, which is correct, but avoids the issue of the rather small proportion of the overall greenhouse effect provided by CO2 and the even smaller proportion provided by man. It also begs the question as to whether the oceans are slowly releasing CO2 as a result of natural warming. If the oceans warm for any reason they will release CO2 into the atmosphere because water holds less CO2 at higher temperatures.
The greenhouse effect, as a whole, may smooth out rises and falls in temperature from other causes but is not itself the determining factor for global temperature. If the heat from the sun declines the global temperature will fall with or without any greenhouse effect and if the heat from the sun increases the global temperature will, of course, rise. The greenhouse effect does not create new heat. All it does is increase the residence time of heat in the atmosphere.
Continues ......
I cannot fault this article. I have wondered for several years now how a tiny proportion of the tiny proportion of a natural atmospheric gas could have a greater effect on our climate than the interaction between the energy output of the sun and the energy store of the oceans. That has never made sense to me that the former was greater than the latter, or that it could even have any effect on the latter or more of an effect than, say, a fly hitting the windscreen would have on the momentum of a motor vehicle. I have always considered that our climate is merely the meeting layer and interactive layer between a huge energy output source (the sun) and a huge energy store (the oceans) The landmass has a smaller effect and the people on it practically none. You only have to use google earth to see how insignificant mankind is. Spin the earth and with eyes closed stop the spin and zoom into the surface, 7 times out of 10 that will be uninhabited water. Of the three times that land surface is encountered it is usually barren desert or mountains. People only have the feeling that we over populate the planet because we all live together and spend our waking experiences mostly in towns and cities. The vast majority of the earth is unspoilt nature.
The variations in the suns output, our irregular orbit around the sun and the electro-magnetic energy fluctuations, would have a far greater effect on the climate than any tiny proportion of a tiny proportion of natural atmospheric gas. To my way of thinking this is blindingly obvious.
Increasing the amount of "greenhouse" gas may have a tiny effect on climate, but to compare our climate to a greenhouse is massively and grossly over-simplifying our complex climate to the extent that it completely omits many of the critical and most fundamental regulatory mechanisms that actually occur in our real climate (many of which are omitted entirely from so-called sophisticated computer models). I was aghast when I read that many of these models cannot accurately model clouds and rain, and some omit them altogether. They do not model the solar cycles, they do not model winds correctly and they did not model ocean cycles at all until recently. The most hysterical models have the "greenhouse effect" creating a "tropospheric heat island" high in the atmosphere that reflects more heat back to earth in a positive feedback loop leading to the "tipping point" that starts catastrophic global warming. Inconveniently, the NASA Aqua satellite system has shown that the tropospheric heat island (central to the catastrophic human induced global warming scare) does not, in fact, exist in reality. The cooling of the earth since 1998 matches in with solar observations and the ocean's cooling as observed by the Argos sub-ocean probes. More and more evidence is coming in all the time that demonstrates that the earth IS cooling. Climate alarmists deny this and in desperation call it merely a "stalling of global warming". This suggests that warming is on-going and irreversible so that they can continue to get their fat grant cheques. In that case the last 200 years has been a long stalling in onset of the next ice age then!
To my way of thinking, the earth is either warming or cooling. It is always doing one or the other. As to trends over time, it depends on when you want to measure from or to. I could show dates that currently show that we are in a warming trend and others that show that we are in a cooling trend. Alarmists only allow dates that support their alarmism and refute all other dates as meaningless.
We should stop worrying about CO2 and start tackling the problems that DO exist. Tackling the destruction of ancient forests, the massive damage done to the Amazon and the ancient forests of Borneo must be a high priority. The Orang-utang is facing extinction because of the desire to grow palm for palm oil. This kind of rape and butchery of nature must be stopped. We should clean up genuine pollution. CO2 is NOT a pollutant. We must grow crops for food, not oil! We are witnessing mass starvation in much of the world so that the political class can feel pleased with themselves that they are "tackling climate change" in their knee-jerk over-reaction to a false alarm. Tackle climate change? that has to be the worst and most brain dead slogan I have ever heard. What do they propose to do? Move the earth further from the sun? This is truly the science and politics of King Canute.
Excellent article and also plain common sense.
In Stephen Wilde's third and exclusive article for CO2Sceptics.Com, he explores the mechanics and mechanism involved that are attributed to the Earth's Warming and Cooling, needless to say the presence of CO2 is not part of the process.
Global Warming and Cooling - The Reality.
It’s all very well doing what alarmists do which is to say that Co2 is rising and temperatures are rising so in the absence of any other known cause it must be man made CO2 that is warming the planet. That approach ignores both the differing scale of the possible influencing factors and the clear historical relationship between cooler climates and periods of a less active sun. The presence of the sun must be a much bigger influence on global temperatures than the greenhouse characteristics of CO2 on it’s own.
At most the greenhouse effect can only be marginal though some have tried to talk it up by asserting that the planet would be very much colder without a greenhouse effect, which is correct, but avoids the issue of the rather small proportion of the overall greenhouse effect provided by CO2 and the even smaller proportion provided by man. It also begs the question as to whether the oceans are slowly releasing CO2 as a result of natural warming. If the oceans warm for any reason they will release CO2 into the atmosphere because water holds less CO2 at higher temperatures.
The greenhouse effect, as a whole, may smooth out rises and falls in temperature from other causes but is not itself the determining factor for global temperature. If the heat from the sun declines the global temperature will fall with or without any greenhouse effect and if the heat from the sun increases the global temperature will, of course, rise. The greenhouse effect does not create new heat. All it does is increase the residence time of heat in the atmosphere.
Continues ......
I cannot fault this article. I have wondered for several years now how a tiny proportion of the tiny proportion of a natural atmospheric gas could have a greater effect on our climate than the interaction between the energy output of the sun and the energy store of the oceans. That has never made sense to me that the former was greater than the latter, or that it could even have any effect on the latter or more of an effect than, say, a fly hitting the windscreen would have on the momentum of a motor vehicle. I have always considered that our climate is merely the meeting layer and interactive layer between a huge energy output source (the sun) and a huge energy store (the oceans) The landmass has a smaller effect and the people on it practically none. You only have to use google earth to see how insignificant mankind is. Spin the earth and with eyes closed stop the spin and zoom into the surface, 7 times out of 10 that will be uninhabited water. Of the three times that land surface is encountered it is usually barren desert or mountains. People only have the feeling that we over populate the planet because we all live together and spend our waking experiences mostly in towns and cities. The vast majority of the earth is unspoilt nature.
The variations in the suns output, our irregular orbit around the sun and the electro-magnetic energy fluctuations, would have a far greater effect on the climate than any tiny proportion of a tiny proportion of natural atmospheric gas. To my way of thinking this is blindingly obvious.
Increasing the amount of "greenhouse" gas may have a tiny effect on climate, but to compare our climate to a greenhouse is massively and grossly over-simplifying our complex climate to the extent that it completely omits many of the critical and most fundamental regulatory mechanisms that actually occur in our real climate (many of which are omitted entirely from so-called sophisticated computer models). I was aghast when I read that many of these models cannot accurately model clouds and rain, and some omit them altogether. They do not model the solar cycles, they do not model winds correctly and they did not model ocean cycles at all until recently. The most hysterical models have the "greenhouse effect" creating a "tropospheric heat island" high in the atmosphere that reflects more heat back to earth in a positive feedback loop leading to the "tipping point" that starts catastrophic global warming. Inconveniently, the NASA Aqua satellite system has shown that the tropospheric heat island (central to the catastrophic human induced global warming scare) does not, in fact, exist in reality. The cooling of the earth since 1998 matches in with solar observations and the ocean's cooling as observed by the Argos sub-ocean probes. More and more evidence is coming in all the time that demonstrates that the earth IS cooling. Climate alarmists deny this and in desperation call it merely a "stalling of global warming". This suggests that warming is on-going and irreversible so that they can continue to get their fat grant cheques. In that case the last 200 years has been a long stalling in onset of the next ice age then!
To my way of thinking, the earth is either warming or cooling. It is always doing one or the other. As to trends over time, it depends on when you want to measure from or to. I could show dates that currently show that we are in a warming trend and others that show that we are in a cooling trend. Alarmists only allow dates that support their alarmism and refute all other dates as meaningless.
We should stop worrying about CO2 and start tackling the problems that DO exist. Tackling the destruction of ancient forests, the massive damage done to the Amazon and the ancient forests of Borneo must be a high priority. The Orang-utang is facing extinction because of the desire to grow palm for palm oil. This kind of rape and butchery of nature must be stopped. We should clean up genuine pollution. CO2 is NOT a pollutant. We must grow crops for food, not oil! We are witnessing mass starvation in much of the world so that the political class can feel pleased with themselves that they are "tackling climate change" in their knee-jerk over-reaction to a false alarm. Tackle climate change? that has to be the worst and most brain dead slogan I have ever heard. What do they propose to do? Move the earth further from the sun? This is truly the science and politics of King Canute.
Excellent article and also plain common sense.
Thursday, May 08, 2008
My considered response to Labour's kicking in the local elections.
Labour were utterly humiliated and crushed and about time too. There performance was terrible and it was a delicious delight to watch the hapless Harriet Harman squirm as the true scale of their fully deserved defeat began to sink in.
Their excuses for their failure are, though, just as inept as their inability to govern.
Thursday's election was not a call to "pull your socks up Gordon" or a reaction purely to the 10p tax bad being DOUBLED (it was NOT abolished) People paying tax on that band are now and will continue to pay tax at 20p, that is NOT an abolition. I wish the media would finally after 14 months and hundreds of letters finally get a fucking clue and report the simple truth that this was a tax doubling not a tax abolition.
No the 10p tax was merely the straw that broke the camel's back. The re-introduction of 10p will not fix the splintered vertebrae.
What the 10p tax doubling showed in very simple and graphic terms was the character of a Government that will spend more than £100 billion pounds in loan guarantees bailing out billionaire bankers from billions of pounds of worthless loans, whilst doubling the income tax on 5 million of the poorest people in the country.
That stark realisation is what has not only lost labour a big chunk of their natural support, but utterly disgusted and sickened many of those whose father's and grandfather's had always voted labour so they must too... It took such a stark contrast to throw into graphic relief the difference between the support that Labour cravenly give to the billionaire bankers and the sickening contempt in which they hold their working class base.
That kind of awakening, forced by the sudden sickening jarring of realisation of contemptuous betrayal cannot be bought off lightly. Nor will it ever be forgotten by those whose taxes have now doubled.
Thursday's election was NOT a warning shot. Neither was it the labour party failing to get their message across. Labour's message, by their numerous and on-going vile, arrogant and corrupt actions, has got across very very clearly indeed and the result on Friday morning was the country had told that complacent and arrogant Labour party to FUCK RIGHT OFF!!!. Never return. No excuses, no fourth or fifth chances, no cheap policy initiatives to buy our support back. Labour have had numerous warnings before.
Every national election since 2001, except ONE general election, has been won by the Tories. So that is every local and European election that labour lost was a warning to labour. They did NOT listen to any of them. The sight of an unelected labour leader lecturing Mugabe on democracy after Brown has reneged on a promise to hold a referendum on the EU treaty sticks firmly in the throat.
Thursday was a national cry of enough is enough! Get out of power and never darken our political landscape with your oppressive centrist authoritarian politically correct ineptitude and corruption ever again.
The media that keep referring to this as the "abolition" of the 10p tax band will never ever get why this is such a pivotal moment and I cannot for the life of me understand why the media will keep insisting of referring to it as the abolition of the 10p band, as if just re-instating the 10p band will make everything OK again... It won't.
The fact that the labour party doubled the income tax whilst prices rise and at the same time have set aside hundreds of billions of pounds to bail out bankers has shown that the mask has slipped to reveal, in all it's ghastly nastiness, the real face of labour's leadership, this cannot be undone. Putting the mask back will not make people forget the horror's that laid beneath.
I would ask that anyone who still had the hatred in their hearts or the mendacity to vote labour to explain to me, how it is morally acceptable to spend billions bailing out the billionaire bankers whilst doubling the income tax on 5 million of the poorest workers in the land? This is a spiteful and cruel act upon a minority group of some of the most vulnerable people in the land. Spiteful and cruel acts on homosexuals are now illegal. spiteful and cruel acts against people because of the colour of their skin is now illegal.
In my humble opinion, voting labour now is on a par with racism or gender/sexual preference discrimination and should be legally classed as a hate crime.
Their excuses for their failure are, though, just as inept as their inability to govern.
Thursday's election was not a call to "pull your socks up Gordon" or a reaction purely to the 10p tax bad being DOUBLED (it was NOT abolished) People paying tax on that band are now and will continue to pay tax at 20p, that is NOT an abolition. I wish the media would finally after 14 months and hundreds of letters finally get a fucking clue and report the simple truth that this was a tax doubling not a tax abolition.
No the 10p tax was merely the straw that broke the camel's back. The re-introduction of 10p will not fix the splintered vertebrae.
What the 10p tax doubling showed in very simple and graphic terms was the character of a Government that will spend more than £100 billion pounds in loan guarantees bailing out billionaire bankers from billions of pounds of worthless loans, whilst doubling the income tax on 5 million of the poorest people in the country.
That stark realisation is what has not only lost labour a big chunk of their natural support, but utterly disgusted and sickened many of those whose father's and grandfather's had always voted labour so they must too... It took such a stark contrast to throw into graphic relief the difference between the support that Labour cravenly give to the billionaire bankers and the sickening contempt in which they hold their working class base.
That kind of awakening, forced by the sudden sickening jarring of realisation of contemptuous betrayal cannot be bought off lightly. Nor will it ever be forgotten by those whose taxes have now doubled.
Thursday's election was NOT a warning shot. Neither was it the labour party failing to get their message across. Labour's message, by their numerous and on-going vile, arrogant and corrupt actions, has got across very very clearly indeed and the result on Friday morning was the country had told that complacent and arrogant Labour party to FUCK RIGHT OFF!!!. Never return. No excuses, no fourth or fifth chances, no cheap policy initiatives to buy our support back. Labour have had numerous warnings before.
Every national election since 2001, except ONE general election, has been won by the Tories. So that is every local and European election that labour lost was a warning to labour. They did NOT listen to any of them. The sight of an unelected labour leader lecturing Mugabe on democracy after Brown has reneged on a promise to hold a referendum on the EU treaty sticks firmly in the throat.
Thursday was a national cry of enough is enough! Get out of power and never darken our political landscape with your oppressive centrist authoritarian politically correct ineptitude and corruption ever again.
The media that keep referring to this as the "abolition" of the 10p tax band will never ever get why this is such a pivotal moment and I cannot for the life of me understand why the media will keep insisting of referring to it as the abolition of the 10p band, as if just re-instating the 10p band will make everything OK again... It won't.
The fact that the labour party doubled the income tax whilst prices rise and at the same time have set aside hundreds of billions of pounds to bail out bankers has shown that the mask has slipped to reveal, in all it's ghastly nastiness, the real face of labour's leadership, this cannot be undone. Putting the mask back will not make people forget the horror's that laid beneath.
I would ask that anyone who still had the hatred in their hearts or the mendacity to vote labour to explain to me, how it is morally acceptable to spend billions bailing out the billionaire bankers whilst doubling the income tax on 5 million of the poorest workers in the land? This is a spiteful and cruel act upon a minority group of some of the most vulnerable people in the land. Spiteful and cruel acts on homosexuals are now illegal. spiteful and cruel acts against people because of the colour of their skin is now illegal.
In my humble opinion, voting labour now is on a par with racism or gender/sexual preference discrimination and should be legally classed as a hate crime.
Saturday, April 19, 2008
Why the FUCK are the media STILL calling this...
... the abolition of the 10p tax rate???
For the low paid worker opening his or [more likely] her wage slip, they will not see that their income tax has been abolished. The poorest workers in the land will see that their income tax has been doubled. They will see their income tax increased by 100%!!!
THAT is what labour truly think of the working poor.
The media ought to call this the DOUBLING of the 10p tax band.
Labour, the 100% tax increase party. The screw the poor party. The nasty3 party
Remember this when you go to vote.
For the low paid worker opening his or [more likely] her wage slip, they will not see that their income tax has been abolished. The poorest workers in the land will see that their income tax has been doubled. They will see their income tax increased by 100%!!!
THAT is what labour truly think of the working poor.
The media ought to call this the DOUBLING of the 10p tax band.
Labour, the 100% tax increase party. The screw the poor party. The nasty3 party
Remember this when you go to vote.
Indulgent Nonsense
Axis of evil
So that bastion of labour ideals, Ed Balls, the education secretary of the party created out of the sweat and grit of millions of the hard-working poor, has nailed the final nail in the coffin of the labour party's dedication to the poor. When responding to labour MP's alledged concern for the working poor that will be hit hardest by having their income tax doubled at a time of run-away inflation in the fuel and food markets and the fear of labour councillors that are looking at being thrown out of office by the very working poor that they claim to represent, said:
"The efforts of local councillors and shadow leaders should not be undermined by this kind of indulgent nonsense."
INDULGENT NONSENSE? From the minister who brought you "SO WHAT?" in response to the poor being hit hardest by the collapsing mortgage markets and increasing taxes and runaway inflation...
The hard-working poor, the backbone of this nation, are really struggling and are facing massive difficulties. The labour leadership's response? So what? To care for the working poor is "indulgent nonesense"
Remember that when you go and vote.
Thursday, April 17, 2008
I am sick of the BBC Harping on about Mugabe!
Why should Mugabe listen to Gordon Brown on democracy?
How many national elections has Brown or HIS labour party actually won? Oh yeah, NONE!
In fact since taking over the office of Prime Minister, Brown has scrapped election manifesto promises without any democratic consultation or electoral mandate. To make his "democratic" credentials even worse, the central election promise that he overturned was to hold a democratic referendum on the future of this country regarding it's electoral accountability in law-making vis-a-vis rule from the unelected EU!
Even Mugabe has more democratic credentials than Brown. And don't forget that Blair's labour party was "elected" by only 22% of the adult population. Even then postal vote fraud on behalf of the labour party was rife and that was in a system in which labour were already gifted a 66 seat majority before any counting of votes started. If labour and tory had received exactly the same number of votes, the constituency boundaries were drawn up in such a way as to gift labour a 66 seat in-built majority.
Given all this built in bias, the vote fraud and the result showing that only 22% of adults that voted for Blair's labour party on the understanding that he would serve a full third term, AND the promise that even if the voters disagreed with labour on the EU, that was not an election matter as they were promised a referendum. Then this hardly represents any kind of democratic mandate for Blair, and no democratic mandate for Brown at all.
Even Mugabe's Presidential result (an alleged and suspected loss) has probably secured a greater level of popular support than labour attained under Blair in 2005. It is only our very biased and undemocratic system that let Labour into power at all. I suspect that although Mugabe would definitely lose, he would still get more than 22% in an honest election.
It is about time that the BBC was a lot more honest about the (current) total and absolute lack of democratic accountability or democratic legitimacy in this country, before they attack another nation which, ironically, is actually MORE democratic than here.
How many national elections has Brown or HIS labour party actually won? Oh yeah, NONE!
In fact since taking over the office of Prime Minister, Brown has scrapped election manifesto promises without any democratic consultation or electoral mandate. To make his "democratic" credentials even worse, the central election promise that he overturned was to hold a democratic referendum on the future of this country regarding it's electoral accountability in law-making vis-a-vis rule from the unelected EU!
Even Mugabe has more democratic credentials than Brown. And don't forget that Blair's labour party was "elected" by only 22% of the adult population. Even then postal vote fraud on behalf of the labour party was rife and that was in a system in which labour were already gifted a 66 seat majority before any counting of votes started. If labour and tory had received exactly the same number of votes, the constituency boundaries were drawn up in such a way as to gift labour a 66 seat in-built majority.
Given all this built in bias, the vote fraud and the result showing that only 22% of adults that voted for Blair's labour party on the understanding that he would serve a full third term, AND the promise that even if the voters disagreed with labour on the EU, that was not an election matter as they were promised a referendum. Then this hardly represents any kind of democratic mandate for Blair, and no democratic mandate for Brown at all.
Even Mugabe's Presidential result (an alleged and suspected loss) has probably secured a greater level of popular support than labour attained under Blair in 2005. It is only our very biased and undemocratic system that let Labour into power at all. I suspect that although Mugabe would definitely lose, he would still get more than 22% in an honest election.
It is about time that the BBC was a lot more honest about the (current) total and absolute lack of democratic accountability or democratic legitimacy in this country, before they attack another nation which, ironically, is actually MORE democratic than here.
Guest Opinion: Dissenters on global warming face attacks - Wayne Holbrook
Apparently the global warming zealots have decided that if they can’t destroy the facts, they will destroy anyone who questions them.
Dr. S. Fred Singer is an accomplished scientist whose outspoken questioning of global warming earned him one of the most outrageous media smear pieces ever aired. Dr. Singer’s accomplishments are too lengthy to list, but they include the invention of the instrument to measure stratospheric ozone.Among his many prominent positions, he was the first director of the National Weather Satellite Center and held key administrative posts in the EPA, DOT and Department of the Interior.
Continues....
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
My reply to a common last retort of the very few labour supporters left....
"Can the Tories do any better? I think not."
Well, Did the Tories:
Lie repeatedly to invade a sovereign nation that was no threat, in clear breach of Geneva conventions?
Spy on and invade everyone's privacy to a degree that has never been seen in this country before, building a police surveillance state?
Lose all the private, personal financial data of all parents in the UK?
Fill our prisons with OAP council tax protesters whilst letting out criminals and convicted terrorists early for lack of space?
Break a central promise of their last manifesto to grant a referendum on the EU treaty? Whilst overseeing the break-up of the UK into powerless regions to be ruled by the unelected EU oligarchy?
Sell our nation's gold at an all time low and squander the proceeds?
Squander the tax revenue from private pension funds?
Or double the income taxes of the poorest workers in the land whilst food and fuel inflation sky rockets?
The Tories were NEVER this bad!
Well, Did the Tories:
Lie repeatedly to invade a sovereign nation that was no threat, in clear breach of Geneva conventions?
Spy on and invade everyone's privacy to a degree that has never been seen in this country before, building a police surveillance state?
Lose all the private, personal financial data of all parents in the UK?
Fill our prisons with OAP council tax protesters whilst letting out criminals and convicted terrorists early for lack of space?
Break a central promise of their last manifesto to grant a referendum on the EU treaty? Whilst overseeing the break-up of the UK into powerless regions to be ruled by the unelected EU oligarchy?
Sell our nation's gold at an all time low and squander the proceeds?
Squander the tax revenue from private pension funds?
Or double the income taxes of the poorest workers in the land whilst food and fuel inflation sky rockets?
The Tories were NEVER this bad!
Monday, April 14, 2008
There will be no return to boom and bust economics under a Labour Government
Oh really????
This shows that the FTSE as a measure of British companies worth over the last 24 years. A gradual improvement during the Conservative administration punctuated by the 1987 crash, but that was a rapid fall followed by an immediate return to a steady growth.
Under Labour there has what can only be described as a boom and bust on steroids. After 11 years of labour mis-rule the FTSE is now barely above what it was when they came to power in 1997. Allowing for real inflation, that is quite a big loss in value in real terms.
From 2000 the FTSE went on a downward spiral for 3 years. NOTE this stared over a year before the terrorist attacks on New York that closed the NYSE and actually, the stocks recovered for a while after 9/11 before collapsing further as shown below:
The FTSE fell and recovered for a few months, before continuing the slide that started in 2000.The Boom and Bust economic policy employed by labour has been continuously mis-reported by a media enthralled and seemingly mesmerised by Tony Blair.
It has only taken 9 months of the Brown Government for the spell to be broken and for people to see what I have been seeing since 1997.
Labour are bereft of economic competence and have been destroying the economy for years.
Now Gordon Brown is DOUBLING the tax on the poorest workers. He has NOT aboliched the 10p rate of tax, he has DOUBLED it!
He has no ideas left, he squandered the golden economic legacy of the Tory years, he has stolen and squandered the value in private pensions and he has squandered the nation's gold reserves at a time when Gold's price was at rock bottom.
There is only one party who has shown a boom and bust economic mis-management of our economy and that is the Labour Party. This is NOT a recommendation of the Conservative party, merely accurate critisism of the Labour party, and a comparison with the previous Tory administration that was rightly booted out of power in 1997.
It is just such a terrible shame that it was the disaster that is Labour, and not a PRO UK party, that took over in 1997.
My take on the Credit Crunch!
Whilst I know that fractional reserve banking means that money is created out of thin air (based on a 10-1 ratio of 1 pound deposited means 10 can be lent out) and interest charged upon it. And this allows a system in which the economy is dependent on the banks lending enough into circulation to repay outstanding loans plus interest. Once the banks decide to lend less. a recession is inevitable. And I know that occasionally the banks deliberately stop lending enough to cover the existing loans so that they can take back tangible assets at a fraction of their real worth and create a recession or depression for political purposes. I shall add a little more on this later
However the current credit squeeze is a little different as it seems to be the big banks that are getting hit first and hardest.
It could just be that the big banks have been "played" at their own game and some derivative managers have retired on a fortune at their expense?
Here is how the game has been played.
The smaller mortgage and realty based banks in the US had been lending sub-prime to self assessed debtors for a while, due to ridiculously low interest rates a few years ago.
These smaller banks realised that they could lend out lots of money to people who could not afford to repay and these banks didn't have to worry about re-payments as they immediately sold on the debt to other money market types who then sliced and diced these "worthless" loans and sold them onto the big banks as secure financial instruments with a high value rating.
These middlemen took their cut and retired very very rich too.
The big banks fractional reserve banking relies on the worthless "money" that they create out of thin air in the form of loans actually being re-paid for their scam to continue to work.
This credit squeeze might not be the standard market contraction that the banks deliberately create occasionally to repossess tangible assets at a fraction of their worth, and to put political pressure on world leaders to capitulate to the banker's demands. As in the 1920's crash that enabled the Federal Reserve Banks (Via the US Government) to steal all of the nation's private gold. Nobody knows what has happened to that gold since.
The reason? The big Federal Reserve banks could not have private gold in existence that could rival the worthless I.O.U's known as federal reserve notes as a means of measuring wealth for the masses.
But what could the big bankers want now? They already, literally, own everything. Their plans for utter and total global domination are well on track, and money, as in cash, folding notes and coins that can literally be in the possession of individuals, outside of the banks control, are soon to be eliminated. All money will be transacted electronically at the whim of the bankers before too long. And anyway, folding money is not effected by this credit squeeze.
So what is the purpose of the credit squeeze if it IS the big banks behind it?
After all, why would the banker's be demanding anything from the world leaders who currently pay fealty to them now?
I think that these banks have been played for billions maybe even a trillion or two and now the great scam, the greatest and largest financial fraud in the history of mankind which is the fractional reserve banking of a fiat currency, may be about to fall.
There is very real desperation in the world's banking fraternity at the moment and it is only going to get a lot worse.
But it could be the very thing that is needed to remove mankind from the banker's control web and allow us to truly evolve.
However the current credit squeeze is a little different as it seems to be the big banks that are getting hit first and hardest.
It could just be that the big banks have been "played" at their own game and some derivative managers have retired on a fortune at their expense?
Here is how the game has been played.
The smaller mortgage and realty based banks in the US had been lending sub-prime to self assessed debtors for a while, due to ridiculously low interest rates a few years ago.
These smaller banks realised that they could lend out lots of money to people who could not afford to repay and these banks didn't have to worry about re-payments as they immediately sold on the debt to other money market types who then sliced and diced these "worthless" loans and sold them onto the big banks as secure financial instruments with a high value rating.
These middlemen took their cut and retired very very rich too.
The big banks fractional reserve banking relies on the worthless "money" that they create out of thin air in the form of loans actually being re-paid for their scam to continue to work.
This credit squeeze might not be the standard market contraction that the banks deliberately create occasionally to repossess tangible assets at a fraction of their worth, and to put political pressure on world leaders to capitulate to the banker's demands. As in the 1920's crash that enabled the Federal Reserve Banks (Via the US Government) to steal all of the nation's private gold. Nobody knows what has happened to that gold since.
The reason? The big Federal Reserve banks could not have private gold in existence that could rival the worthless I.O.U's known as federal reserve notes as a means of measuring wealth for the masses.
But what could the big bankers want now? They already, literally, own everything. Their plans for utter and total global domination are well on track, and money, as in cash, folding notes and coins that can literally be in the possession of individuals, outside of the banks control, are soon to be eliminated. All money will be transacted electronically at the whim of the bankers before too long. And anyway, folding money is not effected by this credit squeeze.
So what is the purpose of the credit squeeze if it IS the big banks behind it?
After all, why would the banker's be demanding anything from the world leaders who currently pay fealty to them now?
I think that these banks have been played for billions maybe even a trillion or two and now the great scam, the greatest and largest financial fraud in the history of mankind which is the fractional reserve banking of a fiat currency, may be about to fall.
There is very real desperation in the world's banking fraternity at the moment and it is only going to get a lot worse.
But it could be the very thing that is needed to remove mankind from the banker's control web and allow us to truly evolve.
Thursday, April 10, 2008
What about the threat of Man-Made global knee-jerking?
Thank god for sites like whatreallyhappened.com, prisonplanet.com and others that have the balls to report news that the likes of the BBC are too shit scared of for fear of upsetting the climate cultists. Without these sites opening the door and allowing me to go through it to find the information that is deliberately with-held by the mainstream media, the truth about climate change and the threat that the knee-jerk reaction to a fraudulent theory, would not be as widely available.
Yes, this information is deliberately with-held by the BBC and others who are actively censoring the truth under pressure from the global warming cult.
This is leading to the following effects being felt globally:
World grain, corn and rice prices at an all time high, mass starvation imminent, huge areas of ancient natural forests eradicated forever, with the Orang-utans on the verge of extinction, all to make room for fuel crops. Bio-fuel has been found to be much more harmful to the environment and have a greater carbon footprint than regular fuel and yet the clamour to produce it is causing enormous and growing problems for the world. Taxes and fuel costs rising alarmingly and the entire global economy put under severe threat. as remedies costing trillions of dollars are being demanded to cut CO2 by 60 - 80% by 2050.
This shows what happens when there is a knee-jerk reaction to dogmatic misunderstanding of complex systems (and a healthy dose of greed)! We run the risk of wrecking the global economy, implementing damaging environmental policies that would cause greater environmental harm and starve the third world in order to avert "global warming" at a time when temperatures are currently falling precipitously.
How dare the global warming alarmists tell us that there is consensus on global warming when they do not even know how and why clouds form and behave at different levels of altitude, and how rainfall is created and how it effects global climate? They don't know how the sun effects the climate, they don't know a heck of a lot about how the climate works and many of these important sub climate systems are performing incorrectly in their computer models or they are omitted entirely.
Yet Al Gore "claims" that there is NO DOUBT????
Nonsense. The fact is, their models are WRONG.
The only place where evidence can be found for CO2 driving global warming to some mystical tipping point is in their computer models, (and that is only in a tiny minority of models too). NONE of which predicted the near decade of temperature stasis followed by a dramatic fall in temperatures that has, in reality, happened to the only real model of the climate we have.
The theoretical models have many minor flaws and one major fundamental flaw in them. The tropospheric heat island that the theories predict should be growing (and creating a positive feedback loop) is actually rather conspicuous by its absence in the real world. It is NOT there. Without this heat island, all the other mechanisms of man-made global warming cannot occur. The NASA Aqua satellite data shows clearly that the climate regulates itself. That is why the earth has not fried to a crisp at times in the distant past when CO2 was at far higher concentrations in the atmosphere than today. That is why we get ice ages and then come out of the ice ages. All natural and without man's help.
In simple language, there is NO Significant Anthropogenic Global Warming. NONE! That is why the earth is currently cooling!
Yes CO2 does effect climate, yes it is a green house gas, but without the heat island high in the troposphere, there cannot be a cataclysmic infinite positive feedback loop. Instead we see a law of diminishing returns. The CO2 is effective as concentrations rise and then as the more CO2 is added, the less of an effect it has. Like painting over glass with thin paint. The first coat has a major effect of cutting out light. the second coat cuts out some more, the third a bit more, but the fourth and subsequent coats have no more effect.
So the raise in CO2 we have seen will raise temperatures slightly. (the vast majority of the raise in CO2 has been natural anyway) Maybe by a maximum of 2 degrees over 2 centuries then the climate regulates itself.
2 degrees is the target that the EU wishes to stall the temperature at, or rather, since global temperatures have dropped by half a degree in the last year, perhaps that should be 2.5 degrees.
Well it seems that we may not even get to a 2 degree rise. and certainly we are not going to exceed it and that will happen without humans taking any action whatsoever.
The EU needs to get on board with the latest science, because otherwise, we are going to spend TRILLIONS and cause massive disruption to our way of life, for no gain whatsoever.
CO2 is NOT a pollutant, it is a natural gas.
Global politicians should be delighted, global catastrophe had been averted and we didn't even have to do anything about it. Yippee?
No, the alarmists need a great Satan. It is not a scientific thing, it is a human condition thing. The leaders always need something to scare the followers with. You know, to keep them in-line. The followers need something to believe in. Something they themselves cannot control, something bigger than themselves, so that they can maintain trust in the leaders and allow someone else to make decisions for them, but it must be something that they can participate in, so they can have a sense of belonging.
Religion does not work in the west as a great fearful motivator anymore, the fear of communism has gone away, science has taken over.
Without global warming to unite the globe in slavery to our benevolent democratic global leaders, what is there?
Oh yeah, "human induced climate disruption!!!"
What? It's snowing in Greece? darn those pesky humans!!!
Yes, this information is deliberately with-held by the BBC and others who are actively censoring the truth under pressure from the global warming cult.
This is leading to the following effects being felt globally:
World grain, corn and rice prices at an all time high, mass starvation imminent, huge areas of ancient natural forests eradicated forever, with the Orang-utans on the verge of extinction, all to make room for fuel crops. Bio-fuel has been found to be much more harmful to the environment and have a greater carbon footprint than regular fuel and yet the clamour to produce it is causing enormous and growing problems for the world. Taxes and fuel costs rising alarmingly and the entire global economy put under severe threat. as remedies costing trillions of dollars are being demanded to cut CO2 by 60 - 80% by 2050.
This shows what happens when there is a knee-jerk reaction to dogmatic misunderstanding of complex systems (and a healthy dose of greed)! We run the risk of wrecking the global economy, implementing damaging environmental policies that would cause greater environmental harm and starve the third world in order to avert "global warming" at a time when temperatures are currently falling precipitously.
How dare the global warming alarmists tell us that there is consensus on global warming when they do not even know how and why clouds form and behave at different levels of altitude, and how rainfall is created and how it effects global climate? They don't know how the sun effects the climate, they don't know a heck of a lot about how the climate works and many of these important sub climate systems are performing incorrectly in their computer models or they are omitted entirely.
Yet Al Gore "claims" that there is NO DOUBT????
Nonsense. The fact is, their models are WRONG.
The only place where evidence can be found for CO2 driving global warming to some mystical tipping point is in their computer models, (and that is only in a tiny minority of models too). NONE of which predicted the near decade of temperature stasis followed by a dramatic fall in temperatures that has, in reality, happened to the only real model of the climate we have.
The theoretical models have many minor flaws and one major fundamental flaw in them. The tropospheric heat island that the theories predict should be growing (and creating a positive feedback loop) is actually rather conspicuous by its absence in the real world. It is NOT there. Without this heat island, all the other mechanisms of man-made global warming cannot occur. The NASA Aqua satellite data shows clearly that the climate regulates itself. That is why the earth has not fried to a crisp at times in the distant past when CO2 was at far higher concentrations in the atmosphere than today. That is why we get ice ages and then come out of the ice ages. All natural and without man's help.
In simple language, there is NO Significant Anthropogenic Global Warming. NONE! That is why the earth is currently cooling!
Yes CO2 does effect climate, yes it is a green house gas, but without the heat island high in the troposphere, there cannot be a cataclysmic infinite positive feedback loop. Instead we see a law of diminishing returns. The CO2 is effective as concentrations rise and then as the more CO2 is added, the less of an effect it has. Like painting over glass with thin paint. The first coat has a major effect of cutting out light. the second coat cuts out some more, the third a bit more, but the fourth and subsequent coats have no more effect.
So the raise in CO2 we have seen will raise temperatures slightly. (the vast majority of the raise in CO2 has been natural anyway) Maybe by a maximum of 2 degrees over 2 centuries then the climate regulates itself.
2 degrees is the target that the EU wishes to stall the temperature at, or rather, since global temperatures have dropped by half a degree in the last year, perhaps that should be 2.5 degrees.
Well it seems that we may not even get to a 2 degree rise. and certainly we are not going to exceed it and that will happen without humans taking any action whatsoever.
The EU needs to get on board with the latest science, because otherwise, we are going to spend TRILLIONS and cause massive disruption to our way of life, for no gain whatsoever.
CO2 is NOT a pollutant, it is a natural gas.
Global politicians should be delighted, global catastrophe had been averted and we didn't even have to do anything about it. Yippee?
No, the alarmists need a great Satan. It is not a scientific thing, it is a human condition thing. The leaders always need something to scare the followers with. You know, to keep them in-line. The followers need something to believe in. Something they themselves cannot control, something bigger than themselves, so that they can maintain trust in the leaders and allow someone else to make decisions for them, but it must be something that they can participate in, so they can have a sense of belonging.
Religion does not work in the west as a great fearful motivator anymore, the fear of communism has gone away, science has taken over.
Without global warming to unite the globe in slavery to our benevolent democratic global leaders, what is there?
Oh yeah, "human induced climate disruption!!!"
What? It's snowing in Greece? darn those pesky humans!!!
Wednesday, April 09, 2008
The tipping point of the "global warming" scam!
I have published here a story that is so important that it must be printed in its entirety: (Just in case the original does not stay online) The original is here in the National Business Review and is written by Owen McShane
o -===================================- o
In December last year, at the UN conference in Bali, I heard Viscount Monckton present a paper prepared by himself, the Australian Dr David Evans and our own Dr Vincent Gray (who were at Bali, too) that showed while the IPCC models predict that greenhouse gases would produce an extensive "hot spot" in the upper troposphere over the tropics, the satellite measurements show no such hotspots have appeared.
Monckton and Evans found a large part of this discrepancy is the result of some basic errors in the IPCC's assessment of the Stefan-Boltzmann equation. When they applied their revised factor to the effect of greenhouse gases, the temperature rise was about a third of that predicted by the IPCC.
So by late last year we not only knew IPCC forecasts of atmospheric global warming were wrong; we were beginning to understand why they are wrong.
The key issue in this debate is whether anthropogenic greenhouse gases or natural solar activities are the prime drivers of climate change. A closely related argument is whether the climate is highly sensitive to carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere.
Doubtful predictions
Put together, these uncertainties raise doubts as to whether the IPCC models can accurately forecast the climate over the long term. If they cannot, then we have to wonder how much damage we should risk doing to the world's economies in attempts to manage the possibly adverse effects of these "predictions."
The findings that the predicted "tropical hot spots" do not exist are important because the IPCC models assume these hot spots will be formed by increased evaporation from warmer oceans leading to the accumulations of higher concentrations of water vapour in the upper atmosphere, and thereby generating a positive feedback reinforcing the small amount of warming that can be caused by CO2 alone.
Atmospheric scientists generally agree that as carbon dioxide levels increase there is a law of "diminishing returns" - or more properly "diminishing effects" - and that ongoing increases in CO2 concentration do not generate proportional increases in temperature. The common analogy is painting over window glass. The first layers of paint cut out lots of light but subsequent layers have diminishing impact.
So, you might be asking, why the panic? Why does Al Gore talk about temperatures spiraling out of control, causing mass extinctions and catastrophic rises in sea-level, and all his other disastrous outcomes when there is no evidence to support it?
The alarmists argue that increased CO2 leads to more water vapour - the main greenhouse gas - and this provides positive feedback and hence makes the overall climate highly sensitive to small increases in the concentration of CO2.
Consequently, the IPCC argues that while carbon dioxide may well "run out of puff" the consequent evaporation of water vapour provides the positive feedback loop that will make anthropogenic global warming reach dangerous levels.
This assumption that water vapour provides positive feedback lies behind the famous "tipping point," which nourishes Al Gore's dreams of destruction, and indeed all those calls for action now - "before it is too late!" But no climate models predict such a tipping point.
However, while the absence of hot spots has refuted one important aspect of the IPCC models we lack a mechanism that fully explains these supposed outcomes. Hence the IPCC, and its supporters, have been able to ignore this "refutation."
So by the end of last year, we were in a similar situation to the 19th century astronomers, who had figured out that the sun could not be "burning" its fuel - or it would have turned to ashes long ago - but could not explain where the energy was coming from. Then along came Einstein and E=mc2.
Hard to explain
Similarly, the climate sceptics have had to explain why the hotspots are not where they should be - not just challenge the theory with their observations.
This is why I felt so lucky to be in the right place at the right time when I heard Roy Spencer speak at the New York conference on climate change in March. At first I thought this was just another paper setting out observations against the forecasts, further confirming Evans' earlier work.
But as the argument unfolded I realised Spencer was drawing on observations and measurements from the new Aqua satellites to explain the mechanism behind this anomaly between model forecasts and observation. You may have heard that the IPCC models cannot predict clouds and rain with any accuracy. Their models assume water vapour goes up to the troposphere and hangs around to cook us all in a greenhouse future.
However, there is a mechanism at work that "washes out" the water vapour and returns it to the oceans along with the extra CO2 and thus turns the added water vapour into a NEGATIVE feedback mechanism.
The newly discovered mechanism is a combination of clouds and rain (Spencer's mechanism adds to the mechanism earlier identified by Professor Richard Lindzen called the Iris effect).
The IPCC models assumed water vapour formed clouds at high altitudes that lead to further warming. The Aqua satellite observations and Spencer's analysis show water vapour actually forms clouds at low altitudes that lead to cooling.
Furthermore, Spencer shows the extra rain that falls from these clouds cools the underlying oceans, providing a second negative feedback to negate the CO2 warming.
Alarmists' quandary
This has struck the alarmists like a thunderbolt, especially as the lead author of the IPCC chapter on feedback has written to Spencer agreeing that he is right!
There goes the alarmist neighbourhood!
The climate is not highly sensitive to CO2 warming because water vapour is a damper against the warming effect of CO2.
That is why history is full of Ice Ages - where other effects, such as increased reflection from the ice cover, do provide positive feedback - while we do not hear about Heat Ages. The Medieval Warm Period, for example, is known for being benignly warm - not dangerously hot.
We live on a benign planet - except when it occasionally gets damned cold.
While I have done my best to simplify these developments they remain highly technical and many people distrust their own ability to assess competing scientific claims. However, in this case the tipping point theories are based on models that do not include the effects of rain and clouds.
The new Nasa Aqua satellite is the first to measure the effects of clouds and rainfall. Spencer's interpretation of the new data means all previous models and forecasts are obsolete. Would anyone trust long-term forecasts of farm production that were hopeless at forecasting rainfall?
The implications of these breakthroughs in measurement and understanding are dramatic to say the least. The responses will be fun to watch.
Alarmists, 'experts' face a new inconvenient truth
Christopher Pearson, of The Australian newspaper (March 22), has written up a remarkable ABC television interview with Dr Jennifer Marohasy, a senior fellow of the Institute of Public Affairs, a Melbourne-based think tank.
Dr Marohasy says the impact of the Aqua satellite and Spencer's interpretation of the data and prompts the reporter to conclude with some pungent observations of his own:
"If Marohasy is anywhere near right about the impending collapse of the global warming paradigm, life will suddenly become a whole lot more interesting.
"A great many founts of authority, from the Royal Society to the UN, most heads of government along with countless captains of industry, learned professors, commentators and journalists will be profoundly embarrassed. Let us hope it is a prolonged and chastening experience.
"With catastrophe off the agenda, for most people the fog of millennial gloom will lift, at least until attention turns to the prospect of the next ice age. Among the better educated, the sceptical cast of mind that is the basis of empiricism will once again be back in fashion. The delusion that by recycling and catching public transport we can help save the planet will quickly come to be seen for the childish nonsense it was all along.
RAIN CHECK: Spencer's analyses based on new satellite data pour cold rain on warming theory
"The poorest Indians and Chinese will be left in peace to work their way toward prosperity, without being badgered about the size of their carbon-footprint, a concept that for most of us will soon be one with Nineveh and Tyre, clean forgotten in six months.
"The scores of town planners in Australia building empires out of regulating what can and can't be built on low-lying shorelines will have to come to terms with the fact inundation no longer impends and find something more plausible to do. The same is true of the bureaucrats planning to accommodate 'climate refugees."
7-Apr-2008
Monday, April 07, 2008
Some things never change
With the current fake credit crisis heading close to becoming full swing, now would be a good time for a little history lesson:
"In March 1929 there was a little meeting in New York. After that meeting, Bernard Baruch sells out [of stocks], the Rockefellers sell out, the Kennedys sell out, all of the big bankers sell out. The big people were out [of the stock market] by August. Then the Federal Reserve cut the money supply four times in a month. There were four drastic reductions in the money supply."Then one day in October the banks called all of their loans on all of their margins at the same minute. Every bank in the money desk - and these were call loans, callable on demand. People had their stock on margin, borrowing 90%. Now they went to the banks and the banks weren't lending, they were calling. They run to the market and everyone's trying to sell. The banks had shut the money off. The call desks were closed. The money desk shut down....and all these people were running around trying to sell because they had to sell 10% down and they were wiped out. All of the people who weren't on the inside were gone."
Some things never change, it would seem.
Now a little economic lesson:
The economy grows when the banks lend more money into circulation than is needed simply to repay the loans already lent + interest on those loans.Remember this when your home/business is being repossessed/foreclosed. Then you know who really is to blame!
The economy shrinks when the banks stop lending as much as is needed to repay the loans + interest.
The state of the economy is entirely down to the banks. Simple really.
BBC caught outright lying and censoring truth AGAIN!
So the BBC changed it's misleading article linked in my previous post. the suggestion that the CURRENT La Nina has caused the last decade's cooling clearly will not wash, and so, after pressure from the cultists, they caved in and removed any reference to the last 10 years worth of cooling.
(The same 10 years of cooling that NO SINGLE COMPUTER MODEL MANAGED TO PREDICT!)
Rather than debate science, evidence, or truth, these alarmist cultists are trying to censor the truth and stifle debate and opinion.
They are Just like the King Canutes and the flat earthers rolled into one.
They have lost the argument and should just fuck off and die and let the rest of us get on with our lives in peace. They think humans are acting like a virus and are killing the planet??? Fine, do something about it and KILL YOURSELVES you worthless, lying, fanatical fuckwits!
I am becoming more and more convinced that AGW is a major scam and is completely Bullshit. the AGW alarmist cultist's own behaviour is the major driver in this opinion shift. IF they had any decent, un-discredited evidence left, I would listen. But they don't. so they should just fuck off!
(The same 10 years of cooling that NO SINGLE COMPUTER MODEL MANAGED TO PREDICT!)
Rather than debate science, evidence, or truth, these alarmist cultists are trying to censor the truth and stifle debate and opinion.
They are Just like the King Canutes and the flat earthers rolled into one.
They have lost the argument and should just fuck off and die and let the rest of us get on with our lives in peace. They think humans are acting like a virus and are killing the planet??? Fine, do something about it and KILL YOURSELVES you worthless, lying, fanatical fuckwits!
I am becoming more and more convinced that AGW is a major scam and is completely Bullshit. the AGW alarmist cultist's own behaviour is the major driver in this opinion shift. IF they had any decent, un-discredited evidence left, I would listen. But they don't. so they should just fuck off!
Friday, April 04, 2008
So global warming means time travel is possible?
Global temperatures this year will be lower than in 2007 due to the cooling effect of the La Nina current in the Pacific, UN meteorologists have said.
The World Meteorological Organisation's secretary-general, Michel Jarraud, told the BBC it was likely that La Nina would continue into the summer.
This would mean global temperatures have not risen since 1998, prompting some to question climate change theory.
======================================
OK so THIS year's La Nina, means that global temperatures have not risen since 1998???
And the alarmists wonder why people are not taken in by the global warming hysteria???
the article continues:
But experts have also forecast a record high temperature within five years.
=======================================
OK so this means "Yeah OK, we KNOW the earth is now cooling, BUT the temperature WILL rise again at some point in the future, so keep paying your carbon taxes and let us monitor all your activities, just in case you are trying to destroy the planet, you viral human scum!"
The only problem with what these "weather forecasters" is saying is, the fact that this season's La Nina started AFTER the cooling started.
According to the NASA Aqua satellite system and the Argo sub-sea system of global temperature monitoring, the cooling has been happening for some years. Other data contradicts this, and shows the year to 2007 as the second warmest year since 1998. The problem is, we are not getting a total accurate picture of global temperature yet, and much of the data measured has been measured in places different to earlier years and these locations may be in warmer places, regardless of global warming, thus the figures could be misleading.
Thursday, March 27, 2008
Ice Sheet hanging on by a thread!!!
so I guess this is proof of man-made global warming then?
Well, no actually. And I shall now explain why:
- This is happening at the end of summer. The ice has been weakened by the normal, every year event called summertime.
- The scientists failed to mention the large earthquake that happened in the pacific-Antarctic Ridge. This is what may have provided the energy required to break the ice in such a straight uniform crack. A crack that is NOT typical of ice-sheet cracks observed in the past.
- There is evidence that there has been significant volcanic activity in the region: http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/node/1810
- This ice-shelf may have been stable for a hundred years, but that is nothing in geological terms, The South Pole had no ice whatsoever only 14000 years ago. These ice shelves have melted many times in the past.
- even IF this was helped by global warming, there is still NO scientific consensus that the warming of the 20th century was caused by man's CO2 emissions. The 400 scientists who had the time, capability and courage to attend the 2008 climate change conference in New York proved that.
There has actually been NO warming for a decade. I am still waiting for the BBC or any other mainstream media outlet to admit this inconvenient truth.
The single most pointless phrase in use today has to be, "Tackling Climate Change"!
The climate has ALWAYS changed. Often at rates and amounts far far greater than it is currently. This tackling climate change phrase makes as much sense as saying we must tackle the earth orbiting the sun!
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
What my Evolution mission is all about. This MUST SEE video.
The purpose of this blog is to present information that allows people to see how they are manipulated by a shadow into giving up their innate power, and to submit to being a tiny, insignificant fraction of who and what they really are. This is in the hope that people will realise who and what they really are and then that they might go on to discover for themselves how to evolve from what they have limited themselves to be, into what they really are. An expression of infinite consciousness that is infinite Love.
The 2 hour video below, explains better than I, what the purpose of this, and thousands of other similar blogs, are actually about.
The 2 hour video below, explains better than I, what the purpose of this, and thousands of other similar blogs, are actually about.
Monday, March 24, 2008
2 more must read articles on climate change.
Climate facts to warm to
Christopher Pearson | March 22, 2008 in The Australian
CATASTROPHIC predictions of global warming usually conjure with the notion of a tipping point, a point of no return.
Last Monday - on ABC Radio National, of all places - there was a tipping point of a different kind in the debate on climate change. It was a remarkable interview involving the co-host of Counterpoint, Michael Duffy and Jennifer Marohasy, a biologist and senior fellow of Melbourne-based think tank the Institute of Public Affairs. Anyone in public life who takes a position on the greenhouse gas hypothesis will ignore it at their peril.
Duffy asked Marohasy: "Is the Earth stillwarming?"
She replied: "No, actually, there has been cooling, if you take 1998 as your point of reference. If you take 2002 as your point of reference, then temperatures have plateaued. This is certainly not what you'd expect if carbon dioxide is driving temperature because carbon dioxide levels have been increasing but temperatures have actually been coming down over the last 10 years."
Continues ...
And
Perhaps The Climate Change Models Are Wrong
Lorne Gunter, National Post Published: Monday, March 24, 2008
They drift along in the worlds' oceans at a depth of 2,000 metres -- more than a mile deep -- constantly monitoring the temperature, salinity, pressure and velocity of the upper oceans.
Then, about once every 10 days, a bladder on the outside of these buoys inflates and raises them slowly to the surface gathering data about each strata of seawater they pass through. After an upward journey of nearly six hours, the Argo monitors bob on the waves while an onboard transmitter sends their information to a satellite that in turn retransmits it to several land-based research computers where it may be accessed by anyone who wishes to see it.
These 3,000 yellow sentinels --about the size and shape of a large fence post -- free-float the world's oceans, season in and season out, surfacing between 30 and 40 times a year, disgorging their findings, then submerging again for another fact-finding voyage.
It's fascinating to watch their progress online. (The URLs are too complex to reproduce here, but Google "Argo Buoy Movement" or "Argo Float Animation," and you will be directed to the links.)
When they were first deployed in 2003, the Argos were hailed for their ability to collect information on ocean conditions more precisely, at more places and greater depths and in more conditions than ever before. No longer would scientists have to rely on measurements mostly at the surface from older scientific buoys or inconsistent shipboard monitors.
So why are some scientists now beginning to question the buoys' findings? Because in five years, the little blighters have failed to detect any global warming. They are not reinforcing the scientific orthodoxy of the day, namely that man is causing the planet to warm dangerously. They are not proving the predetermined conclusions of their human masters. Therefore they, and not their masters' hypotheses, must be wrong.
In fact, "there has been a very slight cooling," according to a U.S. National Public Radio (NPR) interview with Josh Willis at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, a scientist who keeps close watch on the Argo findings.
Continues ...
Christopher Pearson | March 22, 2008 in The Australian
CATASTROPHIC predictions of global warming usually conjure with the notion of a tipping point, a point of no return.
Last Monday - on ABC Radio National, of all places - there was a tipping point of a different kind in the debate on climate change. It was a remarkable interview involving the co-host of Counterpoint, Michael Duffy and Jennifer Marohasy, a biologist and senior fellow of Melbourne-based think tank the Institute of Public Affairs. Anyone in public life who takes a position on the greenhouse gas hypothesis will ignore it at their peril.
Duffy asked Marohasy: "Is the Earth stillwarming?"
She replied: "No, actually, there has been cooling, if you take 1998 as your point of reference. If you take 2002 as your point of reference, then temperatures have plateaued. This is certainly not what you'd expect if carbon dioxide is driving temperature because carbon dioxide levels have been increasing but temperatures have actually been coming down over the last 10 years."
Continues ...
And
Perhaps The Climate Change Models Are Wrong
Lorne Gunter, National Post Published: Monday, March 24, 2008
They drift along in the worlds' oceans at a depth of 2,000 metres -- more than a mile deep -- constantly monitoring the temperature, salinity, pressure and velocity of the upper oceans.
Then, about once every 10 days, a bladder on the outside of these buoys inflates and raises them slowly to the surface gathering data about each strata of seawater they pass through. After an upward journey of nearly six hours, the Argo monitors bob on the waves while an onboard transmitter sends their information to a satellite that in turn retransmits it to several land-based research computers where it may be accessed by anyone who wishes to see it.
These 3,000 yellow sentinels --about the size and shape of a large fence post -- free-float the world's oceans, season in and season out, surfacing between 30 and 40 times a year, disgorging their findings, then submerging again for another fact-finding voyage.
It's fascinating to watch their progress online. (The URLs are too complex to reproduce here, but Google "Argo Buoy Movement" or "Argo Float Animation," and you will be directed to the links.)
When they were first deployed in 2003, the Argos were hailed for their ability to collect information on ocean conditions more precisely, at more places and greater depths and in more conditions than ever before. No longer would scientists have to rely on measurements mostly at the surface from older scientific buoys or inconsistent shipboard monitors.
So why are some scientists now beginning to question the buoys' findings? Because in five years, the little blighters have failed to detect any global warming. They are not reinforcing the scientific orthodoxy of the day, namely that man is causing the planet to warm dangerously. They are not proving the predetermined conclusions of their human masters. Therefore they, and not their masters' hypotheses, must be wrong.
In fact, "there has been a very slight cooling," according to a U.S. National Public Radio (NPR) interview with Josh Willis at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, a scientist who keeps close watch on the Argo findings.
Continues ...
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
2 Must read Articles on Climate Change...
My Nobel Moment
I've had a lot of fun recently with my tiny (and unofficial) slice of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize awarded to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). But, though I was one of thousands of IPCC participants, I don't think I will add "0.0001 Nobel Laureate" to my resume.
The other half of the prize was awarded to former Vice President Al Gore, whose carbon footprint would stomp my neighborhood flat. But that's another story.
Continues ...
AND
IPCC too blinkered and corrupt to save
I've had a lot of fun recently with my tiny (and unofficial) slice of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize awarded to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). But, though I was one of thousands of IPCC participants, I don't think I will add "0.0001 Nobel Laureate" to my resume.
The other half of the prize was awarded to former Vice President Al Gore, whose carbon footprint would stomp my neighborhood flat. But that's another story.
Continues ...
AND
IPCC too blinkered and corrupt to save
Vincent Gray has begun a second career as a climate-change activist. His motivation springs from the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a body that combats global warming by advocating the reduction of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Dr. Gray has worked relentlessly for the IPCC as an expert reviewer since the early 1990s.
But Dr. Gray isn't an activist in the cause of enforcing the Kyoto Protocol and realizing the other goals of the worldwide IPCC process. To the contrary, Dr. Gray's mission, in his new role as cofounder of The New Zealand Climate Science Coalition, is to stop the IPCC from spreading climate-change propaganda that undermines the integrity of science.
Monday, March 17, 2008
In light of the cheap takeover of Bear Stearns ...
Bear Stearns was taken over for a grand price of $2.00 per share. JP Morgan carried on their tradition of swallowing up banks for cents on the dollar, and managed to have the Federal reserve take on all the risk. WHAT A DEAL!!! They just got a major mortgagor for cents on the dollar, a knock down, bargain bucket price.
That means that they now own the mortgages that Bear Stearns owned, that means they now own all those properties and have bought them for a tiny fraction of their market value AND, I remind you, Got the Federal Reserve to take on ALL the risk!
Well lets take a look at what these elite are really thinking:
These people belong to the elite clubs. George Carlin describes them perfectly:
Meanwhile everyday, blue collar, white collar, working and middle class Americans are being royally fucked over and left to live in tent cities:
All this happening whilst JP Morgan gets to own their homes for pennies and dump the risk on the Federal Reserve, who are funded entirely by governments income tax receipts!!!
So that is the taxpayer picking up the tab!
How much more are you going to take before you STOP GIVING YOUR POWER TO THESE 'NEW WORLD ORDER' ELITISTS WHO CONTINUALLY PISS ON YOUR BOOTS AND TELL YOU IT'S RAINING???
If Only ......
Albert Burgess follows on about how Ted Heath committed Treason and how the EEC was set up.
It is a real shame that Albert Burgess does not understand the law, or realise that the offences he quotes are no longer on the statute book and even if they were, there is a time limit applied with the statute of limitations, that the offence must be reported within 3 years.
Sadly he does not appear to have a legal leg to stand on.
for more information:
http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/european-union/47623-treason-3.html
Oh Well, let's try and persuade the Irish to vote against the Lisbon Treaty.
Saturday, March 15, 2008
Congratulations Lewis Hamilton
Lewis Hamilton scored a fine pole position for the opening round of the 2008 FIA Formula 1 world championship. A superb start to the new season.
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Well, self censorship sometimes pays off.
I have had one of my comments published within a speech bubble on the BBC news website. I thought long and hard about what I was going to say about today's Budget Speech.
Then I changed my mind and wrote what was published:
I was going to say that this budget is dressing up the fiscally disasterous economy in the cloak of competence in the same way as a whore dresses up to look like a nun.
But then I thought that they would not publish that.
Then I changed my mind and wrote what was published:
I was going to say that this budget is dressing up the fiscally disasterous economy in the cloak of competence in the same way as a whore dresses up to look like a nun.
But then I thought that they would not publish that.
It’s About Freedom, Not Climatology
When Vaclav Klaus, who has just won reelection as President of the Czech Republic, states that he has comparative advantage over other speakers on the issue of Climate Change, he is trenchantly correct. Klaus lived under the last large central planning scheme – communism. He rejects the offer to live under the even more draconian central plan of our time – climate alarmism and environmentalism.
Klaus explained his déjà vu vantage point to over five hundred participants at the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change assembled at Times Square New York City on March 2–4. Stressing his personally acquired wisdom, Klaus said, "Future dangers will not come from the same source [communism]. The ideology will be different. Its essence [environmentalism and climate alarmism] will, nevertheless, be identical – the attractive, pathetic, at first sight noble idea that transcends the individual in the name of common good, and the enormous self-confidence on the side of its proponents about their right to sacrifice the man and his freedom in order to make this idea a reality."
"What I see in Europe and the U.S.," Klaus cautioned, "is a powerful combination of irresponsibility, of wishful thinking, of implicit believing in some form of Malthusianism, of a cynical approach of those who are themselves sufficiently well-off, together with the strong belief in the possibility of changing the economic nature of things through a radical political project."
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Conspiracy theorists are nutters
Paranoid? Don't Worry; It's All Under Control
By Peter Carlson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 19, 2008;
Have you seen the latest issue of Paranoia magazine?
No? Well, that's not surprising, is it? There's a very good reason why you haven't seen it: They don't want you to see it. They know that Paranoia exposes them and their secret conspiracies to control every aspect of human life......
It continues in this sad predictable and ignorant vein.
My response to Peter Carlson...
Ha ha ha ha ha ha, Those whacky tin-hat conspiracy theorists will believe anything. I mean, let's take a serious look at what a conspiracy ACTUALLY is:
con·spir·a·cy /kÉ™nˈspɪrÉ™si/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[kuhn-spir-uh-see] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun, plural -cies.
1. the act of conspiring.
2. an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.
3. a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose: He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.
4. Law. an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.
Let's look at definition 4. Agreement by 2 or more persons to commit a crime, fraud or OTHER wrongful act. That is conspiracy.
No Government would ever do that, clearly.
OK now some people would foolishly believe that the US or UK Government leaders themselves would be willing to partake in such nonsense.
I mean, you would have to have the leader of the USA and the UK actually have secret meetings to plot to commit a wrongful or fraudulent or illegal act for that to be true.
I mean, it would mean that, Oh, I don't know, Bush and Blair would have meetings, the minutes of which would be kept secret, and at this meeting they would discuss how to arrange for the public to be deceived into supporting, what? a war perhaps? Against whom? Perhaps against a country that bore no threat? But that's OK, these so-called conspirators could lie and invent a threat and even invent actual evidence, like yellowcake uranium. They could easily fake, or have the intelligence services of their own, or an ally nation, fake a report to that effect. Even if that did not work and was uncovered, they could publicly ruin the reputation of those that uncovered the great lie.
I mean the very idea of it? It is preposterous.
OK let's take the most ridiculous 9/11 conspiracy, that 19 cave dwellers from Afghanistan could infiltrate and overcome the most sophisticated air defence system in the world and defeat it, without any inside help whatsoever, and then NOBODY in control that day would face any punishment whatsoever for this incredible security failure that cost the lives of well over 3000 people to date (accounting for the other conspiracy that the New York authorities and the EPA told the population that the air was safe to breathe even though they KNEW FOR A FACT that it was not) and that some of those responsible for, and failed in, keeping the country safe on that day were actually promoted instead?
Why that is a conspiracy so crazy that even the joint chairs of the official 9/11 commission even refuse to stand by their own findings, citing too much interference and obstruction from the administration. The same administration, that is, that was in charge that day and rewarded people who failed in their duty, even to the point of being guilty of gross criminal negligence, with promotions and medals of honour.
No you are right, conspiracies are something only other countries leaderships partake in. Shadowy, undemocratic regimes that do not value freedom undertake plots and conspiracies, not the United States. Underhand rogue states that do not allow people the freedom to go about their day without their emails, and telephone calls being intercepted and listened to. Regimes that can break into a persons house without a search warrant just because they feel like it. Regimes that kidnap people and fly them around the world and treat them harshly to extract fake confessions to prop up fake policies. They would detain people for years without charge or trial at secret prisons or even military bases. Regimes that increasingly keep things secret from their ever more fearful populations, whilst expecting the populations to offer up more and more personal details so that these shadowy rogue governments can track and ultimately control their serf populations.
Those are the kind of Rogue States that may stoop to underhand conspiracies and plots, not the great and free USA, THE Land of Freedom.
You are right, conspiracy theorists are nutters!
By Peter Carlson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 19, 2008;
Have you seen the latest issue of Paranoia magazine?
No? Well, that's not surprising, is it? There's a very good reason why you haven't seen it: They don't want you to see it. They know that Paranoia exposes them and their secret conspiracies to control every aspect of human life......
It continues in this sad predictable and ignorant vein.
My response to Peter Carlson...
Ha ha ha ha ha ha, Those whacky tin-hat conspiracy theorists will believe anything. I mean, let's take a serious look at what a conspiracy ACTUALLY is:
con·spir·a·cy /kÉ™nˈspɪrÉ™si/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[kuhn-spir-uh-see] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun, plural -cies.
1. the act of conspiring.
2. an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.
3. a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose: He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.
4. Law. an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.
Let's look at definition 4. Agreement by 2 or more persons to commit a crime, fraud or OTHER wrongful act. That is conspiracy.
No Government would ever do that, clearly.
OK now some people would foolishly believe that the US or UK Government leaders themselves would be willing to partake in such nonsense.
I mean, you would have to have the leader of the USA and the UK actually have secret meetings to plot to commit a wrongful or fraudulent or illegal act for that to be true.
I mean, it would mean that, Oh, I don't know, Bush and Blair would have meetings, the minutes of which would be kept secret, and at this meeting they would discuss how to arrange for the public to be deceived into supporting, what? a war perhaps? Against whom? Perhaps against a country that bore no threat? But that's OK, these so-called conspirators could lie and invent a threat and even invent actual evidence, like yellowcake uranium. They could easily fake, or have the intelligence services of their own, or an ally nation, fake a report to that effect. Even if that did not work and was uncovered, they could publicly ruin the reputation of those that uncovered the great lie.
I mean the very idea of it? It is preposterous.
OK let's take the most ridiculous 9/11 conspiracy, that 19 cave dwellers from Afghanistan could infiltrate and overcome the most sophisticated air defence system in the world and defeat it, without any inside help whatsoever, and then NOBODY in control that day would face any punishment whatsoever for this incredible security failure that cost the lives of well over 3000 people to date (accounting for the other conspiracy that the New York authorities and the EPA told the population that the air was safe to breathe even though they KNEW FOR A FACT that it was not) and that some of those responsible for, and failed in, keeping the country safe on that day were actually promoted instead?
Why that is a conspiracy so crazy that even the joint chairs of the official 9/11 commission even refuse to stand by their own findings, citing too much interference and obstruction from the administration. The same administration, that is, that was in charge that day and rewarded people who failed in their duty, even to the point of being guilty of gross criminal negligence, with promotions and medals of honour.
No you are right, conspiracies are something only other countries leaderships partake in. Shadowy, undemocratic regimes that do not value freedom undertake plots and conspiracies, not the United States. Underhand rogue states that do not allow people the freedom to go about their day without their emails, and telephone calls being intercepted and listened to. Regimes that can break into a persons house without a search warrant just because they feel like it. Regimes that kidnap people and fly them around the world and treat them harshly to extract fake confessions to prop up fake policies. They would detain people for years without charge or trial at secret prisons or even military bases. Regimes that increasingly keep things secret from their ever more fearful populations, whilst expecting the populations to offer up more and more personal details so that these shadowy rogue governments can track and ultimately control their serf populations.
Those are the kind of Rogue States that may stoop to underhand conspiracies and plots, not the great and free USA, THE Land of Freedom.
You are right, conspiracy theorists are nutters!
Democrats WAKE THE HELL UP part II
And according to sources in "The Clinton Chronicles" Hillary's law firm helped launder the drugs money.
Sunday, March 09, 2008
Please, Democrats, WAKE UP!!!
Wake the hell up. These are fronts for the SAME PEOPLE in power. Clinton does NOT represent change. Watch the Clinton chronicles for more info...
Wednesday, March 05, 2008
Michelle Malkin and the puppy conspiracy.
There has been a video flying around the internet that past few days showing a US Marine hurling a puppy off a cliff. I shall not post the vid for 2 reasons.
And, I would add, Be very very very grateful that you have such a leviathan force there for your defence against any would be toss-pot dictator. The Marines are, sadly-but-realistically, essential in this day and age. They keep you safe from foreign aggression.
However, I also add that I seriously wish that they had been exclusively deployed in Afhghanistan to eliminate all traces of Al Queda (CIA, MOSSAD, MI6 and otherwise) instead of being deployed in a illegal, immoral, un-necessary, avoidable war of chosen aggression in Iraq, based on blatant and exposed lies at the time.
It is a testimony to the depth of the mind control training (aka brainwashing) performed on the Marines that they would willingly support an undemocratic, unelected court appointed President (at the time of the invasion) in an illegal war and travel half way around the world to kill hundreds of thousands of people, innocent of any charge of WMD or Terrorist support or collusion in 9/11, and do so without question or compassion or guilt.
So why are people surprised that they could kill a puppy? or take pleasure in the act? Or is it the shock of the moral equivalence between the marine and the "reported" murderers of this other puppy?
(the puppy used to convince a sceptical America that Saddam WAS still developing chemical weapons after all, the Americans could never be so cruel as to kill a puppy, could they? Well obviously yes, and not for research this time either, but purely for fun.)
Whatever, the theme of this article is Michelle Malkin, the right-wing vapid and mindless supporter of neo-con madness and lunacy.
She wrote the following:
OK, I have watched it closely and it is ALIVE and hanging still because of the in-built reflex all puppies (and kittens) have to go limp when grasped at the scruff of the neck, so that their parents can pick them up and move them from danger. It is natural.
For Michelle Malkin to come up with such dire and frankly, amateurish nonsense as the only way to be able to show unwavering support (regardless of the act) of her hired psychotic killers, shows a clear lack of understanding, reason, moral centre and blatant tin-hat style tendencies to elaborate anything into crazy and impossible hypothesis in order to prevent having to accept any possibility that she may be wrong.
The very same charge she accuses truth seekers in relation to what really happened on 9/11 of. Except the main difference is, 9/11 truthers base their information on the actual evidence and the analysis of the world's leading scientists and experts in the fields of engineering, construction, architecture, international security, secret intelligence services, secret government, air traffic control, military, air-defence, industry, politics, and whistle blowers form the CIA, FBI, Politics, etc etc...
She bases her mindless support of this indefensible act on a wild and incorrect theory. I suggest that if anyone ever has the unfortunate experience of actually having to communicate with this empty woman, in relation to anything truthful at all, then they should remind her of her utterly lunatic response to this Marine's cruelty.
She adds:
"Have those expressing outrage over the dubious YouTube video expressed the same outrage at jihadists planting IEDS in sheep and dogs to kill American soldiers?"
Well I agree that those jihadists planting IEDS in sheep and dogs to kill American soldiers are not doing a nice thing, BUT
Michelle Malkin, do the world a favour and retire your blog. It is a waste of electricity.
- It is sick and I will not link to such mindlessly cruel deliberate acts of inhuman cruelty
- It is available on hundreds of other websites
- Oh my god! how cruel and shocking, I cannot believe a fine patriotic American Marine could do such a barbaric thing.
- How in the world is this worse than killing tens of thousands of innocent people in a war based on lies?
And, I would add, Be very very very grateful that you have such a leviathan force there for your defence against any would be toss-pot dictator. The Marines are, sadly-but-realistically, essential in this day and age. They keep you safe from foreign aggression.
However, I also add that I seriously wish that they had been exclusively deployed in Afhghanistan to eliminate all traces of Al Queda (CIA, MOSSAD, MI6 and otherwise) instead of being deployed in a illegal, immoral, un-necessary, avoidable war of chosen aggression in Iraq, based on blatant and exposed lies at the time.
It is a testimony to the depth of the mind control training (aka brainwashing) performed on the Marines that they would willingly support an undemocratic, unelected court appointed President (at the time of the invasion) in an illegal war and travel half way around the world to kill hundreds of thousands of people, innocent of any charge of WMD or Terrorist support or collusion in 9/11, and do so without question or compassion or guilt.
So why are people surprised that they could kill a puppy? or take pleasure in the act? Or is it the shock of the moral equivalence between the marine and the "reported" murderers of this other puppy?
(the puppy used to convince a sceptical America that Saddam WAS still developing chemical weapons after all, the Americans could never be so cruel as to kill a puppy, could they? Well obviously yes, and not for research this time either, but purely for fun.)
Whatever, the theme of this article is Michelle Malkin, the right-wing vapid and mindless supporter of neo-con madness and lunacy.
She wrote the following:
Watch the clip closely. The puppy doesn’t move. It’s clear to me that it’s either dead or a stuffed toy. The sound effects of a dog yapping seem to have been dubbed in.
OK, I have watched it closely and it is ALIVE and hanging still because of the in-built reflex all puppies (and kittens) have to go limp when grasped at the scruff of the neck, so that their parents can pick them up and move them from danger. It is natural.
For Michelle Malkin to come up with such dire and frankly, amateurish nonsense as the only way to be able to show unwavering support (regardless of the act) of her hired psychotic killers, shows a clear lack of understanding, reason, moral centre and blatant tin-hat style tendencies to elaborate anything into crazy and impossible hypothesis in order to prevent having to accept any possibility that she may be wrong.
The very same charge she accuses truth seekers in relation to what really happened on 9/11 of. Except the main difference is, 9/11 truthers base their information on the actual evidence and the analysis of the world's leading scientists and experts in the fields of engineering, construction, architecture, international security, secret intelligence services, secret government, air traffic control, military, air-defence, industry, politics, and whistle blowers form the CIA, FBI, Politics, etc etc...
She bases her mindless support of this indefensible act on a wild and incorrect theory. I suggest that if anyone ever has the unfortunate experience of actually having to communicate with this empty woman, in relation to anything truthful at all, then they should remind her of her utterly lunatic response to this Marine's cruelty.
She adds:
"Have those expressing outrage over the dubious YouTube video expressed the same outrage at jihadists planting IEDS in sheep and dogs to kill American soldiers?"
Well I agree that those jihadists planting IEDS in sheep and dogs to kill American soldiers are not doing a nice thing, BUT
Michelle Malkin, do the world a favour and retire your blog. It is a waste of electricity.
Tuesday, March 04, 2008
Open Letter of Complaint to the BBC.
I would like to know why the BBC has completely failed to cover the The 2008 International Conference on Climate Change in New York. (March 2-4 2008)
Given that the BBC has given exhaustive coverage to the Bali Conference and many other conferences that have been dedicated to promoting the theory of man-made CO2 driven Global Warming and given that the recent Global Cooling (as scientifically verified by all four major global temperature tracking outlets (Hadley, NASA's GISS, UAH, RSS)) stands in stark contrast to the Global Warming "Hysteria" falsely reported as scientific consensus, and given that the BBC is supposed to be politically neutral and report reasonable facts and opinion on all sides of science, politics and the human condition in general, Why has there been no coverage of the New York conference at all? I could find no reference to it at all on the BBC news website.
Uniquely, The New York Conference has been convened in order to definitively demonstrate to the wider world that there is no scientific consensus whatsoever on the theory of man-made global warming, or even on global warming as a definitive direction or outcome of on-going permanent climate change.
The opening remarks of the conference,delivered Sunday, March 2, 2008, include the following:
Is it not newsworthy to show that the very basis upon which major serious global political and economic decisions (that are being forced upon the entire global population) is, in actual fact, completely, totally and absolutely wrong? Namely that the science of AGW is settled and there is global scientific and political consensus demanding that severe global action to tackle climate change be taken immediately?
Hundreds of the world's top scientists and other experts on climate change, [from Australia, Canada, England, France, Hungary, New Zealand, Poland, Russia, Sweden, and of course the United States including from the University of Alabama, Arizona State, Carleton, Central Queensland, Delaware, Durham, and Florida State University, George Mason, Harvard, The Institute Pasteur in Paris, James Cook, John Moores, Johns Hopkins, and the London School of Economics, The University of Mississippi, Monash, Nottingham, Ohio State, Oregon State, Oslo, Ottawa, Rochester, Rockefeller, and the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, the Russian Academy of Sciences, Suffolk University, the University of Virginia, Westminster School of Business (in London), and the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and others] are meeting in New York and presenting cold, hard scientific data that not only contradicts AGW and shows that man is NOT responsible for climate change, (and never has been) but that we may already be entering a prolonged period of dramatic global cooling. There has been no global warming at all for a decade and solar activity points towards much more cooling to come. Some of the scientists and experts attending disagree and say that the earth is generally warming still but mankind is not the cause, others claim mankind may be having a tiny almost negligible effect, but that is the point, there is NO scientific consensus. These scientists are arguing on the scientific principle in analysing the raw data and extrapolating accurate, genuine peer reviewed hard, honest and reliable scientific information. Many of these eminent and world leading scientists include people who actually contributed to the IPCC research (that was subsequently ignored in the summary and final reports due to their scientific conclusions being contradictory to the political outcome of the summary, eg they contradict the theory that man is to blame for the moderate and temporary warming of the last 150 years).
This is a serious and newsworthy conference and to omit it from news coverage, that has been radically supporting climatological news, leaves the BBC open to charges of blatant political bias.
That the BBC will continue to broadcast news that assumes that man-made climate change is a reality and this assumption will be broadcast as if it is actual conclusive proven fact is a given, regardless of the fact that man-made global warming is, in reality, a poor and debatable theory at best.
The BBC, as a public service broadcaster, surely has a duty to inform the British public that this conference is taking place and what this conference is covering and to what purpose.
I am extremely angry and disappointed in the BBC for this blatant omission from the scientific news.
Given that the BBC has given exhaustive coverage to the Bali Conference and many other conferences that have been dedicated to promoting the theory of man-made CO2 driven Global Warming and given that the recent Global Cooling (as scientifically verified by all four major global temperature tracking outlets (Hadley, NASA's GISS, UAH, RSS)) stands in stark contrast to the Global Warming "Hysteria" falsely reported as scientific consensus, and given that the BBC is supposed to be politically neutral and report reasonable facts and opinion on all sides of science, politics and the human condition in general, Why has there been no coverage of the New York conference at all? I could find no reference to it at all on the BBC news website.
Uniquely, The New York Conference has been convened in order to definitively demonstrate to the wider world that there is no scientific consensus whatsoever on the theory of man-made global warming, or even on global warming as a definitive direction or outcome of on-going permanent climate change.
The opening remarks of the conference,delivered Sunday, March 2, 2008, include the following:
"Welcome to the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change.
This is a truly historic event, the first international conference devoted to answering questions overlooked by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. We’re asking questions such as:
* how reliable are the data used to document the recent warming trend?
* how much of the modern warming is natural, and how much is likely the result of human activities?
* how reliable are the computer models used to forecast future climate conditions? and
* is reducing emissions the best or only response to possible climate change?
Obviously, these are important questions. Yet the IPCC pays little attention to them or hides the large amount of doubt and uncertainty surrounding them.
Are the scientists and economists who ask these questions just a fringe group, outside the scientific mainstream? Not at all. A 2003 survey of 530 climate scientists in 27 countries, conducted by Dennis Bray and Hans von Storch at the GKSS Institute of Coastal Research in Germany, found
* 82 percent said global warming is happening, but only
* 56 percent said it’s mostly the result of human causes, and only
* 35 percent said models can accurately predict future climate conditions.
Only 27 percent believed “the current state of scientific knowledge is able to provide reasonable predictions of climate variability on time scales of 100 years.”
That’s a long ways from “consensus.”It’s actually pretty close to what the American public told pollsters for the Pew Trust in 2006:
* 70 percent thought global warming is happening,
* only 41 percent thought it was due to human causes,
* and only 19 percent thought it was a high-priority issue.
The alarmists think it’s a “paradox” that the more people learn about climate change, the less likely they are to consider it a serious problem. But as John Tierney with The New York Times points out in a blog posted just a day ago, maybe, just maybe, it’s because people are smart rather than stupid."
CLIMATE CHANGE CONFERENCE LINK (please take the time to read all of the opening statement. It is simply awesome).
Is it not newsworthy to show that the very basis upon which major serious global political and economic decisions (that are being forced upon the entire global population) is, in actual fact, completely, totally and absolutely wrong? Namely that the science of AGW is settled and there is global scientific and political consensus demanding that severe global action to tackle climate change be taken immediately?
Hundreds of the world's top scientists and other experts on climate change, [from Australia, Canada, England, France, Hungary, New Zealand, Poland, Russia, Sweden, and of course the United States including from the University of Alabama, Arizona State, Carleton, Central Queensland, Delaware, Durham, and Florida State University, George Mason, Harvard, The Institute Pasteur in Paris, James Cook, John Moores, Johns Hopkins, and the London School of Economics, The University of Mississippi, Monash, Nottingham, Ohio State, Oregon State, Oslo, Ottawa, Rochester, Rockefeller, and the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, the Russian Academy of Sciences, Suffolk University, the University of Virginia, Westminster School of Business (in London), and the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and others] are meeting in New York and presenting cold, hard scientific data that not only contradicts AGW and shows that man is NOT responsible for climate change, (and never has been) but that we may already be entering a prolonged period of dramatic global cooling. There has been no global warming at all for a decade and solar activity points towards much more cooling to come. Some of the scientists and experts attending disagree and say that the earth is generally warming still but mankind is not the cause, others claim mankind may be having a tiny almost negligible effect, but that is the point, there is NO scientific consensus. These scientists are arguing on the scientific principle in analysing the raw data and extrapolating accurate, genuine peer reviewed hard, honest and reliable scientific information. Many of these eminent and world leading scientists include people who actually contributed to the IPCC research (that was subsequently ignored in the summary and final reports due to their scientific conclusions being contradictory to the political outcome of the summary, eg they contradict the theory that man is to blame for the moderate and temporary warming of the last 150 years).
This is a serious and newsworthy conference and to omit it from news coverage, that has been radically supporting climatological news, leaves the BBC open to charges of blatant political bias.
That the BBC will continue to broadcast news that assumes that man-made climate change is a reality and this assumption will be broadcast as if it is actual conclusive proven fact is a given, regardless of the fact that man-made global warming is, in reality, a poor and debatable theory at best.
The BBC, as a public service broadcaster, surely has a duty to inform the British public that this conference is taking place and what this conference is covering and to what purpose.
I am extremely angry and disappointed in the BBC for this blatant omission from the scientific news.
Friday, February 29, 2008
Where is the outrage?
As reported on Reuters:
Instead we see them turning into a rogue state. A rogue state that has significant stocks of WMD. They have chemical, biological AND NUCLEAR weaponry and delivery systems and they are threatening a holocaust. Is this NOT a blatant breach of international law?
I am sure that decent, honourable Jews the world over will be deeply ashamed of Israel today and going forward. The Israeli Government has brought shame upon all Jews and they MUST be stopped.
"Deputy Israeli Defence Minister Matan Vilnai said on Friday the Palestinians would bring on themselves what he called a "bigger holocaust" by stepping up rocket attacks on Israel from the Gaza Strip."Holocaust" is a term rarely used in Israel outside discussions of the Nazi genocide during World War Two. Many Israelis are loathe to countenance using the word to describe other contemporary events."
How can the world allow this to continue? Where are the UN resolutions? When the Zionist media misinterpreted Iran's Prime Minister in a quote that the media wrongly interpreted as "Wiping Israel from the map" there was international outrage.
Whenever anyone else mentions holocaust, they have to be very careful to Not upset the "Jews" and be labeled anti-semites. Yet here we have the Israeli Government themselves warning that they will CAUSE a holocaust?Our western leaders MUST act. There MUST be sanctions IMMEDIATELY placed on the Israeli Government. They MUST be stopped.
Is it time to consider that the Israeli experiment has failed? Giving the Israelis a country was the right thing to do, BUT the Israeli's themselves MUST behave as a fit and responsible nation. They MUST recognise international law.Instead we see them turning into a rogue state. A rogue state that has significant stocks of WMD. They have chemical, biological AND NUCLEAR weaponry and delivery systems and they are threatening a holocaust. Is this NOT a blatant breach of international law?
I am sure that decent, honourable Jews the world over will be deeply ashamed of Israel today and going forward. The Israeli Government has brought shame upon all Jews and they MUST be stopped.
Thursday, February 28, 2008
Global warming has ended.
OK it could warm more, in the future, or it could get colder, but we see from this that we have NOT seen any warming for the last 10 years. The period in which AGW the hysteria has been at it's greatest level. The Global warming cultist's computer models did not predict this. Even looking at the averages over time, rather than the peaks and troughs, there has been NO average increase for 10 years now.Here's the article that this graph comes from:
"Twelve-month long drop in world temperatures wipes out a century of warming
Over the past year, anecdotal evidence for a cooling planet has exploded. China has its coldest winter in 100 years. Baghdad sees its first snow in all recorded history. North America has the most snowcover in 50 years, with places like Wisconsin the highest since record-keeping began. Record levels of Antarctic sea ice, record cold in Minnesota, Texas, Florida, Mexico, Australia, Iran, Greece, South Africa, Greenland, Argentina, Chile -- the list goes on and on.
No more than anecdotal evidence, to be sure. But now, that evidence has been supplanted by hard scientific fact. All four major global temperature tracking outlets (Hadley, NASA's GISS, UAH, RSS) have released updated data. All show that over the past year, global temperatures have dropped precipitously."
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Forget global warming: Welcome to the new Ice Age
Snow cover over North America and much of Siberia, Mongolia and China is greater than at any time since 1966.
The U.S. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) reported that many American cities and towns suffered record cold temperatures in January and early February. According to the NCDC, the average temperature in January "was -0.3 F cooler than the 1901-2000 (20th century) average."
Monday, February 25, 2008
Friday, February 15, 2008
If there was one lecture I could give to the world, I would love it to be this one...
I am sorry. It is easy to get caught up in the 'things people do'. To complain, moan, and bitch. Even when some of those things are trying to destroy the freedom and liberty we enjoy as free human beings.
This Video is amazingly humbling and speaks the truth to what we all should aspire to. If we all lived to these lessons, WOW! the world would ONLY be a magnificent, inspiring, loving and beautiful place.
If there is only one video you watch online, make sure it is this one.
Thursday, February 14, 2008
If you are innocent, then you have nothing to fear???
As background to the linked article: "Arrested, caged and DNA tested - for using MP3"
The Government could not get permission to have a DNA database of everyone, but people did not object to criminals being recorded. That, we were promised, was so very useful. And so it is, BUT that does not get us all recorded in their database, SO the government decided to amend the laws in two subtle ways.
From dropping litter, to shouting in the street, to any other 'made up on the spur of the moment' charge then became an arrestable offence. All the police would have to do is arrest you on "any" charge, take you to the station, get your DNA, then spend hours filling in a load of paperwork showing that this offence fits in some target crime category, including why the suspect is now being released because the crime has been solved, to make their statistics look better, (so that the Chief Constable can "earn" his £15,000 ($30,000) bonus), then let you go.
You are totally innocent, but have acquired a police record of being arrested for some "crime" and the state have legally added you to their DNA database.
So much for being innocent and having nothing to fear, eh? The way the system has been changed, nobody is considered innocent anymore, we are ALL becoming suspects.
The Government could not get permission to have a DNA database of everyone, but people did not object to criminals being recorded. That, we were promised, was so very useful. And so it is, BUT that does not get us all recorded in their database, SO the government decided to amend the laws in two subtle ways.
- The taking of DNA (which used to be only permitted when a criminal was convicted), was then to be allowed at the time of arrest.
- Every crime, no matter how minor, was changed to become an arrestable offence.
From dropping litter, to shouting in the street, to any other 'made up on the spur of the moment' charge then became an arrestable offence. All the police would have to do is arrest you on "any" charge, take you to the station, get your DNA, then spend hours filling in a load of paperwork showing that this offence fits in some target crime category, including why the suspect is now being released because the crime has been solved, to make their statistics look better, (so that the Chief Constable can "earn" his £15,000 ($30,000) bonus), then let you go.
You are totally innocent, but have acquired a police record of being arrested for some "crime" and the state have legally added you to their DNA database.
So much for being innocent and having nothing to fear, eh? The way the system has been changed, nobody is considered innocent anymore, we are ALL becoming suspects.
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
General Strike against the IRS!
Whilst I do not believe that a one day strike will achieve the ends hoped by some. I support the notion of any direct and peaceful action that raises awareness of the fraudulent monetary system in the USA (and globally).
As a simple guide, this is how it works: The Government is lent money by the Federal Reserve. That money is created out of thin air at the click of a mouse. It cost the Federal reserve nothing to create it. The amount of money owed in interest was never ever created or lent into circulation. The loan to the Government is secured against the income tax of ordinary American taxpayers. That is ALL your income tax is for. Not for schools, Hospitals, Libraries, civic ammenaties, police or any other stuff. Your income tax is solely used to repay the fed for what it cost them NOTHING to not-create. As what they did not create in the first place is the interest on the loan.
Basically, income tax is an un-constitutional theft of your labor and income. The Government are stealing from you to pay off the banking gangsters. They are stealing your hard earned money to subsidise trillionaire bankers.
Ron Paul understands this and wants to bring it to an end. Support his March to Washington.
BE THERE IN NUMBERS SO LARGE, NO MEDIA IN THE WORLD COULD IGNORE IT!!!
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Thursday, February 07, 2008
Sunday, February 03, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)