Why the BBC is plain wrong!

The BBC managed to, somehow, predict the collapse of WTC 7 half an hour in advance of it happening. They also predicted HOW and WHY it fell in advance. The same how and Why that has been parroted without question ever since by the 'official' news media and the 'official' government.

I am NOT suggesting that the BBC is part of the conspiracy, but I am still waiting for them to explain how they got detailed talking points in advance of the collapse happening.

This 'official' version of the conspiracy of Islamic terrorists attacking the USA and causing the collapse of WTC 1, 2 and 7 is what has lead to several wars and a major reduction in our civil liberties and a significant change in our way of life, not to mention that it has been used almost daily ever since by the Government and media to deliberately attempt to scare the population and make us live daily in fear and to submit to the Government ever since.

The Problem is WTC 7 could not have collapsed the way the official version suggests it did. Why? well below is one argument:

"Just to give you an example of the strength of a weld, for example; a 5/16" fillet weld 6" long, .928 x 5 x 6 = 27.84 kips per each 6" weld. A kip is equal to 1000 pounds, so this weld strength would be 27,840 pounds, if properly welded. thats 14 ton of force per 6 inches of weld or nearly 2.5 ton per inch. I have just read that WTC7 had steel added for reinforcement with 12 miles of welding. It supposedly fell down, at freefall speed with no resistance because of fire, no way. Workout the resistance 12 miles of welding would produce at 2.5 tons per inch. That’s 63360 inches per mile which is 760320 inches per 12 miles at 2.5 tons per inch which is 1900800 ton of resistance or 41,000 ton of resistance per floor using an average. The resistance is the force needed to shear the weld and the way this building was built all the welds per floor would need to shear at the same time to fall the way it didl. That is only the calculation for added steel. Absolute nonsense, this is so obviously not feasable.How can you meet such massive resistance and fall as fast as finding no resistance at all.If 41,000 ton of weight fell on 41,000 ton of resistance it would stop. If 100 ton of force met 50 ton of resistance you would have 50 ton of force so my point is you will meet resistance on every floor maybe not enough to stop it but easily enough to slow it..You don’t need to have any engineering knowledge to know freefall speed with absolutely no resistance is simply not possible,you just need some common sense and I despair that so many people appear not to have any.As for the heat causing the metal to weaken garbage,steel is a very good heat transferor.You can heat one beam and the heat will transfer to every other interconnected beam like a massive heatsink.Carbon fires would do diddly squat to that steel.This building WTC7 was a controlled demolition,it is the only possible explanation.
- ROBBY B | 03.01.07 - 7:04 pm"

And here is another-

the building was constructed with a huge amount of structural redundancy built in. In other words, it could stand having entire floors removed and still maintain structural integrity. In other words, it was VERY BLOODY STRONGLY BUILT! : Read more...

Why No One Could Have Predicted The Collapse Of WTC 7


So in the way that the BBC has tried to muddy the water and avoid answering serious questions, they have only brought more people into contact with the WTC 7 story. Some of these people realise that, whenever, or however the collapse story came out, that the collapse, as described by the media, is (according to the laws of physics) impossible.

However plausible the notion that during the day, firefighters believed the building became structurally unsound and cleared a collapse zone, believing the building to be in danger of collapse.(fact) The news of this spread the news agencies (fact) the BBC mistakingly went to air with a collapse presented as fact half an hour before it happened (fact). The BBC was NOT part of the conspiracy to attack the United States (fact). The fact remains that, without the use of explosives, the firemen should have been keeping people away from the building for days until the area was finally cleared by the 'deconstruction and site clearing engineers. Says who? THE LAWS OF PHYSICS!

Why did the firefighters believe the building was going to collapse? Some because their colleagues told them, some it was gut instinct, they looked at the building, and after everything that happened that day, they just thought it would. Some firefighters thought it would, because they had been told it was going to be blown up! SO, WHO TOLD THEM?

Therefore, it makes the media's pre-determination of collapse with their description of cause even more suspiscious.

More unsatisfactory answers from the BBC.

Hello and thank you for your email in reaction to claims made in an
article published online.

The notion that the BBC has been part of any conspiracy is patently
ludicrous. We reported the situation as accurately as we could, based on
the best information available. We cannot be categorical about the exact
timing of events that day - this is the first time it has been brought
to our attention and it was more than five years ago. If in the chaos
and confusion of that day our correspondent reported that the building
had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been a genuine error.

With regards
BBC World Customer Relations

Sorry, but that does not come even close to an acceptable reply. I have not ever at any point suggested in this question that the BBC were part of a conspiracy on the day and for you to suggest this is both offensive and beneath contempt.

Your response to this may lead people to suggest that you have become part of the cover up, however.

> The notion that the BBC has been part of any
> conspiracy is patently ludicrous.

I agree!

> We reported the
> situation as accurately as we could, based on the
> best information available.

Not True, you did not check the story at all, nor did you offer any attribution.

> We cannot be categorical
> about the exact timing of events that day - this is
> the first time it has been brought to our attention
> and it was more than five years ago.

Check the video of the day? Oh you can't, you LOST them! (in breach of your own procedures!) download a copy from the internet then!

> If in the chaos
> and confusion of that day our correspondent reported
> that the building had collapsed before it had done
> so, it would have been a genuine error.

IF? The building was clearly standing behind her! there is no IF in this. However I do accept that reporting this was a genuine error, now what we want to know is, how, exactly, did this error occur? It is obvious from the video that an error occured, that is NOT the issue here, the issue is HOW?

I have several very reasonable questions that the BBC, for some unknown reason, is refusing to answer.

1. How did you get the report that the WTC 7 had collapsed (past tense) before it happened?

2. Who prepared the detailed talking points about the collapse?

3. Were talking points prepared for the other (closer to to the two towers) buildings in the WTC complex, just in case they collapsed also? If not why not? Why only for this building?

4. Why was this news rushed to air live? without attribution or qualification, but presented as factual? I thought the BBC had a duty to check it's stories OR Attribute them. on this occasion they did neither.

5. Why has the BBC not complied with it's own obligations with regards to keeping copies of it's broadcasts?

6. What was the cause of the dropped feed 5 minutes before the building collapsed?

7. What did the correspondent in Manhatten think as the building actually collapsed? and what did she think once she realised it was the building that she had already described in detail collapsing, before it collapsed?

These are serious questions that, for some reason, the BBC refuses to take seriously, or answer. So far the BBC has lied and contradicted itself in response to valid questions of it's handling of a very serious story on a very significant day.

9/11 is a day so infamous that barely a news day goes by when it is not trumpeted as the cause of many major national and international policies, from ID cards, to immigration, to detention withoout charge or trial, to participating in multiple theater wars and the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people worldwide, paid for out of our taxes.

Why, then, are you taking such a cavalier and condescending approach to people asking very reasonable questions about the BBC's conduct on his day?

I have been trying, seriously, for 5 years to dis-prove the notion that WTC 7 was deliberately imploded. I have failed to PROVE this.

I can state that it may be plausable that it looked like WTC 7 might be compromised to some people and they thought that it MIGHT fall over. These are unqualified people who were going off their gut instinct, however this story may have been changed, in a chinese wispers effect to become 'has collapsed' (instead of 'may collapse') and was passed on the wires and unquestioningly reported as fact by the BBC and CNN, but this still does not explain, why you reported as fact without attribution or source or checking, a surprise collapse well before it happened. Nor does it explain why the BBC lost the tapes from this day.

NIST has not helped, by only adding supposition to their conclusions. FEMA has not helped. Larry Silverstein did not help by saying that he had the building 'pulled'. Many fire fighters have written sworn affidavids that they were told that the building was to be "brought down". Add this to the fact that no steel frame building had ever collapsed due to fire, the building collapsed in a way that was fully consistant with a controlled demolition, molten metal has been reported at the site. WTC 7 was further away from and behind two other buldings, so was unlikely to be compromised by the two towers collapsing.

Add all this and more together and the whole, "we accidentally broadcast an un-attributed claim of a demolished building, without it being checked, 25 minutes before it actually fell", and it begins to look very much like someone (who? and how?) knew it was going to collapse in advance. How else could you have repoerted the collapse 25 minutes early? How did they know? Whilst this does NOT prove forknowledge, it IS VERY suspicious.

IF this building was so badly damaged, by the collapsing towers, that for public safety reasons, it had to be deliberatly brought down, then that is a reasonable conclusion, given what had happened that day. However therin lies the problem.

How long does it take to wire up a 47 story building for a controlled demolition? A lot more than the few hours that they had had that day. This would mean that the building had to have been prepared before 9/11. That would mean more than forknowledge of the attacks. It would mean a deliberate involvement in the instigation of these attacks. Complicity!

The public who are paying for the multiple wars with their hard earned taxes, the people whose international reputations are going down the drain further with every innocent child bombed because of 9/11 has a right to have these VERY SERIOUS questions answered.

This has NOT been seriously investigated by anybody except the 'oddball conspiracy fringe'. NIST has not covered this properly, FEMA hasn't, the official 9/11 commision didn't. and now the BBC parrot without question the 'official line'. WHY CAN YOU NOT INVESTIGATE THIS?

You mention it has been five years since the attacks, very true. Why has it taken so long for this to come out? Because the mainstream media has (and largely still does) completely refuse to touch the WTC 7 story with a barge pole. Why? Because when people see that building come down, the obvious conclusion people (including demolition experts with 40 years of Controlled Demolition experience) draw, is that this WAS a controlled demolition.

This needs to be investigated. We need an answer that stands up to close scrutiny. We have had years of the Bush and Blair administration lying to us about WMD and Iran's nuclear ambitions and so much more. We have also had years of the BBC parroting these false and demonstratably fraudulent claims as fact. Without any investigation whatsoever, the BBC has been a propaganda mouthpiece for the Government.

It is time the people were represented and it is time you gave an honest account of both yourselves and of WTC7.

There are still too many if this happened and if that happened then that means that, on both sides of the debate. EVERY version of what happened that day, including the official one backed by the BBC, is a 'conspiracy theory'. None of these theories stand close scrutiny, they all have holes in them.

We just want the truth!

Ken Hall.

More from the BBC.

Another video has been found, this time from BBC news 24, with a UK timestamp.



The BBC is a nexus at the heart of the establishment, for all intents and purposes, it IS the establishment. Their number one priority with regards to 9/11 was to ignore the truth at all costs. Only when the truth would not go away, did they lend their enormous credibility to the 'official' conspiracy to try to shut up, once and for all, the so called conspiracy nutters.

The problem is, the people who made sure that 9/11 happened, left far too many clues and we are now living in an age where the information is available. We surfs are not stupid, and can make our own minds up. BBC take note, the truth movement will never let this go and after your inteventions in this subject area, you are either part of the solution, or you are part of the problem. You can decide which.

the facts remain. the BBC announced the collapse of a building with pre-prepared, detailed, specific talking points before the actual building collapsed.

These where not, "a source tells us", or "we are hearing that" sort of qualifications. this was reported as established fact with talking points.

1. Where did the talking points come from?

2. Who prepared them?

3. How did they know the building was going to collapse before it actually did?

4. How did they know the cause of the collapse five and a half years before NIST?

5. Did they provide talking points for WTC buildings 3, 4 and 5, (which where closer to the two towers), Just in case these buildings also fell down? if not, why not?

6. Why did the BBC not check this story at all? even to the extent of a glimpse through the window?

The BBC obviously trusted the source implicitly, or was following orders from ? whom?

If the source was trusted, then it must be part of the mainstream media, or the Government. first responders on the scene are not trusted enough to provide information, without it being checked, or attributed to them as a source. This story was niether checked, nor attributed. it was reported as established fact.

BBC, we are coming after you!.

EDIT ) 01 March 2007.

So, Google have removed the 'fair use' timestapmed clip from their website eh? WHY? If all this was a mistake on a shocking and confusing day, why hide it?

Why are the Questions not being answered and the footage that the questions refer to is constatantly being (pointlessly) removed? Something to hide?

The BBC videos of the report of WTC 7 collapsing, before it collapsed are available here:

Shouldn't someone let the Department of Homeland Security know about this?

Bush funding Al Queda? State sponsored terrorism brought to you by the GOP!





And as a brilliant put down of the ignorant and incompetenet Condi Rice:



'Nuff said!

The BBC responds! with utter contempt for our intelligence

My response to the BBC's contemptuous reply:

"1. We're not part of a conspiracy. Nobody told us what to say or do on September 11th. We didn't get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn't receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening."

You did not get told in advance that the building was going to fall down? Then how did you report, from detailed talking points, that the Building had collapsed, what caused it to collapse, that people had been evacuated etc etc? BEFORE it had happened? clairvoyance? Tarot cards? Time Machine? This is BBC world service, not some two piece amatuer wacko news like FOX or SKY! HOW THE HELL COULD YOU NOT EVEN LOOK THROUGH THE WINDOW AND SEE THAT THE BUILDING WAS STILL STANDING??? Your excuse is not good enough by a long shot! The news crew obviously picked the information about the Solomon Brothers Building collapsing from somewhere and had talking points prepared and even had the news ticker saying that the Solomon Brothers Building had collapsed. This all happened BEFORE the building collapsed.

"2. In the chaos and confusion of the day, I'm quite sure we said things which turned out to be untrue or inaccurate - but at the time were based on the best information we had. We did what we always did - sourced our reports, used qualifying words like "apparently" or "it's reported" or "we're hearing" and constantly tried to check and double check the information we were receiving."

There where no "qualifying words" in the ticker. The additional information that was discussed were void of the kind of qualifying statements that should have been used too, considering that the building in question was clearly visible over the reporter's shoulder. This was a pre prepared set of talking points presented as established fact. Who would prepare these talking points before the building had actually collapsed, and WHY? Were there also talking points prepared for any of the other buildings in the WTC complex, for just in case they collapsed also? If not why not? How could they have known in advance that the building would collapse? and how would they know the cause in advance too, when NIST still have not decided how wtc 7 collapsed over 5 years later?

"3. Our reporter Jane Standley was in New York on the day of the attacks, and like everyone who was there, has the events seared on her mind. I've spoken to her today and unsurprisingly, she doesn't remember minute-by-minute what she said or did - like everybody else that day she was trying to make sense of what she was seeing; what she was being told; and what was being told to her by colleagues in London who were monitoring feeds and wires services."

You have just contradicted your point in number 1. Either you were being told or you were not. Which is it? and if so, who by?

"4. We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I'd love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don't help clear up the issue one way or another."

You can get copies that are flying all over the internet. If the BBC was engaged in any serious genuine investigative journalism, that should not be a problem. Why not recruit a proper journalist, like Mike Rivero, or Alex Jones? They have more footage of that day than the BBC do apparently.

"5. If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error - no more than that. As one of the comments on You Tube says today "so the guy in the studio didn't quite know what was going on? Woah, that totally proves conspiracy... ""

An error, sure, but who gave you the detailed talking points before the building had collapsed? How did they know it was going to collapse?

This is the key point here. That many many first responders, police, fire fighters, emergency workers, amblulance workers have all come forward and told that they where told that they were going to 'bring the building down' Larry Silverstein, the leaseholder of the WTC complex, admitted on PBS that they decided to pull the building. It may be this news that was misconstrued and reported mistakenly as fact, before the building was pulled, BUT the point is, this shows pre-determination that the building was to be brought down. How long does it take to do that? was the building wired up before 9/11 to be brought down?

WTC 7 was quite a long distance from the two towers. There where other buildings between the two towers and wtc 7. No plane hit wtc 7. No steel frame building has ever collapsed due to fire prior to, or since 9/11. Even large skyscrapers that have burned for days and days have not collapsed.

All this information added together is VERY suspicious, and for the BBC to try to brush this under the carpet and dismiss it, instead of investigate is just staggeringly unbelieveable. The last part where you quote some loon from youtube is just beyond a joke. I could quote some nutter from youtube saying that 9/11 was caused by aliens, would that automatically make it true?

Your defence of this is far from satisfactory, and in fact is bordering on contemptuous. Enquiring minds want to know the truth, as the official version of what happened that day, the Government and mainstream media backed version is a wacky conspiracy theory that has been massively debunked. Why cannot the BBC take this seriously and actually investigate?

Is the BBC too scared?

What has the BBC to say about this?

Below is a message that I have sent to the BBC. Now I am NOT claiming that the BBC is part of a conspiracy and it was inside the 'inside job'! Nor am I suggesting that those who may possibly (but not certainly) be behind an inside job have given the BBC inside knowledge of it in advance. That would be preposterous.

I suspect that in the confusion of that day, the BBC picked up some prematurely released, and possibly speculative talking points and ran with them, WITHOUT ANY INVESTIGATION AT ALL! All they had to do was look out of the window for pity's sake, but no! they ran with a story that the Solomon Brothers Building has just collapsed and read off the pre-prepared talking points of how and why it collapsed, whilst the building in question was clearly STILL STANDING in the background!

As for some of the people querying this news, it was live, (as the ticker proves) it was filmed in front of a window - NOT A PREVIOUS RUN VIDEO, the news anchor in Manhatten turns and look out of the window at the scene to describe it. Additionally the time can be Established as the newsreader in London says that the attacks started eight hours previously and there is a top of the hour news headline review during the clip. This clearly places the time of this live news as being before WTC 7 Collapses.

The established facts therefore are that the BBC prematurely announces a building collapses 25 minutes before it actually does.

below is my submission to the BBC. If I get a response I shall post it immediately:

I know that on 9/11 there where many conflicting reports surfacing and there was lots of confusion, but given the revelations surrounding WTC 7, from the admission by it's leaseholder (Larry Silverstien) on PBS that he ordered the building 'pulled' and the revelations that emergency crews on the scene were told in advance that the building was to be brought down, is it not suspicious that the BBC reported that the building had collapsed a full 25 minutes before it actually did, and that the building was visible behind the correspondent clearly standing as she was describing, live, how and why it had collapsed?

This video is blazing around the internet and being seen by hundreds of thousands of people, if not millions. the BBC's reputation as an accurate reporter of news is at risk.

What is the BBC's response to this?
Why did you run with a set of talking points before they had been checked?
Where did these talking points come from?
Who prepared them in advance of the building collapsing? and Why?
How did the source of the talking points know that the building was likely to collapse?

No steel framed building (not leased by Mr Silverstien) has ever collapsed due to fire and there is significant doubt surrounding the cause of this particular building. The BBC's lax editorial control is adding fuel to the conspiracies surrounding this building and the rest of the attacks in general. What have you got to say for yourselves?

Will the BBC respond accurately or honestly? Watch this space.

Propaganda Extravaganza

So I have spent a good deal of this evening reading the accounts of the "highly" secretive, "ultra-classified" and "on monumental background" Iran briefing that the White House orchestrated today, just in time for Monday's breaking news. What is quite clear is that US corporate press has become an extension of the White House public relations department.

Under what circumstances would the following criteria for a news story ever be considered "journalism:"

The U.S. Administration have been caught lying again and again to deliberately and willfully launch un-neccessary wars. Why should we believe them now, on such utterly pathetic and flimsy evidence (and that is being generous) and when the stakes are so much higher.

As I have been saying, until I am blue in the face, the intelligence was NOT wrong on Iraq. the intelligence community was constantly telling the Pentagon and the Whitehouse that they could NOT corroberate the intelligence coming from the zionist office of special plans. Feith was twisting, exaggerating and inventing evidence of WMD plans, even from known disreputable single sources.

IN FACT: there are more witnesses that can claim that WTC 7 was deliberately brought down in a controlled demolition on the afternoon of 911, than there where to corroberate the lies coming out of the office of special plans. many, many, separate emergency workers have come forward stating that they were told to evacuate the media and the public out of the vacinity as the Building was going to be "BLOWN UP"

The American Way of War

Being a military thinker of the profoundest sort, I offer the following manual of martial affairs for nations yearning to copy the American way of war. Read it carefully. Great clarity will result. The steps limned below will facilitate disaster without imposing the burden of reinventing it. The Pentagon may print copies for distribution. more......

by Fred Reed

Fred Reed is author of Nekkid in Austin: Drop Your Inner Child Down a Well and the just-published A Brass Pole in Bangkok: A Thing I Aspire to Be.

Copyright © 2007 Fred Reed

At last, some common sense. Who'd have thought it?

The director of public prosecutions, Sir Ken Macdonald, put himself at odds with the home secretary and Downing Street last night by denying that Britain is caught up in a "war on terror" and calling for a "culture of legislative restraint" in passing laws to deal with terrorism.

Sir Ken warned of the pernicious risk that a "fear-driven and inappropriate" response to the threat could lead Britain to abandon respect for fair trials and the due process of law....

Sir Ken (great name) should be highly commended for speaking truth to power. At last some common sense.

Needed: New BS meter. Mine just exploded!

The President of the USA is in trouble. His poll numbers are in the toilet and with even more unpopular policies in the pipeline, he is to deliver his State of the Union Address in the next 24 hours.

It is against this back drop that an Al Queda video suddenly appears, specifically targeting the 21,000 new troops heading to Baghdad. You have got to admire the timing. Just when Bush needs a populist boost for his 'purge', along comes Al Queda, right on time, to help him out. How kind.

And people still doubt that Al Queda is a CIA psyop.

If the mainstream media allows you to see the video, pay close attention to the quality, backdrop and the way the face moves. It is clearly a computer generated fake and a poor one at that. It is a digitally altered manipulation of Ayman Alzawahri created, specifically, to help a desparate Bush.

Watch this and decide for yourself what is possible:



and this is the quality of the video image:



This video is poor quality, but are we really being expected to believe that, on the one hand, AL Queda is a global threat to the most sophisticated and technologically advanced nation on earth, well funded it can afford an endless supply of armunition, explosive and even WMD if it can find any, It can launch simultaneous global attacks against US interests, it is the greatest threat faced by the west since the cold war. AND on the other hand, they cannot find a decent quality video camera for love nor money, hence the grainy internet pictures. BS! These pictures are either grainy and pixelated because:

A) They are a digitally created fake and the grainy, pixelated pictures are deliberate to hide the obvious manipulation, or
B) As in the superb documentary, the power of nightmares,(below) the real Al queda really are a tiny organisation that cannot frighten a camel, let alone the USA, and the CIA's or Mossad's version of Al Queda is required to frighten the western population into abject submission to the Western Government's will.

Or a bit of both!

For the truth on Al queda watch these:
Part 1:


Part 2


Part 3


Educate and inform yourself. The evil old guard is failing. Humanity is evolving. Love and peace to you all.

We are seeing the dawning of peace.

The linked article shows clearly that the Iranian nuclear issue shall be resolved peacefully. We move towards peace and witness the Israeli's extremists fail in their demands for a nuclear attack on Iran.

We need leaders of vision and uncommon courage and resolve to pursue peaceful outcomes. We are experienceing the beginning of a process whereby the Iranians are becoming more moderate and the extremists are losing support. We need to be engaging with the moderate Iranians and helping them to create their nuclear power-stations in return for the promised entry into the global fold. The world needs moderate people in positions of power. Impeach those who would wage war as a first resort, whether they be Iranian, Israeli or American.

Peace and love to all.

Additionally, Iran has just announced that it is banning some IAEA inspectors from conducting inspections. In various places in the dishonest mainstream media, this is being mis-reported as the Iranians banning the IAEA. This is not true. They are stopping some specific members of the IAEA from visiting and Iran is completely within their rights and this action is 100% legal. That is something that even FOX news (to its credit and my surprise) admitted.

And these people believe they are part of the world's most superior nation.

There are stupid people in every country, BUT these countries do not believethat they are the best and most intelligent country in the world. They do not have people supporting every dumb military misadventure without having the first clue about what is being fought over, where or why or what the consequences are.

Many of the people here are allowed to vote! HOW SCARY IS THAT!!! Now I know why the imbecile (a dunce; blockhead; dolt) in the video below got so many votes. This is typical of the mentality of people who support the war, purely because they are so stupid that they do not realise that they don't have to support it. I bet after these interviews they went straight onto yahoo answers. It would explain a lot!

The world is in dire peril!

I think it is time that presidential candidates took an IQ test before being allowed to run for high office. Surely, when you are looking to place someone in a position of high power, you expect that they are intelligent and more capable than average. The highest level positions need to be filled by the best possible candidates.

American supporters of Bush should realise that this video is exactly what the rest of the world thinks Bush is.

If you support bush, does this video really make you feel proud that he is what is representative of America in the world today?



And the clip of the party at the end? That was filmed at about 5:00am May 2nd 1987. the morning of the general election victory of the Labour Party in the UK. This was the labour leadership (and Kinnock) celebrating wrestling power from the Tories after 18 years. So in reality it shows a bunch of very happy, but very tired old farts 'dad dancing' OK they don't have a natural rythm and look like prats, but that is not what they were elected for. I don't care how my political leaders look on the dancefloor. I do care how they perform in their duties at looking after the state. Unfortunately, labour are better dancers than they are statesmen.

Who do you think you are kidding Mr Hain?

Mr Peter Hain MP has labeled the current Administration, 'the most right wing in living memory'. he has stated that the neo-con agenda has been knocked for six and is delighted that the democrats have done so well in the November mid-terms.

This is supposedly to position himself in a better light to attract the grass-roots support in the Labour party deputy leaders election.

Well, forgive me for having a functioning memory and brain, BUT, He NEVER EVER CONTRADICTED THE NEO-CONS ON ANY POLICY!

He voted to go to war, and if he genuinely believed that Iraq had WMD at the time, then he was as big an idiot then as he is a liar and spiv now!

He has loyally supported every right wing policy of Blair over the last 10 years and has been as right wing as the neo-cons he supported.

He cannot back away from his past. And, if he believes that the neo-con agenda has been knocked off course, then he is clearly STILL an idiot, as the neo-cons send 21,000 more troops to Iraq and they are gearing up for a military attack on Iran!

Hain is a weak, cowardly spiv. he is just as detestable as all the other labour cabinet put together. Now he is realising the extent as to how wrong he has been, he is fleeing as far from his decisions as possible. It will not do.

Hain IS A NEO-CON PUPPET! He has been in bed with them and is every bit as guilty as them for the mess of Iraq as they are, He has toured the TV News studios Backing Tony Blair to the hilt for years.

Hain looks like a desparately foolish and cowardly man.

It's not a right vs left thing. It's a right vs wrong thing.

I am increasing hacked off at being accused of being a liberal because I am against war crimes and idiotic shortsighted strategically inept military adventures overseas. Sure the liberals may be against the Iraq war because it is an easy stick with which to beat a tired, corrupt and incompetent administration bereft of ideas other than for their own personal survival and enrichment, but in reality the Iraq war is just plain bad.

Any way you slice it, the iraq war is wrong. And that is not a liberal view, its a common sense, decent, honest, truthful and conservative view.

As a lifelong conservative, I am appalled that I am more and more agreeing with liberals, as the CON-servatives move further and further away from real conservatism to nestle on the banks of a neo-fascist extremist interventionist worldview. REAL conservatives are appalled also at how the CON-servatives waste billions in support of terrorist regimes (Bush is the best recruitment sergeant Al Queda ever had) to create fear at home to terrify the population into submission.

Conservatives like small Government and people taking care of and taking responsibility for themselves. Conservatives do not waste billions on constructing extensive surveillance systems for controlling people.

Conservatives believe in a fair and level playing field for business, not tax free handouts for corporations whilst small businesses are stifled by increased taxes and red tape.

Conservatives support working people. Conservative believe in playing fairly by the rules and being honest.

The current CON-servatives (republicans, pro war democrats and Tony Blair's cabinet) are a sad stain on the name conservative.

They are really fascists.

Conservatives are against the this war too.

Outstanding!!!

Impeach them all!

It is my belief that the current potentially catastrophic problems in the world today could be solved and fairly soon. ie within the next 12 - 18 months.

We the people of this planet do have the opportunity and ability to make a very positive change, if we only had the brass cahoneys to sieze it.

In the west, we have many voices calling loudly for the impeachment of Bush. In the middle east, in Iran, the Parliament is starting impeachment proceedings against president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. I hope both cases of impeachment succeed!

We need to start calling, sending letters and faxes by the million in support of peacefull and legal measures that lead to the removal of tyrants at home and abroad.

Click here to support these measure now!

My experiment appears to be creating ever more examples supporting the theory of the law of attraction. These are but two, but as time continues this year, we will se more and more.

Peace and love to all.

CNN apologizes for Obama gaffe in Bin Laden graphic

It is hardly surprising that the mainstream media fools over at CNN made a simple mistake of getting Obama and Osama mixed up. After all, they had Osama and Saddam mixed for well over a year prior to Saddam's arrest.

Can the media really be so stupid as to allow these basic errors go unchecked? Or is there a far more sinister deliberation involved?

More awakenings

As we venture into the undescovered and fresh new dawn of 2007, There feels like the awakening is accelerating.

More and more people are waking and understanding where we find oursleves, spiritually and in reality.

At a new year party last night, the subject of Saddam's execution was brought up, typically, in the form of a joke: Why should saddam be in porn films? Because he is bloody well-hung!

Well this (to my surprise) did not get a laugh, or even a mild titter. But people stood silent for a short while and then each person in the room expressed their disgust in the manner of Saddam's demise.

Now for those reading this, the party was not at a muslim house, nor was it attended by anyone with any natural sympathy for Saddam at all. In fact it was at a house in a white 'working class' Northern town with a labour MP. This is a typical 'salt of the earth' working class area. at the party where people of all political persuasions, but everyone was disgusted at the way in which Saddam was publicly executed and in the way in which we all where collectively tarred, as British subjects, with the same brush as Blair.

Christians, atheists, labour supporters, tories and independents all agreed upon what was wrong. All agreed that Bush and Blair are the greatest terrorists on earth.

When many people from such diverse backgrounds and beliefs all agree on these things, then surely an awakening of consciousness is taking place. The dark forces are losing. 2007 shall bear witness to even greater understandings of the awakening of the human spirit.

With peace and love to all. Happy new year!

Happy New Year

Happy New Year!

Here's to 2007

Have a wonderful and peaceful new year!

We start 2007 without Saddam Hussien. Publicly hanged at dawn yesterday. (a war crime in breach of international law) He was hanged for the deaths of only 148 Iraqis. These Iraqis had been accused, charged and found guilty in court of plotting to kill Saddam. If 148 Texan townsmen had been similarly found guilty of plotting to kill Bush, then they too would have faced the death sentence in The USA surely?

Whatever, if Saddam must have been executed for the deaths of 148 Iraqis, then what about Bush, Cheney and Blair? For each of these 148 Iraqis, another thousand+ more Iraqis have died due to the murderous policies of Bush and Blair's administrations.

In case you are under the misaprehension that Saddam was hanged for killing thousands of Iraqis, for gassing his own people at Halabja, or for the abuse, torture and murder of tens of thousands of Kurds and Shias, then you are mistaken. He was tried for the deaths of only 148 men. The other alledged crimes are left un-investigated and unresolved. the victims left without justice, their stories left as propaganda for the west to keep regurgitating to accomodate their bloodlust.

There have been mass graves uncovered, but in total only about 50,ooo victims of the combination of Saddam's cruelty and the victims of the Iran vs Iraq war. A war in which saddam was helped, and encouraged every savage step of the way by the USA. Don Rumsfeld himself being a major supporter of Saddam at that time.

So Saddam was hanged for the deaths of 148 men. The west glibly announce that this is justice for the victims of Saddams Brutal regime. What, where and when will the hundreds and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis killed since the totally illegal and immoral invasion on 2003 see their justice?

I ask you, if it was your country that had some foreign nation lay a massive campaign of disinfo, misinfo and blatant lies about, and your nation's leader had tried to comply with international laws and rules, but clearly could not (As Saddam tried to comply, but he could not hand over the WMD to the UN weapons inspectors, because he no longer had any WMD and the west KNEW this at the time!!!) and then if your nation was invaded, your leader overthrown to be replaced by a murdering bunch of thugs and theives and torturing rapists. Your nation's natural wealth plundered, your nation's laws re-written to suit the invaders, your prisons turned over to people to torture on a scale in excess of the prior leadership etc etc etc..

At what point would YOU stop fighting against the invaders????

Saddam was executed wrongly. We cannot right that wrong! However we could make up for it by granting justice to the many more numerous victims of Bush and Blair's crimes. They should be executed in Baghdad and laid to rest alongside Saddam.

In 2007, support your troops, DEMAND they be brought home. Demand that the whole world works to end war, poverty and the conflicts in Africa, the middle east and Asia.

We live in a world that is far more peaceful than violent. The vast majority of the planet is currently at peace. Out of the 6.75 Billion people sharing this lump of spinning rock, more than 6 Billion of them are NOT at war. Look out of your window, chances are, no matter where you are in this world, you are NOT at war either.

Remember that and that war is the exception to the human condition and it is because of a minority of greedy and evil leaders that war continues at all. It is time for humanity to evolve, to grow up and take real responsibility for this planet, clean it up, stop filling it with ever more people and to live and grow together in peace.

This journey continues in 2007. We need to accellerate this process and work to rid the world of these evil political leaders and only grant power to those who serve humanity and freedom, not those who abuse and enslave.

Please have a wonderful and peaceful 2007. Here's to a year of increasing peace and awareness of our infinate consciousness. A year of the demons being ever more clipped back, their wealth, influence, and capabilities stalled. The dark forces are failing and will continue to fail more and more in 2007. We are witnessing the fall of Rome, and the ascent of the human spirit.

Here's to 2007!

Time Magazine Person of the year, YOU!!

What a strange year this has been. The awakening of the great mass of people to the extent that only a tiny vocal and terrified minority still cling to the belief that the US Administration or the British Government still are acting as a benevolent force for peace and democracy, fighting evil terrorists and trying to create a better world for all of us. The reality is, of course the opposite. Blair and Bush are, (as I write these words) working to create a new dictatorship in Iraq. They wish to overthrow the current unelected Prime Minister and install another 'Saddam'. A strong-man who will crush all dissent for the benefit of the US/UK.

The public are awakening to this in ever greater numbers. Awarenes of many truths are increasing at an exponential rate and this is largely due to blogs like this one, and of the manifestation of truth as highlighted in my experiment.

This leads to the award of Time Magazine's Person of the Year award. They have awarded this to you, and to me and to all users of the internet. Particularly those who have taken control of the internet as a means to educate and inform. I personally take that to mean bloggers like me.

Of course I deserve this recognition. I have spent countless hours upon hours browsing the internet, researching and writing in my blog and writing in to mainstream media institutions and blogs alike.

I have worked tirelessly for peace, highlighting and passing on the blatant lies of Bush and Blair. The fraudulance of the case for war, the sure knowledge (confirmed further this week by a former civil servant) that Blair knew Iraq was not a threat. The decision to invade regardless of WMD (As shown in Downing St. Memos) and as been admitted through Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney and Blair all stating clearly on the record recently, that if they knew then what they know now, that they would have STILL invaded.

The WMD issue was a lie. The invasion is purely about western hegemony and a pursuit to [adopt evil comic-book villian character here] Take over the world HA HA HA HA!!! No, seriously. The Cheney neo-cons are seriously THAT CRAZY!

The internet community has managed inform and warn the public as to the real dangers, to expose the lies and basically do what the mainstream media has been FAILING to do. In fact, the Mainstream media acted, not as an honest broker of news and information, but as a paid cheerleader for Government propaganda.

As a part of the internet community that spread the truth, and as part of the community that has mobalised public opinion against the evil lies of Blair et-al. Evil? Yes, for how else can you describe deliberate and willful intent to lie to gain support for an illegal war and therefore the mass-murder of tens upon tens upon tens of thousands of innocent men women and children, and the mutilation of hundreds of thousands more. Yea, this is what Ian Huntley is doing time in prison for times 100,000!!! I cannot think of a more suitable adjective than evil. Blair personifies evil in his fake sincerity, whilst his policies indiscriminately kill thousands.

On behalf of whatreallyhappened.com, rense.com, prisonplanet.com, informationclearinghouse.info, davidicke.com, jimmarrs.com and many many more dedicated reporters of truth, I accept this honour.

Thank you.

Discover thebest version of you through these AMAZING downloads!

	Search the hypnosis library below or browse over 300 self hypnosis downloads
	Search for:

3 for 1?

I welcome the verdict on Saddam Hussien. After 20+ years in power he is responsible for something approaching 300,000 dead in Iraq. Although I was and remain vehemently opposed to the war in Iraq, This verdict MUST be welcomed. 300,000 of Saddam's victims are having justice finally served and if only one good thing can come out of the debacle, then this is it.

Now, When they remove Saddam's lifeless body from the gallows, do you think it could be possible for the hangman to do a 3 for 1 deal?

In three years, Bush and Blair are responsible for over 500,000 dead in Iraq. Think about that.

Saddam, over 20 years, 300,000 and will be hung.

Bush and Blair, only 3 years and far more death in Iraq.

Even with these figures, the West cannot maintain law and order.

What has been done in Iraq is a massive war crime. Saddam should have a couple of people join him on the gallows. Saddams victims are seeing justice, so you gotta ask, when will there really be justice for the very many more victims of Bush and Blair in Iraq?

Bush and Blair welcomed the verdict and the penalty for 300,000 victims. What about the penalty for over 500,000 victims in the last 3 years?

Buy this movie

The experiment.

I have been running a little experiment with the law of attraction for some time now. Now the law of attraction is happening to everyone all the time. It is the law that gives you the life you are experiencing NOW!

I am not going to explain what the law of attraction is, or how it works in this little article, but I can describe the experiment and the results I am seeing.

Firstly, when MOST people become aware of the law and understand it's power, they get all greedy and start manifesting luxury homes, houses, holidays and generally having a wonderful time for themselves, all well and good. However, I am not most people. I care about the state of the world and as you can tell from my previous posts, I don't like what the powers that be are doing.

SO my experiment has been to see the powers that be fail in their attempts to take over the world and turn it into an enslaved prison planet. To see the resurection of human spirit and the passion of freedom. to see the people elevated to a position of real power, and an upsurge in Love and Understanding.

I have been applying the law of attraction to this end and I am delighted to say that I am seeing wonderful results. already.

For example, Bush's Approval rating tanked from the mid 40's to the low 30's. Blair's Labour now down into the high 20's and the public are waking up to the depths of corruption of the Bush/Blair axis of negligent fascism.

This is helped by the lies such as the following:


More people are waking up, more people are seeing for themselves things like this:


(Update 31-Dec-2006. This video has been removed. It showed firemen warning people that WTC7 was about to be blown up!)

and they are realising that the people who are leading them to disaster are lying to them.

The truth about the collaberation, sponsorship and use of terrorists by the likes of the CIA, MI6, MOSSAD, etc in the fomenting and execution of western foriegn policy will become more apparent. thisngs like P2OG will become better known and will sicken many petriotic citizens to realise that WE have become the bad guys. WE execute the terrorism in Iraq that is creating civil war.

The cases of citizens stopped at American checkpoints, detained for several hours whilst details are checked, then to be released and told to collect their driving licence from another police station, only to discover 'en route' that their vehicle has been filled with explosives linked to a radio controlled detonator. How many people have been murdered in this way only to have the news report yet another suicide car bombing?

The locals in Iraq are not turning to terrorism in a vacuum. They are REACTING to our presence there.

Look again at the WTC attacks from the point of view of the following:



Also watch this for a better background of what is happening:



To understand who is behind it all:

Read This

and then go to This link and buy this DVD:



The world is WAKING UP, we are re-discovering our power, the established elite are losing and they are in freefall.

We will have and enjoy our democracy returned to us, the war on terror is a fraud and is ending. We are victorious in enlightening the people and allowing them the power to be free, loving people. We are evolving spiritually, growing into a people of wisdom, tolerance, understanding and deep pure love.


I am delighted that the human spirit is not dimninished and is winning against the evil in the world. defeating it with intelligence, logic, love.

We are FREE people complying only to our own truth. Bush and Blair and all their shadow people have lost and they know it.

Keep visiting to see how my experiment is progressing.

Why don't self help guru's work, Judith Summers?

I caught the linked article and read it with a great deal of interest. You see, I have been to the Tony Robbins UNLEASH THE POWER WITHIN event .... twice! Would I go again? hell yeah! these events are amazing fun and you meet wonderful people there.

But the point of the linked article, by Judith Summers, is that, as she admits herself,

"So was the power unleashed within me? Alas, no. I’m just too sceptical."

Well there you have it. She admits, in her own words, ANOTHER limiting belief, that of being too sceptical. That is an identity she has placed upon herself, either sub-consciously or through years of disapointment and let down. She has developed a strategy of reacting in a certain way to defend herself from future disapointment. Be sceptical.

That scepticism is stopping her from discovering the giant within, it won't let her break through to become the person she wants to be.

The sad part is she will carry on, spending a fortune on self-help books and seminars looking for a magic bullet to fix her life, and it is inside her already. She then blames her failure on those 'gurus' that she feels have let her down, when all along the answers are truly within herself. She just will not believe. WHY?

She gets too much significance from being sceptical. She gains certainty from it and she gets connection with others in her being sceptical. "Listen to me, it won't work!"

I am glad that she did the firewalk, and yes it IS easy, but she needs to look at the central message of the firewalk. If you have the right MINDSET, you can achieve anything AND she can have the right mindset.

These gurus cannot do it for you. If you want to change your life, they can only point the way, then you have to do it for yourself.

What Tony teaches is NLP. he gives you mental tools that you can use. He shows you exactly how to guarentee success. Know your outcome, with clarity. Make the decision. Take MASSIVE action. Develop sensory aqcuity to see if you are on track. If you are not on track, CHANGE COURSE and try again. and KEEP TRYING UNTIL you succeed!

He also gives people far FAR more than this. BUT if you go to this event determined to be sceptical, then you ARE wasting your money.

What impressed me at the UPW, and what I learned from it that had the biggest impact was, that CONTRIBUTION to others was a HUGE part.

Tony contributes to the poor and needy and charities and government programs for free. he gives his time and money to help others. He has created a charitable foundation that feeds millions of people around the world at Christmas. Gives them a wonderful Christmas feast for free.

Guru's do not work, when you do not let them.

How to win in Iraq.

"Asked by a reporter whether the latest deaths would prompt US President George W Bush to change strategy, White House spokesman Tony Snow said: "No, the strategy is to win.""

I now know how to get much closer to winning in Iraq. Buy those stupid people in the administration a dictionary.
It seems that they do not know the difference between a goal and a strategy.

you cannot have a strategy of "to win" or "to lose" for that matter, those are goals, NOT strategies!

A goal is the desired outcome, in this case "to win".

A strategy is a series of tactical steps that are designed to result in the desired outcome, or goal.

So in Iraq, what the dumbass neocons have is a goal, but absolutely NO strategy. At least not a strategy that will obtain the goal.

When you have a goal, but an a loack of strategy or an unsuccesful strategy, or your strategy is consistently taking you further and further from your goal, (as in Iraq) then the only logical, sensible and necessary thing to do is to CHANGE strategy. OR in extreme circumstances, change the goal.

In this case, with the USA [apparently] not knowing the difference between a strategy and a goal, then the prognosis for the Iraq war and the ongoing war on the concept of terror [by creating more terror?] is very poor indeed.

Perhaps if someone bought the administration a dictionary, then they might be able to come up with a strategy that could get them closer to the goal of 'to win' (whatever that means).

They first have to define, in clear and unambiguous terms, what the goal of 'to win' actually means on the ground. They have changed their minds many times over the last three years. From the patently absurd "Greet us as liberators" to "establishing a free and liberal democratic Iraq" to "stay the course" to "establishing a democratic Iraq" to "stay the course" to " replacing their prime minister with one that America likes a bit more" to "standing down as they stand up" to "stay the course" to "Well we haven't got a frikking clue anymore, christ I hope whoever wins in 2008 has a clue. WHAT? You mean WE are going to win again? SHIT! Those damned election machines!"

I would say 'To Win' should mean that the people of Iraq should be better off than they where under Saddam, in terms of security, due process of law, less murders, less rapes, less kidnappings, less bombs, less violence, less crime, stable economy, stable prices, stable education, freedom of religious expression (as they had under Saddam (sorry no they didn't because Saddam clamped down on Islamic Extremists) BUT, ordinary Iraqis had more freedom of religious expression under Saddam than they do now.) freedom for women to dress, work and behave how they would like, stable supply of electricity, regular flow of clean, hygienic water, etc...

Currently the situation in Iraq is worse under the current puppet regime in Iraq, than under Saddam.

However you slice it, the strategy in Iraq has been an utter disaster. (unless you have shares in Halliburton or Bechtel).

After they have described in detail what 'to win' means, they need to look realistically where they are now in relation to that goal, what direction they have been going in (backwards) then they can get some grown-ups to create a proper strategy for success in achieving the desired outcome, or goal. This will inevitably involve changing course. Staying the course only makes sense if you are not heading flat out to the edge of a cliff!

For the current administration to not realise this is sadly now too familiar, as is the lamentable lack of understanding of basic english by the so-called journalists who covered this press conference.

I thought that to become a journalist that one would require a decent understanding of the English language. When it comes to covering the whitehouse, I guess English can be as superfluous as logic, compassion or loyalty to the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

I am, however, greatly heartened by the mass waking up of people across the political spectrum to the disaster that is bush/cheney/rumsfeld/rice/blair et al.

They are on to a BIG loss and they know it. They are hated and reviled by the vast majority of humans on earth. They are experiencing the first faltering and painful steps of a long painful and deeply shaming downfall. I am watching them slowly slipping into the abyss. they will have to live with the effects of thier actions in time.

I am watching this downfall with great delight, as only through the downfall of such traitors and fascists, can the USA become the land of the FREE and home of the BRAVE again.

This awakening of the masses is showing itself more and more, through poll results like these: and in many other ways too.

The end of this nightmare is upon us. They have lost their phoney war on terror. They have lost their real war on humanity. Freedom and liberty are upon us at last.

Vote for a pro peace candidate in November!

The Greatest Diplomatic Fuck Up!

What does it sound like when all your chickens come home to roost? The incompetent cowboy, GW Bush heard that sound today. It came in the form of his Bullish axis of evil speech turning nuclear.

If Bush is bluffing, he should be prepared to have his bluff called. Now he looks weak, stupid and completely out-maneuvered.

This amazing turn of events were completely avoidable. If bush were a capable, intelligent and wise statesman, then he would have acted differently. America would still be respected around the globe and the world would be a safer place. However, he is a fool, a puppet controlled by evil men who seek global dominion and revel in sick, paedaphallic sex games and ritualistic lucifarian practices. They hide behind Christian morality, but there veneer has peeled and the whole world can see them for what they are.

They are evil, they are corrupt and they are losing. Their greed and unbridled lust exposes them for what they are. We see clearly and we, as good, honest and just people, reject everything they stand for.

The GREAT republic of the USA has been corrupted, it is time NOW, through the ballot box to reject the corruption before us. To vote in numbers so great that even diebold cannot steal this election.

The future is Bright! I attracted it!

OK so a lot of my posts have been negative and 'ranty'. I do have a strong belief in justice and truth. This leads me to consider the Bush and Blair [mal]administrations as being a snakes nest of evil, viperous, lying, self indulgent, greedy, sleazy and corrupt monsters. However, I am starting a new leaf. Allow me to explain... (and if you want to survive in the future, you had better read closely and take in what I am writing here).

I have taken some time out recently from writing this blog. I have been learning, discovering, growing and evolving. I have discovered truths greater than any administration, and more powerful than anything on this tiny speck of rock we all inhabit together called earth, in fact this truth is far more powerful than anything in our entire galaxy. An insignificant but remarkable part of this truth is that the future IS bright. This is insignificant as the future IS not real, it does not exist and never has, but it is BRIGHT!

As you can probably guess, the new concepts and understandings of truth that I have become aware of are presenting me with something of a dilema in terms of grasping with any concept of persistance and scale. This is because of the holographic nature of, well, nature.

As part of my journey of discovery, I had removed many of my earlier angry posts, as I felt that the hatred I felt and expressed in them was manifesting in a negative way. removing them cannot negate this so I shall re-instate them, as a record of my journey of discovery. Also I felt at the time I removed tham that the fascist thought police would declare them illegal and possibly as material that could aid an enemy, and thus render me liable to be detained without trial indefinately and leave me open to being tortured to 'confess' some unreal and false reality.

I know now that this cannot happen.

Please bear with me on this.

Now, the reason that the future is bright is because we sub-consciously create our reality all of the time. (which is not real) You worry about the future, but ask yourself now, how many times have you worried about something, only for it to not happen? did you worry for nothing?

Now as to the few times that the thing you worried about happening actually happening, guess what? It was your worry that caused it.

I have spent a large part of my life worrying, almost obsessively about certain things. Things on a personal level have not come true, things on a national and international level have. I have noticed a difference. The things that I have worried about personally, that did not and will not come true, have had an extra element to them. I have (unconsciouly) used a law of nature to avoid and prevent these things happening. On international worries, I have done the opposite.

The law is the law of attraction. On personal matters, I have worried what might happen if.... then because it is a worry, I immediately tell myself that what I am worrying about is not happening and moreover, I tell myself that at this moment in time now, the opposite IS happening.

On an international level, I have been writing in this blog, (or affirming) that the totalitarianism of a fascist elite IS building a total police state. Well there's irony for you. I started writing this blog to alert people (however few read this blog) to the reality of a prison planet. In taking the actions of concentrating my nervous system in writing my observations and fears with a great deal of passion, I was actually MANIFESTING the outcomes I was trying to warn people about.

that is how the law of attraction works. It works exactly the same every time. whatever you focus, on you become. the more passion you feel and express about what you focus on, your create with more conviction in reality, than those things that you don't give passion to. And attraction only happens in the 'NOW'. If you focus with agreat deal of worry on being in debt, that is what you will manifest over and over. Start focusing on being abundant NOW. feel it, live it. Believe in it and do it. Whatever thoughts you have with any intensity, they will be picked up and created.

Somewhere on my journey, I learned this truth of attraction, but still harboured doubts. But I Intellectually understood that the law was true, so I was going to make my fortune from it. (as many others already have). I was going to create the ultimate personal development toolkit. It was going to be a website, with asoociated products. It was to be a new operating system for the mind, a Mind-OS so to speak, so I did go ahead with it. I ordered a domain name, web hosting and built a site, gathered information I had researched, wrote a book. paid out thousands of pounds for mentoring in efficient web marketing and went through the motions. going through the motions meant I had very limited success. Total spend on the project = £6,000 give or take a few hundred quid. total income = £31.00.

So I manifested through my own efforts a website, www.mind-os.com. But I never really manifested it as a glowing glorious success in the NOW and eventually my efforts waned and the site has not been updated for a while.

Then a friend pointed out another product to me. It turns out that the idea I had for a complete package of 'mind tools' as an operating system had been created by someone else. I was beaten to it! Someone else had done it and got it to market first.

Was I dissapointed? for a split second I was. But then it dawned on me. I HAD manifested this. I put the idea out there, into global universal consciousness, but not followed it up with the passion and intensity required to manifest it for me. Someone else had. The law of attraction had still worked, but I had not followed all the steps, I merely created the brain's operating system for someone else, who probably had more passion in his project, than I had in mine.

Does this mean I quit? Hell no! it means I re affirm and continue better than ever, creating a better world than ever. I change my strategy slightly, and in the future I shall have a vlog to help in this manifestation. (stay tuned for that)

That is why the future is actually bright. I am forthwith going to continue to write and develop my vlog about the globalist elite, BUT I am going to find and write with a great deal of passion and commitment of examples that demonstrate that they are NOW failing in their plans. that they are getting weaker and weaker with each passing week. That their cabals are fracturing and turning inward and increasingly venting their poison upon themselves. That they are slowly and painfully losing.

I am actually happy and confident that the future, whenever we experience it, will be very bright and pleasurable. that is because we only live in and experience the NOW. and so long as we live in and experience the now, and act in the now, and can influence the now, we can create the NOW that we want to experience and all these infantesimal 'nows' add up to a terrific future.

I have presented in the history of this blog ample evidence of the disease of the global elite in this world. From NOW on, WE ALL TOGETHER can manifest the cure and I shall continue to do so.

Look out for the vlog after the next weekend 8th/9th October 2006.

The first edition of this video log shall be an introduction to the law of attraction, and how it creates our manifest reality and how WE ALL can use this to defeat evil in this world. how WE ALL can choose freedom and love over hatred and distrust. How we shall set ourselves free of the elite who have known about and kept this secret and only taught it to their elite through secret initiations into highest and most secret of secret societies, throughout history. How they have used this to manipulate the masses into manifesting the elite's chosen reality, through mass conditioning of religion, dictatorship, media manipulation and control.

Well their secret is out now, and when you truly understand the power of creation itself. NO ruling elite can defeat you, not ever. for you know that they are not real, merely an artificially created construct.

Join me in creating a better world.

Another 911 anomaly?

Just over 5 years since the terrible attacks, I have seen many many videos of the attacks on the WTC, aswell as many many videos showing the collapses of the three buildings. The more I see WTC 7, from every angle, The more I see a building with very minor damage. Evry angle shows a complete building. The only images of WTC 7 showing major damage have not been made public and we have to rely on the nice people at popular mechanics for saying such a picture exists. We, the tax paying public are not allowed to see it!

We have to trust them, Even though much of the evidence they rely on to justify their opinion that 'the official conspiracy theory' is indeed correct, is still classified and we, the public, that are suffering under and paying with our taxes for the war on terror, are not allowed to see it. WHY?

The WTC 7 is clearly destroyed by a controlled implosion. No question. It falls from the middle bottom up, in perfect free-fall and into it's own footprint. It falls beautifully, it was a very highly skilled demolition job.

The 2 towers, however, fell very differently. From the top down, with the fallen debris spilling outwards.

What the anomaly I have noticed is, these building where built to be massively over engineered, to be much stronger than they needed to be. Now, if what we are told is true, and the aircraft alone, with its explosion and fires, heating and weakening the trusses holding the top floors causing a pancaking effect, was an accurate reason for what happened, and there was no explosives in the building, at all. Then why, when the lower floors had no fire, no damage and where underneath the strengthened sections, why did the bottom part of the towers collapse?

As the upper floors collapsed, much of those floors fell outwards, some downwards, but as these masses fell, the weight carried by the lower floors was reducing all the time. By the time half the towers had collapsed, the bottom third of the towers should have easily carried the weight of what was falling.

Whatever had happened above, without explosions in the lower sections, the bottom thirds of the two towers should have remained standing.

Don't forget that the two towers where built in three sections each. these sections where separated by a strengthened safety cell, designed as a place that people could take refuge in the event of a catastrophic fire.

How did the fires, (hot enough to weaken, but not liquify steel) create the 'molten steel pools' that where located by the salvage teams? That is not answered by those clever people at Popular Mechanics. In fact there are many elements of the case that are not answered by popular mechanics magazine, they merely ask us to trust them, they (for some reason) have been shown evidence that the rest of us are not allowed to see, and they have NOT independently examined and they have taken this evidence purely on face value, as it appears to support the official version and so, must not be questioned at all.

A brilliant example of this is the DNA evidence of the hijackers on the aircraft. Despite the fact that none of the flight lists as released at the time had any hijackers listed, and the fact that there has been no reliable, or untampered video evidence of them boarding the planes, and the fact that several of those thought to be hijackers had been discovered alive and well after the attacks, mistaken ID or not, this casts some doubt on who the hijackers where, or even IF there where any hijackers at all?

So the guy at Popular Mechanics says, they have recovered the DNA of the hijackers from the crash sites.

OK, let's go out on a very implausable limb here and accept for the time being that the DNA would survive the explosions and intense fires (hot enough to melt steel and so hot that it caused the only collapse of steel framed tower blocks in history) and massive pressures, that pulverised thousands of tonnes of concrete into a fine powder, but, let's offer the conjecture that the hijackers DNA survived. (after all the paper pasport survived) What did the FBI compare the recovered DNA with to conclude that the Hijackers where on the planes?

If you recover DNA, to make a succesful ID, you need some DNA of the person you are trying to ID first. to compare it against. Where did the FBI get the DNA of people it had not arrested? If we are to believe the official version, the hijackers stuck the US as a total surprise. the hijackers where people who we are supposed to believe where not under heavy survielence.

Popular mechanics could NOT answer that simple question, and worse still, claimed it was a stupid question, it shouldn't be asked. Yet we are suuposed to take THEIR word that this supposed DNA exists.

Popular Mechanics did NOT do a thorough or independent analysis and took a position of supporting the official version as a matter of fact from the outset of there so called investigation., then they looked for any evidence that would support that position, accept that evidence as infallible. Any other contrary evidence was ignored, or rubbished out of hand as being unreliable, purely because it casts doubt on the official version and therefore could not possibly be reliable. (because the people at popular mechanics had already decided what the truth was before they started their investigation).

They had no interest in establishing truth, merely on lending credibility to the official cover up.

The world changed on 911, WHY?

When the UK and US Governments are changing our laws to restrict freedom of individuals, increasing the freedom of the state to spy on and detain any individual without charge or trial, solely for suspicion of 'terrorism' and when those Governments are seriously suggesting changing the relationship between the state and the electorate, then they always quote 'the war on terror' (now re-branded as the long war) and 911 as the reason. When they launch pre-emptive action that causes death and meyhem on a massive scale (also pushing UP the price of oil, financially benefitting the oilmen in the whitehouse) they quote 911

The world changed on 911

We didn't ask for this war, 'they' (islamofascists) started it, they claim.

We cannot argue against these never ending intrusions in our liberty, because to question our Government after 911 would be unpatriotic. To have doubts about the direction our government is taking us, during a time of war, would be giving succor to the enemy. Some would even claim it is treasonous to question our leaders during the long war, because of what happened on 911.

All the time they are ramming 911 down our throats. Our leaders and the mainstream media are constantly referring to 911. it 'the world changed on 911. we need to accept these changes after what happened on 911. THEY ARE ALWAYS GOING ON ABOUT 911. But with one proviso.

YOU CANNOT QUESTION IT!!!
OK, then, let's just do that then.

I am not suggesting that 911 did not happen as the official version says, but I am asking, if the official version is true, then how can the following fit in to that scenario.

WTC 7:



Does the above video look like anything other than controlled (pre planned) demolition?

Larry Silverstein was the leaseholder of the WTC complex prior to 911. Watch this:



Now ask yourself, How long does it take, in normal circumstances, and free access to a building, to wire up a 47 story building for demolition? It can takes weeks. There is no way in hell, that they could wire up that building for a controlled demolition inside the 5 or so hours they had available to them that morning/afternoon of 911.

So seeing with your own eyes how that building collapsed from the bottom up, direclty into its own footprint, it was a controlled demolition. The leasholder admitted as much by stating,
"They made the decision to pull and we watched the building collapse"

Some people on the internet are suggesting that the Aircraft AA77 757 did not hit the Pentagon, OK if it did (and I have never ever claimed it hasn't) all the US government needs to do is show the video.

Explain the anomolies in the flight manifests. How come none of the alledged hihackers were on the passenger flight lists? How come none of the victims at the pentagon (according to the official autopsy reports) were arabs?

There is no record from any credit card company that these calls were made on the 'in flight' systems. You need a credit card to get a connection, you cant reverse the charges.

That leaves the only possibility being mobile cellphone calls. These cannot work in aircraft in flight at the altitude that those aircraft were at at the times of the alledged calls.

Add this question to building seven WTC collapse and the related 'pull it' comment by the lease-holder Larry Silverstein.

Add this to the 'Put Options' on the airline and the money being traced back to the CIA.

Add these to the many 'military exercizes' that morning that misdirected NORAD.

Add these to the change in orders for a shoot down changed by Rumsfeld in June 2001.

Add this to the wire tranfer by US ally Pakistan's ISI security service of as much as $100,000 to Mohammad Atta

Add this to the lack of action by the Presidents secret service protection team at the time of the attacks.

Add this to the president stating on two separate occasions that the president admitted watching the 'FIRST PLANE' Impact the WTC, before he went into the classroom, despite no footage of that being available for at least 5 hours after the attack. the second impact was the only one broadcast live.

Add this to the lies told since that 'Nobody could have predicted this scenario' despite this very scenario being drilled several times by the Pentagon and other alphabet agencies

Add this to the PNAC documents calling for a catalysing effect of 'a new pearl harbour'

Add this to the Hard drives from the WTC that had millions of pounds worth of transactions that were being recovered by a german company. this company was bought by an American military linked company and the project scrapped.

Add this to the fact that many of the Hijackers are still alive, proving that their ID's were stolen, so we don't actually know who was on those planes that morning. None of the 'official' hijackers appear on any manifest of any of the flights that morning, nor have any arabic remains been discovered in the Pentagon according to the official autopsy reports.

Add this to the Operation Northwoods documents showing clear intent to deceive by using military to shoot down a civilian airliner and blame it on enemies to provoke support for a foreign invasion.

Add this to the Downing street memo that had Bush proposing to paint an American U2 in UN colors to provoke Saddam Hussien to shoot it down to create a reason to invade Iraq. He proposed this at the time when he was claiming publicly that he wanted to avoid military action if possible.

Also Colin Powell and Condi Rice both made public announcements prior to 911 where the clearly stated that Saddam Hussien and Iraq was not a threat, he had no WMD

Watch: http://www.thememoryhole.org/war/powell-rice-wmd.wmv

Of course the US/UK never could have got to attack Iraq without 911 and many MANY lies. Everything Colin Powell said before the UN Security Council has proven false and much was known to be unreliable at the time he said it. He claimed he was stating known facts, yet he knew he was stating half truths, supposition and blatant lies.

The Project for a New American Century document, drawn up before Bush stole his way into the whitehouse, clearly demands multiple theatre wars, but only with some kind of new 'pearl harbor'

911 was that pearl harbour.

Don't accept the Government starting pre emptive wars of choice overseas

Don't accept YOUR liberty and freedom being sacrificed to the fascists in charge.

Impeach Bush, Cheney, Blair et al

Restore Freedom and let's get back to being the good guys.

For more excellent 911 analysis go here

White House spokesman Scott McClellan, The entire DIA and the mainstream media should all resign in embarrasment.

The reports coming out that Bush knew that the 'trailers' discovered in Iraq where not actually wmd or mobile bio-labs should come as no surprise to anyone. It is indeed obvious.

In fact, what is very disturbing is the idea that ANYONE with a working neuron could have thought otherwise for more than say, 3 seconds.

It is obvious that these 'discovered' trailers where not bio labs, after all it is impossible to create the 'worlds deadliest weapons' in a curtain sided truck.

You need at least 4 levels of bio filtration at a major facility to create these kinds of weapons. The Pentagon know this, the DIA know this, The CIA know this, even Scott McClellan should be able to figure this out. I am not surprised an idiot like Bush didn't know it, he probably had only been told that the trailers had been found, and not actually shown the pictures. After all, even monkey boy Bush should be able to work out that these where not bio-labs.

But the mainstream media treat the public like total idiots. they should hang their heads in shame for not askingthe following question:

"How the fuck could the DIA and/or the CIA not instantly realise that these where not bio-labs?"

Why would it take a fact finding mission and three years for this to come out?

The mainstream media are obviously presstitutes, propaganda mouthpieces for the current administration.

It's like Bush coming out and saying 2+2 = 6 and the media buying it.

unbelieveable.

./ later

White Flag for Cameron?

PMQ's score: 2 - 0 to Blair. Cameron may be overdoing the cameraderie in the House of Commons. I know he wants an end to punch and Judy politics, but does that really mean he should try to turn into PMQ's into some kind of mutual admiration society? it is as much of a let down as Gene Simmonds meeting Simon Cowell. 2 great egos about to meet and how would they react? They loved each other!

What is it with Cameron's insistance that he be seen as not disagreeing with, and with helping Blair? Does he not realise that he actually is now the leader of the opposition? or is he secretly a fifth column inside the tory party who is there to help the neo-cons keep dominion over all British politics?

It is early days, I know, but there is plenty of stuff that Blair should be critisied for, but Cameron would rather help Blair to privatise Schools and Hospitals by stealth and starve the developing world with backwards trade that only supports the rich nations, whilst actually screwing the poor one's.

That talk of lowering tarrifs and opening areas of free trade to all, but would never EVER dare actually commit to creating policy in this direction.

It looks like Blair and Cameron are actually trying to create a merger of New tory and New Labour. By all means agree and work together where it actually makes obvious sense to do so, but come ON!

Is there nothing Blair has done that deserves 'ripping him a new one' over? Surely Cameron can begin to hold Blair to account on something?

How blatant can they be? the Powers that be know that under our totally screwed electoral system, that they will only face Cameron or Brown at the next election. Blair has declared his total surrender to the Blairite (neo-con - Rothschild) agenda. Cameron, by his actions thus far, is showing he is doing likewise. We really REALLY need a peaceful revolution in this country now.

./ later

Cameron - Blair Lite?

I have just watched the first exchanges between Blair and Cameron (This year's conservative party leader) and I am now worried.

It would seem that Cameron is intent on not only seeking more of a concensus politics (which I welcome) but to seek to be a crutch to a disastrous Blair Government and assist that government get it's policies through.

He looks at this early stage to be a total let down!

./ later