Buy this movie

The experiment.

I have been running a little experiment with the law of attraction for some time now. Now the law of attraction is happening to everyone all the time. It is the law that gives you the life you are experiencing NOW!

I am not going to explain what the law of attraction is, or how it works in this little article, but I can describe the experiment and the results I am seeing.

Firstly, when MOST people become aware of the law and understand it's power, they get all greedy and start manifesting luxury homes, houses, holidays and generally having a wonderful time for themselves, all well and good. However, I am not most people. I care about the state of the world and as you can tell from my previous posts, I don't like what the powers that be are doing.

SO my experiment has been to see the powers that be fail in their attempts to take over the world and turn it into an enslaved prison planet. To see the resurection of human spirit and the passion of freedom. to see the people elevated to a position of real power, and an upsurge in Love and Understanding.

I have been applying the law of attraction to this end and I am delighted to say that I am seeing wonderful results. already.

For example, Bush's Approval rating tanked from the mid 40's to the low 30's. Blair's Labour now down into the high 20's and the public are waking up to the depths of corruption of the Bush/Blair axis of negligent fascism.

This is helped by the lies such as the following:


More people are waking up, more people are seeing for themselves things like this:


(Update 31-Dec-2006. This video has been removed. It showed firemen warning people that WTC7 was about to be blown up!)

and they are realising that the people who are leading them to disaster are lying to them.

The truth about the collaberation, sponsorship and use of terrorists by the likes of the CIA, MI6, MOSSAD, etc in the fomenting and execution of western foriegn policy will become more apparent. thisngs like P2OG will become better known and will sicken many petriotic citizens to realise that WE have become the bad guys. WE execute the terrorism in Iraq that is creating civil war.

The cases of citizens stopped at American checkpoints, detained for several hours whilst details are checked, then to be released and told to collect their driving licence from another police station, only to discover 'en route' that their vehicle has been filled with explosives linked to a radio controlled detonator. How many people have been murdered in this way only to have the news report yet another suicide car bombing?

The locals in Iraq are not turning to terrorism in a vacuum. They are REACTING to our presence there.

Look again at the WTC attacks from the point of view of the following:



Also watch this for a better background of what is happening:



To understand who is behind it all:

Read This

and then go to This link and buy this DVD:



The world is WAKING UP, we are re-discovering our power, the established elite are losing and they are in freefall.

We will have and enjoy our democracy returned to us, the war on terror is a fraud and is ending. We are victorious in enlightening the people and allowing them the power to be free, loving people. We are evolving spiritually, growing into a people of wisdom, tolerance, understanding and deep pure love.


I am delighted that the human spirit is not dimninished and is winning against the evil in the world. defeating it with intelligence, logic, love.

We are FREE people complying only to our own truth. Bush and Blair and all their shadow people have lost and they know it.

Keep visiting to see how my experiment is progressing.

Why don't self help guru's work, Judith Summers?

I caught the linked article and read it with a great deal of interest. You see, I have been to the Tony Robbins UNLEASH THE POWER WITHIN event .... twice! Would I go again? hell yeah! these events are amazing fun and you meet wonderful people there.

But the point of the linked article, by Judith Summers, is that, as she admits herself,

"So was the power unleashed within me? Alas, no. I’m just too sceptical."

Well there you have it. She admits, in her own words, ANOTHER limiting belief, that of being too sceptical. That is an identity she has placed upon herself, either sub-consciously or through years of disapointment and let down. She has developed a strategy of reacting in a certain way to defend herself from future disapointment. Be sceptical.

That scepticism is stopping her from discovering the giant within, it won't let her break through to become the person she wants to be.

The sad part is she will carry on, spending a fortune on self-help books and seminars looking for a magic bullet to fix her life, and it is inside her already. She then blames her failure on those 'gurus' that she feels have let her down, when all along the answers are truly within herself. She just will not believe. WHY?

She gets too much significance from being sceptical. She gains certainty from it and she gets connection with others in her being sceptical. "Listen to me, it won't work!"

I am glad that she did the firewalk, and yes it IS easy, but she needs to look at the central message of the firewalk. If you have the right MINDSET, you can achieve anything AND she can have the right mindset.

These gurus cannot do it for you. If you want to change your life, they can only point the way, then you have to do it for yourself.

What Tony teaches is NLP. he gives you mental tools that you can use. He shows you exactly how to guarentee success. Know your outcome, with clarity. Make the decision. Take MASSIVE action. Develop sensory aqcuity to see if you are on track. If you are not on track, CHANGE COURSE and try again. and KEEP TRYING UNTIL you succeed!

He also gives people far FAR more than this. BUT if you go to this event determined to be sceptical, then you ARE wasting your money.

What impressed me at the UPW, and what I learned from it that had the biggest impact was, that CONTRIBUTION to others was a HUGE part.

Tony contributes to the poor and needy and charities and government programs for free. he gives his time and money to help others. He has created a charitable foundation that feeds millions of people around the world at Christmas. Gives them a wonderful Christmas feast for free.

Guru's do not work, when you do not let them.

How to win in Iraq.

"Asked by a reporter whether the latest deaths would prompt US President George W Bush to change strategy, White House spokesman Tony Snow said: "No, the strategy is to win.""

I now know how to get much closer to winning in Iraq. Buy those stupid people in the administration a dictionary.
It seems that they do not know the difference between a goal and a strategy.

you cannot have a strategy of "to win" or "to lose" for that matter, those are goals, NOT strategies!

A goal is the desired outcome, in this case "to win".

A strategy is a series of tactical steps that are designed to result in the desired outcome, or goal.

So in Iraq, what the dumbass neocons have is a goal, but absolutely NO strategy. At least not a strategy that will obtain the goal.

When you have a goal, but an a loack of strategy or an unsuccesful strategy, or your strategy is consistently taking you further and further from your goal, (as in Iraq) then the only logical, sensible and necessary thing to do is to CHANGE strategy. OR in extreme circumstances, change the goal.

In this case, with the USA [apparently] not knowing the difference between a strategy and a goal, then the prognosis for the Iraq war and the ongoing war on the concept of terror [by creating more terror?] is very poor indeed.

Perhaps if someone bought the administration a dictionary, then they might be able to come up with a strategy that could get them closer to the goal of 'to win' (whatever that means).

They first have to define, in clear and unambiguous terms, what the goal of 'to win' actually means on the ground. They have changed their minds many times over the last three years. From the patently absurd "Greet us as liberators" to "establishing a free and liberal democratic Iraq" to "stay the course" to "establishing a democratic Iraq" to "stay the course" to " replacing their prime minister with one that America likes a bit more" to "standing down as they stand up" to "stay the course" to "Well we haven't got a frikking clue anymore, christ I hope whoever wins in 2008 has a clue. WHAT? You mean WE are going to win again? SHIT! Those damned election machines!"

I would say 'To Win' should mean that the people of Iraq should be better off than they where under Saddam, in terms of security, due process of law, less murders, less rapes, less kidnappings, less bombs, less violence, less crime, stable economy, stable prices, stable education, freedom of religious expression (as they had under Saddam (sorry no they didn't because Saddam clamped down on Islamic Extremists) BUT, ordinary Iraqis had more freedom of religious expression under Saddam than they do now.) freedom for women to dress, work and behave how they would like, stable supply of electricity, regular flow of clean, hygienic water, etc...

Currently the situation in Iraq is worse under the current puppet regime in Iraq, than under Saddam.

However you slice it, the strategy in Iraq has been an utter disaster. (unless you have shares in Halliburton or Bechtel).

After they have described in detail what 'to win' means, they need to look realistically where they are now in relation to that goal, what direction they have been going in (backwards) then they can get some grown-ups to create a proper strategy for success in achieving the desired outcome, or goal. This will inevitably involve changing course. Staying the course only makes sense if you are not heading flat out to the edge of a cliff!

For the current administration to not realise this is sadly now too familiar, as is the lamentable lack of understanding of basic english by the so-called journalists who covered this press conference.

I thought that to become a journalist that one would require a decent understanding of the English language. When it comes to covering the whitehouse, I guess English can be as superfluous as logic, compassion or loyalty to the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

I am, however, greatly heartened by the mass waking up of people across the political spectrum to the disaster that is bush/cheney/rumsfeld/rice/blair et al.

They are on to a BIG loss and they know it. They are hated and reviled by the vast majority of humans on earth. They are experiencing the first faltering and painful steps of a long painful and deeply shaming downfall. I am watching them slowly slipping into the abyss. they will have to live with the effects of thier actions in time.

I am watching this downfall with great delight, as only through the downfall of such traitors and fascists, can the USA become the land of the FREE and home of the BRAVE again.

This awakening of the masses is showing itself more and more, through poll results like these: and in many other ways too.

The end of this nightmare is upon us. They have lost their phoney war on terror. They have lost their real war on humanity. Freedom and liberty are upon us at last.

Vote for a pro peace candidate in November!

The Greatest Diplomatic Fuck Up!

What does it sound like when all your chickens come home to roost? The incompetent cowboy, GW Bush heard that sound today. It came in the form of his Bullish axis of evil speech turning nuclear.

If Bush is bluffing, he should be prepared to have his bluff called. Now he looks weak, stupid and completely out-maneuvered.

This amazing turn of events were completely avoidable. If bush were a capable, intelligent and wise statesman, then he would have acted differently. America would still be respected around the globe and the world would be a safer place. However, he is a fool, a puppet controlled by evil men who seek global dominion and revel in sick, paedaphallic sex games and ritualistic lucifarian practices. They hide behind Christian morality, but there veneer has peeled and the whole world can see them for what they are.

They are evil, they are corrupt and they are losing. Their greed and unbridled lust exposes them for what they are. We see clearly and we, as good, honest and just people, reject everything they stand for.

The GREAT republic of the USA has been corrupted, it is time NOW, through the ballot box to reject the corruption before us. To vote in numbers so great that even diebold cannot steal this election.

The future is Bright! I attracted it!

OK so a lot of my posts have been negative and 'ranty'. I do have a strong belief in justice and truth. This leads me to consider the Bush and Blair [mal]administrations as being a snakes nest of evil, viperous, lying, self indulgent, greedy, sleazy and corrupt monsters. However, I am starting a new leaf. Allow me to explain... (and if you want to survive in the future, you had better read closely and take in what I am writing here).

I have taken some time out recently from writing this blog. I have been learning, discovering, growing and evolving. I have discovered truths greater than any administration, and more powerful than anything on this tiny speck of rock we all inhabit together called earth, in fact this truth is far more powerful than anything in our entire galaxy. An insignificant but remarkable part of this truth is that the future IS bright. This is insignificant as the future IS not real, it does not exist and never has, but it is BRIGHT!

As you can probably guess, the new concepts and understandings of truth that I have become aware of are presenting me with something of a dilema in terms of grasping with any concept of persistance and scale. This is because of the holographic nature of, well, nature.

As part of my journey of discovery, I had removed many of my earlier angry posts, as I felt that the hatred I felt and expressed in them was manifesting in a negative way. removing them cannot negate this so I shall re-instate them, as a record of my journey of discovery. Also I felt at the time I removed tham that the fascist thought police would declare them illegal and possibly as material that could aid an enemy, and thus render me liable to be detained without trial indefinately and leave me open to being tortured to 'confess' some unreal and false reality.

I know now that this cannot happen.

Please bear with me on this.

Now, the reason that the future is bright is because we sub-consciously create our reality all of the time. (which is not real) You worry about the future, but ask yourself now, how many times have you worried about something, only for it to not happen? did you worry for nothing?

Now as to the few times that the thing you worried about happening actually happening, guess what? It was your worry that caused it.

I have spent a large part of my life worrying, almost obsessively about certain things. Things on a personal level have not come true, things on a national and international level have. I have noticed a difference. The things that I have worried about personally, that did not and will not come true, have had an extra element to them. I have (unconsciouly) used a law of nature to avoid and prevent these things happening. On international worries, I have done the opposite.

The law is the law of attraction. On personal matters, I have worried what might happen if.... then because it is a worry, I immediately tell myself that what I am worrying about is not happening and moreover, I tell myself that at this moment in time now, the opposite IS happening.

On an international level, I have been writing in this blog, (or affirming) that the totalitarianism of a fascist elite IS building a total police state. Well there's irony for you. I started writing this blog to alert people (however few read this blog) to the reality of a prison planet. In taking the actions of concentrating my nervous system in writing my observations and fears with a great deal of passion, I was actually MANIFESTING the outcomes I was trying to warn people about.

that is how the law of attraction works. It works exactly the same every time. whatever you focus, on you become. the more passion you feel and express about what you focus on, your create with more conviction in reality, than those things that you don't give passion to. And attraction only happens in the 'NOW'. If you focus with agreat deal of worry on being in debt, that is what you will manifest over and over. Start focusing on being abundant NOW. feel it, live it. Believe in it and do it. Whatever thoughts you have with any intensity, they will be picked up and created.

Somewhere on my journey, I learned this truth of attraction, but still harboured doubts. But I Intellectually understood that the law was true, so I was going to make my fortune from it. (as many others already have). I was going to create the ultimate personal development toolkit. It was going to be a website, with asoociated products. It was to be a new operating system for the mind, a Mind-OS so to speak, so I did go ahead with it. I ordered a domain name, web hosting and built a site, gathered information I had researched, wrote a book. paid out thousands of pounds for mentoring in efficient web marketing and went through the motions. going through the motions meant I had very limited success. Total spend on the project = £6,000 give or take a few hundred quid. total income = £31.00.

So I manifested through my own efforts a website, www.mind-os.com. But I never really manifested it as a glowing glorious success in the NOW and eventually my efforts waned and the site has not been updated for a while.

Then a friend pointed out another product to me. It turns out that the idea I had for a complete package of 'mind tools' as an operating system had been created by someone else. I was beaten to it! Someone else had done it and got it to market first.

Was I dissapointed? for a split second I was. But then it dawned on me. I HAD manifested this. I put the idea out there, into global universal consciousness, but not followed it up with the passion and intensity required to manifest it for me. Someone else had. The law of attraction had still worked, but I had not followed all the steps, I merely created the brain's operating system for someone else, who probably had more passion in his project, than I had in mine.

Does this mean I quit? Hell no! it means I re affirm and continue better than ever, creating a better world than ever. I change my strategy slightly, and in the future I shall have a vlog to help in this manifestation. (stay tuned for that)

That is why the future is actually bright. I am forthwith going to continue to write and develop my vlog about the globalist elite, BUT I am going to find and write with a great deal of passion and commitment of examples that demonstrate that they are NOW failing in their plans. that they are getting weaker and weaker with each passing week. That their cabals are fracturing and turning inward and increasingly venting their poison upon themselves. That they are slowly and painfully losing.

I am actually happy and confident that the future, whenever we experience it, will be very bright and pleasurable. that is because we only live in and experience the NOW. and so long as we live in and experience the now, and act in the now, and can influence the now, we can create the NOW that we want to experience and all these infantesimal 'nows' add up to a terrific future.

I have presented in the history of this blog ample evidence of the disease of the global elite in this world. From NOW on, WE ALL TOGETHER can manifest the cure and I shall continue to do so.

Look out for the vlog after the next weekend 8th/9th October 2006.

The first edition of this video log shall be an introduction to the law of attraction, and how it creates our manifest reality and how WE ALL can use this to defeat evil in this world. how WE ALL can choose freedom and love over hatred and distrust. How we shall set ourselves free of the elite who have known about and kept this secret and only taught it to their elite through secret initiations into highest and most secret of secret societies, throughout history. How they have used this to manipulate the masses into manifesting the elite's chosen reality, through mass conditioning of religion, dictatorship, media manipulation and control.

Well their secret is out now, and when you truly understand the power of creation itself. NO ruling elite can defeat you, not ever. for you know that they are not real, merely an artificially created construct.

Join me in creating a better world.

Another 911 anomaly?

Just over 5 years since the terrible attacks, I have seen many many videos of the attacks on the WTC, aswell as many many videos showing the collapses of the three buildings. The more I see WTC 7, from every angle, The more I see a building with very minor damage. Evry angle shows a complete building. The only images of WTC 7 showing major damage have not been made public and we have to rely on the nice people at popular mechanics for saying such a picture exists. We, the tax paying public are not allowed to see it!

We have to trust them, Even though much of the evidence they rely on to justify their opinion that 'the official conspiracy theory' is indeed correct, is still classified and we, the public, that are suffering under and paying with our taxes for the war on terror, are not allowed to see it. WHY?

The WTC 7 is clearly destroyed by a controlled implosion. No question. It falls from the middle bottom up, in perfect free-fall and into it's own footprint. It falls beautifully, it was a very highly skilled demolition job.

The 2 towers, however, fell very differently. From the top down, with the fallen debris spilling outwards.

What the anomaly I have noticed is, these building where built to be massively over engineered, to be much stronger than they needed to be. Now, if what we are told is true, and the aircraft alone, with its explosion and fires, heating and weakening the trusses holding the top floors causing a pancaking effect, was an accurate reason for what happened, and there was no explosives in the building, at all. Then why, when the lower floors had no fire, no damage and where underneath the strengthened sections, why did the bottom part of the towers collapse?

As the upper floors collapsed, much of those floors fell outwards, some downwards, but as these masses fell, the weight carried by the lower floors was reducing all the time. By the time half the towers had collapsed, the bottom third of the towers should have easily carried the weight of what was falling.

Whatever had happened above, without explosions in the lower sections, the bottom thirds of the two towers should have remained standing.

Don't forget that the two towers where built in three sections each. these sections where separated by a strengthened safety cell, designed as a place that people could take refuge in the event of a catastrophic fire.

How did the fires, (hot enough to weaken, but not liquify steel) create the 'molten steel pools' that where located by the salvage teams? That is not answered by those clever people at Popular Mechanics. In fact there are many elements of the case that are not answered by popular mechanics magazine, they merely ask us to trust them, they (for some reason) have been shown evidence that the rest of us are not allowed to see, and they have NOT independently examined and they have taken this evidence purely on face value, as it appears to support the official version and so, must not be questioned at all.

A brilliant example of this is the DNA evidence of the hijackers on the aircraft. Despite the fact that none of the flight lists as released at the time had any hijackers listed, and the fact that there has been no reliable, or untampered video evidence of them boarding the planes, and the fact that several of those thought to be hijackers had been discovered alive and well after the attacks, mistaken ID or not, this casts some doubt on who the hijackers where, or even IF there where any hijackers at all?

So the guy at Popular Mechanics says, they have recovered the DNA of the hijackers from the crash sites.

OK, let's go out on a very implausable limb here and accept for the time being that the DNA would survive the explosions and intense fires (hot enough to melt steel and so hot that it caused the only collapse of steel framed tower blocks in history) and massive pressures, that pulverised thousands of tonnes of concrete into a fine powder, but, let's offer the conjecture that the hijackers DNA survived. (after all the paper pasport survived) What did the FBI compare the recovered DNA with to conclude that the Hijackers where on the planes?

If you recover DNA, to make a succesful ID, you need some DNA of the person you are trying to ID first. to compare it against. Where did the FBI get the DNA of people it had not arrested? If we are to believe the official version, the hijackers stuck the US as a total surprise. the hijackers where people who we are supposed to believe where not under heavy survielence.

Popular mechanics could NOT answer that simple question, and worse still, claimed it was a stupid question, it shouldn't be asked. Yet we are suuposed to take THEIR word that this supposed DNA exists.

Popular Mechanics did NOT do a thorough or independent analysis and took a position of supporting the official version as a matter of fact from the outset of there so called investigation., then they looked for any evidence that would support that position, accept that evidence as infallible. Any other contrary evidence was ignored, or rubbished out of hand as being unreliable, purely because it casts doubt on the official version and therefore could not possibly be reliable. (because the people at popular mechanics had already decided what the truth was before they started their investigation).

They had no interest in establishing truth, merely on lending credibility to the official cover up.

The world changed on 911, WHY?

When the UK and US Governments are changing our laws to restrict freedom of individuals, increasing the freedom of the state to spy on and detain any individual without charge or trial, solely for suspicion of 'terrorism' and when those Governments are seriously suggesting changing the relationship between the state and the electorate, then they always quote 'the war on terror' (now re-branded as the long war) and 911 as the reason. When they launch pre-emptive action that causes death and meyhem on a massive scale (also pushing UP the price of oil, financially benefitting the oilmen in the whitehouse) they quote 911

The world changed on 911

We didn't ask for this war, 'they' (islamofascists) started it, they claim.

We cannot argue against these never ending intrusions in our liberty, because to question our Government after 911 would be unpatriotic. To have doubts about the direction our government is taking us, during a time of war, would be giving succor to the enemy. Some would even claim it is treasonous to question our leaders during the long war, because of what happened on 911.

All the time they are ramming 911 down our throats. Our leaders and the mainstream media are constantly referring to 911. it 'the world changed on 911. we need to accept these changes after what happened on 911. THEY ARE ALWAYS GOING ON ABOUT 911. But with one proviso.

YOU CANNOT QUESTION IT!!!
OK, then, let's just do that then.

I am not suggesting that 911 did not happen as the official version says, but I am asking, if the official version is true, then how can the following fit in to that scenario.

WTC 7:



Does the above video look like anything other than controlled (pre planned) demolition?

Larry Silverstein was the leaseholder of the WTC complex prior to 911. Watch this:



Now ask yourself, How long does it take, in normal circumstances, and free access to a building, to wire up a 47 story building for demolition? It can takes weeks. There is no way in hell, that they could wire up that building for a controlled demolition inside the 5 or so hours they had available to them that morning/afternoon of 911.

So seeing with your own eyes how that building collapsed from the bottom up, direclty into its own footprint, it was a controlled demolition. The leasholder admitted as much by stating,
"They made the decision to pull and we watched the building collapse"

Some people on the internet are suggesting that the Aircraft AA77 757 did not hit the Pentagon, OK if it did (and I have never ever claimed it hasn't) all the US government needs to do is show the video.

Explain the anomolies in the flight manifests. How come none of the alledged hihackers were on the passenger flight lists? How come none of the victims at the pentagon (according to the official autopsy reports) were arabs?

There is no record from any credit card company that these calls were made on the 'in flight' systems. You need a credit card to get a connection, you cant reverse the charges.

That leaves the only possibility being mobile cellphone calls. These cannot work in aircraft in flight at the altitude that those aircraft were at at the times of the alledged calls.

Add this question to building seven WTC collapse and the related 'pull it' comment by the lease-holder Larry Silverstein.

Add this to the 'Put Options' on the airline and the money being traced back to the CIA.

Add these to the many 'military exercizes' that morning that misdirected NORAD.

Add these to the change in orders for a shoot down changed by Rumsfeld in June 2001.

Add this to the wire tranfer by US ally Pakistan's ISI security service of as much as $100,000 to Mohammad Atta

Add this to the lack of action by the Presidents secret service protection team at the time of the attacks.

Add this to the president stating on two separate occasions that the president admitted watching the 'FIRST PLANE' Impact the WTC, before he went into the classroom, despite no footage of that being available for at least 5 hours after the attack. the second impact was the only one broadcast live.

Add this to the lies told since that 'Nobody could have predicted this scenario' despite this very scenario being drilled several times by the Pentagon and other alphabet agencies

Add this to the PNAC documents calling for a catalysing effect of 'a new pearl harbour'

Add this to the Hard drives from the WTC that had millions of pounds worth of transactions that were being recovered by a german company. this company was bought by an American military linked company and the project scrapped.

Add this to the fact that many of the Hijackers are still alive, proving that their ID's were stolen, so we don't actually know who was on those planes that morning. None of the 'official' hijackers appear on any manifest of any of the flights that morning, nor have any arabic remains been discovered in the Pentagon according to the official autopsy reports.

Add this to the Operation Northwoods documents showing clear intent to deceive by using military to shoot down a civilian airliner and blame it on enemies to provoke support for a foreign invasion.

Add this to the Downing street memo that had Bush proposing to paint an American U2 in UN colors to provoke Saddam Hussien to shoot it down to create a reason to invade Iraq. He proposed this at the time when he was claiming publicly that he wanted to avoid military action if possible.

Also Colin Powell and Condi Rice both made public announcements prior to 911 where the clearly stated that Saddam Hussien and Iraq was not a threat, he had no WMD

Watch: http://www.thememoryhole.org/war/powell-rice-wmd.wmv

Of course the US/UK never could have got to attack Iraq without 911 and many MANY lies. Everything Colin Powell said before the UN Security Council has proven false and much was known to be unreliable at the time he said it. He claimed he was stating known facts, yet he knew he was stating half truths, supposition and blatant lies.

The Project for a New American Century document, drawn up before Bush stole his way into the whitehouse, clearly demands multiple theatre wars, but only with some kind of new 'pearl harbor'

911 was that pearl harbour.

Don't accept the Government starting pre emptive wars of choice overseas

Don't accept YOUR liberty and freedom being sacrificed to the fascists in charge.

Impeach Bush, Cheney, Blair et al

Restore Freedom and let's get back to being the good guys.

For more excellent 911 analysis go here

White House spokesman Scott McClellan, The entire DIA and the mainstream media should all resign in embarrasment.

The reports coming out that Bush knew that the 'trailers' discovered in Iraq where not actually wmd or mobile bio-labs should come as no surprise to anyone. It is indeed obvious.

In fact, what is very disturbing is the idea that ANYONE with a working neuron could have thought otherwise for more than say, 3 seconds.

It is obvious that these 'discovered' trailers where not bio labs, after all it is impossible to create the 'worlds deadliest weapons' in a curtain sided truck.

You need at least 4 levels of bio filtration at a major facility to create these kinds of weapons. The Pentagon know this, the DIA know this, The CIA know this, even Scott McClellan should be able to figure this out. I am not surprised an idiot like Bush didn't know it, he probably had only been told that the trailers had been found, and not actually shown the pictures. After all, even monkey boy Bush should be able to work out that these where not bio-labs.

But the mainstream media treat the public like total idiots. they should hang their heads in shame for not askingthe following question:

"How the fuck could the DIA and/or the CIA not instantly realise that these where not bio-labs?"

Why would it take a fact finding mission and three years for this to come out?

The mainstream media are obviously presstitutes, propaganda mouthpieces for the current administration.

It's like Bush coming out and saying 2+2 = 6 and the media buying it.

unbelieveable.

./ later

White Flag for Cameron?

PMQ's score: 2 - 0 to Blair. Cameron may be overdoing the cameraderie in the House of Commons. I know he wants an end to punch and Judy politics, but does that really mean he should try to turn into PMQ's into some kind of mutual admiration society? it is as much of a let down as Gene Simmonds meeting Simon Cowell. 2 great egos about to meet and how would they react? They loved each other!

What is it with Cameron's insistance that he be seen as not disagreeing with, and with helping Blair? Does he not realise that he actually is now the leader of the opposition? or is he secretly a fifth column inside the tory party who is there to help the neo-cons keep dominion over all British politics?

It is early days, I know, but there is plenty of stuff that Blair should be critisied for, but Cameron would rather help Blair to privatise Schools and Hospitals by stealth and starve the developing world with backwards trade that only supports the rich nations, whilst actually screwing the poor one's.

That talk of lowering tarrifs and opening areas of free trade to all, but would never EVER dare actually commit to creating policy in this direction.

It looks like Blair and Cameron are actually trying to create a merger of New tory and New Labour. By all means agree and work together where it actually makes obvious sense to do so, but come ON!

Is there nothing Blair has done that deserves 'ripping him a new one' over? Surely Cameron can begin to hold Blair to account on something?

How blatant can they be? the Powers that be know that under our totally screwed electoral system, that they will only face Cameron or Brown at the next election. Blair has declared his total surrender to the Blairite (neo-con - Rothschild) agenda. Cameron, by his actions thus far, is showing he is doing likewise. We really REALLY need a peaceful revolution in this country now.

./ later

Cameron - Blair Lite?

I have just watched the first exchanges between Blair and Cameron (This year's conservative party leader) and I am now worried.

It would seem that Cameron is intent on not only seeking more of a concensus politics (which I welcome) but to seek to be a crutch to a disastrous Blair Government and assist that government get it's policies through.

He looks at this early stage to be a total let down!

./ later

Blair Bush Al Jazeera Bomb Account... Watch this space!

You sleazy, lying, paranoid delusional criminal terrorist scumbags Bush and Blair, You can run, but you cannot hide from the truth. The world's Bloggers ara a comin' after ya! Woooo Ha!

Count me in!

There is no longer any justification for this

The invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq now has no legitimacy whatsoever. Lofty aims and claims of disarming Saddam of his WMD and then of spreading democracy have now been shown to be cruel deceptions.

The ever changing rationale for entering and then staying in Iraq cannot hide one underlying truth. Pre-emptive invasion of a non-threatening sovereign state is immoral, unethical, illegal and evil.

The invasion did not disarm Saddam, he was already disarmed, as our intelligence prior to the war suspected. Not one single pre-invasion claim of Saddam retaining his WMD capability has stood up to scrutiny. NOT ONE! In fact, every claim that he was was disproved BEFORE the invasion happened.

So we had to invade to protect the Iraqis from their brutal dictator. Saddam was another Hitler, threatening the entire world. This was bullshit too! Claims of his putting people through meat grinders proved to be just as false as his fantasy WMD arsenal. Yes he was a brutal dictator, but no worse than many, many others in the world, yet still, he was not a threat to us and in fact was becoming less dictatorial with every year that passed. As he feared assasination, he was becoming more and more reclusive and spent the majority of his time writing awful romance novels.

Now the UK/US have illegally invaded a nation that was no threat, used chemical weapons against civillians, set up torture facilities where innocent people where tortured to death and now we have, former Iraq Prime Minister, Allawi coming out and saying that the situation for Iraqis is now worse than under Saddam Hussien!

When will this madness end with the public trials of Tony Blair and George W Bush?

Saddam's trial rightly continues today, Bush' and Blair's MUST follow soon!

Why? because we trusted lunatics?

So we went into a destructive, deadly debacle in Iraq because Saddam Hussien had WMD and was using them on his own people and torturing his own people to death.
Except; he didn't have them, and we've used them on his own people and, despite them having a very poor version of democracy, now Iraqi's are still being tortured to death.

Was it because we trusted in the paranoid delusions of lunatics?

How can we prevent the next mistake?

./ later

A News Revolution Has Begun
by John Pilger
The Indian writer Vandana Shiva has called for an "insurrection of subjugated knowledge." The insurrection is well under way. In trying to make sense of a dangerous world, millions of people are turning away from the traditional sources of news and information and to the World Wide Web, convinced that mainstream journalism is the voice of rampant power. The great scandal of Iraq has accelerated this. In the United States, several senior broadcasters have confessed that had they challenged and exposed the lies told about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, instead of amplifying and justifying them, the invasion might not have happened.

More ...

More proof of delusions? Are they mad?

In a follow up to my last post, I have linked to an article from the mainstream media, USA Today. This article is a must read. It shows clearly that the US Administration did NOT lie about Iraq's WMD. Much worse, they genuinely believed their own paranoid delusional fantasies and were determined and succeeded in launching a terrible war of conquest and then destruction upon a sovereign nation that was no threat.

*NOTE The mainstream media SHOULD have been reporting this information all along, as I and hundreds of other bloggers WERE telling these truths as they came to light. During these last 2-3 years the mainstream media have been slagging off and ridiculing the blogs when we were doing THEIR JOB!!! Now they come clean(ish) and propose to tell us what we already knew all along. The mainstream media were still complicit in passing the government propaganda, without qualification, to the people as truth. They were NOT duped by the administration, or the intelligence services, they complied with them. Further, they would often not report the doubts that the intelligence community were raising prior to the invasion! I welcome the very late conversion of the mainstream media to reporting what really happened, (www.whatreallyhappened.com have already been doing this for some years as have rense.com, informationclearinghouse.info, prisonplanet.com davidicke.com antiwar.com amongst many others ) But now they need to look at the genuine, unanswered questions relating to 911 too, especially the controlled, pre-planned demolition of WTC7 and the prior arranged, multiple 'miitary exercises' taking place that day under the direct control of VP Dick Cheney. We are often told 'the world changed on 911, and 911 is constantly used to validate the on-going destruction of civil liberties at home, and creation of terrorist threat abroad. When the truth of 911 is generally acknowledged as an 'at least' assisted inside job engineered, or allowed, to succeed by the Neo-con cabal. Then, prehaps, the whole phoney war-on-terror house of cards may come crashing down and end this nightmare of delusion, destruction and death.*

I used to believed that Bush and Cheney lied us to war, and I argued that they were warned of the lack of evidence to support their arguments about Iraq's WMD and yet they continued to push those discredited and debunked claims. Thus supporting my argument that they deliberately lied.

I was wrong.

For them to lie, they would have to know that what they were saying was not true. They were told on many occasions by the UN, foreign intelligence and their own CIA, NSA and others that what they were claiming was not supported by evidence on the ground. That the intelligence could not be corroborated. However, they refused to even acknowledge for a nanosecond, that anything other than their fantasies could ever be real. They genuinely could not accept and therefore did not hear anything that contradicted their pre-created fantasy.

Worse, they created offices within the administration, The Office of Special Plans (under Rumsfeld), The Whitehouse Iraq Group (Under Cheney) that cherry picked and molded intelligence around their own delusional plans. How far did they go to create the reality they believed had to be real? The aluminum Tubes story was total nonsense and the Yellowcake Uranium from Africa was based on a known forgery, but still they believed this self-generated hallucination. The Mobile labs, were in fact Hydrogen balloon inflators, this was easily discoverable, they only had to look at the British receipts! Every single claim made by the administration in public in support of their fantasy world was very quickly proven wrong. How far did the administration go to create their reality? Was Valerie Plame outed as a CIA agent because her team uncovered and prevented the neo-cons from illegally smuggling WMD into Iraq to frame Saddam?

Like a teenager on LSD believing he could fly, they threw themselves off the roof of reality.

They did not therefore lie, but what they did do was far worse, they created policy that ultimately took us to a continuing quagmire of death and destruction based on their paranoid delusion. The Bush/Cheney administration in Washington and the Blair Government in London are not mentally fit to hold office. They are mentally unstable. In earlier, pre-politically correct days, they would be called lunatics. They are psychotic megalomaniacs with paranoid delusions and persecution complexes, add this to the Resident in thief's messianic delusion, linked to an over-compensation to his inferiority complex, and drug/alcohol brain damage and you get an administration that should not have control of a TV remote, let alone the worlds Weapons of Total Destruction.

They should be locked up in secure padded cells for their own, and for the rest of the planet's, safety.




Apologies to Iron Maiden , Eddie and especially Derek Riggs!

Why is this worse than them lying? Well, with a liar, they still have a reference of reality. Something that they can be confronted with and deal with as subjective and collective reality. A paranoid delusional, has no such reference and therefore can keep slipping ever further from that point of collective reality. Eventually the paranoid delusional will create their own reality based on the fantasies needed to supply their addiction to the emotions that keep feeding the fantasy reality. This sounds gibberish, but basically it means that the the brain chemical that are released into the body by the subjects emotions which have been triggered by their delusional fantasies become an addiction. In other words, They are addicted to the brain chemicals which are only released when they replay their fantasies and cause a specific emotion during that time. The paranoid delusional becomes less and less affected by the chemicals secreted by the brain when feeling the emotions that the subject is addicted to. In response to this hardening to the chemicals, they need stronger emotions of that type to produce the levels of chemical required to satiate the addiction. This means that the subjective reality that the subject needs to experience to satisfy their emotional addiction need to become stronger and more extreme. That leads to their own subjective reality and collective reality becoming two different things. The paranoid delusional needs ever more unrealistic and extreme fantasies in order to keep satisfying their chemical/emotional addiction.

The danger here is that if the level of delusional fantasy needed, (by the collective lunacy of the UK/US administrations), is one that has already created the disastrous Iraq war, then what's next?

These guys NEED to be locked up and QUICK!

Give me a liar over a lunatic everytime.

./later

I wanted to write this:

In this article, Justin Raimondo, again, succintly and with a deft attention to detail, manages to put into one column, what I would take 10 to cover in equal depth. Kudos to Justin.

I would simply take minor exception to one point. As I have come to realise over the recent past, reading as I have on the 'non-reality based' philosophy of the neo-cons, that the neo-cons did not actually lie us to war at all.

No, it is worse than that. For the situation to become as it is now, the neo-cons would either have had to not realise and be genuinely in error about the WMD and reception of the iraqis to the western invaders and so prove themselves to be too stupid to hold office, or they lied or worse, they knew they were wrong, but genuinely convinced themselves that they were right and so are dangerously delusional.

They claim that they are so big and powerful that they create the reality on the ground, international law and foriegn and domestic observers be damned! But when their delusional reality is tested by ACTUAL reality, there fake, wishfull thinking version becomes a disaster. Their delusions account for, 'no civilians targetted with white phosphorus', as there were no civilians in Fallujah. They were all enemy combatants in a free-fire zone. Unfortunately for the women, children, babies, elderly and infirm, the white phosphorus was only too real.

What we have in America and the UK at this time is not lying neo-cons, or sadly, even stupid neocons, but dangerously powerful, paranoid delusional neocons with nukes. These people are psychologically unfit to hold any position of power or influence anywhere in the world. I wouldn't even give them the remote control to the TV.

Shame the 25th ammendment only applies to the president and not the whole lunatic bunch of the neocon nutjobs. That include the neo-cons in the Senate, Congress, Parliament and the media too.

They have all rushed this world closer to the brink of a nuclear WW3 based on their paranoid delusions, creating fake terrorism, 911, 7/7, Afghanistan, Iraq, a global backlash against imperialist USA/UK et al in their wake.

Thankfully, we are just starting to see the beginning of the end for these psychopaths.

As the Plamegate controversy starts to eat away at their base and support like a cancer, I agree with Justin, Fetch the popcorn!

./ later.

The UK committed war crimes in Iraq too

This is more evidence of the mandacity, the lies and the evil depths to which our leaders have sunk.

We have liberated Iraq from an evil dictator to let them live under an avalanche of Crime, rapes, murders, kidnappings, terrorism and with a worse supply of power, food, water and medicines than under Saddam Hussien, We have used, or supported the use of, internationally banned chemical weapons against civillians.

Don't give me shit about white phosferous NOT being a chemical weapon! it's a chemical and it's a weapon! It's a fucking chemical weapon. PERIOD!!!

We are told by the Pentagon and the UK MOD and the UK Defense Secretary that these were not used against civilians, well that is PURELY a matter of cowardly and sickening semantics.

The defence secretary said he could not answer for the US use of the substance.

But he said: "We do not use white phosphorus, or indeed any other form of munition or weaponry, against civilians...

"We do not use it for anything other than a smokescreen to protect our troops when in action."

A smokescreen to defend the political crimes against humanity commited in Fallujah more like. Fallujah was a civilian center that was also home to Iraqis who believed they were fighting for their homeland against foreign invaders, much as I would similarly fight against anyone who invaded the UK. This is not praise or glorification of the resistance fighters, as many of their acts of violence and depravity can never be condoned or supported in any way, the City was a den of thieves and criminals and violent evil people. However it was also home to thousands and thousands of innocent civilians too, many of whom fled before the attacks, but many of whom also never managed to escape and were killed when they attempted to do so.

The US Military, supported by the UK military, cut off the water, sanitation, power and medication to an entire city. They then attacked the hospital, killing patients and doctors and nurses, this in itself was a warcrime. They then prevented women, children, elderly and disabled people from leaving the city. They shot and killed almost everything that moved, destroying Mosques, Clinics, museums and cultural and humanitarian facilities on their way to the total destruction of 75% of the city.

The US and UK uses weasel words to defend it's indefensible actions, words like enemy combatants, and free-fire zone. do you want to see an enemy combatant?

Here's one after the US finished with it:



After all those infants are a fearful enemy. A 300lb Marine with automatic weapons, air support, armoured vehicles and white phosferous needs to be very carefull with such a poweful enemy!

The whole city was turned into a free-fire zone, meaning that everything within the city and out including the Euphrates river, was thought of as having NO CIVILIANS in it. Women, children, babies, the elderly, the disabled, cats, dogs and any other living entity within Fallujah, whether a fighter or not, was DESIGNATED BY THE US AS AN ENEMY COMBATANT AND THEREFORE AS A LEGITIMATE TARGET!

the rules of engagement for a free-fire zone are "KILL EVERYTHING!!!"

Undoubtedly, there were civilians in Fallujah and they were targeted and killed with a weapon (that uses the effect of it's chemical interaction with the air to burn anything it meets so long as there is air present) that has also been banned by laws signed by many countries throughout the world.

Cowardly, deliberately misleading weasel words notwithstanding, civilians were targeted and killed with an internationally banned chemical weapon in Iraq by US troops supported by the US and UK Governments!

What happened in fallujah was as serious a war-crime as it gets (short of using nukes), and we are trying Saddam Hussien for lesser things right now.

ANYBODY that even attempts to describe what happened there as legal, necessary or right is a supporter of war crimes and is an enemy of humanity. Pure and Simple!

./later

Who bombed the Jordanian hotels?

Take a good look at this image:


supposedly this was the aftermath of a suicide bomber with an explosive belt tied to his chest. OK how come the tables where not blown to bits? it seems unlikely to me that the tables were moved there after the blasts and then placed in a crimescene.

The blast is powerful enough to rip a human to shreds, blast through the ceiling of the room, but, yet, not disturb the tablecloth? and how considerate of the suicide bomber not to get any of his blood on the walls. Oh, and how considerate of the Jordanian security forces to evacuate all the Israeli guests, but why did they forget the Jordanian guests or the other nationalities:

33 Jordanians

6 Iraqis

2 Bahrainis

1 Saudi

1 American

1 Indonesian

2 Chinese

(Note, no Israeli's in that list from the bbc website)

A number of Israelis staying yesterday at the Radisson SAS were evacuated before the bombing by Jordanian security forces, apparently due to a specific security alert. They were escorted back to Israel by security personnel.

This Haaretz article denies the earlier claims.

However, the other article appeared earlier and in my opinion is more reliable due to the fact that the other evidence in this case refutes later testimony and media assertions.

This LA Times article states:

Amos N. Guiora, a former senior Israeli counter-terrorism official, said in a phone interview with The Times that sources in Israel had also told him about the pre-attack evacuations.

"It means there was excellent intelligence that this thing was going to happen," said Guiora, a former leader of the Israel Defense Forces who now heads the Institute for Global Security Law and Policy at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland. "The question that needs to be answered is why weren't the Jordanians working at the hotel similarly removed?"

The image at the top of this article clearly shows the aftermath of an explosive planted ABOVE the room, Israelis are forwarned and evacuated,



The patsy is created and led before the worlds media so that we know who to blame.

Dig deeper people, the truth is not so hard to find. This was a wet false flag psy-op to create support, in the west, for the war on terror.

See This article for more...

./ later

What a load of CRAP!

ITN News: Jack Straw shocked by Baghdad abuse allegations

7.59AM, Wed Nov 16 2005

The Foreign Secretary Jack Straw has condemned the alleged abuse of 170 detainees held by Iraqi security forces in Baghdad.

He said he was "deeply shocked" after US troops discovered the malnourished inmates at an interior ministry detention centre on Sunday.

Washington has also said it's troubled by the discovery after some of the inmates were found to be showing signs of apparent torture. Iraqi's prime minister has ordered a full investigation.

He said: "Such behaviour is totally unacceptable. I very much welcome the immediate investigation announced by Iraqi prime minister Ja'afari today and his confirmation that such practices are completely contrary to Iraqi government policy.

"Whoever carried out this abuse must be caught and brought to justice, regardless of rank or background. We look forward to seeing the results of this investigation as soon as possible.

"Steps must be taken to prevent this sort of incident happening again."

OK so Mr Straw is shocked? really? I wonder why he hasn't expressed the same outrage against VP Dick Cheney? It is Cheney after-all that wants the CIA to be exempt from torture.

Or what about the President, GW Bush?

Those limitations do not extend to the CIA, however. Citing “national security”, the Bush administration has vigorously argued that the CIA be excluded from the restrictions. Bush has threatened to veto a Senate bill to ban torture - McCain is its chief proponent.

Jack straw should, perhaps, aim his shock and revulsion at the administration that supported and encouraged torture in the first place.

Now I ask myself, Why did we replace Saddam and in what way are Iraqis better off?