Back to normal...

OK after my fawning and cheeky request for people to buy my books and stuff, I received one complaint. Well I don't do self-promotion as a rule, but on this occasion I made an exception on the grounds laid out in my reply.

I may change my rules and do self promotion some more. I may not, I don't know yet

Back to my normal rants, thoughts and musings...



George Galloway misses a crucial point with his replies. He completely misses the crucial Russian response. What would Russia do? Well, unreported by mainstream media, the Russian's have already told us. Their foreign minister and their head of the military have both said that Iran is a strategic partner in Russia's energy policy, therefore ANY attack on Iran shall be perceived as a direct attack on Russia and will be met in like terms. In exactly the same way that the USA will respond to ANY attack on Israel in the same manner.

The Israelis have made it clear that their plans to disable Iran's nuclear capability (whether power generation or weapons manufacturing) will require the use of nuclear bunker busters. Now, as a brief aside, how can it be acceptable for Israel to threaten and plan and run drills and practice runs for a nuclear attack on another sovereign state? Where is the criticism, condemnation and UN sanctions against Israel because of that? The whole western world has been condemning massively a mistranslation of a desire on Iran's part to see the end of a Zionist regime (NOT a call to wipe Israel from the map) when that wish was not and is not backed up in any way with capability. Iran has NO nukes! Yet Israel can say that they intend to nuke Iran and then perform drills showing a clear intent and there is no response at all from a supine western world?

Anyway, back to the Russian response, in addition to thispromise to defend Iran militarily, the Russians added that any attack against Iran using nuclear weapons will be met with an immediate nuclear response.

The scenario could play out as follows: Israel nukes Iran's facilities. Russia nukes Tel Aviv, America Nukes back and the whole world goes up!!!

Does this fool on the radio calling for precision strategic attacks realise that in reality he is calling for a full blown global nuclear war?

A Huge WELCOME to the masses of visitors from David Icke's website

Welcome welcome welcome...

I am amazed and very pleasantly surprised by the fact that David Icke has linked to one of my articles. I am greatly honoured and humbled that he has done this. I am also MASSIVELY grateful. Thank You David.

Whilst you are here please have a read of my earlier work, buy my books, click on links, buy a hypnosis MP3 to solve some personal problem and generally help me to pay off my debts so that I can remove myself from the debt slavery of the global banking system. I know that is a very cheeky request, but hey, it's not everyday that my work is suddenly thrust before a much wider (and dare I hope ) sympathetic audience. This may even be a very synchronistic happening relating to my manifestation experiment. Thank you for visiting and please come back again soon... Tell you friends too.

Once again thank you for dropping by and I hope that you enjoy your visit.

I really really do appreciate your time here.

Thank you.

When the evidence no longer supports the theory, I guess the theory is wrong.

But since 1999 new evidence has seriously weakened the case that carbon emissions are the main cause of global warming, and by 2007 the evidence was pretty conclusive that carbon played only a minor role and was not the main cause of the recent global warming. As Lord Keynes famously said, "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?"

Continues ....

I apologise for my blatant error. Davis does NOT stand for freedom or liberty.

I (along with many frustrated people in this country) was played for a fool. David Davis MP and Shami Chakrabati, of the Liberty organisation, played us all for fools. The real reason is that they are being used by the system, (that they falsely claim to oppose) to be the tool that softens resistance to the imposition of a "Big Brother" state. When they turn and claim that ID cards, or a microchip in everyone is required, then it CAN'T be that it is the big nasty state that is enforcing something un-necessary on us. I mean, if David Davis, the leading light on conservative libertarian idealism is proposing this (and he will) then it MUST be necessary.... right?

The same "powers that be" were going to use Gordon Brown in the same way on the Euro single currency. His skeptisism was fake. The proof is that he has secretly seen to it that the Lisbon Treaty has now been fully ratified by the British Government, (they have delivered the signed deal to Rome) contrary to his promise to wait for the outcome of an appeal on the legality of refusing a direct promise to hold a referendum on this treaty in the manifesto upon which he was elected.

When the previous Blair government felt that they would have had about 40% support for scrapping the pound and introducing the Euro, then Gordon would have had a dramatic change of heart, based on some made up economic law that would have been widely published and supported by a totally supine mainstream media and lo, a huge chunk of opposition to the Euro would vanish. I mean, if the "Iron Chancellor" was now in favour? it MUST be necessary. They could have won a referendum on such measures. However, the powers that be did not reckon on the chancellor's two main character flaws. His abject cowardice combined with his enormous ego and desire to be PM. He knew that if this did not work, then he would never be PM. So he bottled the issue. There never quite was a figure of 40% in favour of the Euro anyway, so he became PM and gave the whole system away to the EU in grubby secretive deals. Signing the treaty alone; forcing the treaty through both houses of Parliament with the hypocritical support of the Liberals, both parties having to ditch their own election promises to do so. Having the Queen sign the deal and then despite a promise to wait to October and the outcome of a House of Lords appeal, thus ratifying the treaty that closes the door on ever being able to peacefully become a free independent nation once more. But I digress, what has that to do with David Davis?

Well it is the same sort of bare faced treachery at work. As the diary below demonstrates, the whole "big brother by election" was a great big sham and con job. Designed and controlled in such a way as to manipulate the debate so that it would firmly establish in people's minds and perceptions that David Davis becomes the leader of public opinion on issues of liberty, freedom and "the big brother state". That way, when the "system" needs to soften public opinion, all that they have to do is get Shami and David to say, "look, if I am in favour of this new measure, and sadly in the light of the recent [insert problem reaction solution event here] unfortunately there clearly IS a need for [insert Big Brother toolkit solution here]." And much of the Davis and Liberty supporting opposition will crumble.

Anyway, below is the Journal of a person who witnessed first hand the deliberate control, the shutting down of debate, the refusal of liberty to assemble and question, as this former supporter of David Davis became so dissillusioned with the whole sham. The journal is republished here with permission from the author and copied from the David Icke website.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tuesday, 15 July 2008

Journal of a Sham Election

By a Concerned Citizen

This is the journal of a local person who supported the David Icke stand in the Big Brother by-election and took her own personal action to get key questions answered by David Davis, the man who said he triggered the election to highlight the impositions of surveillance cameras, ID cards, the DNA database and the law allowing 'terrorist suspects' to be held without charge for 42 days.

As the David Icke team soon realised, and this journal records, the 'Big Brother' by-election was not an 'election' at all. It was a coronation for David Davis with all others, and the wider debate, excluded from this stage-managed sham.

If we have to rely on David Davis MP and Shami Chakrabati of the Liberty organisation to protect us from Big Brother then we're in serious trouble.

Picture this, it’s the evening of the 10^th July and I am standing in a sports centre witnessing the count for the Haltemprice and Howden by-election, and also the biggest sham and travesty, personally, I have ever been witness to. Elections are only rigged in America aren’t they?! Plenty of characters are here and I had the pleasure of meeting most of the candidates. Mr. Davis is floating around with an almost stupid grin on his face, basking in the glory of his fair and balanced open debate on Big Brother.

I had to laugh as I watched the man who I had witnessed personally over the past previous few days, squirm and lie to his voters bare faced. Of course, as we all know he won the seat for Haltemprice and Howden making him an MP. Now to the casual observer this process may have appeared open, balanced and fair, but believe me it was anything but. What I am about to describe to you is a version of events very different to the ones presented in the media. Hold on tight. This is in reverse chronological order and begins with ‘bosom buddies’ Mr. Davis and Shami Chakrabati’s cosy little debate on liberties in Willerby.

09/07/2008 – Willerby Manor Hotel

Excellent, I thought, another opportunity to ask Mr. Davis some more awkward questions. Today Mr. Davis was meeting with Shami Chakrabati (Head of Liberty) amongst others to discuss our ‘liberties’. I got there nice and early and was handing out a list of questions that David Icke would like to have asked Mr. Davis if he were not barred from his events! How ironic, eh? That Mr. Davis receives personal support from Bob Geldoff at Guildhall, and David Icke, the man who has written numerous books on the subject of Big Brother, a leading authority on the subject, is barred from the event?!?! Now alarm bells should be ringing!!

This is just one of the ways that the by-election has been hi-jacked and the debate stifled – ah yes, that reminds me – back to Shami and Mr. Davis. So there I was outside the Willerby Manor Hotel handing out question leaflets, and stating to people that David Icke had been banned from the Guildhall – when lo and behold the free public event that was advertised on Mr. Davis’ website was at the cost of five pounds! OK, I thought, I’ll go find out who I give my money to. By the time I had got from the hotel entrance to the conference room where the so-called debate was being held, it was constituent members only. My God I thought, what are these people afraid of? Certainly not moving the goalposts!

The world’s media attended this event and at least one camera captured not just my protests – but various other protests that fell on deaf ears. How ironic, once again, that a debate centred on liberties and freedom, and also attended by the Head of Liberty, left individuals at the door, shut out, voices silenced. If freedom of speech isn’t for everyone then it’s for no-one at all; and sadly on that day the point could not have been illustrated better.

Whilst the melee was going on outside the room where the debate was to be had, who should turn up but Shami herself, closely followed by the ‘puppet’ Mr. Davis. At this point Shan Oakes from the Green Party (candidate that came second to Mr. Davis in the sham by-election, yes she was excluded from this debate, too) sprinted across the hotel into the reception area and told Shami Chakrabati exactly what had just gone on.

For a split second I thought to myself ‘great, surely she will do or say something’, and then I remembered the question I was going to ask her if I could get in and her connections to Davis. Silly me, of course she isn’t going to do anything, maybe apart from forcing Andy Burnham, Culture Secretary, to apologise to her for suggesting Mr. Davis was conducting ‘late night, hand-wringing, heart-melting’ phone calls with her over the 42 days issue. On this one, I have to agree with Andy Burnham.

Shami disappears no doubt for some more ‘hand-wringing’ with Mr. Davis, and the outcome doesn’t change – we are not allowed entry to the debate. If Shami would like me to apologise I am available for some ‘late night, hand-wringing, heart-melting phone calls’ over issues of liberty and truly open debate.

Concentrating on Shami Chakrabati for the moment, I will record here what I was going to ask her. This should make it clear to all what perfect bedfellows Shami and Davis really are (just a shame they didn’t have the ideals of John and Yoko).

‘You have close ties to the British American Project, and are a Governor of the Ditchley Foundation. Both recruit up and coming young talent in various fields of business, and like the Bilderberg meetings, discussions are private and non-attributable. For liberty to mean anything process must be transparent. How can you justify your position as Director of Liberty in light of this?’

Seen as though I was not allowed to ask this fair and honest question, in a fair and open debate, I have no choice but to answer it myself. You have no justification for your position as Head of Liberty. On this day you stand accused of stifling debate, dodging questions, encouraging secret agenda debate and having no positive effects on the rights denied to the very people you claim to represent. You silenced the voice of open, truthful debate and replaced it with your order of debate, not the peoples.

Shami Chakrabati you and Mr. Davis should be thoroughly ashamed of yourselves and resign forthwith. (After maybe a couple of ‘hand-wringing’ phone calls). Don’t you just love a good rant!?!? So that’s basically what happened on that day, and if we rewind a bit further, Mr. Davis, only the day before, is caught out, bare-faced lying to his constituents in Eastringham, near Howden (no media, maybe that’s why I was allowed in!).

7pm 08/07/2008 – Eastringham Village Hall, Near Howden

Again, another free public meeting wherein Mr. Davis wanted a ‘safe debate’, no ‘awkward questions’. On the panel tonight were Martin Bell (bless him, I loved the stories he regaled about war zones, cheese and fine wines but couldn’t help thinking, that’s not what this is about – nice and safe though) and a guy whose name escapes me who wrote ‘Taking Liberties’ – how ironic, again, that he should be sat next to a man that was, and is, doing exactly that!

The hall was reasonably well filled; I would say a comfortable 150 people attended and so began the phony debate. Mr. Davis addressed the issue of a Big Brother presence in England, and basically blamed the Labour Party. Martin read a poem, and as charmed as I was, by his charming befuddlement, I thought to myself ‘this isn’t a debate, this is more like a self-congratulatory party to celebrate the fact that we have achieved looking like we are having a debate and actually discussing nothing at all’.

Questions were then taken, and to no surprise at all, on my part, he wasn’t even looking in my direction. I had my hand raised to the ceiling! I think he recognized me too!! My hand still raised and thinking ‘damn, not going to be able to ask this question’, a guy, stood against the wall next to me, had actually had his hand up for me (don’t know your name but thank you!). Mr. Davis indicated for this man’s question and he duly informed him that he had his hand up for me! Result!! I stood up and asked him this:

Me: Fleishman-Hillard is a global PR firm representing companies that have introduced ID Cards in the US and Spain. Can you explain why your ‘Freedom Campaign’ website is set up by Fleishman-Hillard?

Davis: Well ... er ... well ... in the short time I had to set up this campaign I didn’t have time to look into the connections and what companies it was associated to ... blah blah blah.

Me (stood up): So then Mr. Davis, can you confirm or deny that you have been close friends with Kevin Bell for the past 20 years, who also happens to be the Vice President of Fleishman-Hillard? And Entrust, a client of Fleishman-Hillard, is responsible for your website, and is also responsible for 30million Spanish citizens ID Cards?

Right off on one; Mr. Davis rattled, his lie shown up to the high heavens, all in a bit of an uproar, party members telling me he’s heard what I just asked him, me saying that I know, I just wanted to make sure that the people had heard, still standing.

Davis: Sit down! Sit down! And I’ll answer the question.

Watch out for Mr. Davis’ turn about -

Me: If you don’t mind I would rather stand – it is all about civil liberties after all.

Laughter, the sweet sound of laughter……..I remained standing and listened to Mr. Davis’ pathetic back peddle

Davis: Er ... yes ... er ... well ... I ... actually…..er ... had a meeting with er ... Kevin Bell and he told me er ... .he didn’t believe er ... in them. Wouldn’t work, wouldn’t work.

Now, what worried me the most is not that Kevin Bell (Mr. Davis’ close friend of 20years) doesn’t believe ID cards will work, but Mr. Davis’ blatant lie about not even knowing the connection with regards to ID Cards; something integral to his stance against Big Brother. Oh Lordy, someone hold me up or beam me up. Old mates are you Mr. Davis? Why don’t you be honest about your connections? Or is it because you think that it wouldn’t lay well with the voters?

A man, who resigned from the Shadow Cabinet on the basis of challenging Big Brother, then has his website set up by the very same company that is responsible for 30million ID Cards. Or do you know the game you’re in? I suspect you do, or else you wouldn’t be lying about important facts such as these to the people who could potentially vote for you.

Mr. Davis was also asked at this event why David Icke had been turned away from the Guildhall despite having a ticket for the public event. Mr. Davis’ response to this was to move swiftly along to the next question. Maybe it’s because he didn’t want to answer the biggie:

‘You have been strongly supported in your stance against Big Brother by Ed Vaizey MP, Michael Grove MP and Colonel Tim Collins, who are all original signatories to ‘The Statement of Principles’ of the Henry Jackson Society, a Neocon or Neoconservative ‘think tank’, set up in Britain in 2005 and named after the US Senator Henry ‘Scoop’ Jackson, one of the icons of the Neocon Movement in the US, that has controlled the Bush Administration since it came to power and orchestrated the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq and the War on Terror in general.

This is the very same War on Terror that has been used to justify the introduction of the Big Brother society that you say you oppose.'

Once you start looking at the connections, money and glowing support for a one Mr. Davis, you start to see things, and the man that is now MP for Haltemprice and Howden in a very different light. Which brings me nicely to a conversation I had with George Osborne, the Shadow Chancellor, outside the Conservative Club in Willerby the very same morning. Once again a high profile figure turns out to support Mr. Davis on his stance against Big Brother. I turned up again to ask a reasonable question of Mr. Osborne. The Press Association was there, two or three newspapers, and the general stick of hypocrisy. He was duly interviewed and publicly supported Mr. Davis on his stance against Big Brother.

After waiting patiently and ingratiating myself as a budding reporter for the University Press; it went like this:

Me: Mr. Osborne, how do you justify your support for ...

Mr. Osborne: Wait ... wait ... hang on ... you haven’t told me your name or where you’re from, blah blah (trying to silence debate!)

Me: My name is ****** and I’m from the university and I really need to ask you this question and I really need you to listen (no cameras, but picked up on audio, not that the press will use it!).

Mr. Osborne: OK, OK (squirming and hopping).

Me: Mr. Osborne, how do you justify your support for David Davis and his stance on the Big Brother issue regarding your recent attendance of the Bilderberg meeting, a ‘think tank’ for World Government that has proposed a plan to microchip Americans under the pretext of fighting terrorism?

Mr. Osborne: Well ... er ... well ... I ... we don’t normally admit to being at such a meeting, but, er, on this occasion I think we can make an exception. Yes, I was at that meeting.

Me: Yes, in Chantilly, Virginia, I have your name on the attendance list here (Google Bilderberg meeting 2008).

Mr. Osborne (well puffed up and sure of himself): Well, yes I was there ... haw, haw ...laugh, laugh, but I can assure you microchips were not discussed.

Me (pulling out a report from www.infowars.com reporting microchips being discussed and planned at the Bilderberg meeting he had attended): Well, if that’s the case Mr. Osborne you might want to read this; it says the complete opposite, in fact.

Mr. Osborne (backing off trying to make excuses): Er ... well ... thank you ... I will.

Me: I suggest you do, because your bosses are planning to recruit more ‘blue eyed, blonde haired terrorists’ making them almost impossible to recognise – thus giving them the excuse to microchip us all.

Mr. Osborne (walking away): Thank you ... anyway, must go and blah, blah, blah.

Me: Mr. Osborne, hang on, don’t walk away. You haven’t answered my question. How do you justify your support of Mr. Davis in light of this?

Mr. Osborne (must have slipped into standard response mode): Well, er ... er ... it’s all about individual civil liberties blah, blah.

Me (laughing): Please, how can you say that after attending a secret meeting only a month ago that discussed and proposed a microchip for every man, woman and child in America!?! (still laughing).

At this point Mr. Osborne fairly ran for the door, but did pause at the top of the steps of the Conservative Party Office to say: 'Thanks'.

Me (waving as I walked away): No problem Mr. Osborne. See you soon.

Again, in and around Mr. Davis’ campaign there are individuals supporting his stance on Big Brother, whilst at the same time having connections to the very substance of what Mr. Davis’ campaign opposes; ID Cards, microchips, Neocons, secret meetings and deliberate suppression of the truth out loud and proud. But hey, what better place to hide the corruption and lies of the ‘establishment’ that knows the people are becoming restless about Big Brother. Have a placeman, a yes man and the rest will follow. The appearance of a full and honest open debate. The placeman I am talking about here is Mr. Davis.

To conclude I would like to finish with my first encounter with Mr. Davis on the 5^th July 2008 in Cottingham Church. It was a Saturday and raining hard.

05/07/2008 – Cottingham Church

I was stood outside a supermarket handing out election leaflets when I heard Mr. Davis was in the church. Excellent, my opportunity to ask him why he refuses to debate with David Icke (and others of course!). I briskly walk over to the church just hoping he was there and that I could have a chat with him. It couldn’t have gone any better. As I am walking down the aisle who should appear walking away from the altar towards me?!? Yes. Mr. Davis. I clocked him and as we both rounded a massive pillar in the church the conversation began:

Me (to Mr. Davis): Don’t suppose you’ve seen David Davis anywhere?

Davis (looking a bit puzzled): Well yes, that’s me…….

Me: Hi, pleased to meet you (shook hands). Could you tell me why you have refused to have an open debate with David Icke over the issue of Big Brother?

Davis: Ah yes well, time constraints plus too many candidates, there’s not enough time to debate. I mean would you want to debate with The Monster Raving Loony Party?

Me: Well….. (humouring him – everyone has the right to stand and be heard) regardless of time constraints, and the number of candidates, this debate still needs to be had at some point. It isn’t a localised problem, it is on a global scale and if we aren’t careful very soon we will be living in a Global Fascist Dictatorship. What’s your take on it?

Davis: My concerns are ID Cards, DNA Databases and cameras which are against civil liberties ...

Me (interrupting): I appreciate what you’re saying and agree with you – but the problem is global and connected, it’s a global Big Brother problem, not local.

Davis: Oh well, let’s sort out England first!

Me: It’s not a case of that, it’s a global problem. Have you heard of the Bilderbergs, Council for Foreign Relations or the Trilateral Commission?

Davis: No, never heard of any of them, and if it’s a global Big Brother, where’s your evidence?

Me: Oh I have evidence Mr. Davis. The question is will you read it and will you look at it? There’s no point in it being presented to you if you don’t do that.

Davis: Send it to me and I will.

At this point I asked Mr. Davis for a card or point of contact – which he responded to by saying I could send the evidence to the Conservative Party Office in Willerby. The information will be sent, but here is the address in full for anyone else wanting to enlighten him –

Conservative Party Office

32 Main Street

Willerby

Hull

HU10 6BU

Tel: 01482 657938

email: contact@daviddavisforfreedom.com

So there we have it. You make your own mind up. But do remember; I’m not politically motivated nor a journalist - just an individual that has concerns and questions. And during this experience I had first hand, my concerns were confirmed, my questions unanswered.

The man that is now MP for Haltemprice and Howden is surrounded and protected by the Big Brother Agenda he is supposed to oppose; the agenda that he resigned over and the agenda that ultimately assured he was elected as MP. This debate was fake, controlled and contrived from start to finish. I am only glad that I was close enough to witness the hypocrisy, lies and deceit that passes for Democracy in this country, and county of Yorkshire. If you agree please feel free to distribute this journal far and wide.

With all my love,

K

More Icke from the Mid '90's.

3 hour presentation by David Icke.

This is a three hour presentation by David Icke in response to David Davis MP calling a by-election to highlight and fight the big-brother state.

David Icke barely even scratches the surface in this but still shows the reach of "big brother" and it is WAY more advanced than David Davis MP admits. David Icke presents much more information in his normal (7 hour) presentations and STILL barely scratches the surface on some topics as to tell everything he had uncovered during 20 years of intense full-time research in 40+ countries would require a presentation spanning several days. Compare that to the mere few minutes the average journalist spends looking into this issue before reflex action kicks into to dismiss this as crazy nonsense.

This is a much watch video.

Manifestation experiment continued: What amazing synchronicities

Only 4 days in and already synchronisities are appearing. This is because the hypnosis actually programs the sub-conscious mind to notice opportunities that may otherwise be missed.

Some people have a difficulty with hypnosis, so here is an article that explodes the myths.

5 Hypnosis Myths Exploded

OVER the years, hypnosis has picked up all sorts of weird associations from stage hypnotists, the media and superstition. This is a great shame, because in reality, hypnosis is your single most effective tool for change. Hypnosis is your birthright, and you should know how to use it so it doesn't use you. Here we dispel the biggest hypnosis myths.

Hypnosis Myth 1) All hypnosis is the same

As with anything, hypnosis can be good, bad or indifferent. The most common is old-style authoritarian hypnosis of the type "You are getting sleepy, you are feeling confident". Unsurprisingly, this sort of hypnosis doesn't work well with many people. Good hypnosis uses subtle psychological principles and advanced communication patterns.

It's like the difference between a football coach who thinks you'll perform best if he yells at you, compared with the more elegant style of a great leader who knows that to get the best from his people, he needs to understand motivation, to cajole, encourage and reward.

Hypnosis Downloads.com offers hundreds of sessions using the best type of hypnosis.

Hypnosis Myth 2) Subliminals work

Subliminals are words that you can't hear. Common sense says they shouldn't work, and there's no research proving that they do.

Hypnosis Myth 3) Some people can't be hypnotized

The only reason you can't be hypnotized is if you are incapable of paying attention due to extremely low IQ or brain damage. That's not to say that every hypnotist can hypnotize you however. The more flexible the hypnotist, the more effective she will be with the largest number of people.

Hypnosis Myth 4) Hypnosis is something weird that other people do to you

If you couldn't go into hypnosis, you wouldn't be able to sleep, to learn, or get nervous through 'negative self hypnosis'. (You know when you imagine things going wrong and it makes you feel anxious? Well that's self hypnosis!)

Hypnosis is simply a deliberate utilization of the REM (Rapid Eye Movement) or dream state. We're not giving people medication here – if it wasn't a natural ability, hypnosis wouldn't work!

Hypnosis Myth 5) You lose control in hypnosis

Crazy news stories, stage hypnotists and gossip have created the illusion that you lose control in hypnosis. In fact, when hypnotized, you are relaxed and focused – and able to choose to get up and walk away at any time. You choose to give your attention to the hypnotist, and you can withdraw it at any time.

If you have been scared of hypnosis in the past, this article has hopefully convinced you to at least give it a try. But remember, ensure what you're getting is the real thing. Visit www.hypnosisdownloads.com

Article by Mark Tyrrell of Hypnosis Downloads.com.

Manifestation experiment continued: Mission Statement

My purpose is to express my determination to achieve goals and take action every day to pursue these goals relentlessly and stay persistent, to demonstrate my love for my family by showing consistently that I put them first and demonstrate my ability to create wealth by goal setting and monitoring how these are being achieved and by doing whatever is necessary (getting outside my comfort zones) to be financially independent, create valuable products, inspire and lead and obtain at least £54,500.00 by 24th June 2009

Created with Nightingale Conant's FREE mission statement tool.

An experiment in Manifestation.

I have read about "the secret" and about manifesting your own reality. I have had small successes in this area and this has led me to do more research further upon these little successes, so I have decided to do a larger scale experiment.

I shall manifest a reality in which I become completely debt free in only 1 year from today the 23rd of June 2008.

I shall keep this blog up to date with my progress.

Let me stress before I start that I am currently at least 10 years from becoming debt free at my current rate of budgeting, additionally, I have no idea, not the first clue HOW I shall become debt free. I have not got (at this time of writing) ANY foreknowledge of where this extra money is going to come from. I just have made a decision that it is coming and I shall be debt free in one year's time. That is the last time I shall write about this in this way.

Now, a major part of manifestation is keeping the vision in the current tense and keeping ALL the language surrounding this positive, therefore from now on, I shall not refer to debt free, as this places an energy into the concept of debt, thus creating debt. So from now on, I shall only refer to having a positive total financial balance and being completely financially independent and being in surplus.

I shall do this by meditation, writing the goal in detail many times every day, strong positive visualisation. self hypnosis creating absolute belief. I shall watch out for powerful synchronicities that will keep delivering my goals faster and faster.

Check back often to see how I do and please feel free to comment.

Microchipping people....it's beginning already.

(NaturalNews) The British government is developing a plan to track current and former prisoners by means of microchips implanted under the skin, drawing intense criticism from probation officers and civil rights groups.

More...

George Carlin R.I.P.

George Carlin, a great comedic hero famed for his routines about global mis-governance, religion and the power elite, died of heart failure at a Los Angeles-area hospital on Sunday, a spokesman said. He was 71.

Interesting.

ABOUT TIME!!!!

First step the by election.... next step, the general election and then, perhaps, we can have our country back from the labour dictatorship and have our freedoms and our privacy respected again.

Labour: **** OFF!

The nature of reality exposed by a stroke.

AWESOME.

If Only ...

We had some news interviewers in the UK who would have the balls to take our politicians and so-called experts to task like this. I would have loved for someone to interview Blair like this and call him on his blatant BS before he invaded Iraq. The news media has been supremely craven and supine in their support for our corrupt political leaders for far too long.

Amen to that!

Global Warming and Cooling - The Reality

Stephen Wilde has been a Fellow of the Royal Meteorological Society since 1968. The first two article's from Mr Wilde were received with a great deal of interest throughout the Co2 Sceptic community.

In Stephen Wilde's third and exclusive article for CO2Sceptics.Com, he explores the mechanics and mechanism involved that are attributed to the Earth's Warming and Cooling, needless to say the presence of CO2 is not part of the process.

Global Warming and Cooling - The Reality.

It’s all very well doing what alarmists do which is to say that Co2 is rising and temperatures are rising so in the absence of any other known cause it must be man made CO2 that is warming the planet. That approach ignores both the differing scale of the possible influencing factors and the clear historical relationship between cooler climates and periods of a less active sun. The presence of the sun must be a much bigger influence on global temperatures than the greenhouse characteristics of CO2 on it’s own.

At most the greenhouse effect can only be marginal though some have tried to talk it up by asserting that the planet would be very much colder without a greenhouse effect, which is correct, but avoids the issue of the rather small proportion of the overall greenhouse effect provided by CO2 and the even smaller proportion provided by man. It also begs the question as to whether the oceans are slowly releasing CO2 as a result of natural warming. If the oceans warm for any reason they will release CO2 into the atmosphere because water holds less CO2 at higher temperatures.

The greenhouse effect, as a whole, may smooth out rises and falls in temperature from other causes but is not itself the determining factor for global temperature. If the heat from the sun declines the global temperature will fall with or without any greenhouse effect and if the heat from the sun increases the global temperature will, of course, rise. The greenhouse effect does not create new heat. All it does is increase the residence time of heat in the atmosphere.

Continues ......

I cannot fault this article. I have wondered for several years now how a tiny proportion of the tiny proportion of a natural atmospheric gas could have a greater effect on our climate than the interaction between the energy output of the sun and the energy store of the oceans. That has never made sense to me that the former was greater than the latter, or that it could even have any effect on the latter or more of an effect than, say, a fly hitting the windscreen would have on the momentum of a motor vehicle. I have always considered that our climate is merely the meeting layer and interactive layer between a huge energy output source (the sun) and a huge energy store (the oceans) The landmass has a smaller effect and the people on it practically none. You only have to use google earth to see how insignificant mankind is. Spin the earth and with eyes closed stop the spin and zoom into the surface, 7 times out of 10 that will be uninhabited water. Of the three times that land surface is encountered it is usually barren desert or mountains. People only have the feeling that we over populate the planet because we all live together and spend our waking experiences mostly in towns and cities. The vast majority of the earth is unspoilt nature.

The variations in the suns output, our irregular orbit around the sun and the electro-magnetic energy fluctuations, would have a far greater effect on the climate than any tiny proportion of a tiny proportion of natural atmospheric gas. To my way of thinking this is blindingly obvious.

Increasing the amount of "greenhouse" gas may have a tiny effect on climate, but to compare our climate to a greenhouse is massively and grossly over-simplifying our complex climate to the extent that it completely omits many of the critical and most fundamental regulatory mechanisms that actually occur in our real climate (many of which are omitted entirely from so-called sophisticated computer models). I was aghast when I read that many of these models cannot accurately model clouds and rain, and some omit them altogether. They do not model the solar cycles, they do not model winds correctly and they did not model ocean cycles at all until recently. The most hysterical models have the "greenhouse effect" creating a "tropospheric heat island" high in the atmosphere that reflects more heat back to earth in a positive feedback loop leading to the "tipping point" that starts catastrophic global warming. Inconveniently, the NASA Aqua satellite system has shown that the tropospheric heat island (central to the catastrophic human induced global warming scare) does not, in fact, exist in reality. The cooling of the earth since 1998 matches in with solar observations and the ocean's cooling as observed by the Argos sub-ocean probes. More and more evidence is coming in all the time that demonstrates that the earth IS cooling. Climate alarmists deny this and in desperation call it merely a "stalling of global warming". This suggests that warming is on-going and irreversible so that they can continue to get their fat grant cheques. In that case the last 200 years has been a long stalling in onset of the next ice age then!

To my way of thinking, the earth is either warming or cooling. It is always doing one or the other. As to trends over time, it depends on when you want to measure from or to. I could show dates that currently show that we are in a warming trend and others that show that we are in a cooling trend. Alarmists only allow dates that support their alarmism and refute all other dates as meaningless.

We should stop worrying about CO2 and start tackling the problems that DO exist. Tackling the destruction of ancient forests, the massive damage done to the Amazon and the ancient forests of Borneo must be a high priority. The Orang-utang is facing extinction because of the desire to grow palm for palm oil. This kind of rape and butchery of nature must be stopped. We should clean up genuine pollution. CO2 is NOT a pollutant. We must grow crops for food, not oil! We are witnessing mass starvation in much of the world so that the political class can feel pleased with themselves that they are "tackling climate change" in their knee-jerk over-reaction to a false alarm. Tackle climate change? that has to be the worst and most brain dead slogan I have ever heard. What do they propose to do? Move the earth further from the sun? This is truly the science and politics of King Canute.

Excellent article and also plain common sense.

My considered response to Labour's kicking in the local elections.

Labour were utterly humiliated and crushed and about time too. There performance was terrible and it was a delicious delight to watch the hapless Harriet Harman squirm as the true scale of their fully deserved defeat began to sink in.

Their excuses for their failure are, though, just as inept as their inability to govern.

Thursday's election was not a call to "pull your socks up Gordon" or a reaction purely to the 10p tax bad being DOUBLED (it was NOT abolished) People paying tax on that band are now and will continue to pay tax at 20p, that is NOT an abolition. I wish the media would finally after 14 months and hundreds of letters finally get a fucking clue and report the simple truth that this was a tax doubling not a tax abolition.

No the 10p tax was merely the straw that broke the camel's back. The re-introduction of 10p will not fix the splintered vertebrae.

What the 10p tax doubling showed in very simple and graphic terms was the character of a Government that will spend more than £100 billion pounds in loan guarantees bailing out billionaire bankers from billions of pounds of worthless loans, whilst doubling the income tax on 5 million of the poorest people in the country.

That stark realisation is what has not only lost labour a big chunk of their natural support, but utterly disgusted and sickened many of those whose father's and grandfather's had always voted labour so they must too... It took such a stark contrast to throw into graphic relief the difference between the support that Labour cravenly give to the billionaire bankers and the sickening contempt in which they hold their working class base.

That kind of awakening, forced by the sudden sickening jarring of realisation of contemptuous betrayal cannot be bought off lightly. Nor will it ever be forgotten by those whose taxes have now doubled.

Thursday's election was NOT a warning shot. Neither was it the labour party failing to get their message across. Labour's message, by their numerous and on-going vile, arrogant and corrupt actions, has got across very very clearly indeed and the result on Friday morning was the country had told that complacent and arrogant Labour party to FUCK RIGHT OFF!!!. Never return. No excuses, no fourth or fifth chances, no cheap policy initiatives to buy our support back. Labour have had numerous warnings before.

Every national election since 2001, except ONE general election, has been won by the Tories. So that is every local and European election that labour lost was a warning to labour. They did NOT listen to any of them. The sight of an unelected labour leader lecturing Mugabe on democracy after Brown has reneged on a promise to hold a referendum on the EU treaty sticks firmly in the throat.

Thursday was a national cry of enough is enough! Get out of power and never darken our political landscape with your oppressive centrist authoritarian politically correct ineptitude and corruption ever again.

The media that keep referring to this as the "abolition" of the 10p tax band will never ever get why this is such a pivotal moment and I cannot for the life of me understand why the media will keep insisting of referring to it as the abolition of the 10p band, as if just re-instating the 10p band will make everything OK again... It won't.

The fact that the labour party doubled the income tax whilst prices rise and at the same time have set aside hundreds of billions of pounds to bail out bankers has shown that the mask has slipped to reveal, in all it's ghastly nastiness, the real face of labour's leadership, this cannot be undone. Putting the mask back will not make people forget the horror's that laid beneath.

I would ask that anyone who still had the hatred in their hearts or the mendacity to vote labour to explain to me, how it is morally acceptable to spend billions bailing out the billionaire bankers whilst doubling the income tax on 5 million of the poorest workers in the land? This is a spiteful and cruel act upon a minority group of some of the most vulnerable people in the land. Spiteful and cruel acts on homosexuals are now illegal. spiteful and cruel acts against people because of the colour of their skin is now illegal.

In my humble opinion, voting labour now is on a par with racism or gender/sexual preference discrimination and should be legally classed as a hate crime.