Friday, August 22, 2008
A top U.S. general visiting Georgia condemned the pullout as "far too little, far too slow".
Well, when was "Mission Accomplished" in Iraq? May 1st 2003! If the Russian pull-out is going at a snail's pace, then the USA's is like continental drift.
It has been said that George Bush doesn't know the meaning of the word "hypocrisy" - but then again he doesn't know the meaning of most words.
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
So why is oxygen disappearing from fishing waters in the Gulf of Mexico? The answer, scientists say, is found hundreds of miles to the north, up the Mississippi River in corn country.
Farmers in Iowa and across the Midwest use tons of nitrogen and phosphorous to make their cornfields more productive, which allows the farmers to take advantage of high corn prices resulting from growing demand from ethanol factories and developing countries.
Response stolen from Mike Rivero of whatreallyhappened.com. because I could not put it better myself:
So, let us recap.
Ethanol is sold to us on the claim that it is "carbon neutral" (which it isn't when you add in the emissions form the processing itself), and therefore a way to deal with the crisis-de-jour, human-caused global warming (at a time when the Earth's temperature is actually in decline). Since ethanol contains less energy than an equivalent amount of gasoline, drivers must buy and burn more of it to drive the same distance, which means it is actually more expensive per mile than gasoline. Plus, Germany has just banned ethanol because they discovered it actually damages the fuel system on cars designed to run on gasoline, thereby driving up the cost of car repairs (and the carbon output from the factories that make those spare hoses and gaskets).
As a side effect of turning corn into ethanol, food prices went through the roof. Crop surpluses vanished, and as a consequence, weather and flood-induced food shortages occurred right here in the United States.
And now we find out that the run-off from all this intensified corn farming is creating oxygen-free dead zones, killing off another source of food, deep ocean fish.
So what we have here is a media hoax used to sell us a product that we did not really need that costs more and does more harm to the world than the non-existent crisis supposedly did.
It sounds good in Al Gore's TV Commercials, but it has not been thought out very well. It may be good public relations, but it is not good science.
But then, snake oil never is.
Friday, August 15, 2008
Oh dear. I guess these people get their news exclusively from the mainstream media.
Here are but two examples that stand out.
1. "We should finish what we started in world war two and go in and finish those Russians once and for all." Ignoring the fact that Russia was on OUR side in World War 2 and the 10 MILLION troops they lost to Hitler's army was critical to the allied victory, without which this Blog would be in German. Any call to attack a Russia that still has 6000 nuclear weapons is plain suicide.
2. "When Georgia gets a US backed puppet in power, those Russians won't be invading her anymore." OK, It is the fact that the current President of Georgia IS an American puppet and launched a genocide against Russian nationals in an American backed sneak attack that CAUSED this current crisis.
The mainstream media has been woeful and rediculously inept at truthful reporting about what really happened. That is why I get my news from a very wide range of sources. News items from all over the world, east, west , north and south, bulletin boards and forums devoted to those with inside knowledge of international geo-political events, newsgroups of the same. etc etc...
Speaking of what really happened.
I get some of my news from an excellent resource online called whatreallyhappened.com. This site has a slight bias against Israel, sure, but the news on the site is generally rather accurate. It is from this site that I discovered how much Israel was involved in the Georgian incursion into South Ossetia. Mike Rivero is the site's owner and has a marvelous instinct for what is happening. He also has a descernment that is very rarely wrong. (He hasn't fallen for the "no plane hit the pentagon" nonsense for example).
So here's the thing Mike, Israeli and American "advisers" were in Georgia, training the Georgian troops to carry out urban clearances. They utilised the American experience of Iraq and the Israeli experience of dealing with Palestinian areas to train the Georgians in the same techniques. Georgia then invaded South Ossetia to deal with the pesky seperatists in the same way Israel deals with Palestine. Why?
Here is my take on this. Bigger picture... Israel is in the advanced stages of preparations for an attack on Irans nuclear facilities. (NOT weapons facilities, as NO international body, intelligence agency or anyone else has found ANY evidence that such facilities exist) The Iranian nuclear facilities are supported by Russian expertise in the form of many Russian nuclear experts. Russia has told the world loudly and proudly (though completely ignored by the western mainstream media) that they retain the right to use nuclear arms pre-emptively against any nuclear threat to them or their interests, ie Irans nuclear programme. Russia has made it clear that they will act to protect Russian nationals.
If Israel is planning to launch nuclear attacks against the Iranian nuclear facilities, and those facilities contain many Russian nationals, What will Russia's response be? I think that Israel were using this attack to gauge Russia's commitment to Russian nationals in the face of a threat to Russian national interest. IF Israel was wondering if Russia's words are mere bluster, I guess that they now have their answer writ large in the form of the rapid and heavy defeat of the Israeli trained Georgian army.
Had the attack gone to plan, I posit that South Ossetia would be under Georgian control, Thousands more Russians would be dead, most people in the west would never have heard of South Ossetia as the mainstream media would have ignored this genocide completely and Isreal would be giving the all-clear to attack Iran with nuclear bunker busters.
What do you think Mike?
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
This has been a remarkably restrained intervention by Russia. They did what they set out to do and removed the Georgian threat from the nominally independent regions of South Ossetia and Abkahzia.
The western media's constant bias and lies have been a source of deep embarrassment. America has been made to look foolish for provoking this war in the first place, then been shown to be utterly impotent to act in any way during it, and then being proven wrong on Russia's intent. Russia bitch-slapped Georgia into place inside 4 days. Hopefully Georgia will NEVER become a member of NATO now and I am utterly appalled at David Cameron's desire to speed up that process. Cameron is an ignorant fool and a puppet of the same Rothschild's new world order that Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili was pleading with the west to protect.
I hope that the peace in Georgia can be achieved with the swift removal from power of the butcher and child killer, Saakashvili. and I hope to see him stand trial for crimes against humanity.
The Georgian President has called for international aid to defend the future world order. This is clearly a call to defend the Rothschild sphere of influence and their plans for a unipolar world order.
This is not good for humanity. We are facing the possibility that the world could change massively in a very short time. Whose side are you going to be on? Think long and hard about this.
If you said American, or Russian, or any other nation - then you could be calling for the destruction of humanity.
I recommend being on the side of peace and humanity and self.
"There is NO road to peace, peace IS the road" - Ghandi.
The Russian retaliation against western backed aggression is a necessary evil to stop the new world order in its tracks. Now each of us should visualise how this will play out peacefully with humanity emerging as the winner.
My take on it? Well, it transpires that the USA and Israel were training the Georgian forces to destroy those pesky South Ossetian separatists. Using techniques perfected against Iraqi insurgents, Afghan tribes and Palestinians. The Georgians used the cover of a supine international media, distracted by the launch of the Olympics, to start a brutal war crime against civilians. This is NOT Russian propaganda as there are videos on youtube of independent witnesses, some American, describing their personal witness to the crimes against humanity that the Georgian military, backed up by American, Isreali and Ukranian mercenaries committed. Well over a thousand civilians killed in cold blood. Men, women, children, the elderly and the ill were blown to bits by hand grenades and rockets.
Jewish Georgian minister, Temur Yakobshvili: Thanks to Israeli training, we're fending off Russia
Temur should think again, look out of his window and see the thousands of Israeli trained troops deserting and going home. The mistake made by the Georgians (in reality the Washington puppets) was to treat the South Ossetians like the Israelis treat the Palestinians, and expect only a Palestinian style response. They should have treat the South Ossetians like the Russians, then they may have thought twice before biting a huge bear on the ass and hoping that it would not notice.
The west has absolutley ZERO credibility to tell Russia to stop and withdraw. Time and again the west has interfered in the internal politics of former soviet republics. The west broke up Serbia and granted independence to Kosovo without ANY consideration for the Serbians or the Russians. Outside of the former soviet republics, The west invaded and still occupies Iraq and Afghanistan. The west launched "SHOCK AND AWE" killing thousands of civilians on the deliberate lie of WMD and links to Al Queda. A lie that the Whithouse had to manufacture a faked letter to support. They spouted the lie also based on what they knew was another faked letter about yellowcake Uranium from Niger. When the administration had to rely on what they knew at the time were faked documents to support their invasion, it is clear that they were deliberately and knowingly, with malice aforethought, conspiring to use deliberate lies to provide a reason to illegally invade a sovereign nation. They knew that the letter linking Saddam to Al-Queda was fake, because THEY FAKED IT!)
The hypocracy and the stench coming from the west and the western mainstream media is revolting. America miscalculated on this BIG TIME, like they did in pushing Israel to invade Lebanon in 2006. The Israelis had their asses kicked big time in Lebanon, and the Georgians are having their sorry asses handed to them on a plate now.
To any other American ally thinking of doing America's bidding by attacking one of your neighbours.... Look at what happened to the Israelis and Georgians. Tell America to fuck the hell off!
Let us hope that the Russians secure their objectives quickly, with minimal loss of life and then they can withdraw. They have stated many times in the last few days that they only seek to make Georgia safe for Russians. That they do NOT intend to annexe Georgia. ONLY time can tell if this is true. I hope and pray that it is.
Tuesday, August 05, 2008
Primates 'face extinction crisis'
Now this is what pisses me off. People hark on about global warming and the gas CO2. With no evidence to back up their theories, they spout alarmist nonsense all over the media. Yet when there is a REAL ecological crisis, happening now, on a greater scale than the 'global was warming but it has now stopped' so-called crisis, what do we get? Fuck All!!!
The tropical deforestation is:
D) causing actual mass extinctions.
E) causing CO2 in the atmosphere to increase more rapidly.
Unlike the (so called) global warming, this is something that we ARE responsible for and that we CAN do something about!
Whenever anyone mentions cars or flights as being inherantly evil, remind them of deforestation.
Tuesday, July 29, 2008
How could I be making a fortune? Carbon Credits. It's easy! build a website, charge offsets based on any old bullshit formula and the green-eco-mentalists will buy them to offset their pathetic and meaningless eco guilt!
DAMN DAMN DAMN!!! It would be so EASY to take advantage of these retarded fuckwits that believe all the enviroguilt bullshit. Christ, they will fall for any old bullshit. If they believe that EVERYTHING we do emits poisonous CO2 into the athmospere that is destroying our environment and killing those poor polar bears (who's numbers are shooting up like a motherfucker BTW) then they will fall for any BULLSHIT. Like those people that had a great laugh at a festival collecting signitures to BAN that dangerous chemical : Dyhydrogen monoxide!!! (yeah that's H20, or regular old water to you and me). They had thousands of signitures by the end of the gig. Thousands of people who (because they are good kind, yet gullible idiots) fell for the scam hook-line and sinker and signed a petition for a GLOBAL BAN ON WATER!
Why can I NOT do this, WHY???? I could pay off my mortgage in no time with this scam EASY, but my conscience just will NOT let me take advantage of the misdirected, gullible fuckwits that are being victimised by this evil global warming scam.
I guess that I am just too nice.
Here is some light comical relief by Penn & Teller by way of explanation.
Please people, do NOT be fooled by rich hypocritical BULLSHITTERS (for definition of rich hypocritcal bullshitter: see AL Gore) selling salvation by way of selling you out of your guilt! Just Don't! Better yet, forget the enviro-guilt in the first place.
IF the Governments of the world really, and I mean seriously and honestly believed that CO2 really was the cause of global warming (in spite of the fact that the earth has been cooling for a fucking DECADE!) then instead of taxing the living shit out of us an inventing ever more ways to control us through fear, they would be acting together to take action in stopping the destruction of the earth's secondary-lungs and protecting the rain-forests. THAT is what they would be doing, IF the threat was real. It's not real and they know that it is not real.
The oceans (4/5ths of the world's surface) are the world's main lungs.
You wanna talk about off-setting, for fucking real? Protecting and restoring the rain-forests would offset EVERY journey in every petrol vehicle and every aircraft journey on earth!
The destruction of the rain forests is causing more environmental harm, than every SUV journey combined many times over.
What are global government's doing about THAT? FUCK ALL! So I guess that the man-made global warming scare is just so much BULLSHIT after all!
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
I may change my rules and do self promotion some more. I may not, I don't know yet
Back to my normal rants, thoughts and musings...
George Galloway misses a crucial point with his replies. He completely misses the crucial Russian response. What would Russia do? Well, unreported by mainstream media, the Russian's have already told us. Their foreign minister and their head of the military have both said that is a strategic partner in Russia's energy policy, therefore ANY attack on Iran shall be perceived as a direct attack on Russia and will be met in like terms. In exactly the same way that the USA will respond to ANY attack on Israel in the same manner.
The Israelis have made it clear that their plans to disable Iran's nuclear capability (whether power generation or weapons manufacturing) will require the use of nuclear bunker busters. Now, as a brief aside, how can it be acceptable for Israel to threaten and plan and run drills and practice runs for a nuclear attack on another sovereign state? Where is the criticism, condemnation and UN sanctions against Israel because of that? The whole western world has been condemning massively a mistranslation of a desire on Iran's part to see the end of a Zionist regime (NOT a call to wipe Israel from the map) when that wish was not and is not backed up in any way with capability. Iran has NO nukes! Yet Israel can say that they intend to nuke Iran and then perform drills showing a clear intent and there is no response at all from a supine western world?
Anyway, back to the Russian response, in addition to thispromise to defend Iran militarily, the Russians added that any attack against Iran using will be met with an immediate nuclear response.
The scenario could play out as follows: Israel nukes Iran's facilities. Russia nukes Tel Aviv, America Nukes back and the whole world goes up!!!
Does this fool on the radio calling for precision strategic attacks realise that in reality he is calling for a full blown ?
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
I am amazed and very pleasantly surprised by the fact that David Icke has linked to one of my articles. I am greatly honoured and humbled that he has done this. I am also MASSIVELY grateful. Thank You David.
Whilst you are here please have a read of my earlier work, buy my books, click on links, buy a hypnosis MP3 to solve some personal problem and generally help me to pay off my debts so that I can remove myself from the debt slavery of the global banking system. I know that is a very cheeky request, but hey, it's not everyday that my work is suddenly thrust before a much wider (and dare I hope ) sympathetic audience. This may even be a very synchronistic happening relating to my manifestation experiment. Thank you for visiting and please come back again soon... Tell you friends too.
Once again thank you for dropping by and I hope that you enjoy your visit.
I really really do appreciate your time here.
Sunday, July 20, 2008
The same "powers that be" were going to use Gordon Brown in the same way on the Euro single currency. His skeptisism was fake. The proof is that he has secretly seen to it that the Lisbon Treaty has now been fully ratified by the British Government, (they have delivered the signed deal to Rome) contrary to his promise to wait for the outcome of an appeal on the legality of refusing a direct promise to hold a referendum on this treaty in the manifesto upon which he was elected.
When the previous Blair government felt that they would have had about 40% support for scrapping the pound and introducing the Euro, then Gordon would have had a dramatic change of heart, based on some made up economic law that would have been widely published and supported by a totally supine mainstream media and lo, a huge chunk of opposition to the Euro would vanish. I mean, if the "Iron Chancellor" was now in favour? it MUST be necessary. They could have won a referendum on such measures. However, the powers that be did not reckon on the chancellor's two main character flaws. His abject cowardice combined with his enormous ego and desire to be PM. He knew that if this did not work, then he would never be PM. So he bottled the issue. There never quite was a figure of 40% in favour of the Euro anyway, so he became PM and gave the whole system away to the EU in grubby secretive deals. Signing the treaty alone; forcing the treaty through both houses of Parliament with the hypocritical support of the Liberals, both parties having to ditch their own election promises to do so. Having the Queen sign the deal and then despite a promise to wait to October and the outcome of a House of Lords appeal, thus ratifying the treaty that closes the door on ever being able to peacefully become a free independent nation once more. But I digress, what has that to do with David Davis?
Well it is the same sort of bare faced treachery at work. As the diary below demonstrates, the whole "big brother by election" was a great big sham and con job. Designed and controlled in such a way as to manipulate the debate so that it would firmly establish in people's minds and perceptions that David Davis becomes the leader of public opinion on issues of liberty, freedom and "the big brother state". That way, when the "system" needs to soften public opinion, all that they have to do is get Shami and David to say, "look, if I am in favour of this new measure, and sadly in the light of the recent [insert problem reaction solution event here] unfortunately there clearly IS a need for [insert Big Brother toolkit solution here]." And much of the Davis and Liberty supporting opposition will crumble.
Anyway, below is the Journal of a person who witnessed first hand the deliberate control, the shutting down of debate, the refusal of liberty to assemble and question, as this former supporter of David Davis became so dissillusioned with the whole sham. The journal is republished here with permission from the author and copied from the David Icke website.
Tuesday, 15 July 2008
Journal of a Sham Election
This is the journal of a local person who supported the David Icke stand in the Big Brother by-election and took her own personal action to get key questions answered by David Davis, the man who said he triggered the election to highlight the impositions of surveillance cameras, ID cards, the DNA database and the law allowing 'terrorist suspects' to be held without charge for 42 days.
As the David Icke team soon realised, and this journal records, the 'Big Brother' by-election was not an 'election' at all. It was a coronation for David Davis with all others, and the wider debate, excluded from this stage-managed sham.
If we have to rely on David Davis MP and Shami Chakrabati of the Liberty organisation to protect us from Big Brother then we're in serious trouble.Picture this, it’s the evening of the 10th July and I am standing in a sports centre witnessing the count for the Haltemprice and Howden by-election, and also the biggest sham and travesty, personally, I have ever been witness to. Elections are only rigged in America aren’t they?! Plenty of characters are here and I had the pleasure of meeting most of the candidates. Mr. Davis is floating around with an almost stupid grin on his face, basking in the glory of his fair and balanced open debate on Big Brother.
I had to laugh as I watched the man who I had witnessed personally over the past previous few days, squirm and lie to his voters bare faced. Of course, as we all know he won the seat for Haltemprice and Howden making him an MP. Now to the casual observer this process may have appeared open, balanced and fair, but believe me it was anything but. What I am about to describe to you is a version of events very different to the ones presented in the media. Hold on tight. This is in reverse chronological order and begins with ‘bosom buddies’ Mr. Davis and Shami Chakrabati’s cosy little debate on liberties in Willerby.
09/07/2008 – Willerby Manor Hotel
Excellent, I thought, another opportunity to ask Mr. Davis some more awkward questions. Today Mr. Davis was meeting with Shami Chakrabati (Head of Liberty) amongst others to discuss our ‘liberties’. I got there nice and early and was handing out a list of questions that David Icke would like to have asked Mr. Davis if he were not barred from his events! How ironic, eh? That Mr. Davis receives personal support from Bob Geldoff at Guildhall, and David Icke, the man who has written numerous books on the subject of Big Brother, a leading authority on the subject, is barred from the event?!?! Now alarm bells should be ringing!!
This is just one of the ways that the by-election has been hi-jacked and the debate stifled – ah yes, that reminds me – back to Shami and Mr. Davis. So there I was outside the Willerby Manor Hotel handing out question leaflets, and stating to people that David Icke had been banned from the Guildhall – when lo and behold the free public event that was advertised on Mr. Davis’ website was at the cost of five pounds! OK, I thought, I’ll go find out who I give my money to. By the time I had got from the hotel entrance to the conference room where the so-called debate was being held, it was constituent members only. My God I thought, what are these people afraid of? Certainly not moving the goalposts!
The world’s media attended this event and at least one camera captured not just my protests – but various other protests that fell on deaf ears. How ironic, once again, that a debate centred on liberties and freedom, and also attended by the Head of Liberty, left individuals at the door, shut out, voices silenced. If freedom of speech isn’t for everyone then it’s for no-one at all; and sadly on that day the point could not have been illustrated better.
Whilst the melee was going on outside the room where the debate was to be had, who should turn up but Shami herself, closely followed by the ‘puppet’ Mr. Davis. At this point Shan Oakes from the Green Party (candidate that came second to Mr. Davis in the sham by-election, yes she was excluded from this debate, too) sprinted across the hotel into the reception area and told Shami Chakrabati exactly what had just gone on.
For a split second I thought to myself ‘great, surely she will do or say something’, and then I remembered the question I was going to ask her if I could get in and her connections to Davis. Silly me, of course she isn’t going to do anything, maybe apart from forcing Andy Burnham, Culture Secretary, to apologise to her for suggesting Mr. Davis was conducting ‘late night, hand-wringing, heart-melting’ phone calls with her over the 42 days issue. On this one, I have to agree with Andy Burnham.
Shami disappears no doubt for some more ‘hand-wringing’ with Mr. Davis, and the outcome doesn’t change – we are not allowed entry to the debate. If Shami would like me to apologise I am available for some ‘late night, hand-wringing, heart-melting phone calls’ over issues of liberty and truly open debate.
Concentrating on Shami Chakrabati for the moment, I will record here what I was going to ask her. This should make it clear to all what perfect bedfellows Shami and Davis really are (just a shame they didn’t have the ideals of John and Yoko).
‘You have close ties to the British American Project, and are a Governor of the Ditchley Foundation. Both recruit up and coming young talent in various fields of business, and like the Bilderberg meetings, discussions are private and non-attributable. For liberty to mean anything process must be transparent. How can you justify your position as Director of Liberty in light of this?’
Seen as though I was not allowed to ask this fair and honest question, in a fair and open debate, I have no choice but to answer it myself. You have no justification for your position as Head of Liberty. On this day you stand accused of stifling debate, dodging questions, encouraging secret agenda debate and having no positive effects on the rights denied to the very people you claim to represent. You silenced the voice of open, truthful debate and replaced it with your order of debate, not the peoples.
Shami Chakrabati you and Mr. Davis should be thoroughly ashamed of yourselves and resign forthwith. (After maybe a couple of ‘hand-wringing’ phone calls). Don’t you just love a good rant!?!? So that’s basically what happened on that day, and if we rewind a bit further, Mr. Davis, only the day before, is caught out, bare-faced lying to his constituents in Eastringham, near Howden (no media, maybe that’s why I was allowed in!).
7pm 08/07/2008 – Eastringham Village Hall, Near Howden
Again, another free public meeting wherein Mr. Davis wanted a ‘safe debate’, no ‘awkward questions’. On the panel tonight were Martin Bell (bless him, I loved the stories he regaled about war zones, cheese and fine wines but couldn’t help thinking, that’s not what this is about – nice and safe though) and a guy whose name escapes me who wrote ‘Taking Liberties’ – how ironic, again, that he should be sat next to a man that was, and is, doing exactly that!
The hall was reasonably well filled; I would say a comfortable 150 people attended and so began the phony debate. Mr. Davis addressed the issue of a Big Brother presence in England, and basically blamed the Labour Party. Martin read a poem, and as charmed as I was, by his charming befuddlement, I thought to myself ‘this isn’t a debate, this is more like a self-congratulatory party to celebrate the fact that we have achieved looking like we are having a debate and actually discussing nothing at all’.
Questions were then taken, and to no surprise at all, on my part, he wasn’t even looking in my direction. I had my hand raised to the ceiling! I think he recognized me too!! My hand still raised and thinking ‘damn, not going to be able to ask this question’, a guy, stood against the wall next to me, had actually had his hand up for me (don’t know your name but thank you!). Mr. Davis indicated for this man’s question and he duly informed him that he had his hand up for me! Result!! I stood up and asked him this:
Me: Fleishman-Hillard is a global PR firm representing companies that have introduced ID Cards in the US and Spain. Can you explain why your ‘Freedom Campaign’ website is set up by Fleishman-Hillard?
Davis: Well ... er ... well ... in the short time I had to set up this campaign I didn’t have time to look into the connections and what companies it was associated to ... blah blah blah.
Me (stood up): So then Mr. Davis, can you confirm or deny that you have been close friends with Kevin Bell for the past 20 years, who also happens to be the Vice President of Fleishman-Hillard? And Entrust, a client of Fleishman-Hillard, is responsible for your website, and is also responsible for 30million Spanish citizens ID Cards?
Right off on one; Mr. Davis rattled, his lie shown up to the high heavens, all in a bit of an uproar, party members telling me he’s heard what I just asked him, me saying that I know, I just wanted to make sure that the people had heard, still standing.
Davis: Sit down! Sit down! And I’ll answer the question.
Watch out for Mr. Davis’ turn about -
Me: If you don’t mind I would rather stand – it is all about civil liberties after all.
Laughter, the sweet sound of laughter……..I remained standing and listened to Mr. Davis’ pathetic back peddle
Davis: Er ... yes ... er ... well ... I ... actually…..er ... had a meeting with er ... Kevin Bell and he told me er ... .he didn’t believe er ... in them. Wouldn’t work, wouldn’t work.
Now, what worried me the most is not that Kevin Bell (Mr. Davis’ close friend of 20years) doesn’t believe ID cards will work, but Mr. Davis’ blatant lie about not even knowing the connection with regards to ID Cards; something integral to his stance against Big Brother. Oh Lordy, someone hold me up or beam me up. Old mates are you Mr. Davis? Why don’t you be honest about your connections? Or is it because you think that it wouldn’t lay well with the voters?
A man, who resigned from the Shadow Cabinet on the basis of challenging Big Brother, then has his website set up by the very same company that is responsible for 30million ID Cards. Or do you know the game you’re in? I suspect you do, or else you wouldn’t be lying about important facts such as these to the people who could potentially vote for you.
Mr. Davis was also asked at this event why David Icke had been turned away from the Guildhall despite having a ticket for the public event. Mr. Davis’ response to this was to move swiftly along to the next question. Maybe it’s because he didn’t want to answer the biggie:
‘You have been strongly supported in your stance against Big Brother by Ed Vaizey MP, Michael Grove MP and Colonel Tim Collins, who are all original signatories to ‘The Statement of Principles’ of the Henry Jackson Society, a Neocon or Neoconservative ‘think tank’, set up in Britain in 2005 and named after the US Senator Henry ‘Scoop’ Jackson, one of the icons of the Neocon Movement in the US, that has controlled the Bush Administration since it came to power and orchestrated the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq and the War on Terror in general.
This is the very same War on Terror that has been used to justify the introduction of the Big Brother society that you say you oppose.'
Once you start looking at the connections, money and glowing support for a one Mr. Davis, you start to see things, and the man that is now MP for Haltemprice and Howden in a very different light. Which brings me nicely to a conversation I had with George Osborne, the Shadow Chancellor, outside the Conservative Club in Willerby the very same morning. Once again a high profile figure turns out to support Mr. Davis on his stance against Big Brother. I turned up again to ask a reasonable question of Mr. Osborne. The Press Association was there, two or three newspapers, and the general stick of hypocrisy. He was duly interviewed and publicly supported Mr. Davis on his stance against Big Brother.
After waiting patiently and ingratiating myself as a budding reporter for the University Press; it went like this:
Me: Mr. Osborne, how do you justify your support for ...
Mr. Osborne: Wait ... wait ... hang on ... you haven’t told me your name or where you’re from, blah blah (trying to silence debate!)
Me: My name is ****** and I’m from the university and I really need to ask you this question and I really need you to listen (no cameras, but picked up on audio, not that the press will use it!).
Mr. Osborne: OK, OK (squirming and hopping).
Me: Mr. Osborne, how do you justify your support for David Davis and his stance on the Big Brother issue regarding your recent attendance of the Bilderberg meeting, a ‘think tank’ for World Government that has proposed a plan to microchip Americans under the pretext of fighting terrorism?
Mr. Osborne: Well ... er ... well ... I ... we don’t normally admit to being at such a meeting, but, er, on this occasion I think we can make an exception. Yes, I was at that meeting.
Me: Yes, in Chantilly, Virginia, I have your name on the attendance list here (Google Bilderberg meeting 2008).
Mr. Osborne (well puffed up and sure of himself): Well, yes I was there ... haw, haw ...laugh, laugh, but I can assure you microchips were not discussed.
Me (pulling out a report from www.infowars.com reporting microchips being discussed and planned at the Bilderberg meeting he had attended): Well, if that’s the case Mr. Osborne you might want to read this; it says the complete opposite, in fact.
Mr. Osborne (backing off trying to make excuses): Er ... well ... thank you ... I will.
Me: I suggest you do, because your bosses are planning to recruit more ‘blue eyed, blonde haired terrorists’ making them almost impossible to recognise – thus giving them the excuse to microchip us all.
Mr. Osborne (walking away): Thank you ... anyway, must go and blah, blah, blah.
Me: Mr. Osborne, hang on, don’t walk away. You haven’t answered my question. How do you justify your support of Mr. Davis in light of this?
Mr. Osborne (must have slipped into standard response mode): Well, er ... er ... it’s all about individual civil liberties blah, blah.
Me (laughing): Please, how can you say that after attending a secret meeting only a month ago that discussed and proposed a microchip for every man, woman and child in America!?! (still laughing).
At this point Mr. Osborne fairly ran for the door, but did pause at the top of the steps of the Conservative Party Office to say: 'Thanks'.
Me (waving as I walked away): No problem Mr. Osborne. See you soon.
Again, in and around Mr. Davis’ campaign there are individuals supporting his stance on Big Brother, whilst at the same time having connections to the very substance of what Mr. Davis’ campaign opposes; ID Cards, microchips, Neocons, secret meetings and deliberate suppression of the truth out loud and proud. But hey, what better place to hide the corruption and lies of the ‘establishment’ that knows the people are becoming restless about Big Brother. Have a placeman, a yes man and the rest will follow. The appearance of a full and honest open debate. The placeman I am talking about here is Mr. Davis.
To conclude I would like to finish with my first encounter with Mr. Davis on the 5th July 2008 in Cottingham Church. It was a Saturday and raining hard.
05/07/2008 – Cottingham Church
I was stood outside a supermarket handing out election leaflets when I heard Mr. Davis was in the church. Excellent, my opportunity to ask him why he refuses to debate with David Icke (and others of course!). I briskly walk over to the church just hoping he was there and that I could have a chat with him. It couldn’t have gone any better. As I am walking down the aisle who should appear walking away from the altar towards me?!? Yes. Mr. Davis. I clocked him and as we both rounded a massive pillar in the church the conversation began:
Me (to Mr. Davis): Don’t suppose you’ve seen David Davis anywhere?
Davis (looking a bit puzzled): Well yes, that’s me…….
Me: Hi, pleased to meet you (shook hands). Could you tell me why you have refused to have an open debate with David Icke over the issue of Big Brother?
Davis: Ah yes well, time constraints plus too many candidates, there’s not enough time to debate. I mean would you want to debate with The Monster Raving Loony Party?
Me: Well….. (humouring him – everyone has the right to stand and be heard) regardless of time constraints, and the number of candidates, this debate still needs to be had at some point. It isn’t a localised problem, it is on a global scale and if we aren’t careful very soon we will be living in a Global Fascist Dictatorship. What’s your take on it?
Davis: My concerns are ID Cards, DNA Databases and cameras which are against civil liberties ...
Me (interrupting): I appreciate what you’re saying and agree with you – but the problem is global and connected, it’s a global Big Brother problem, not local.
Davis: Oh well, let’s sort out England first!
Me: It’s not a case of that, it’s a global problem. Have you heard of the Bilderbergs, Council for Foreign Relations or the Trilateral Commission?
Davis: No, never heard of any of them, and if it’s a global Big Brother, where’s your evidence?
Me: Oh I have evidence Mr. Davis. The question is will you read it and will you look at it? There’s no point in it being presented to you if you don’t do that.
Davis: Send it to me and I will.
At this point I asked Mr. Davis for a card or point of contact – which he responded to by saying I could send the evidence to the Conservative Party Office in Willerby. The information will be sent, but here is the address in full for anyone else wanting to enlighten him –
Conservative Party Office
32 Main Street
Tel: 01482 657938
So there we have it. You make your own mind up. But do remember; I’m not politically motivated nor a journalist - just an individual that has concerns and questions. And during this experience I had first hand, my concerns were confirmed, my questions unanswered.
The man that is now MP for Haltemprice and Howden is surrounded and protected by the Big Brother Agenda he is supposed to oppose; the agenda that he resigned over and the agenda that ultimately assured he was elected as MP. This debate was fake, controlled and contrived from start to finish. I am only glad that I was close enough to witness the hypocrisy, lies and deceit that passes for Democracy in this country, and county of Yorkshire. If you agree please feel free to distribute this journal far and wide.
With all my love,
Sunday, July 13, 2008
David Icke barely even scratches the surface in this but still shows the reach of "big brother" and it is WAY more advanced than David Davis MP admits. David Icke presents much more information in his normal (7 hour) presentations and STILL barely scratches the surface on some topics as to tell everything he had uncovered during 20 years of intense full-time research in 40+ countries would require a presentation spanning several days. Compare that to the mere few minutes the average journalist spends looking into this issue before reflex action kicks into to dismiss this as crazy nonsense.
This is a much watch video.
Thursday, June 26, 2008
Some people have a difficulty with hypnosis, so here is an article that explodes the myths.
5 Hypnosis Myths Exploded
OVER the years, hypnosis has picked up all sorts of weird associations from stage hypnotists, the media and superstition. This is a great shame, because in reality, hypnosis is your single most effective tool for change. Hypnosis is your birthright, and you should know how to use it so it doesn't use you. Here we dispel the biggest hypnosis myths.
Hypnosis Myth 1) All hypnosis is the same
As with anything, hypnosis can be good, bad or indifferent. The most common is old-style authoritarian hypnosis of the type "You are getting sleepy, you are feeling confident". Unsurprisingly, this sort of hypnosis doesn't work well with many people. Good hypnosis uses subtle psychological principles and advanced communication patterns.
It's like the difference between a football coach who thinks you'll perform best if he yells at you, compared with the more elegant style of a great leader who knows that to get the best from his people, he needs to understand motivation, to cajole, encourage and reward.
Hypnosis Downloads.com offers hundreds of sessions using the best type of hypnosis.
Hypnosis Myth 2) Subliminals work
Subliminals are words that you can't hear. Common sense says they shouldn't work, and there's no research proving that they do.
Hypnosis Myth 3) Some people can't be hypnotized
The only reason you can't be hypnotized is if you are incapable of paying attention due to extremely low IQ or brain damage. That's not to say that every hypnotist can hypnotize you however. The more flexible the hypnotist, the more effective she will be with the largest number of people.
Hypnosis Myth 4) Hypnosis is something weird that other people do to you
If you couldn't go into hypnosis, you wouldn't be able to sleep, to learn, or get nervous through 'negative self hypnosis'. (You know when you imagine things going wrong and it makes you feel anxious? Well that's self hypnosis!)
Hypnosis is simply a deliberate utilization of the REM (Rapid Eye Movement) or dream state. We're not giving people medication here – if it wasn't a natural ability, hypnosis wouldn't work!
Hypnosis Myth 5) You lose control in hypnosis
Crazy news stories, stage hypnotists and gossip have created the illusion that you lose control in hypnosis. In fact, when hypnotized, you are relaxed and focused – and able to choose to get up and walk away at any time. You choose to give your attention to the hypnotist, and you can withdraw it at any time.
If you have been scared of hypnosis in the past, this article has hopefully convinced you to at least give it a try. But remember, ensure what you're getting is the real thing. Visit www.hypnosisdownloads.com
Article by Mark Tyrrell of Hypnosis Downloads.com.
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Created with Nightingale Conant's FREE mission statement tool.
Monday, June 23, 2008
I shall manifest a reality in which I become completely debt free in only 1 year from today the 23rd of June 2008.
I shall keep this blog up to date with my progress.
Let me stress before I start that I am currently at least 10 years from becoming debt free at my current rate of budgeting, additionally, I have no idea, not the first clue HOW I shall become debt free. I have not got (at this time of writing) ANY foreknowledge of where this extra money is going to come from. I just have made a decision that it is coming and I shall be debt free in one year's time. That is the last time I shall write about this in this way.
Now, a major part of manifestation is keeping the vision in the current tense and keeping ALL the language surrounding this positive, therefore from now on, I shall not refer to debt free, as this places an energy into the concept of debt, thus creating debt. So from now on, I shall only refer to having a positive total financial balance and being completely financially independent and being in surplus.
I shall do this by meditation, writing the goal in detail many times every day, strong positive visualisation. self hypnosis creating absolute belief. I shall watch out for powerful synchronicities that will keep delivering my goals faster and faster.
Check back often to see how I do and please feel free to comment.
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Friday, May 16, 2008
We had some news interviewers in the UK who would have the balls to take our politicians and so-called experts to task like this. I would have loved for someone to interview Blair like this and call him on his blatant BS before he invaded Iraq. The news media has been supremely craven and supine in their support for our corrupt political leaders for far too long.
Friday, May 09, 2008
In Stephen Wilde's third and exclusive article for CO2Sceptics.Com, he explores the mechanics and mechanism involved that are attributed to the Earth's Warming and Cooling, needless to say the presence of CO2 is not part of the process.
Global Warming and Cooling - The Reality.
It’s all very well doing what alarmists do which is to say that Co2 is rising and temperatures are rising so in the absence of any other known cause it must be man made CO2 that is warming the planet. That approach ignores both the differing scale of the possible influencing factors and the clear historical relationship between cooler climates and periods of a less active sun. The presence of the sun must be a much bigger influence on global temperatures than the greenhouse characteristics of CO2 on it’s own.
At most the greenhouse effect can only be marginal though some have tried to talk it up by asserting that the planet would be very much colder without a greenhouse effect, which is correct, but avoids the issue of the rather small proportion of the overall greenhouse effect provided by CO2 and the even smaller proportion provided by man. It also begs the question as to whether the oceans are slowly releasing CO2 as a result of natural warming. If the oceans warm for any reason they will release CO2 into the atmosphere because water holds less CO2 at higher temperatures.
The greenhouse effect, as a whole, may smooth out rises and falls in temperature from other causes but is not itself the determining factor for global temperature. If the heat from the sun declines the global temperature will fall with or without any greenhouse effect and if the heat from the sun increases the global temperature will, of course, rise. The greenhouse effect does not create new heat. All it does is increase the residence time of heat in the atmosphere.
I cannot fault this article. I have wondered for several years now how a tiny proportion of the tiny proportion of a natural atmospheric gas could have a greater effect on our climate than the interaction between the energy output of the sun and the energy store of the oceans. That has never made sense to me that the former was greater than the latter, or that it could even have any effect on the latter or more of an effect than, say, a fly hitting the windscreen would have on the momentum of a motor vehicle. I have always considered that our climate is merely the meeting layer and interactive layer between a huge energy output source (the sun) and a huge energy store (the oceans) The landmass has a smaller effect and the people on it practically none. You only have to use google earth to see how insignificant mankind is. Spin the earth and with eyes closed stop the spin and zoom into the surface, 7 times out of 10 that will be uninhabited water. Of the three times that land surface is encountered it is usually barren desert or mountains. People only have the feeling that we over populate the planet because we all live together and spend our waking experiences mostly in towns and cities. The vast majority of the earth is unspoilt nature.
The variations in the suns output, our irregular orbit around the sun and the electro-magnetic energy fluctuations, would have a far greater effect on the climate than any tiny proportion of a tiny proportion of natural atmospheric gas. To my way of thinking this is blindingly obvious.
Increasing the amount of "greenhouse" gas may have a tiny effect on climate, but to compare our climate to a greenhouse is massively and grossly over-simplifying our complex climate to the extent that it completely omits many of the critical and most fundamental regulatory mechanisms that actually occur in our real climate (many of which are omitted entirely from so-called sophisticated computer models). I was aghast when I read that many of these models cannot accurately model clouds and rain, and some omit them altogether. They do not model the solar cycles, they do not model winds correctly and they did not model ocean cycles at all until recently. The most hysterical models have the "greenhouse effect" creating a "tropospheric heat island" high in the atmosphere that reflects more heat back to earth in a positive feedback loop leading to the "tipping point" that starts catastrophic global warming. Inconveniently, the NASA Aqua satellite system has shown that the tropospheric heat island (central to the catastrophic human induced global warming scare) does not, in fact, exist in reality. The cooling of the earth since 1998 matches in with solar observations and the ocean's cooling as observed by the Argos sub-ocean probes. More and more evidence is coming in all the time that demonstrates that the earth IS cooling. Climate alarmists deny this and in desperation call it merely a "stalling of global warming". This suggests that warming is on-going and irreversible so that they can continue to get their fat grant cheques. In that case the last 200 years has been a long stalling in onset of the next ice age then!
To my way of thinking, the earth is either warming or cooling. It is always doing one or the other. As to trends over time, it depends on when you want to measure from or to. I could show dates that currently show that we are in a warming trend and others that show that we are in a cooling trend. Alarmists only allow dates that support their alarmism and refute all other dates as meaningless.
We should stop worrying about CO2 and start tackling the problems that DO exist. Tackling the destruction of ancient forests, the massive damage done to the Amazon and the ancient forests of Borneo must be a high priority. The Orang-utang is facing extinction because of the desire to grow palm for palm oil. This kind of rape and butchery of nature must be stopped. We should clean up genuine pollution. CO2 is NOT a pollutant. We must grow crops for food, not oil! We are witnessing mass starvation in much of the world so that the political class can feel pleased with themselves that they are "tackling climate change" in their knee-jerk over-reaction to a false alarm. Tackle climate change? that has to be the worst and most brain dead slogan I have ever heard. What do they propose to do? Move the earth further from the sun? This is truly the science and politics of King Canute.
Excellent article and also plain common sense.
Thursday, May 08, 2008
Their excuses for their failure are, though, just as inept as their inability to govern.
Thursday's election was not a call to "pull your socks up Gordon" or a reaction purely to the 10p tax bad being DOUBLED (it was NOT abolished) People paying tax on that band are now and will continue to pay tax at 20p, that is NOT an abolition. I wish the media would finally after 14 months and hundreds of letters finally get a fucking clue and report the simple truth that this was a tax doubling not a tax abolition.
No the 10p tax was merely the straw that broke the camel's back. The re-introduction of 10p will not fix the splintered vertebrae.
What the 10p tax doubling showed in very simple and graphic terms was the character of a Government that will spend more than £100 billion pounds in loan guarantees bailing out billionaire bankers from billions of pounds of worthless loans, whilst doubling the income tax on 5 million of the poorest people in the country.
That stark realisation is what has not only lost labour a big chunk of their natural support, but utterly disgusted and sickened many of those whose father's and grandfather's had always voted labour so they must too... It took such a stark contrast to throw into graphic relief the difference between the support that Labour cravenly give to the billionaire bankers and the sickening contempt in which they hold their working class base.
That kind of awakening, forced by the sudden sickening jarring of realisation of contemptuous betrayal cannot be bought off lightly. Nor will it ever be forgotten by those whose taxes have now doubled.
Thursday's election was NOT a warning shot. Neither was it the labour party failing to get their message across. Labour's message, by their numerous and on-going vile, arrogant and corrupt actions, has got across very very clearly indeed and the result on Friday morning was the country had told that complacent and arrogant Labour party to FUCK RIGHT OFF!!!. Never return. No excuses, no fourth or fifth chances, no cheap policy initiatives to buy our support back. Labour have had numerous warnings before.
Every national election since 2001, except ONE general election, has been won by the Tories. So that is every local and European election that labour lost was a warning to labour. They did NOT listen to any of them. The sight of an unelected labour leader lecturing Mugabe on democracy after Brown has reneged on a promise to hold a referendum on the EU treaty sticks firmly in the throat.
Thursday was a national cry of enough is enough! Get out of power and never darken our political landscape with your oppressive centrist authoritarian politically correct ineptitude and corruption ever again.
The media that keep referring to this as the "abolition" of the 10p tax band will never ever get why this is such a pivotal moment and I cannot for the life of me understand why the media will keep insisting of referring to it as the abolition of the 10p band, as if just re-instating the 10p band will make everything OK again... It won't.
The fact that the labour party doubled the income tax whilst prices rise and at the same time have set aside hundreds of billions of pounds to bail out bankers has shown that the mask has slipped to reveal, in all it's ghastly nastiness, the real face of labour's leadership, this cannot be undone. Putting the mask back will not make people forget the horror's that laid beneath.
I would ask that anyone who still had the hatred in their hearts or the mendacity to vote labour to explain to me, how it is morally acceptable to spend billions bailing out the billionaire bankers whilst doubling the income tax on 5 million of the poorest workers in the land? This is a spiteful and cruel act upon a minority group of some of the most vulnerable people in the land. Spiteful and cruel acts on homosexuals are now illegal. spiteful and cruel acts against people because of the colour of their skin is now illegal.
In my humble opinion, voting labour now is on a par with racism or gender/sexual preference discrimination and should be legally classed as a hate crime.
Saturday, April 19, 2008
For the low paid worker opening his or [more likely] her wage slip, they will not see that their income tax has been abolished. The poorest workers in the land will see that their income tax has been doubled. They will see their income tax increased by 100%!!!
THAT is what labour truly think of the working poor.
The media ought to call this the DOUBLING of the 10p tax band.
Labour, the 100% tax increase party. The screw the poor party. The nasty3 party
Remember this when you go to vote.
So that bastion of labour ideals, Ed Balls, the education secretary of the party created out of the sweat and grit of millions of the hard-working poor, has nailed the final nail in the coffin of the labour party's dedication to the poor. When responding to labour MP's alledged concern for the working poor that will be hit hardest by having their income tax doubled at a time of run-away inflation in the fuel and food markets and the fear of labour councillors that are looking at being thrown out of office by the very working poor that they claim to represent, said:
"The efforts of local councillors and shadow leaders should not be undermined by this kind of indulgent nonsense."
INDULGENT NONSENSE? From the minister who brought you "SO WHAT?" in response to the poor being hit hardest by the collapsing mortgage markets and increasing taxes and runaway inflation...
The hard-working poor, the backbone of this nation, are really struggling and are facing massive difficulties. The labour leadership's response? So what? To care for the working poor is "indulgent nonesense"
Remember that when you go and vote.
Thursday, April 17, 2008
How many national elections has Brown or HIS labour party actually won? Oh yeah, NONE!
In fact since taking over the office of Prime Minister, Brown has scrapped election manifesto promises without any democratic consultation or electoral mandate. To make his "democratic" credentials even worse, the central election promise that he overturned was to hold a democratic referendum on the future of this country regarding it's electoral accountability in law-making vis-a-vis rule from the unelected EU!
Even Mugabe has more democratic credentials than Brown. And don't forget that Blair's labour party was "elected" by only 22% of the adult population. Even then postal vote fraud on behalf of the labour party was rife and that was in a system in which labour were already gifted a 66 seat majority before any counting of votes started. If labour and tory had received exactly the same number of votes, the constituency boundaries were drawn up in such a way as to gift labour a 66 seat in-built majority.
Given all this built in bias, the vote fraud and the result showing that only 22% of adults that voted for Blair's labour party on the understanding that he would serve a full third term, AND the promise that even if the voters disagreed with labour on the EU, that was not an election matter as they were promised a referendum. Then this hardly represents any kind of democratic mandate for Blair, and no democratic mandate for Brown at all.
Even Mugabe's Presidential result (an alleged and suspected loss) has probably secured a greater level of popular support than labour attained under Blair in 2005. It is only our very biased and undemocratic system that let Labour into power at all. I suspect that although Mugabe would definitely lose, he would still get more than 22% in an honest election.
It is about time that the BBC was a lot more honest about the (current) total and absolute lack of democratic accountability or democratic legitimacy in this country, before they attack another nation which, ironically, is actually MORE democratic than here.
Apparently the global warming zealots have decided that if they can’t destroy the facts, they will destroy anyone who questions them.Dr. S. Fred Singer is an accomplished scientist whose outspoken questioning of global warming earned him one of the most outrageous media smear pieces ever aired. Dr. Singer’s accomplishments are too lengthy to list, but they include the invention of the instrument to measure stratospheric ozone.
Among his many prominent positions, he was the first director of the National Weather Satellite Center and held key administrative posts in the EPA, DOT and Department of the Interior.
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
Well, Did the Tories:
Lie repeatedly to invade a sovereign nation that was no threat, in clear breach of Geneva conventions?
Spy on and invade everyone's privacy to a degree that has never been seen in this country before, building a police surveillance state?
Lose all the private, personal financial data of all parents in the UK?
Fill our prisons with OAP council tax protesters whilst letting out criminals and convicted terrorists early for lack of space?
Break a central promise of their last manifesto to grant a referendum on the EU treaty? Whilst overseeing the break-up of the UK into powerless regions to be ruled by the unelected EU oligarchy?
Sell our nation's gold at an all time low and squander the proceeds?
Squander the tax revenue from private pension funds?
Or double the income taxes of the poorest workers in the land whilst food and fuel inflation sky rockets?
The Tories were NEVER this bad!
Monday, April 14, 2008
This shows that the FTSE as a measure of British companies worth over the last 24 years. A gradual improvement during the Conservative administration punctuated by the 1987 crash, but that was a rapid fall followed by an immediate return to a steady growth.
Under Labour there has what can only be described as a boom and bust on steroids. After 11 years of labour mis-rule the FTSE is now barely above what it was when they came to power in 1997. Allowing for real inflation, that is quite a big loss in value in real terms.
From 2000 the FTSE went on a downward spiral for 3 years. NOTE this stared over a year before the terrorist attacks on New York that closed the NYSE and actually, the stocks recovered for a while after 9/11 before collapsing further as shown below:
The FTSE fell and recovered for a few months, before continuing the slide that started in 2000.
The Boom and Bust economic policy employed by labour has been continuously mis-reported by a media enthralled and seemingly mesmerised by Tony Blair.
It has only taken 9 months of the Brown Government for the spell to be broken and for people to see what I have been seeing since 1997.
Labour are bereft of economic competence and have been destroying the economy for years.
Now Gordon Brown is DOUBLING the tax on the poorest workers. He has NOT aboliched the 10p rate of tax, he has DOUBLED it!
He has no ideas left, he squandered the golden economic legacy of the Tory years, he has stolen and squandered the value in private pensions and he has squandered the nation's gold reserves at a time when Gold's price was at rock bottom.
There is only one party who has shown a boom and bust economic mis-management of our economy and that is the Labour Party. This is NOT a recommendation of the Conservative party, merely accurate critisism of the Labour party, and a comparison with the previous Tory administration that was rightly booted out of power in 1997.
It is just such a terrible shame that it was the disaster that is Labour, and not a PRO UK party, that took over in 1997.
However the current credit squeeze is a little different as it seems to be the big banks that are getting hit first and hardest.
It could just be that the big banks have been "played" at their own game and some derivative managers have retired on a fortune at their expense?
Here is how the game has been played.
The smaller mortgage and realty based banks in the US had been lending sub-prime to self assessed debtors for a while, due to ridiculously low interest rates a few years ago.
These smaller banks realised that they could lend out lots of money to people who could not afford to repay and these banks didn't have to worry about re-payments as they immediately sold on the debt to other money market types who then sliced and diced these "worthless" loans and sold them onto the big banks as secure financial instruments with a high value rating.
These middlemen took their cut and retired very very rich too.
The big banks fractional reserve banking relies on the worthless "money" that they create out of thin air in the form of loans actually being re-paid for their scam to continue to work.
This credit squeeze might not be the standard market contraction that the banks deliberately create occasionally to repossess tangible assets at a fraction of their worth, and to put political pressure on world leaders to capitulate to the banker's demands. As in the 1920's crash that enabled the Federal Reserve Banks (Via the US Government) to steal all of the nation's private gold. Nobody knows what has happened to that gold since.
The reason? The big Federal Reserve banks could not have private gold in existence that could rival the worthless I.O.U's known as federal reserve notes as a means of measuring wealth for the masses.
But what could the big bankers want now? They already, literally, own everything. Their plans for utter and total global domination are well on track, and money, as in cash, folding notes and coins that can literally be in the possession of individuals, outside of the banks control, are soon to be eliminated. All money will be transacted electronically at the whim of the bankers before too long. And anyway, folding money is not effected by this credit squeeze.
So what is the purpose of the credit squeeze if it IS the big banks behind it?
After all, why would the banker's be demanding anything from the world leaders who currently pay fealty to them now?
I think that these banks have been played for billions maybe even a trillion or two and now the great scam, the greatest and largest financial fraud in the history of mankind which is the fractional reserve banking of a fiat currency, may be about to fall.
There is very real desperation in the world's banking fraternity at the moment and it is only going to get a lot worse.
But it could be the very thing that is needed to remove mankind from the banker's control web and allow us to truly evolve.
Thursday, April 10, 2008
Yes, this information is deliberately with-held by the BBC and others who are actively censoring the truth under pressure from the global warming cult.
This is leading to the following effects being felt globally:
World grain, corn and rice prices at an all time high, mass starvation imminent, huge areas of ancient natural forests eradicated forever, with the Orang-utans on the verge of extinction, all to make room for fuel crops. Bio-fuel has been found to be much more harmful to the environment and have a greater carbon footprint than regular fuel and yet the clamour to produce it is causing enormous and growing problems for the world. Taxes and fuel costs rising alarmingly and the entire global economy put under severe threat. as remedies costing trillions of dollars are being demanded to cut CO2 by 60 - 80% by 2050.
This shows what happens when there is a knee-jerk reaction to dogmatic misunderstanding of complex systems (and a healthy dose of greed)! We run the risk of wrecking the global economy, implementing damaging environmental policies that would cause greater environmental harm and starve the third world in order to avert "global warming" at a time when temperatures are currently falling precipitously.
How dare the global warming alarmists tell us that there is consensus on global warming when they do not even know how and why clouds form and behave at different levels of altitude, and how rainfall is created and how it effects global climate? They don't know how the sun effects the climate, they don't know a heck of a lot about how the climate works and many of these important sub climate systems are performing incorrectly in their computer models or they are omitted entirely.
Yet Al Gore "claims" that there is NO DOUBT????
Nonsense. The fact is, their models are WRONG.
The only place where evidence can be found for CO2 driving global warming to some mystical tipping point is in their computer models, (and that is only in a tiny minority of models too). NONE of which predicted the near decade of temperature stasis followed by a dramatic fall in temperatures that has, in reality, happened to the only real model of the climate we have.
The theoretical models have many minor flaws and one major fundamental flaw in them. The tropospheric heat island that the theories predict should be growing (and creating a positive feedback loop) is actually rather conspicuous by its absence in the real world. It is NOT there. Without this heat island, all the other mechanisms of man-made global warming cannot occur. The NASA Aqua satellite data shows clearly that the climate regulates itself. That is why the earth has not fried to a crisp at times in the distant past when CO2 was at far higher concentrations in the atmosphere than today. That is why we get ice ages and then come out of the ice ages. All natural and without man's help.
In simple language, there is NO Significant Anthropogenic Global Warming. NONE! That is why the earth is currently cooling!
Yes CO2 does effect climate, yes it is a green house gas, but without the heat island high in the troposphere, there cannot be a cataclysmic infinite positive feedback loop. Instead we see a law of diminishing returns. The CO2 is effective as concentrations rise and then as the more CO2 is added, the less of an effect it has. Like painting over glass with thin paint. The first coat has a major effect of cutting out light. the second coat cuts out some more, the third a bit more, but the fourth and subsequent coats have no more effect.
So the raise in CO2 we have seen will raise temperatures slightly. (the vast majority of the raise in CO2 has been natural anyway) Maybe by a maximum of 2 degrees over 2 centuries then the climate regulates itself.
2 degrees is the target that the EU wishes to stall the temperature at, or rather, since global temperatures have dropped by half a degree in the last year, perhaps that should be 2.5 degrees.
Well it seems that we may not even get to a 2 degree rise. and certainly we are not going to exceed it and that will happen without humans taking any action whatsoever.
The EU needs to get on board with the latest science, because otherwise, we are going to spend TRILLIONS and cause massive disruption to our way of life, for no gain whatsoever.
CO2 is NOT a pollutant, it is a natural gas.
Global politicians should be delighted, global catastrophe had been averted and we didn't even have to do anything about it. Yippee?
No, the alarmists need a great Satan. It is not a scientific thing, it is a human condition thing. The leaders always need something to scare the followers with. You know, to keep them in-line. The followers need something to believe in. Something they themselves cannot control, something bigger than themselves, so that they can maintain trust in the leaders and allow someone else to make decisions for them, but it must be something that they can participate in, so they can have a sense of belonging.
Religion does not work in the west as a great fearful motivator anymore, the fear of communism has gone away, science has taken over.
Without global warming to unite the globe in slavery to our benevolent democratic global leaders, what is there?
Oh yeah, "human induced climate disruption!!!"
What? It's snowing in Greece? darn those pesky humans!!!