Thursday, December 27, 2007

Benazir Bhutto RIP

Today the world lost an angel of peace. A brave woman who never faltered from her beliefs and fought for peace and modernity. Evil forces have taken her from us and this is a terrible step towards regional chaos. Who benefits? Who benefits from a civil war in Pakistan?

Let us remain calm and realise that we are love, an energy force condensed into a slow vibration. If we give in to hate, we become hate.

All peaceful Pakistanis must pick up and personify her fallen torch of peace and progress.

Thursday, December 20, 2007

U.S. Senate Report: Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007


Over 400 prominent scientists from more than two dozen countries recently voiced significant objections to major aspects of the so-called "consensus" on man-made global warming. These scientists, many of whom are current and former participants in the UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), criticized the climate claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al Gore.

The new report issued by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee’s office of the GOP Ranking Member details the views of the scientists, the overwhelming majority of whom spoke out in 2007.

Even some in the establishment media now appear to be taking notice of the growing number of skeptical scientists. In October, the Washington Post Staff Writer Juliet Eilperin conceded the obvious, writing that climate skeptics "appear to be expanding rather than shrinking." Many scientists from around the world have dubbed 2007 as the year man-made global warming fears “bite the dust.” (LINK) In addition, many scientists who are also progressive environmentalists believe climate fear promotion has "co-opted" the green movement. (LINK)

This blockbuster Senate report lists the scientists by name, country of residence, and academic/institutional affiliation. It also features their own words, biographies, and weblinks to their peer reviewed studies and original source materials as gathered from public statements, various news outlets, and websites in 2007. This new “consensus busters” report is poised to redefine the debate. ......

More ...

Friday, December 14, 2007

Open Letter to the Secretary-General of the United Nations

Dec. 13, 2007

His Excellency Ban Ki-Moon

Secretary-General, United Nations

New York, N.Y.

Dear Mr. Secretary-General,

Re: UN climate conference taking the World in entirely the wrong direction

It is not possible to stop climate change, a natural phenomenon that has affected humanity through the ages. Geological, archaeological, oral and written histories all attest to the dramatic challenges posed to past societies from unanticipated changes in temperature, precipitation, winds and other climatic variables. We therefore need to equip nations to become resilient to the full range of these natural phenomena by promoting economic growth and wealth generation.

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has issued increasingly alarming conclusions about the climatic influences of human-produced carbon dioxide (CO2), a non-polluting gas that is essential to plant photosynthesis. While we understand the evidence that has led them to view CO2 emissions as harmful, the IPCC's conclusions are quite inadequate as justification for implementing policies that will markedly diminish future prosperity. In particular, it is not established that it is possible to significantly alter global climate through cuts in human greenhouse gas emissions. On top of which, because attempts to cut emissions will slow development, the current UN approach of CO2 reduction is likely to increase human suffering from future climate change rather than to decrease it.

The IPCC Summaries for Policy Makers are the most widely read IPCC reports amongst politicians and non-scientists and are the basis for most climate change policy formulation. Yet these Summaries are prepared by a relatively small core writing team with the final drafts approved line-by-line

by ­government ­representatives. The great ­majority of IPCC contributors and ­reviewers, and the tens of thousands of other scientists who are qualified to comment on these matters, are not involved in the preparation of these documents. The summaries therefore cannot properly be represented as a consensus view among experts.

Contrary to the impression left by the IPCC Summary reports:

z Recent observations of phenomena such as glacial retreats, sea-level rise and the migration of temperature-sensitive species are not evidence for abnormal climate change, for none of these changes has been shown to lie outside the bounds of known natural variability.

z The average rate of warming of 0.1 to 0. 2 degrees Celsius per decade recorded by satellites during the late 20th century falls within known natural rates of warming and cooling over the last 10,000 years.

z Leading scientists, including some senior IPCC representatives, acknowledge that today's computer models cannot predict climate. Consistent with this, and despite computer projections of temperature rises, there has been no net global warming since 1998. That the current temperature plateau follows a late 20th-century period of warming is consistent with the continuation today of natural multi-decadal or millennial climate cycling.

In stark contrast to the often repeated assertion that the science of climate change is "settled," significant new peer-reviewed research has cast even more doubt on the hypothesis of dangerous human-caused global warming. But because IPCC working groups were generally instructed (see to consider work published only through May, 2005, these important findings are not included in their reports; i.e., the IPCC assessment reports are already materially outdated.

The UN climate conference in Bali has been planned to take the world along a path of severe CO2 restrictions, ignoring the lessons apparent from the failure of the Kyoto Protocol, the chaotic nature of the European CO2 trading market, and the ineffectiveness of other costly initiatives to curb greenhouse gas emissions. Balanced cost/benefit analyses provide no support for the introduction of global measures to cap and reduce energy consumption for the purpose of restricting CO2 emissions. Furthermore, it is irrational to apply the "precautionary principle" because many scientists recognize that both climatic coolings and warmings are realistic possibilities over the medium-term future.

The current UN focus on "fighting climate change," as illustrated in the Nov. 27 UN Development Programme's Human Development Report, is distracting governments from adapting to the threat of inevitable natural climate changes, whatever forms they may take. National and international planning for such changes is needed, with a focus on helping our most vulnerable citizens adapt to conditions that lie ahead. Attempts to prevent global climate change from occurring are ultimately futile, and constitute a tragic misallocation of resources that would be better spent on humanity's real and pressing problems.

Yours faithfully,

[List of signatories]

I guess that shows that the so-called scientific consensus on man-made climate change is total bollocks too.

Friday, December 07, 2007

FUCK the MAINSTREAM MEDIA! The Polls are fixed!

So that explains why Ron Paul is more popular than all the other candidates combined and cannot get above 7% in so-called "scientific" mainstream polls. The polls are Grade A first class bullshit!

Thursday, December 06, 2007

A message from Dr Ron Paul.

Message from Ron (12/3/07)

Want to know a secret? There were two moments I especially enjoyed at the CNN/YouTube debate -- despite my frustration at some of the questions, and the maldistribution of time.

First, I was pleased at John McCain's attack, which he clearly had planned. Not because that sort of stream-of-consciousness nonsense about Hitler and WWII -- when the neocons openly want what they call WW IV! Are we to forget that the first war crime charged at Nuremberg was waging aggressive war?

I mean this: mainstream politicians NEVER attack an opponent they think is far behind. The McCain campaign, we've heard, is worried sick about New Hampshire, and they thought a slam at me would help. Ha! Of course, it only strengthened our forces.

Then, after the debate, Rudy Giuliani walked up to me and said, "Oooh, you sure have a LOT of supporters." It’s only the beginning, I told him.

Indeed, he could have told that by the crowd outside after the debate. Mitt Romney had a few people, but no one else did. We, on the other hand, had about 500 enthusiastic revolutionaries, plus a boat, a trolley, and two planes towing lighted signs. As I looked out at the crowd, I thought: the establishment has no idea of what they are facing. We have an army of freedom, prosperity, and peace. As the LA Times political blog noted the other day, the British also thought they had no problem with the Americans--until Yorktown.

But we have an astoundingly short time before the first contests. The Iowa caucuses are on January 3, the New Hampshire primary is on January 8, and Nevada and South Carolina are both on January 19. We have only 30 days to stake our claim to the nomination, and to the new America that restores the ideals of the founders, and leads the world through free enterprise, a sound dollar, the rule of law, and peaceful example. Not through inflation and bombs.

Help me surprise the neocons and all the establishment with our success. Help me build the foundation for the America we all want. Send your most generous contribution: The military-industrial complex, the biased media, the big banks, the Fed, the waterboarders, and the IRS don’t like what we’re doing. But every good American is applauding us, and daring to hope for a better future.

Please, help me give it to them, to us, to all Americans to come. Keep this revolution growing and winning:



Happy Christmas to you all

Tuesday, December 04, 2007

Is an Israeli attack on Iran MORE likely now?

As the US has been forced onto the back foot over Iran by the news that their own intelligence agencies have taken a pre-emptive strike against the administration and made it very clear to the whole world that they do NOT believe that Iran is trying to develop nuclear weapons, (or nucular* weapons for that matter). It seems to me that they are still pissed at being blamed for 9/11 and Iraq and are preventing the same lies working against them again.

However, with the USA being moved slightly further away from any justification for an attack on Iran, does this mean that Israel will be more likely to go it alone? And thus forcing the USA into a possible nuclear war?

So it looks like the direct attack by the USA on Iran has been cancelled, WW3 called off? or has it been merely subcontracted to Israel?

However as an aside, I am wondering how long it will be before Benjamin Fulford takes credit for this 'intelligence forced' US climbdown?

*Is this President Bush's way of admitting that they are trying to prevent global warming? He keeps talking about new cooler weapons after all?

Friday, November 30, 2007


$10,000,000 in two months.

ALL from spontaneous small individual donations, not corporate largesse.

Congratulations Ron Paul.

Do not forget the teaparty 07 Let's break all records that day!

Thursday, November 22, 2007

Get your Children for sex at

SHoCkIng headline isn't it?

kadja's brand new look website

No - We don't really have access to the 7.5M records of family data that the Government lost on the 18th October 2007. We only wanted to highlight in visual terms just one of the many disastrous and horrible things that could be done with this information if (or when?) it falls into the wrong hands.

We hope we have not upset you too much - we are equally disgusted and appalled by the type of content parodied on the main page. However it sometimes needs a bit of a shock to bring ones mind into focus.

This loss of data is unforgivable, the mere fact that it is possible for someone working in the HMRC to download ALL DATA for EVERY PERSON in the UK receiving Child Benefit, burn it to a disc and stick it in their pocket is a disgrace.

How we can do this

Because the UK Government and Civil Service are apparently incompetent.

OK so this is a fake paedophile site, but it really REALLY strikes home what is wrong with and how serious the Government's mis-handling of OUR PRIVATE data is.

We can never trust the government to protect or look after our private data. Refuse to comply with the ID card.

Please Sign my pledge linked at

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

How many more torpedos can this dedebunked theory take before it finally dies?


Either click the links below:
Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4
Watch each part below:

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

This blows apart the foundations upon which the great global warming scandal is based. There is a lot of excellent science that is unfortunately founded on badly incorrect and unsound empirical data. If the raw data is incorrect, the conclusions drawn from the raw data is unreliable.

There are errors in the accepted science, and good contradictory evidence that is ignored.

The IPCC is a pure political office with an agenda and a huge budget and prestige. They will never let the truth get in the way of their budget or global population control and 3rd world slavery agenda!

We should be cleaning up the pollution and stop the deforestation and get ready for catastrophic global cooling. A warm climate provides FAR more bio-diversity than an ice-based climate. I dearly wish that we were heading for an even warmer climate. My heating bills are astronomical from Autumn to Spring. I only have the heating off for most of the summer. Bio diversity would increase and there would be millions of hectares of arable farming land opened up for crops in Greenland and Siberia if long-term human induced global warming was real. Unfortunately, the earth will get a LOT colder. That IS the natural state of climate over the last few MILLION years.

Another Disclosure Project Press Conference.

In May 2003, the disclosure project held a press conference in the ballroom of the Washington Press Club. It was huge, with high level officials from the Government, military and aviation giving their own smoking gun accounts of unidentified flying objects that could not be explained by conventional, rational explanations. They had physical evidence in the form of radar tapes and corroborative accounts across different military lines. EG an officer in a nuclear missile silo witnessing aerial phenomena and his missiles going involuntarily off line, and a commander of another missile silo receiving automatic electronic notification of one of the silo's in his grid going offline. There was a lot of high level evidence presented to a large collection of the world's mainstream media. Solid evidence from reputable, sane, very credible witnesses, but hardly made a ripple in the mainstream media and what was reported their was reported as to ridicule these highly credible witnesses.

We have just had another such press conference with the following quote:
"During the Q & A session, several journalists asked a version of the question, why is there a UFO coverup, or what do the militaries or aviation associations of various governments around the world, represented in the room and otherwise, fear concerning the public being told there have been unexplained vehicles flying over the airspace of many countries? Whether from France, England, or Peru, the response was the same- few high ranking government officials are willing to publicly admit there are civilizations, and thus craft, over whom we are powerless. Officials specualted about the fear such powerlessness would engender, and said, “The (U.S.) government doesn’t want to scare people…”. One reporter disagreed, citing color alerts and terror warnings, stating, “…They want to scare us about everything else…”
I found this quote very revealing, as to why the Government would play down something that could potentially be really terrifying, but play up the fear of terrorism, global warming, etc etc.? I think it is because the Government and media puppets of the NWO elite that run things have control over the terrorism threat as THEY manufacture and control it. They have control over what they report about Global Warming, as they control that disinfo psyop too. They have NO CONTROL over the Alien presence that observes us at will.

This is VERY important, as if the mainstream media start covering an ALIEN THREAT to Earth, then you will know that it is a FAKE threat. It would be operation bluebeam.

This latest news conference has also been largely ignored by the mainstream media, so we may be safe for a while yet.

Sign up NOW! Give all you can on December 16th.

Tea Party 07, Sign up now. YOU can make a difference.

Ron Paul on Face the Nation.

Monday, November 12, 2007

BBC To Apologize For 9/11 Truth Hit Piece?

Scandal-hit network desperately scrambles to offset legal action over lies and bias in February 2007 documentary.

The BBC news and current affairs department should be scrapped as being unfit for purpose. By all means keep the light entertainment department, with their terrific comedy shows and magazine programmes, Top Gear being particularly good. But their news and current affairs programming resembles nothing other than a propaganda outlet for what Gordon Brown calls the 'new world order'.

Oh the poor polar bears!!!

Why do these quasi religious, neo-fascist man-made-global-warming freaks keep on increasing their own carbon footprints in order to peddle such blatant and proven false and utterly and completely debunked lies? Take the so-called plight of the polar bears as highlighted by a third rate comedian who appears to be desperate to increase his exposure in the comedy rag known as the Sun. This article is typical of so many utterly false sob stories in the media of late. These emotional heart string-pulling pieces are deliberately crafted to appeal to the emotions and NOT the reason part of the brain and so the underlying and sinister message is taken in as a given.

The FACTS of the matter are that evidence from organisations such as the US National Biological Service that in most places polar bear populations are either stable or increasing. In the 1950's the Global Polar Bear population was in the region of 5000 animals. Today, it is around 25,000 or so, give or take a melting ice-berg or two. Now it is pretty clear that 25,000 bears will eat a lot more, no, a hell of a lot more food than would be eaten by a mere 5000. So inevitably many will have to roam far and wide to seek this food. THIS IS NORMAL. Polar bears naturally roam thousands of miles. This is one of the main reasons that keeping these imperious creatures in the confines of a zoo is so massively cruel. I have seen these magnificent beasts up close at San Diego zoo and they were behaving in a way that demonstrated all the classic, repetitive behavior of an animal that had gone clean out of it's mind with boredom. These animals can also swim very well indeed and for hundreds of miles if needs be. So they are not running out of food due to global warming, neither are they encroaching into man's territory due to global warming.

What is happening is that their population explosion is meeting our population explosion.

But never let facts get in the way of the neo-religious AGW cult when fat research grants, emotive headlines and publicity is on the line. Their OWN carbon footprint and the facts be damned.

We have the most draconian detention laws of any democracy - NOT!

Many newspapers are reporting that the UK has the most draconian detention without trial laws of any democracy. This being but one example. Unfortunately it is not accurate as the people who have yet to be charged with any crime in Guantanamo would surely agree. OK so to be detained for more than two days in the good ol' land of the free, there needs to be a criminal charge, OR the slightest suspicion of some kind of tenuous link to terrorism, then they can put a bag over the 'suspects' head, tie his arms and legs, throw him on a plane, fly him to a foreign destination, torture (sorry, subject him to 'enhanced interrogation') indefinitely and never charge the victim (sorry suspect) with anything.

SO the UK is only second in that league. Note, however, that we are constantly told how a certain middle eastern country can get away with certain detestable practices, because it is the only democracy in the middle east? (even though it plainly isn't) EG, it is allowed to have an army because it is representative of a democratic government, and Hamas is not allowed to have an army because they do not respect democracy? Well THAT democracy of Israel is not even listed, so the UK probably drops to third? What about the shiny new democracy of Iraq? they detain people far longer than 28 days, so The UK is now out of the medal positions.

Although it is wrong to detain ANYONE for 28 days without trial, the UK is not the worst offender, by a long stretch and for the liberal press to forget that in some narrow myopic campaign, is plain wrong.

Tuesday, November 06, 2007


Ron Paul Raises More Than $4.2 Million

WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul, aided by an extraordinary outpouring of Internet support Monday, hauled in more than $4.2 million in nearly 24 hours.

Paul, the Texas congressman with a libertarian tilt and an out-of-Iraq pitch, entered heady fundraising territory with a surge of Web-based giving tied to the commemoration of Guy Fawkes Day.

Fawkes was a British mercenary who failed in his attempt to kill King James I on Nov. 5, 1605. He also was the model for the protagonist in the movie "V for Vendetta." Paul backers motivated donors on the Internet with mashed-up clips of the film on the online video site YouTube as well as the Guy Fawkes Day refrain: "Remember, remember the 5th of November."

More ...

Now we have the money, with more being donated daily. We have the volunteers, with more coming on board every day, now we NEED EVERYONE TO REGISTER REPUBLICAN NOW TODAY URGENTLY.

It would be a catastrophe for the USA if Ron Paul is not elected because his supporters do not do enough to convincingly win the primaries.



Monday, November 05, 2007


And REMEMBER to REGISTER as a Republican to support Dr Ron Paul in your Primary.

Tuesday, October 09, 2007

HOW to get Ron Paul as President!

Thanks and Kudos to Karl Schwarz for this easy guide to Get Ron Paul into the white House, despite of vote fraud and the East Coast Establishment's desire to have a Bush/Clinton dynasty.


Here is the easy way to get Ron Paul through the Republican Primaries, through the November 2008 elections and into the White House.

A. Get yourself registered to vote in the Republican primary in your state of residence and do it right now. Several states are trying to put in cut off dates as early as October 12, 2007 to block such acts by you. New Hampshire and New York are two such states, so get in gear and do it now.

B. Take the primary day off, the entire day. As an American you have a duty to yourself, your family and your nation, so get on the front line and stay there all day. What front line you ask? The voting precinct where you are legal to vote. That battle line. Take the entire day off on the general election day too. Your nation needs you on the real front line.

C. Well before the Primary Election Day take the following to a Notary Public, two copies of the following. Have both copies signed in the presence of a Notary Public, and have both of them dated, signed and the Notary Public seal affixed to both copies. The closer to the Primary Election Day that is dated the better.

D. Use this text: Below that put a signature line for your signature and your full name under the signature line. Do not sign it until you go to a Notary Public and sign it in the presence of that person. Down the page center this “

Start of an 8.5x11 piece of paper:


“I, __________________ [your full name], Driver License Number, street address, city, state, ZIP CODE, a resident of the State of _____________, County of ___________do hereby affirm that I am an eligible voter in my state of residence, (Voter ID Number would not hurt if you have to present such to vote such as a Voter Registration Card) and my vote for President of the United States of America is:

Representative Ron Paul, Republican, State of Texas.”

__________________________ [your signature line and signed in front of the Notary Public person]

Your full name clearly printed (typed is better)


State of _______________
County of _______________

Before me, __(name of the Notary Public)____, in and for said state, on this ____ day of ____, ____, personally appeared _____(Your full name)____, to me known to be the identical person who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that __(he/she)_______ executed the same as _____(his/her) vote for President of the United States)____________ as a free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein set forth.

Notary Public in and for the State of ________________________

Print Name:

Commission Expires:

Note: make sure you leave room for the Notary Public seal

End of 8.5x11 page

The following is another possible format and some states have their own required format and are instructions to the notary, not you.

1. When notarizing a signature on a document [Most frequently requested notarial act]:

State of Montana
County of (Where you are performing the notarization)

Signed and acknowledged before me on (date) by (name of Notary Public person witnessing the signing of document) .


(Signature of Notary)

(Name - typed, stamped, or printed)

Notary Public for the State of Montana


Residing at (city where notary lives)

My Commission Expires (Month / Day / Four digit Year)

Do two such pieces of paper for the Republican Primary in your home state and do the exact same thing [two notarized pieces of paper as to how you really voted] on the day of the General Election for President.

DO NOT press any button on any electronic voting machine regarding a vote for President of the United States. That is how and where they are screwing you and all of America in picking the next puppet to put into the White House. Vote for you local issues, US representative, Senator, governor, school board, but DO NOT push a button on that machine for any presidential candidate. Also, if they are using paper ballots that are then scanned by a machine, put no mark for President. Your “MARK” for president is a notarized 8.5 x 11 piece of paper.

Leave one on the desk in the voting precinct and stand outside with the other until they certify the vote in your precinct. In fact, advise them in the precinct that all of you are going to be right outside with the paper receipt of how you really voted for President.

Now, the reason you need to stay there all day and you need to have two copies is simple if you think about it.

Let’s say hypothetically there are 1,500 voters who vote in your precinct and when they certify the vote and declare that Rudy Giuliani or John McCain won that precinct say 62% to 38% but 70% of the voters are standing right there with Notarized documents as to how they really voted, the RNC will be caught red handed in election fraud and that is a felony in virtually every state in the United States.

If enough Americans get off their butts in the General Election, both RNC and DNC will be caught red handed trying to steal the White House and steal your future too.

I wonder if that 71% of eligible voters that sit on their butts during elections can get off their butts if there is a chance to take back America from this criminal cabal that has hijacked America?

The media will be dumbfounded. How can Wolf Blitzer build up the drama on his election night show if Americans in the tens of millions have a written trail [evidence] of how the vote really went?

Consider the entertainment value for yourself on this one and imagine them try to spin their way out of their deceit. The entire world will see them for what they are and so will all of America.

The Exit Poll Pundits will not be able to lie about the true exit poll numbers if overwhelming numbers for Ron Paul are standing right there with paper receipts outside and left exact copies of that notarized document inside as the real vote.

They cannot force America to vote on rigged machines, so stop being an unthinking American, or a Sheeple that does whatever they tell you to do, and take action to take back America.

The RNC and DNC are working overtime right now to steal the elections again. For the love of your nation, do not let them do it again.

We do not need guns and bullets to force these thugs from power.

All that is needed are 4 notarized pieces of paper as to what the true vote is, take two days off to guard your own future, and stand on the front line all day.

We take America back, these thugs are going down and they know it.

All we need is a Revolution and an honest man, and in this instance the REVOLUTION IS YOUR ACTION.

Best regards,


Monday, October 08, 2007

Brown is taking the piss!

Democracy? He cannot be serious.

It wasn't the media that hired election officials, briefed the Unions, the media, started robo-calling potential electors, hired bill-boards and basically did everything required to call an election, short of actually calling one.

Browns team, in time honoured tradition, briefed the media on everything leading up to the announcement and used the media to his own ends the whole way through. He was working towards calling an election, did everything required in order to call that election, but as soon as the polls began to show a dip, he ran away scared. Now he is lying about it and he has made his pets in the media look foolish and they will not ever forget that, I hope!

As for democracy, well, when the labour party has an inbuilt majority of 60 because of electoral boundaries, the politically ignorant and the truly well informed (and politically disgusted) alike form a combined group of up to 50% of the electorate who will not vote at all, the labour party can inflict their rule with as few as 20% of the population voting.

Gordon Brown is now displaying mind numbing cynicism alongside his supine cowardice of the weekend. "I want to demonstrate my vision for change" for two years prior to an election?

Well seeing as how Gordon is abandoning any vestige of the manifesto he was elected to implement, as seen by his obsession with "change", surely he must put that in a manifesto before the electorate? He is entitled to implement the 2005 manifesto as PM, but neither Gordon Brown, nor the current labour Government, have a mandate for change.

This "let me have a couple of years trial period" is politically obscene. Trial periods are for office juniors, not Prime Ministers. If he has any conviction whatsoever he would have the courage to stand up before the country and fight an election upon it. Otherwise, for the sake of political fairness, David Cameron, Ming Cambell and the leaders of UKIP, The Greens and the BNP surely must be given their two year trials of their visions of change too.

How craven can you get? What Gordon Brown is actually doing (and being allowed to get away with it by a media that he has made to look foolish) is to run away frit from an election, abandon the old manifesto and "try out" his new manifesto without any election whatsoever.

He is, to be very crude, pissing on the corpse of British Democracy!

Friday, October 05, 2007

Register NOW!

The Ron Paul revolution has been brilliant so far. Wouldn't it be a shame, or worse, if he were to fail because his supporters online do not actually take the action of going to their local office and registering as Republican on time to vote for him in the primaries.

Here is a list of the deadlines by state.

If you want to save your country. GET OUT THERE AND MAKE THE CHANGE. REGISTER NOW! TODAY!

Global Warming Test

I got 10 out of 10 in my first try and if you have been paying attention to my blog, so should you!

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

A superb letter to the Columbia University President

The President of Columbia University ought to be thoroughly ashamed of himself and resign. Not for his personal political beliefs, to which hi is entitled, but for the ignorance that he demonstrated towards the elected leader of Iran. As the head of a University, he (more than anyone) should demonstrate that he is educated and informed and behave as an academic. Not a closed minded bigoted thug, completely mind controlled by a biased and corrupt media. I read the transcript and was disgusted that a country built on freedom, liberty, justice for alll could have as a Universoty President a man so closed minded, ignorant and above all WRONG, on so many substantive issues.

Mr. Lee Bollinger should apologise for his ignorance and resign.

Seven chancellors and presidents of Iranian universities and research centers, in a letter addressed to their counterpart in the US Colombia University, denounced Lee Bollinger's insulting words against the Iranian nation and president and invited him to provide responses for 10 questions of the Iranian academicians and intellectuals.

The following is the full text of the letter.

Mr. Lee Bollinger
Columbia University President

We, the professors and heads of universities and research institutions in Tehran , hereby announce our displeasure and protest at your impolite remarks prior to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent speech at Columbia University.

We would like to inform you that President Ahmadinejad was elected directly by the Iranian people through an enthusiastic two-round poll in which almost all of the country's political parties and groups participated. To assess the quality and nature of these elections you may refer to US news reports on the poll dated June 2005.

Your insult, in a scholarly atmosphere, to the president of a country with a population of 72 million and a recorded history of 7,000 years of civilization and culture is deeply shameful.

Your comments, filled with hate and disgust, may well have been influenced by extreme pressure from the media, but it is regrettable that media policy-makers can determine the stance a university president adopts in his speech.

Your remarks about our country included unsubstantiated accusations that were the product of guesswork as well as media propaganda. Some of your claims result from misunderstandings that can be clarified through dialogue and further research.

During his speech, Mr. Ahmadinejad answered a number of your questions and those of students. We are prepared to answer any remaining questions in a scientific, open and direct debate.

You asked the president approximately ten questions. Allow us to ask you ten of our own questions in the hope that your response will help clear the atmosphere of misunderstanding and distrust between our two countries and reveal the truth.

1- Why did the US media put you under so much pressure to prevent Mr. Ahmadinejad from delivering his speech at Columbia University? And why have American TV networks been broadcasting hours of news reports insulting our president while refusing to allow him the opportunity to respond? Is this not against the principle of freedom of speech?

2- Why, in 1953, did the US administration overthrow the Iran's national government under Dr Mohammad Mosaddegh and go on to support the Shah's dictatorship?

3- Why did the US support the blood-thirsty dictator Saddam Hussein during the 1980-88 Iraqi-imposed war on Iran, considering his reckless use of chemical weapons against Iranian soldiers defending their land and even against his own people?

4- Why is the US putting pressure on the government elected by the majority of Palestinians in Gaza instead of officially recognizing it? And why does it oppose Iran 's proposal to resolve the 60-year-old Palestinian issue through a general referendum?

5- Why has the US military failed to find Al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden even with all its advanced equipment? How do you justify the old friendship between the Bush and Bin Laden families and their cooperation on oil deals? How can you justify the Bush administration's efforts to disrupt investigations concerning the September 11 attacks?

6- Why does the US administration support the Mujahedin Khalq Organization (MKO) despite the fact that the group has officially and openly accepted the responsibility for numerous deadly bombings and massacres in Iran and Iraq? Why does the US refuse to allow Iran 's current government to act against the MKO's main base in Iraq?

7- Was the US invasion of Iraq based on international consensus and did international institutions support it? What was the real purpose behind the invasion which has claimed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives? Where are the weapons of mass destruction that the US claimed were being stockpiled in Iraq?

8- Why do America's closest allies in the Middle East come from extremely undemocratic governments with absolutist monarchical regimes?

9- Why did the US oppose the plan for a Middle East free of unconventional weapons in the recent session of the International Atomic Energy Agency Board of Governors despite the fact the move won the support of all members other than Israel?

10- Why is the US displeased with Iran's agreement with the IAEA and why does it openly oppose any progress in talks between Iran and the agency to resolve the nuclear issue under international law?

Finally, we would like to express our readiness to invite you and other scientific delegations to our country. A trip to Iran would allow you and your colleagues to speak directly with Iranians from all walks of life including intellectuals and university scholars. You could then assess the realities of Iranian society without media censorship before making judgments about the Iranian nation and government.

You can be assured that Iranians are very polite and hospitable toward their guests.


Mr Bollinger could learn a lot from that invite.

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Aaron Russo RIP

911 = Inside job. The NWO elite planned it. A direct confession to a witness, Aaron Russo, by the elitist Nick Rockefeller, who invited Aaron into the CFR.

Another Rockefeller sent Stew Web the following email:

From "Rockefeller Global Communications"


Title: The Countdown to Armageddon

To the great sea of mankind,

The time of the end is upon us. Like it or hate it, it's the destiny

we must all face. On September 11, 2001 the world was witness

to the beginning of the end. What you saw and experienced will

be nothing compared to the calamity that is to soon transpire. It

is sad that so many lives will be taken - but these things will continue

to happen as this old system begins to collapse.

No human government in existence now or since the ancient times

have been able to sustain a perfect order. Every government has

failed and will fail. They can not protect you. They can not give you

a place where people are truly free, where your neighbours are your family

and foreigners are your friends. No human government today

can or will ever be able to achieve this. That is why the Agenda

has been set. It has been referred to over time as the Armageddon

Agenda. But be not fearful. It will not be a nuclear holocaust or some

stray asteroid from the heavens that will level our civilization. In

fact it's not the planet that will suffer and be swept away. It will be the

human inhabitants of this great planet who have no respect or genuine

regard for their fellow human beings. Each one of you over the next

year must do some very deep and sincere thinking. Will I overcome

my hatred for my fellowman or will I put aside my differences and unite

and care for my neighbour? Will I treat them with kindness? Or will I continue

to take advantage of them? When was the last time you took a person in off

the street and gave them some food or helped them find shelter for the night? Or

sat beside someone on a bus, in a mall, on a train and said Hello. When did you

last comfort a stranger who had lost someone they loved. When was the last time

you befriended someone not because of their posessions or their wealth - but

because you cared about them?

None of the above is easy. It is hard. None of us are perfect. None of us have had a

good life. Some think that because we have suffered to some degree that we deserve

what ever we can get - even if it means hurting another person in the process. But those

who try and rise up against our negative ways will survive and will be rewarded with

a life on earth that right now is only a dream. Only the meek will possess the earth.

This is a certainty.

The New System is coming. The only question is: Will you choose to be there? Or will

you continue to go down the road to self destruction. It's up to you. The following

Agenda is what will happen and what you will need to endure through to

survive and get there. So think deeply. It's your future. And may you do well.

Your Brother


======== AGENDA TO THE NEW WORLD =========

The steps will be:

1) A complete irresolvable collapse of Middle Eastern peace.

2) Vatican city will fall to religious terrorists.

2) World-Wide Crack Down on all religion. All Religions will be

3) United Nations will establish an interm one world government
state, followed by a declaration of worldwide peace and security.

4) Sudden and systematic collapse of Great Britain, Chinese
and the United States Governments. The rest of the world will fall
into anarchy. Billions will perish. Only those of good-will, and
followers of the truth will survive.

5) New system government of 144,000 members and 6 million
plus subjects will take control.

6) Massive cleanup operation will commence as New World is
created. Eco-systems will be restored. Infrastructures re-built. Sickness
and disease will be eliminated. Aging will be reversed and the aging
process itself will cease. A New restored human family will gradually
bring the earth into paradisaical conditions under theocratic rule.

======== END OF AGENDA =========

Friday, September 21, 2007

Do whatever the fuck you want? LMAO!

What a shame for this pussy whipped bitch!

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Rice swipes at IAEA, urges bold action on Iran

The United States has been critical of a deal International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Mohamed ElBaradei has made with Iran to answer long-standing questions about its nuclear activities.

Rice, who has previously accused ElBaradei of "muddying the message" to Iran, voiced strong irritation with the IAEA chief.

Who was correct over the details of Iraq's nuclear program? Ms Rice or the IAEA?

Who are you going to believe now?

Somebody ought to ask this guy about this in the next debate!

In addition to the reasons cited in this video, another reason for the emergency command center to be located in WTC7 was the fact that the unique design and construction of the building meant that an entire floor could be removed and remodeled if needed without effecting the structural integrity of the building. In other words it was several buildings within one. In other words it was very VERY strong. A localised collapse would NOT have brought down the whole building.

Rudy has some explainin' to do.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Welcome to the land of the free!

OK this guy is a little bit agitated at the start, but given how the USA has fucked over the people, I think he has every reason to be angry and considering this, I think he was being very restrained.

Oedipal complex on steroids!

This is a really disturbing video in some ways, but the martial arts baby is hilarious.

Oh, and from personal experience, those shavers are pretty good too.

Monday, September 17, 2007


Satellite photo of ice cover over Arctic poll - 2007 (Source: European Space Agency)
The most direct shipping route from Europe to Asia is fully clear of ice for the first time since records began, the European Space Agency (Esa) says.

Historically, the Northwest Passage linking the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans has been ice-bound through the year.

But the agency says ice cover has been steadily shrinking, and this summer's reduction has made the route navigable.

The findings, based on satellite images, raised concerns about the speed of global warming.


The Northwest Passage is one of the most fabled sea routes in the world - a short cut from Europe to Asia through the Canadian Arctic.

Recent years have seen a marked shrinkage in its ice cover, but this year it was extreme, Esa says.

It says this made the passage "fully navigable" for the first time since monitoring began in 1978.

1978!!! You mean we started monitoring the ice at the END of a cooling period? I'll bet, although they were not monitoring this then, that in the 1930's that this passage WAS navigable then too... In fact it may have been navigable almost permanently back in the medieval warm period. In fact when Greenland was Green I am sure that this route would have been open. But according to the mainstream education, America had not been discovered and the earth was thought to be flat back then so nobody would have dared venture out there in there little boats.

Using phraseology like, "this has been the worst melt since records began," is very misleading and very emotive and paints a wholly inaccurate picture of arctic ice.

What is also NEVER mentioned these days is the antarctic ice, which is getting thicker and wider, the majority of glacier's on the planet are increasing in size and the Polar Bears have survived long periods when the earth has been much warmer than today.

The people who wish to control what we think and do are trying everything to convince us that AGW is real and forget all that nonsense about the way the climate behaved in the past. They must have theri quasi-religious cult brainwash as many of us as possible.

I am not against reducing polution, but the idea of getting every TV in the UK to have it's stand-by function disabled and putting a £3000.oo tax on 4x4's SUV's is not going to make the Northern ice re-freeze.

I have no problem with taking action to solve a problem, IF we know there is a good chance of success. With something as (supposedly) catastrphic as global warming, I have no problem making major sacrifices even if there is the slightest chance of success. However, when the knee-jerkers are running bout saying we must use solutions that create a bigger carbon footprint (EG energy efficient bulbs, whose manufacturing process consumes more energy per-bulb, than the bulb saves over it's lifetime, or windmills placed in places with low levels of wind, so that the carbon footprint of manufacturing it is greater than the energy it will produce over its lifetime) and when the solutions are guaranteed to fail, because even if the UK does reduce its carbon output to zero, it will NOT stop global warming. for 2 reasons.
1. the Chinese and Indians will still increase their output by more than what we, in the UK, produce thus completely negating all our efforts and
2. Global Climate change is not solely driven by CO2.
Then I greatly resent having to make sacrifices that will achieve absolutely nothing!

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Monday, September 03, 2007

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

The past as prologue?

Watch This:

It is an Architect giving a presentation on the collapses of the WTC. It's very good.

This a representative of AE911truth, architects and engineers for 911 truth. The media claim that 911 researchers and 911 truthers are a bunch of whacko fringe conspiracy nuts. They claim that "real" scientists and experts do not agree with the inside job theory. They claim that there isn't any evidence at all that the WTC buildings were demolished by explosive charges and real experts do not support the conspiracy, that there aren't any real experts that support this theory.

ae911truth ARE the real experts, architects, structural engineers, controlled demolition experts et all.

These are guys who really DO know there stuff and guess what? The mainstream media will not DARE meet with them. They (the media) know that they cannot debunk, nor write off, what these guys are showing us. So rather than have the guts to report truth, they hide behind their defense portfolios and keep schtum!

Using 911 as a pretext worked for ousting the Taliban in Afghanistan, for they where shielding Al Queda and Iraq where the lies went as follows: Saddam Hussien has extensive stockpiles of WMD and is not far from developing a nuclear weapon. He could then pass this on to terrorists like Al Queda. 911 turned a passive and defeated non-threat known as Iraq into the direst threat since Hitler.

However in the case of Iran, Al queda and Iran are totally opposed to each other. Their proxies are currently fighting against each other inside Iraq. It would be difficult to sell a new front against Iran based on a:" diminished, yet more dangerous Al Queda allied with Iran." There are simply too many contradictions in that sentence to warrant faith or belief in the concept.

People are waking from the hypnotic trance that they were suddenly and violently induced into on that still Tuesday September Morning, six years ago. They are waking up and beginning to have rational thought. Cognitive processes are telling them that the benevolent great state that they have been clinging to for security is actually the great beast that threatens all.

So, are they about to launch a new 911? How will they put more people back to sleep? As with any subliminal, once you know it exists and you know what to look for, it is no longer subliminal. You cannot willfully induce a subject to a hypnotic trance, if they do not wish to be hypnotised AND they recognise what technique is being used to induce them. They can willfully resist and the induction will fail.

be alert for new attacks. The signs are now there and unmistakable.

As in the following letter from :

To the American people, and to peace loving individuals everywhere:

Massive evidence has come to our attention which shows that the backers, controllers, and allies of Vice President Dick Cheney are determined to orchestrate and manufacture a new 9/11 terror incident, and/or a new Gulf of Tonkin war provocation over the coming weeks and months. Such events would be used by the Bush administration as a pretext for launching an aggressive war against Iran, quite possibly with nuclear weapons, and for imposing a regime of martial law here in the United States. We call on the House of Representatives to proceed immediately to the impeachment of Cheney, as an urgent measure for avoiding a wider and more catastrophic war. Once impeachment has begun, it will be easier for loyal and patriotic military officers to refuse illegal orders coming from the Cheney faction. We solemnly warn the people of the world that any terrorist attack with weapons of mass destruction taking place inside the United States or elsewhere in the immediate future must be considered the prima facie responsibility of the Cheney faction. We urge responsible political leaders everywhere to begin at once to inoculate the public opinion of their countries against such a threatened false flag terror operation.

(Signed) A Group of US Opposition Political Leaders Gathered in Protest at the Bush Compound in Kennebunkport, Maine, August 24-25, 2007


The letter was signed by the group at an anti war protest this weekend which saw four thousand march near the Bush family residence on Walker's Point in Kennebunkport.

The warning comes on the heels of a spate of recent news stories and reports indicating that "chatter" about a terror event is at an all time high.

Further evidence that some form of event is imminent has emerged with strange stock market activity occurring just as did in the weeks and days preceding 9/11.

A mystery trader risks losing around $1 billion dollars after placing 245,000 put options on the Dow Jones Eurostoxx 50 index, leading many analysts to speculate that a stock market crash preceded by a new 9/11 style catastrophe could take place within the next month.

The Kennebunkport group have demanded the immediate impeachment of Dick Cheney in order to prevent any such activities coming to fruition.

Be Alert. If anything happens in the next month or two, do not be shocked into a hypnotic trance to believe all the suggestible nonsense that will be embedded into your psyche and your sub-conscious mind. Be aware that any large attack WILL be followed by lies and manipulations to create a context for martial law and new wars.

Be alert and be prepared to record everything that happens during and immediately following the attacks. Gather the evidence to show who is responsible, who had the means, motive and opportunty and who benefits.

They have lied before, in fact that is ALL they do. How do we defeat these evil men?

Fight Lies with Truth,
Fight Ignorance with Knowledge,
Fight Fire with Water,
Fight Hatred with Love,
Fight Intolerance with Compassion,
Fight Violence with Peace.

Vote Ron Paul '08 Constructing a miracle, one voter at a time!

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

Constructing a miracle one step at a time

How uniquely American!

What am I referring to? No not that self satisfied jibe by GW Bush to the poor mother forced to work 3 jobs to make ends meet. This was actually an admission of economic failure. OK, I know that the top executives in America hold down as many as 20 or 30 jobs, well directorships, but I don't count them unless they actually have to spend more than three days a week at each!

No, the uniquely American value to which I refer is the idea that it is impossible to elect Ron Paul to the presidency, SO that gives everyone involved in his campaign (official and otherwise) MORE determination to see it succeed!

In most other countries, the realization that something is impossible causes people to quit, to give up, to surrender to the inevitable failure. NOT SO AMERICA, whereby people knuckle down, step up and rise to the challenge and, by the sheer force of their WILL, MAKE THE IMPOSSIBLE THE POSSIBLE AND THE ACHIEVED!!!

We would never have gotten to the moon without the American desire to make the impossible possible.

Saying that it is impossible only makes the will stronger, the desire more acute and the determination utterly resolute.

Yes it WILL take a miracle to elect Ron Paul, but miracles are what American People are good at! What the great republic of the United States was BUILT UPON. It took a miracle to end British Tyranny over 200 years ago and Ron Paul and the Ron Paul Supporters are cut from the same cloth as those founding fathers.

Yes it will take a miracle to elect Ron Paul. BUT WE ARE CONSTRUCTING A MIRACLE, ONE VOTE AT A TIME.




Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Congratulations Ron paul Supporters

The Mitt Romney Goon who stood on the Ron Paul banner at the end of this vid is deliberately trying to provoke the Ron Paul supporters, this would have been spun to show Ron Paul supporters as violent nutters.

Well done for showing this goon to be what he really is, fofr showing the MittRomney machine for being what it is. Mitt Romney does NOT support free speech, Mitt Romney does not support free competition.

Constructing a miracle, one vote at a time

Ron Paul 08

Saturday, August 11, 2007

The problem with Climate modelling.

As I have stated on a number of occasions, in various locations online, I may not be a scientist, but I know that computerised climate models cannot be relied upon. How can I be so sure? I may not be a climate scientist, but my other job is as a systems engineer and computer programmer. From this environment I can confidently and authorititavely state that the computer models rely on two unreliable elements to make their predictions. 1. the data entered into the model and 2. the coding of the model itself.

As the article linked to the title of this comment states, the data entered into the famous global warming models is incorrect. This is due to a Y2K bug of all things.

When the raw data that the models use is wrong, the prediction is bound to be wrong.

Man made climate change is a scam.

Wednesday, August 08, 2007

OK so keep voting for the problem then???

I have seen the media and others say that they cannot support Ron Paul because he does not have enough real support or that simply, he has "no chance" of winning.

This is basically saying that they know what the problem is, they know what the solution is, BUT despite liking the solution, they will keep on voting FOR the problem, because it is wasting a vote to vote for the solution.

I do not understand that kind of logic. If my car's tire gets a puncture, I go to the garage and get a new tire. I do not go to the garage and say, I would like a new tire, but realistically another punctured tire is cheaper, so I will have one of those instead.

Or, my computer gets a virus, so I use a virus checker to find and eradicate or inoculate the computer from the virus. I don't add another virus to the computer because, let's face it, computer's get viruses. No, I fix the problem with a solution.

If you do not like the problem, vote for the solution.

Be logical, see sense, reclaim your country, vote for the solution to America's problems.

Vote for Ron Paul.

Wednesday, August 01, 2007

The ONLY hope for an end to this is Ron Paul

Vote for Ron Paul in the Primaries.

Iraq war veteran and experienced demolitions expert blows the cover on 9/11 inside job.

I am posting the following because this person, I believe, has a level of credibility that makes what he says carry serious weight.

Iraq war veteran and experienced demolitions expert blows the cover on 9/11 inside job.
Written by Gibbwake

Meet Torin Wolf. He has a broad and varied background as a US Army Combat Nurse during Operation Iraqi Freedom,....

...building construction contractor, certified structural welder, certified asbestos and hazardous materials worker, experienced demolitions expert, teacher, radio show host, and well studied 9/11 truth activist. Torin knows how to put a building up, and bring the same building down in its own footprint. Torin's free presentation, "Taking the Red Pill" was hosted by Brave New Books on 1904 Guadalupe in Austin last Saturday, June 23rd at 7 pm.

Read the rest here ...

Additionally Architects and Engineers for 911 truth is an EXCELLENT website with credible expert testimony.

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Are YOU this stupid?

This reminds me of the political committee that tried to also ban Dihydrogen-Monoxide to prevent this lethal chemical from falling into the hands of terrorists. After all, in the wrong hands this stuff could (in its gassius form) strip the skin from your body in seconds. It can stop you from breathing, and in large quantities it is poisonous. I mean, thousands of people every year are killed by this chemical.

Additionally, Aliso Viejo city officials famously came close to banning styrofoam cups in 2004 after hearing that "dihydrogen monoxide" was used in their production.

Monday, July 30, 2007

Team calls climate change target too weak

"LONDON (Reuters) - Draft plans to curb the nation's carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 60 percent by 2050 were too weak, an environment committee of parliamentarians said on Monday."
Tim Yeo MP is another victim of the dreaded King Canute Delusion Syndrome. He believes that we can actually reduce the average temperature of the entire planet. How? by reducing how much energy we use by over 60%. That would have us serfs returned to the stone age. We would not be allowed to use cars, washing machines, kettles, fridge freezers, TV's or have any heating on.

We would have to cover our houses in solar panels and windmills. Whilst I am not against this idea, I think if the Government were actually serious about this, and not simply using the debunked specter of man-made global warming as a cash cow and excuse to limit our freedoms and tax us to the hilt, then they would provide solar panels and windmills for free.

Thursday, July 26, 2007

Ben Fulford? Come on!

There has suddenly been a rush of interest in a new character appearing on the alternative, (or accurate/true/hidden/secret/repressed) news scene.

Ben Fulford has come forward on and is offering a ray of hope for the global inhabitants of this human plantation.

Is he for real? Well, I think that the Jury is out, and the worrying thing for me is that what he is offering us good and decent folks in the truth movement is a huge portion of the kind of news that we would LOVE to believe. How many false dawns have we seen before? how many so-called saviors have we put our faith in, only to be sorely disappointed?

If (and that is a HUGE IF) what he is saying is indeed true, (and a lot of it is, but the central message? Hmmmmm?) then we wish that they got on with it and save humanity from the impending nuclear Armageddon that Tim Rifat has been long predicting.

The plan is a simple enough one and to be fair, is the only obvious one to save humanity from global debt slavery.

The "illuminati" (for want of a less conspiratorially tin hat silly name) have been moving steadily in the direction of having the whole world trade using bits of data created out of thin air, but the value of these bits of data is wholly controlled by this global banking elite.

Think about it, if you had the power to legally create electronic money which amounts to nothing more than a decimal numerical figure entry entry in a database table, and then lend those bits at an actual intrinsic value to your debtors, and charge interest upon those credits, and then get the whole world to use your credits for their trade and for taxes and call it money? It would cost you nothing to be the actual owner of all the money in the world. You control its value and you own and run the computer servers that run the databases that store all the bank accounts of all the people in the world. You would control how much money can be created, circulated and spent. You would control the global economy.

Well this power is real and these banking families that make up what is called "the Illuminati" do currently control most of the money in circulation in the west. With this control comes massive power and they are abusing this power by creating wars and funding both sides. They are playing a game of monopoly with a global sized board and money that they themselves created. They use this power to own think tanks and selection boards and buy and promote politicians and media outlets. They use this power to control the bureaucratic arms of the state, to control the laws and the judicial apparatus, to create pockets of secrecy in which they can hide and feed their lustful pursuits. The family courts in the UK are utilised to provide save haven for them to legally snatch children from their loving parents and have them adopted by families that belong to paedophallic and satanic gangs. They use this power to manipulate people's greed and people are indebted into wage slavery in order to still have somewhere to live and call their own.

How can a few families have this much control? By secrecy that's how.

The only way to end this is to take out the ruling Illuminati families. There are very few of them and there are millions of us. The name General Custer springs to mind.

OK so this plan is very very simple.

Is it too good to be true? We have had so many false dawns before, but now we are at a crossroads.

Humanity is evolving, the earths frequency is rising and people's spirits are becoming ever higher. Information is filtering into the common and universal consciousness. The Illuminati's days are numbered.

Fulford writes about the new Cambrian explosion. Who knows? He could be right and I, for one, certainly hope that he is.

Here's to a new and powerful evolution of mind and spirit.

Go for it Cheney!

According to an editorial in the New York Sun, VP Dick Cheney is considering a run for President. Many in the blogosphere on the old right and on the left are horrified at the prospect. Whilst I can understand the horror that a Cheney Presidency would produce, I am positive that Cheney could never ever win a Presidential election.

This is why I urge Cheney to stand for the Presidency. A Cheney Presidential election bid would show clearly how all the other candidates (less Ron Paul) are really evil neocon clones, even Hillary and Obama. The candidate's views on the prospect of an attack on Iran will show this. An election season with all the canidates trying desparately to out-Cheney; Cheney? Bring it on!

The best possible outcome from this would be victory for the Ron Paul camp.

Go for it Cheney.

[stumbleuponStumbleUpon] |
[RedditReddit] |
[Digg ThisDigg] |
[del.icio.usDelicious] |
[NewsvineNewsvine] |
[FacebookFacebook] |

Sunday, July 22, 2007

Feingold: Censure Bush, Cheney for 'their repeated assaults on the rule of law'

Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is calling on Congress to censure President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and other administration officials for "misconduct relating to the war in Iraq and for their repeated assaults on the rule of law." "Censure is about holding the administration accountable,” Feingold said in a press release sent to RAW STORY. "
Well excuse me Senator Feingold, but you are offering way too little way way too late. To use Bush's language, you are either with us, or you are with the neo-con warmongers pushing for more wars and torture.

A censor of the President will do ziltch to put right what the neo-con fundementalist fanatics have destroyed. Step up Feingold, and get behind a full support for the impeachment of Bush and Cheney et al. or YOU TOO will be a target. you WILL be considered a FULL SUPPORTER of the Bush regime. People are angry. People are very VERY angry Senator Feingold, and YOU are going to get the brunt of that wrath.

As far as house politics is concerned, you are either with us, or you are with the neo-cons.

Senator Feingold, you are going to face the anger of the American people. Which side are you on? The American's or the Neo-Cons?

[stumbleuponStumbleUpon] | [RedditReddit] | [Digg ThisDigg] | [del.icio.usDelicious] | [NewsvineNewsvine] | [FacebookFacebook]

Friday, July 20, 2007

The Reason WHY?

Fabian was excited as he once more rehearsed his speech for the crowd certain to turn up tomorrow. He had always wanted prestige and power and now his dreams were going to come true. He was a craftsman working with silver and gold, making jewelry and ornaments, but he became dissatisfied with working for a living. He needed excitement, a challenge, and now his plan was ready to begin.

More ...

Do you want $100,000?

Jock Doubleday, director of the California non-profit corporation Natural Woman, Natural Man, Inc., has offered $75,000 to the first medical doctor or pharmaceutical company CEO who publicly drinks a mixture of standard vaccine additives. ...more...

A look in the mirror

The past week has borne witness to that vanishingly rare event: a bout of media self-examination. We’ve seen major news outlets like the BBC and Channel Four step back and reflect on the quality and accuracy of their output, even going so far as to publicly apologise for mistakes that were made. Well, sort of....... more ...
Actually, I don't think that the mainstream media have gone anywhere near far enough. The article above is very very good, However, until the mainstream media admits to being the willing accomplices and accessories to war-crimes, these media platitudes are utterly meaningless.

Any person or group that brings forward information that runs counter to the continuous Rothschild push for a unipolar world order is dismissed as cranky, delusional, conspiracy theorist and ridiculed, or presented as something dangerous. Globalisation = good. Global Warming = man made. Closer political integration = good. Withdrawing from the EU = Bad. Democracy = good. (except in Palestine or the EU or anywhere where national determination is advanced) I invite th reader to watch, Putin has amazing favourability figures at the moment in Russia, but he is a nationalist. He stands in the way of the Rothschild's New World Order. Watch the mainstream media demonise him, for placing his countries interests ahead of the Rothschild's ambition for their new world order.

The media is a paid propaganda mouthpiece, NOT a place of truth.

Thursday, July 19, 2007

The parts of the 911 documentary that the BBC 'forgot' to mention

Excellent Must See!!!

The Journey Of A Democrat

The Journey Of A Democrat To Ron Paul And The Constitution
By Martha Newhouse
© 2007 Martha Newhouse

As a life-long Democrat, I should be excited as the 2008 race for President of the United States begins. I should be excited to talk with friends and family about how the Democrats are poised to take the White House back. I should be gleeful at how helpful it has been that George Bush has made such a mess of things that any Republican candidate is going to be painted with the same Iraq war brush. At this point my only problem should be, who will I put my energy behind, Clinton, Obama, Edwards, or Kucinich?
But that is not happening. I am already working to elect Republican Ron Paul for president in 2008. How on earth did an active Democrat make a whip-lash, 180-degree turn to support a congressman from Texas, who says he's a "Constitutionalist?" ...more

So voting in a poll is wrong?

I have been reading online that some pollsters are fed up with Ron Paul's supporters and are thinking of removing him from some straw polls because of them. What are these supporters doing that is wrong? Well, I'll tell ya and as an intelligent and thoughtful reader of this blog, you will never fucking believe this, but here goes:

Apparently they are skewing the natural and correct results in polls by actually having the cheek to vote for Ron Paul. YEAH I know, Crazy isn't it? How dare the supporters of a candidate support him by voting for him in polls! Dammit, all the supporters of the other media picked candidates will be pissed to learn that they lost only because of the supporters of another candidate voted for the candidate THEY support. How dare they?

Can you imagine these pollsters saying that about any other candidate? "
We are sorry, but we had to exclude Hillary Clinton from the Straw poll because the results are being skewed because of her supporters. You see that 'targeted' voting by Clinton supporters on this and other open polls may even be hurting their candidate because the public is turned off by her supporter's behavior."

This is blatant, in-your-face Bullshit. How obvious does it have to be that the media are paid shills for the corporate elite's pre-selected candidates.

People, you are going to have to do more, work harder, be even more unreasonable in your assertions and get even more creative. This is going to be like being a Brit in a boxing match in Mexico, You'll need more than a knock-out to draw. Ron Paul supporters are going to have to make sure that at LEAST 65% of ALL Americans support Ron Paul for him to have any chance of victory in this massively biased process.