Tuesday, July 31, 2007
This reminds me of the political committee that tried to also ban Dihydrogen-Monoxide to prevent this lethal chemical from falling into the hands of terrorists. After all, in the wrong hands this stuff could (in its gassius form) strip the skin from your body in seconds. It can stop you from breathing, and in large quantities it is poisonous. I mean, thousands of people every year are killed by this chemical.
Additionally, Aliso Viejo city officials famously came close to banning styrofoam cups in 2004 after hearing that "dihydrogen monoxide" was used in their production.
Monday, July 30, 2007
"LONDON (Reuters) - Draft plans to curb the nation's carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 60 percent by 2050 were too weak, an environment committee of parliamentarians said on Monday."Tim Yeo MP is another victim of the dreaded King Canute Delusion Syndrome. He believes that we can actually reduce the average temperature of the entire planet. How? by reducing how much energy we use by over 60%. That would have us serfs returned to the stone age. We would not be allowed to use cars, washing machines, kettles, fridge freezers, TV's or have any heating on.
We would have to cover our houses in solar panels and windmills. Whilst I am not against this idea, I think if the Government were actually serious about this, and not simply using the debunked specter of man-made global warming as a cash cow and excuse to limit our freedoms and tax us to the hilt, then they would provide solar panels and windmills for free.
Thursday, July 26, 2007
Ben Fulford has come forward on Rense.com and is offering a ray of hope for the global inhabitants of this human plantation.
Is he for real? Well, I think that the Jury is out, and the worrying thing for me is that what he is offering us good and decent folks in the truth movement is a huge portion of the kind of news that we would LOVE to believe. How many false dawns have we seen before? how many so-called saviors have we put our faith in, only to be sorely disappointed?
If (and that is a HUGE IF) what he is saying is indeed true, (and a lot of it is, but the central message? Hmmmmm?) then we wish that they got on with it and save humanity from the impending nuclear Armageddon that Tim Rifat has been long predicting.
The plan is a simple enough one and to be fair, is the only obvious one to save humanity from global debt slavery.
The "illuminati" (for want of a less conspiratorially tin hat silly name) have been moving steadily in the direction of having the whole world trade using bits of data created out of thin air, but the value of these bits of data is wholly controlled by this global banking elite.
Think about it, if you had the power to legally create electronic money which amounts to nothing more than a decimal numerical figure entry entry in a database table, and then lend those bits at an actual intrinsic value to your debtors, and charge interest upon those credits, and then get the whole world to use your credits for their trade and for taxes and call it money? It would cost you nothing to be the actual owner of all the money in the world. You control its value and you own and run the computer servers that run the databases that store all the bank accounts of all the people in the world. You would control how much money can be created, circulated and spent. You would control the global economy.
Well this power is real and these banking families that make up what is called "the Illuminati" do currently control most of the money in circulation in the west. With this control comes massive power and they are abusing this power by creating wars and funding both sides. They are playing a game of monopoly with a global sized board and money that they themselves created. They use this power to own think tanks and selection boards and buy and promote politicians and media outlets. They use this power to control the bureaucratic arms of the state, to control the laws and the judicial apparatus, to create pockets of secrecy in which they can hide and feed their lustful pursuits. The family courts in the UK are utilised to provide save haven for them to legally snatch children from their loving parents and have them adopted by families that belong to paedophallic and satanic gangs. They use this power to manipulate people's greed and people are indebted into wage slavery in order to still have somewhere to live and call their own.
How can a few families have this much control? By secrecy that's how.
The only way to end this is to take out the ruling Illuminati families. There are very few of them and there are millions of us. The name General Custer springs to mind.
OK so this plan is very very simple.
Is it too good to be true? We have had so many false dawns before, but now we are at a crossroads.
Humanity is evolving, the earths frequency is rising and people's spirits are becoming ever higher. Information is filtering into the common and universal consciousness. The Illuminati's days are numbered.
Fulford writes about the new Cambrian explosion. Who knows? He could be right and I, for one, certainly hope that he is.
Here's to a new and powerful evolution of mind and spirit.
This is why I urge Cheney to stand for the Presidency. A Cheney Presidential election bid would show clearly how all the other candidates (less Ron Paul) are really evil neocon clones, even Hillary and Obama. The candidate's views on the prospect of an attack on Iran will show this. An election season with all the canidates trying desparately to out-Cheney; Cheney? Bring it on!
The best possible outcome from this would be victory for the Ron Paul camp.
Go for it Cheney.
Sunday, July 22, 2007
Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is calling on Congress to censure President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and other administration officials for "misconduct relating to the war in Iraq and for their repeated assaults on the rule of law." "Censure is about holding the administration accountable,” Feingold said in a press release sent to RAW STORY. "Well excuse me Senator Feingold, but you are offering way too little way way too late. To use Bush's language, you are either with us, or you are with the neo-con warmongers pushing for more wars and torture.
A censor of the President will do ziltch to put right what the neo-con fundementalist fanatics have destroyed. Step up Feingold, and get behind a full support for the impeachment of Bush and Cheney et al. or YOU TOO will be a target. you WILL be considered a FULL SUPPORTER of the Bush regime. People are angry. People are very VERY angry Senator Feingold, and YOU are going to get the brunt of that wrath.
As far as house politics is concerned, you are either with us, or you are with the neo-cons.
Senator Feingold, you are going to face the anger of the American people. Which side are you on? The American's or the Neo-Cons?
[StumbleUpon] | [Reddit] | [Digg] | [Delicious] | [Newsvine] | [Facebook]
Friday, July 20, 2007
The past week has borne witness to that vanishingly rare event: a bout of media self-examination. We’ve seen major news outlets like the BBC and Channel Four step back and reflect on the quality and accuracy of their output, even going so far as to publicly apologise for mistakes that were made. Well, sort of....... more ...Actually, I don't think that the mainstream media have gone anywhere near far enough. The article above is very very good, However, until the mainstream media admits to being the willing accomplices and accessories to war-crimes, these media platitudes are utterly meaningless.
Any person or group that brings forward information that runs counter to the continuous Rothschild push for a unipolar world order is dismissed as cranky, delusional, conspiracy theorist and ridiculed, or presented as something dangerous. Globalisation = good. Global Warming = man made. Closer political integration = good. Withdrawing from the EU = Bad. Democracy = good. (except in Palestine or the EU or anywhere where national determination is advanced) I invite th reader to watch, Putin has amazing favourability figures at the moment in Russia, but he is a nationalist. He stands in the way of the Rothschild's New World Order. Watch the mainstream media demonise him, for placing his countries interests ahead of the Rothschild's ambition for their new world order.
The media is a paid propaganda mouthpiece, NOT a place of truth.
Thursday, July 19, 2007
By Martha Newhouse
© 2007 Martha Newhouse
As a life-long Democrat, I should be excited as the 2008 race for President of the United States begins. I should be excited to talk with friends and family about how the Democrats are poised to take the White House back. I should be gleeful at how helpful it has been that George Bush has made such a mess of things that any Republican candidate is going to be painted with the same Iraq war brush. At this point my only problem should be, who will I put my energy behind, Clinton, Obama, Edwards, or Kucinich?
But that is not happening. I am already working to elect Republican Ron Paul for president in 2008. How on earth did an active Democrat make a whip-lash, 180-degree turn to support a congressman from Texas, who says he's a "Constitutionalist?" ...more
Apparently they are skewing the natural and correct results in polls by actually having the cheek to vote for Ron Paul. YEAH I know, Crazy isn't it? How dare the supporters of a candidate support him by voting for him in polls! Dammit, all the supporters of the other media picked candidates will be pissed to learn that they lost only because of the supporters of another candidate voted for the candidate THEY support. How dare they?
Can you imagine these pollsters saying that about any other candidate? "
We are sorry, but we had to exclude Hillary Clinton from the Straw poll because the results are being skewed because of her supporters. You see that 'targeted' voting by Clinton supporters on this and other open polls may even be hurting their candidate because the public is turned off by her supporter's behavior."
This is blatant, in-your-face Bullshit. How obvious does it have to be that the media are paid shills for the corporate elite's pre-selected candidates.
People, you are going to have to do more, work harder, be even more unreasonable in your assertions and get even more creative. This is going to be like being a Brit in a boxing match in Mexico, You'll need more than a knock-out to draw. Ron Paul supporters are going to have to make sure that at LEAST 65% of ALL Americans support Ron Paul for him to have any chance of victory in this massively biased process.
Wednesday, July 18, 2007
"You have somebody like George Tenet acknowledging in his book that he knew that the administration was deceiving the American people into a situation that is murdering young men and women from this country and others, then George Tenet and Dick Cheney and Condoleezza Rice and George Bush should be in fucking jail."
-- Sean Penn
-- Sean Penn
IMPEACH! TRY! CONVICT! IMPRISON! EXECUTE FOR TREASON!
They swore to uphold and defend the constitution of the United States from ALL enemies, Foreign OR DOMESTIC!
The reason I post this is because the science of climate change is NOT settled.
Anyone that claims it is, is wrong and the rest of their argument is suspect at best.
Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Is this the image of a devout follower of a very strict form of Islam?
If it is, then, in 20 words or less, Why is Saddam wearing what looks like a gold ring?
Answers on a postcard to :
Osama Bin Laden cock up competition.
Answer: the first is responsible for pushing up the price of the other.
"Fossil fuel are burned to convert corn to ethanol. The net carbon and heat load added to the atmosphere is GREATER using ethanol when the fossil fuel burned to convert the plant matter to ethanol is added in. Plus, now there is a shortage of corn for food products."So the world is apparently getting hotter, and we can't have ice cream because the corn oil is being used for something else?
It's a good job that man-made global warming is a myth. Man has almost 0% effect on the climate. But that big shiny ball of light in the sky, that gives us all our energy, definitely does have an effect.
What is climate? basically it is the tiny interactive layer, where the sun's energy is absorbed by vast oceans and the surface of the planet. To deny that this thin layer is NOT somehow effected by variations in the sun's output and cyclical trends in the oceans is just folly.
To suggest that an insignificant amount of the global CO2, an increase far lower than has been recorded in our history, has a greater effect on climate than that of the sun? That is pure flat earth thinking in my book.Go ahead and download google earth. Look at how vast the earth is, the vast majority of the surface is ocean, and the rest is empty. Go ahead, zoom in anywhere at random. You'll most likely hit a big patch of empty nature.
I know that the world seems crowded and dominated by man's huge and clunking footprint when you live and work and exist almost exclusively in cities. But it is mostly empty and we are NOT making the huge changes that ARE happening. They are NORMAL.
There is a massive amount of King Canutian delusional syndrome about at the moment. The sooner people realise it is all a scam, perpetrated by the Rothschild faction of the unipolar world order, the better.
Monday, July 16, 2007
Iran, Syria and Pakistan are all in his sights, so here's my advice to mr "Lets kill more american troops for a foreign nation" and I shall put it in capitals to be real clear...
MR LEIBERMAN. IF YOU REALLY WANT A WAR WITH IRAN; GET A FUCKING GUN, GO TO TEHRAN, STAND IN THEIR MAIN SQUARE AND START SHOOTING AND DO NOT STOP UNTIL THEY STOP YOU!
Please STOP demanding more wars and deaths, STOP threatening other countries, STOP acting like a beligerant and evil emperor UNLESS you are prepared to have the balls to fight in these wars yourself, in person and on the FRONT LINES YOU EVIL CHICKEN SHIT COWARD!
If you ever got within a thousand miles of real military action you would piss your pants in fear and cry for mommy you sick in the head warmongering dumbfuck!
Your type of amoral, sociapathic cowardice makes me sick to my stomach and the sooner you are unelected and slip into total obscurity to die a lonely and miserable anonymous death, the better we shall all be.
You are a coward and a liar and a hypocrite.
I hope you are reincarnated as an Islamist's sweaty jockstrap.
Oh, and before I am called some called of anti-semite racist, this rant has nothing to do with his being a Jew. NOTHING AT ALL. BUT, it has everything to do with his being a complete fucking jerkoff wanky media whore asshole warmongering cowardly bastard!
Sunday, July 15, 2007
By Peter Baker and Susan Schmidt
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, May 6, 1998; Page A01
A federal judge has ruled that President Clinton cannot use the power of his office to block prosecutors from questioning his senior aides, rejecting Clinton's assertion of executive privilege in the Monica S. Lewinsky investigation, lawyers familiar with the decision said yesterday.
In a ruling issued under court seal Monday, Chief U.S. District Judge Norma Holloway Johnson concluded that independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr's need to collect evidence in his obstruction of justice probe outweighs Clinton's interest in preserving the confidentiality of White House discussions, the lawyers said.
The decision made Clinton the first president to take a claim of executive privilege to court and lose since the dramatic Watergate showdown in 1974, when the Supreme Court unanimously ordered Richard M. Nixon to turn over the secret Oval Office tapes that ultimately led to his resignation. Clinton's case also seems headed for the high court as sources indicated that the White House likely will appeal.
Johnson's ruling could amount to a significant political as well as legal setback for Clinton, lending ammunition to Republican critics, such as House Speaker Newt Gingrich (Ga.), who have charged that Clinton is trying, in Nixonian fashion, to impede Starr's investigation with invalid privilege claims.
© Copyright 1998 The Washington Post Company
Monday, July 09, 2007
However, go back 7 years. The summer of the year 2000. In this more innocent time, before 911, before the War on Terror, When Bush was still considered a compassionate conservative by all but the 31 people executed in the Texas legal system under his watch. In those 'heady*' days when Americans believed themselves to be free, it would have been unthinkable to present the Average American with what we see today.
If you had told the average American that their republican party would be appointed to power by the supreme court, they would have laughed.
If you had told the average American that they would be attacked by airliners that would evade the NORAD and Air force defences of the United States for over 80 minutes to crash (apparently) into the Pentagon. They would deride you as insane. NORAD and the whole of the USA Air defence system defeated by people who could not even fly a Cessna? They would have doubts.
If you had told the average American that on the back if this that the fiscally conservative republicans would create the Department of Homeland Security, a department so huge and vast that the taxpayer will be burdened as never before. They might wonder what had happened to conservatism.
If you had told the average American that the USA would invade Afghanistan to take out Osama Bin Laden, and that this would fail miserably, they would scoff.
If you had told the average American that the Congress would pass the USA PATRIOT Act and that this act would remove their constitutional rights, they they could be detained without trial, that they could have their homes invaded by federal agents, their belongings ransacked and taken and all this could happen without them having to get a court order. Then they would not believe you. Not in the land of the free.
If you had told the average American that their court appointed leader would lie to the American people to succour them into invading a country that had never ever attacked them, to lie about WMD's and to tear up that country leaving it a ruinous wrecked failed nation, more corrupt and dangerous than Saddam's Iraq, a real breeding ground for international terrorism. That their government would have the CIA fly around the world kidnapping people flying them to detention facilities in other countries and torturing them, They would stick their fingers in their ears and shout la la la la la I CAN'T HEAR YOU!
If you had told the average American that their leadership would deliberately and with malice aforethought blow the cover of a covert CIA agent Valerie Plame, an agent who was protecting the world from the proliferation of WMD, in order to deflect criticism of their own deliberate lies. They would be walking away quickly from the strange delusional idiot who claims to be able to see into the future.
If you had told the average American that in the investigation that followed the leaking of Plame's identity, that a member of the Bush administration would deliberately obstruct that investigation and commit perjury to protect the administration, they might not be entirely surprised. But
If you had told the average American that the President would step in and commute the sentence of that criminal who was covering up and obstructing the prosecution in attempting to discover who risked the national security of the United States, during war time? A high crime and misdemeanor and that the opposing party would actively rule out impeachment? They would not believe you.
If you had told the average American that they would no longer be living in the land of the free, that they would be in a country universally detested and reviled in the world, that they would have lost their freedom and that the people of the USA would have rolled over and allowed this to happen with barely a squeak of protest? They would be sure that you are a crazy lunatic.
The global elite must be rubbing their hands with glee. Their selected leaders can do whatever they please and the people will meekly comply. They have the leaders in their pockets, the media in their pockets and now the people so utterly dumbed down and compliant that they may as well go for broke and imprison us all whilst enough of us are still far too deeply asleep to do anything about it.
*I could not resist the cliche, sorry.
Wednesday, July 04, 2007
The image below is of the Glasgow Airport car fire.
Spot the difference?
Now can the mainstream media PLEASE STOP BULLSHITING ABOUT CAR BOMBS!!!!
There was no BOMB! there was some harmless gas cannisters that were never ever going to explode.
The image above is as bad is it was going to get. We were NOT lucky that it was not worse, we have NOT narrowly avoided a mass slaughter. THAT WAS IT! We are not facing a massive terrorist threat, we are facing a bunch of clueless muppets!
I will NOT give up my liberties and hard fought freedoms for these FUCKWITS!
Now is the time to take a stand and throw your full support in time, effort and money, behind Ron Paul.
Go forth and recruit, convert and pursuade everyone you know to vote for Ron Paul in the Primaries and RISE TO THE CHALLENGE SET BY THE FOUNDING FATHERS.
This July 4th, remember that the international banking interests in the City of London are pulling your strings. Declare independence from them once more.
Join and extend the Ron Paul Revolution.
Monday, July 02, 2007
a) These attacks were very small and amounted to one car fire and minor damage to the front facia of an airport and some damaged dustbins.
b) The "terrorists" were caught.
c) the CCTV cameras were actually working and other "terrorists" were recorded succesfully by CCTV.
d) Israelis where not warned of the attacks before hand
e) Security firms linked to intelligence services were not running top secret security drills in the same place at the same time.
f) Several identical copies of the "ID's" of the "terrorists" were not discovered intact at numerous locations.
g) There was no military explosive that magically became "home made". In fact there where no explosives used of any kind.
So this is the REAL terrorists (as opposed to the secrurity service enabled elitist neo-con created terrorists) and what can they do to instill such mind numbing, liberty scrapping, freedom destroying fear?
set light to a car!
wooo. I am, like, soooooooo scared!
"but it could have been so much worse" people foolishly cry.
Actually, NO it could not.
a) There was no bomb!
b) A car was never ever going to get inside the airport.
This pathetic car fire was the best that the terrorists could have hoped to achieve with what they had. There was NO bomb. If the media turn round in days to come and say that there was, they are lying, 1984 memory hole style.
And even IF it there had been, so the hell what? IF my aunt had a dick she would be my uncle!
Big fucking deal! IF this and IF that..... what bollocks. How about this one to make you squirt the brown and runny down your trouser legs:
"If they had a nuke in the car and the controls to all the world's military satelites they could have taken over the world and killed literally billions of people!!!"
Get real for fucks sake. It was a car fire. That's all, and that was all it was ever going to be at worst.
The mainstream media is losing what shreds of credibility it once had by the minute and they should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.
Sunday, July 01, 2007
This is decent responsible journalism. The BBC and SKY and all the other "news" outlets, that are currently salivating in a ridiculous, rabid fearmongering orgy, could learn a lot from this REAL journalism.
Olbermann is a credible journalist who reports on reality, not the vacuous vapid overhyped yellow journalism of the BBC et al.
If we are to judge on the ACTUAL AND REAL IMPACT of what happened, then let's consider how much fear has been spread by what happened.
So, what happened?
In Glasgow, a car was burned, the culprits found and aprehended immediately. Nobody else was even injured.
In London 2 cars were so baldy set up as car fires, (NOT BOMBS) that they did not even ignite. Slight damage was caused to dustbins. That's it!
Let's compare this to what happens nationally every year. From a minor local report in South Wales, UK, a computer system has been installed to reduce the amount of dumped cars.
"But despite this, hundreds are still dumped every year with up to 460 of them set on fire in arson attacks in 2005."
Sorry, let's look at that again? 460???? and this is only mentioned as a side issue in the local news?
Why should I be scared of those clowns in Glasgow? people who have attributed 1/460th to the abandoned and burned out cars statistics.
Well, Who has actually been spreading fear? Worse still, utterly groundless, baseless fear? Encouraging the nation to be afraid, be very afraid.
THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND THE GOVERNMENT!
Look at the evidence. We have 1 car fire, something that happens about 460 times every year in council estates up and down the country, often without any media coverage whatsoever. Occasionally warranting a side issue in another report in local news. How does the media respond to this actual event?
Forget what REALLY happened and go to 24 hour coverage of, IT WAS A Car BOMB! it could be Al Queda! remember 911! Terrorists! trying to kill vast numbers! evil maniacs! just like 911 this was low tech terrorism that could cause mass murder on a large scale. We are under enormous risk from global terrorism. Highest level of alert, etc etc etc.
All genuine quotes from the mainstream media and all fearmongering BOLLOCKS!
So, Who is terrorising the country?
It's not Al queda. Perhaps we should lock up the media and the Government.